Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2020, 12:02:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]
  Print  
Author Topic: Gavin Andresen: stay away from Blockstream, Greg and Samson are toxic trolls.  (Read 1871 times)
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 03, 2017, 06:35:36 PM
 #1

Former Bitcoin Core’s Gavin Andresen Hits Blockstream, Labels Greg Maxwell and Samson Mow Toxic Trolls

Looks like Gavin finally see G.Maxwell for what he is.  Wink

https://cointelegraph.com/news/former-bitcoin-cores-gavin-andresen-hits-blockstream-labels-greg-maxwell-and-samson-mow

Quote
In March, Andresen openly voiced support for Bitcoin Unlimited, calling it a “viable, practical solution to destructive transaction congestion.”



 Cool
1603454543
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603454543

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603454543
Reply with quote  #2

1603454543
Report to moderator
1603454543
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603454543

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603454543
Reply with quote  #2

1603454543
Report to moderator
1603454543
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603454543

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603454543
Reply with quote  #2

1603454543
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1603454543
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603454543

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603454543
Reply with quote  #2

1603454543
Report to moderator
1603454543
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603454543

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603454543
Reply with quote  #2

1603454543
Report to moderator
HabBear
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 621


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 08:15:07 PM
 #2

is Bitcoin imploding?

We have well respected Bitcoin advocates claiming conspiracy theories or blaming core bitcoin organizations and then we have this whole hard fork fight going on.

What's happening? Maybe it's time to walk away...

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.YoBit AirDrop $.|.Get 700 YoDollars for Free!.🏆
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 1504


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 01:49:44 AM
 #3

Haha. Gavin always showed such public deference to the blockstream/core devs. Wonder what finally set him over the edge?

mewn.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 01:53:09 AM
 #4

Andresen is a CIA informant, Satoshi disappeared because of him.  Sad
digaran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 613

111113DUwES2ZNWSJztA3oBuhzfcdmiaG


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 02:04:20 AM
 #5

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software and they definitely didn't kill our beloved Satoshi and burned his body in acid.

Seriously though all they want is the name brand of BTC otherwise they could've easily create a clone with another name and mining with the same ASICcough coughboost machines.
Why wont they do it already? if they are so good then I'm sure people will see and abandon bitcoin to join them.

HOWEYCOINS   ▮      Excitement and         ⭐  ● TWITTER  ● FACEBOOK   ⭐      
  ▮    guaranteed returns                 ●TELEGRAM                         
  ▮  of the travel industry
    ⭐  ●Ann Thread ●Instagram   ⭐ 
✅    U.S.Sec    ➡️
✅  approved!  ➡️
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 04:18:28 AM
 #6

Haha. Gavin always showed such public deference to the blockstream/core devs. Wonder what finally set him over the edge?

mewn.

Greg trolling one of his newest open source side projects on reddit or twitter.


isen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 04:47:47 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2017, 01:44:45 PM by isen
 #7

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability, don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.
Kakmakr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1487


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 06:37:56 AM
 #8

Gavin had his chance to be a Lead Developer and then he could not handle it and left. Now he wants to throw stones at the people who are in control and he even tried to take them down with XT and that failed miserably. When that did not work, he teamed up with BU to try another angle and that is looking bad too. < poor coding and bad flaws >

So if you cannot beat them with your code, try attacking them personally. ^Ooooooo^

.freebitcoin.       ▄▄▄█▀▀██▄▄▄
   ▄▄██████▄▄█  █▀▀█▄▄
  ███  █▀▀███████▄▄██▀
   ▀▀▀██▄▄█  ████▀▀  ▄██
▄███▄▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▄▄██████
██▀▀█████▄     ▄██▀█ ▀▀██
██▄▄███▀▀██   ███▀ ▄▄  ▀█
███████▄▄███ ███▄▄ ▀▀▄  █
██▀▀████████ █████  █▀▄██
 █▄▄████████ █████   ███
  ▀████  ███ ████▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████   ████▀▀
BITCOIN
DICE
EVENT
BETTING
WIN A LAMBO !

