Bitcoin Forum
September 21, 2019, 02:13:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Gavin Andresen: stay away from Blockstream, Greg and Samson are toxic trolls.  (Read 1791 times)
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 03, 2017, 06:35:36 PM
 #1

Former Bitcoin Core’s Gavin Andresen Hits Blockstream, Labels Greg Maxwell and Samson Mow Toxic Trolls

Looks like Gavin finally see G.Maxwell for what he is.  Wink

https://cointelegraph.com/news/former-bitcoin-cores-gavin-andresen-hits-blockstream-labels-greg-maxwell-and-samson-mow

Quote
In March, Andresen openly voiced support for Bitcoin Unlimited, calling it a “viable, practical solution to destructive transaction congestion.”



 Cool
1569075236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569075236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569075236
Reply with quote  #2

1569075236
Report to moderator
1569075236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569075236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569075236
Reply with quote  #2

1569075236
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1569075236
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569075236

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569075236
Reply with quote  #2

1569075236
Report to moderator
HabBear
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 617


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 08:15:07 PM
 #2

is Bitcoin imploding?

We have well respected Bitcoin advocates claiming conspiracy theories or blaming core bitcoin organizations and then we have this whole hard fork fight going on.

What's happening? Maybe it's time to walk away...

jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1342


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 01:49:44 AM
 #3

Haha. Gavin always showed such public deference to the blockstream/core devs. Wonder what finally set him over the edge?

mewn.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 01:53:09 AM
 #4

Andresen is a CIA informant, Satoshi disappeared because of him.  Sad
digaran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 613

111113DUwES2ZNWSJztA3oBuhzfcdmiaG


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 02:04:20 AM
 #5

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software and they definitely didn't kill our beloved Satoshi and burned his body in acid.

Seriously though all they want is the name brand of BTC otherwise they could've easily create a clone with another name and mining with the same ASICcough coughboost machines.
Why wont they do it already? if they are so good then I'm sure people will see and abandon bitcoin to join them.

HOWEYCOINS   ▮      Excitement and         ⭐  ● TWITTER  ● FACEBOOK   ⭐      
  ▮    guaranteed returns                 ●TELEGRAM                         
  ▮  of the travel industry
    ⭐  ●Ann Thread ●Instagram   ⭐ 
✅    U.S.Sec    ➡️
✅  approved!  ➡️
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 04:18:28 AM
 #6

Haha. Gavin always showed such public deference to the blockstream/core devs. Wonder what finally set him over the edge?

mewn.

Greg trolling one of his newest open source side projects on reddit or twitter.


isen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 04:47:47 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2017, 01:44:45 PM by isen
 #7

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability, don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.
Kakmakr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1357

★ ChipMixer | Bitcoin mixing service ★


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 06:37:56 AM
 #8

Gavin had his chance to be a Lead Developer and then he could not handle it and left. Now he wants to throw stones at the people who are in control and he even tried to take them down with XT and that failed miserably. When that did not work, he teamed up with BU to try another angle and that is looking bad too. < poor coding and bad flaws >

So if you cannot beat them with your code, try attacking them personally. ^Ooooooo^

RawDog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1020



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2017, 07:14:09 AM
 #9

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.


at the people who are in control

You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed*  *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew  1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds
Kakmakr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1357

★ ChipMixer | Bitcoin mixing service ★


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:35:37 AM
 #10

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.


at the people who are in control

You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code. If I were getting paid to shill for Blockstream, I would probably not be able to afford a McDonald burger with my post history. ^LoL^

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory.... Lately the people with the most money to spam the network and to use backdoors <ASICBOOST> seem to control the consensus. ^grrrrrr^


franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 1464



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:55:59 AM
 #11

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code. If I were getting paid to shill for Blockstream, I would probably not be able to afford a McDonald burger with my post history. ^LoL^

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory.... Lately the people with the most money to spam the network and to use backdoors <ASICBOOST> seem to control the consensus. ^grrrrrr^

the only implementation that has bypassed users support.. is blockstream(core)
asic boost has nothing to do with it. just like opencl had nothing to do with any decisions of core back in the day of the GPU mining.

imagine it. imagine core in 2012 wanted to change something but couldnt because it would cause issues with ATI's openCL. people would laugh at core if they started blaming ATI.
same goes for now.. if segwit hits a wall before being active, then REWRITE SEGWIT!!

