Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 04:46:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: getwork: give out full blocks?  (Read 1033 times)
relmeas (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 21, 2011, 09:53:02 AM
 #1

I wonder if it's possible to force all the mining pools to abide a new rule that getwork (or an alternative replacement command) should report full blocks to the clients on request?

The problem is that when a miner works on a block header he can't be certain that the header is of a block that generates 50 btc to the address of a pool rather than to some completely different address.

So miners can't be entirely sure in pool's honesty.

If the getwork would transfer full blocks however, the miner could check of the header is correct for this block and that the block contains correct generated coins for the pool.

It could be different command, for example "getfullwork" that can be used instead of "getwork" so it would not be neccessary to get full blocks all the time (for example random 5% of getworks would be getfullworks), but the possibility of such verification would make it impossible to cheat for the pool.

This can also be used by the miners to check if they are being used for some bitcoin network breach attempts like rewriting blocks...
1714193202
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714193202

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714193202
Reply with quote  #2

1714193202
Report to moderator
1714193202
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714193202

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714193202
Reply with quote  #2

1714193202
Report to moderator
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714193202
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714193202

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714193202
Reply with quote  #2

1714193202
Report to moderator
1714193202
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714193202

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714193202
Reply with quote  #2

1714193202
Report to moderator
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1024



View Profile
June 21, 2011, 01:40:57 PM
 #2

No pool would be able to do that twice.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
relmeas (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 21, 2011, 02:13:13 PM
 #3

yeah it would be ddosed to death.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5180
Merit: 12900


View Profile
June 22, 2011, 03:29:26 AM
 #4

Puddinpop's pool used to do something like that. It would give you the full block from time to time, which allowed you to verify that you were scheduled for payout (since it paid out directly like Eligius).

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
BeeCee1
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 23, 2011, 12:47:04 AM
 #5

It could be different command, for example "getfullwork" that can be used instead of "getwork" so it would not be neccessary to get full blocks all the time (for example random 5% of getworks would be getfullworks), but the possibility of such verification would make it impossible to cheat for the pool.

The pool owner could return a block with a pool address when getfullwork was called and a private address when getwork was called, you'd be none the wiser.  You'd have to call getwork then be able to pass that block header back to the server and request the full block that matches it.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!