.
            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
▀██████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
▄▄████▄█████▄████████████████████████████▄█████▄████▄▄
▀████████▀▀▀████████████████████████████████▀▀▀██████████▄
  ▀▀▀████▄▄▄███████████████████████████████▄▄▄██████████
       ▀█████▀  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.PLAY NOW.
RawDog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1020



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2017, 07:14:09 AM
 #9

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.


at the people who are in control

You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed*  *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew  1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds
Kakmakr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1487


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:35:37 AM
 #10

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.


at the people who are in control

You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code. If I were getting paid to shill for Blockstream, I would probably not be able to afford a McDonald burger with my post history. ^LoL^

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory.... Lately the people with the most money to spam the network and to use backdoors <ASICBOOST> seem to control the consensus. ^grrrrrr^


.freebitcoin.       ▄▄▄█▀▀██▄▄▄
   ▄▄██████▄▄█  █▀▀█▄▄
  ███  █▀▀███████▄▄██▀
   ▀▀▀██▄▄█  ████▀▀  ▄██
▄███▄▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▄▄██████
██▀▀█████▄     ▄██▀█ ▀▀██
██▄▄███▀▀██   ███▀ ▄▄  ▀█
███████▄▄███ ███▄▄ ▀▀▄  █
██▀▀████████ █████  █▀▄██
 █▄▄████████ █████   ███
  ▀████  ███ ████▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████   ████▀▀
BITCOIN
DICE
EVENT
BETTING
WIN A LAMBO !

.
            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
▀██████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
▄▄████▄█████▄████████████████████████████▄█████▄████▄▄
▀████████▀▀▀████████████████████████████████▀▀▀██████████▄
  ▀▀▀████▄▄▄███████████████████████████████▄▄▄██████████
       ▀█████▀  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.PLAY NOW.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1780



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:55:59 AM
 #11

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code. If I were getting paid to shill for Blockstream, I would probably not be able to afford a McDonald burger with my post history. ^LoL^

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory.... Lately the people with the most money to spam the network and to use backdoors <ASICBOOST> seem to control the consensus. ^grrrrrr^

the only implementation that has bypassed users support.. is blockstream(core)
asic boost has nothing to do with it. just like opencl had nothing to do with any decisions of core back in the day of the GPU mining.

imagine it. imagine core in 2012 wanted to change something but couldnt because it would cause issues with ATI's openCL. people would laugh at core if they started blaming ATI.
same goes for now.. if segwit hits a wall before being active, then REWRITE SEGWIT!!

its all just finger pointing drama, to get everyon looking in every direction apart from blockstream.
so just look at blockstream
EG blockstream made cludgy code instead of a clean node upgrade event.
EG blockstream made it so only pools get the vote('going soft').
EG blockstream going soft is an admitted backdoor exploit and they admit they want to add more backdoors to be able to go soft more often. (in th wrong hands its called a trojan)
EG blockstream now crying because all them all-inclusive exotic weekends didnt buy the pools into flag waving by last christmas (due to 65% abstaining/ objecting to the cludgy code)
EG blockstream now found out their 2merkle cludge is not as compatible as first thought (so now asking abstainers/objectors to reprogram themselves, to use filter/bridging nodes, to fork off, to add code to avoid attack vectors segwit causes, even offering to PoW bomb just to get the cludgy code in)

yep. instead of just backing down and going for a plan B of a 1 merkle segwit with proper block size increase for the entire network benefit, blockstream still want to bypass the idea of a network consensus upgrade and go straight to a controversial bilateral split..

much simpler blockstream just redo segwit as a proper 1 merkle version, remove the cludge and add the other features the community want too instead of pointing the fingers to blame pools, other implementations (which have done nothing for 2 years) and wasting upto 3 years just to push the cludgy version (UASF 'late2018' mandatory activation) and then make yet again half baked promises that they will remove the cludge and make it 1merkle full proper upgrade after that.. (no one believes them anymore)

a 1 merkle rewrite with the extra features the community want to unite the community. is safer AND FASTER to implement than the 2merkle cludge and all the threats half promises and features that wont 100% fix the network issues.. that blockstream are 'demanding get implemented or else'

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Decoded
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1024


give me your cryptos


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 08:13:03 AM
 #12

Lots of FUD coming up now that Bitcoin has jumped a crapton. First some vs post about how Litecoin has jumped up (Mind you, it's market was relatively small and with all the segwit hype it's blown up, only by $30 or so. You can say it's a 500% increase, but it's market cap hadn't increased nearly as much as Bitcoin's has.