its all just finger pointing drama, to get everyon looking in every direction apart from blockstream.
so just look at blockstream
EG blockstream made cludgy code instead of a clean node upgrade event.
EG blockstream made it so only pools get the vote('going soft').
EG blockstream going soft is an admitted backdoor exploit and they admit they want to add more backdoors to be able to go soft more often. (in th wrong hands its called a trojan)
EG blockstream now crying because all them all-inclusive exotic weekends didnt buy the pools into flag waving by last christmas (due to 65% abstaining/ objecting to the cludgy code)
EG blockstream now found out their 2merkle cludge is not as compatible as first thought (so now asking abstainers/objectors to reprogram themselves, to use filter/bridging nodes, to fork off, to add code to avoid attack vectors segwit causes, even offering to PoW bomb just to get the cludgy code in)

yep. instead of just backing down and going for a plan B of a 1 merkle segwit with proper block size increase for the entire network benefit, blockstream still want to bypass the idea of a network consensus upgrade and go straight to a controversial bilateral split..

much simpler blockstream just redo segwit as a proper 1 merkle version, remove the cludge and add the other features the community want too instead of pointing the fingers to blame pools, other implementations (which have done nothing for 2 years) and wasting upto 3 years just to push the cludgy version (UASF 'late2018' mandatory activation) and then make yet again half baked promises that they will remove the cludge and make it 1merkle full proper upgrade after that.. (no one believes them anymore)

a 1 merkle rewrite with the extra features the community want to unite the community. is safer AND FASTER to implement than the 2merkle cludge and all the threats half promises and features that wont 100% fix the network issues.. that blockstream are 'demanding get implemented or else'

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Decoded
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024


give me your cryptos


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 08:13:03 AM
 #12

Lots of FUD coming up now that Bitcoin has jumped a crapton. First some vs post about how Litecoin has jumped up (Mind you, it's market was relatively small and with all the segwit hype it's blown up, only by $30 or so. You can say it's a 500% increase, but it's market cap hadn't increased nearly as much as Bitcoin's has.

I think that with all these big names attacking each other, they'll only continue to do so. It's evident that Segwit will not activate, and Unlimited is a very risky business. Is it really that hard to come up with a compromise?

looking for a signature campaign, dm me for that
RawDog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1020



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2017, 09:46:21 AM
 #13

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code.

Kaka-makr = Fucking moron.  Holy fuck.  

I didn't say user/miners in charge of coding.  Are you stupid?  They are and should be in charge of the network.  

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory....

Precisely.  And this is why those assholes at Blockstream are losing.  It is not because of paid shills or FUD or ASICBOOST.  It is because SegWit is garbage that renders the network control over to Blockstream via LN and does nearly nothing to address capacity.  

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed*  *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew  1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds
LFC_Bitcoin
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 2100


One of the world's leading Bitcoin-powered casinos


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 10:18:47 AM
 #14

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability,don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.

Pretty much this. His credibility in the bitcoin world is zero these days.

testerx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 600
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 10:20:42 AM
 #15

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 1464



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:38:13 AM
 #16

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol

he is well funded  now as a blockstream employee.

i guess bobbly lee wasnt paying him enough or the DCG cartel thought he would be more useful under the blockstream subsiduary rather than the btcc subsiduary

http://dcg.co/portfolio/#b

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-55-million-series-a/
Quote
Disclaimer: CoinDesk is a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which has an ownership stake in Blockstream.

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
alyssa85
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1059


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:52:43 AM
 #17

Gavin had his chance to be a Lead Developer and then he could not handle it and left.

Gavin is the reason bitcoin went from about $5 in 2011 to $1000 in 2013. He held things together, his original faucet which gave away free whole bitcoins had a massive impact on spreading the word, he did marketing as well as developing. Bitcoin simply wouldn't be where it is without him. It's all gone a bit downhill since he left.

NUFCrichard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:59:58 AM
 #18

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol
Well if it is good enough for the leader of the free world, then it is good enough for Bitcoin!

But in all seriousness, wouldn't it be nice if people could sit down together, even if that means remotely, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different block sizes, respect each others opinions, and not troll each other or bad mouth each other afterwards?

I know that when money is involved, that won't happen, but it would be nice!
BillyBobZorton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1019


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 12:00:47 PM
 #19

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.


at the people who are in control

You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

Satoshi introduced payment channels himself (the foundation for lightning network) you dumbass.

Anyway, keep praising Gavin Andersen, the guy that wanted to set a benevolent dictator in bitcoin:

http://coinjournal.net/gavin-andresen-mike-hearn-will-be-the-benevolent-dictator-of-bitcoinxt/

And the same idiot that got trolled by Craig Wright into being satoshi.

This pathetic moron should be hiding under a rock for the rest of his life, but idiots always have idiots following them so he'll keep tweeting as long as there are idiots circlejerking about anything he says.

anonymoustroll420
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 12:08:06 PM
 #20

Haha. Gavin always showed such public deference to the blockstream/core devs. Wonder what finally set him over the edge?

It's because nullc criticized Gavin's new private key inspector service:
https://www.randomsanity.org/

Please don't stop us from using ASICBoost which we're not using
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!