I think that with all these big names attacking each other, they'll only continue to do so. It's evident that Segwit will not activate, and Unlimited is a very risky business. Is it really that hard to come up with a compromise?

looking for a signature campaign, dm me for that
RawDog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1020



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2017, 09:46:21 AM
 #13

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code.

Kaka-makr = Fucking moron.  Holy fuck.  

I didn't say user/miners in charge of coding.  Are you stupid?  They are and should be in charge of the network.  

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory....

Precisely.  And this is why those assholes at Blockstream are losing.  It is not because of paid shills or FUD or ASICBOOST.  It is because SegWit is garbage that renders the network control over to Blockstream via LN and does nearly nothing to address capacity.  

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed*  *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew  1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2240
Merit: 3807


One of the world's leading Bitcoin-powered casinos


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 10:18:47 AM
 #14

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability,don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.

Pretty much this. His credibility in the bitcoin world is zero these days.

testerx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 10:20:42 AM
 #15

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1780



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:38:13 AM
 #16

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol

he is well funded  now as a blockstream employee.

i guess bobbly lee wasnt paying him enough or the DCG cartel thought he would be more useful under the blockstream subsiduary rather than the btcc subsiduary

http://dcg.co/portfolio/#b

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-55-million-series-a/
Quote
Disclaimer: CoinDesk is a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which has an ownership stake in Blockstream.

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
alyssa85
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:52:43 AM
 #17

Gavin had his chance to be a Lead Developer and then he could not handle it and left.

Gavin is the reason bitcoin went from about $5 in 2011 to $1000 in 2013. He held things together, his original faucet which gave away free whole bitcoins had a massive impact on spreading the word, he did marketing as well as developing. Bitcoin simply wouldn't be where it is without him. It's all gone a bit downhill since he left.

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.YoBit InvestBox.|.BUY X10 AND EARN 10% DAILY.🏆
NUFCrichard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:59:58 AM
 #18

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol
Well if it is good enough for the leader of the free world, then it is good enough for Bitcoin!

But in all seriousness, wouldn't it be nice if people could sit down together, even if that means remotely, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different block sizes, respect each others opinions, and not troll each other or bad mouth each other afterwards?

I know that when money is involved, that won't happen, but it would be nice!
BillyBobZorton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1020


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 12:00:47 PM
 #19

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.


at the people who are in control

You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

Satoshi introduced payment channels himself (the foundation for lightning network) you dumbass.

Anyway, keep praising Gavin Andersen, the guy that wanted to set a benevolent dictator in bitcoin:

http://coinjournal.net/gavin-andresen-mike-hearn-will-be-the-benevolent-dictator-of-bitcoinxt/

And the same idiot that got trolled by Craig Wright into being satoshi.

This pathetic moron should be hiding under a rock for the rest of his life, but idiots always have idiots following them so he'll keep tweeting as long as there are idiots circlejerking about anything he says.

anonymoustroll420
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 12:08:06 PM
 #20

Haha. Gavin always showed such public deference to the blockstream/core devs. Wonder what finally set him over the edge?

It's because nullc criticized Gavin's new private key inspector service:
https://www.randomsanity.org/

Please don't stop us from using ASICBoost which we're not using
Heruur
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 12:09:01 PM
 #21

How Blockstream was rewarded to make BIP and promote Bitcoin dev solution ? Every Business have an economic model my friends. The politician world and developper world is by nature opposite Wink
Darkbot
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 12:11:55 PM
 #22

FUD Thread from Kiklo. = Lambie. Lambie's 9384673764th troll account. She's trolling only to try to get cheaper coins.

Followed by BU troll Rawdog.

Followed by R.I.P BU troll Jonald Fyookball

Followed by copy/paste noob and paid shill Franky1.
monsanto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1242
Merit: 1005


..like bright metal on a sullen ground.


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 02:01:37 PM
 #23

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability,don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.

Pretty much this. His credibility in the bitcoin world is zero these days.

When this initially happened I assumed Gavin Andresen was in on the joke, or was intentionally trying to muddy the waters to protect Satoshi.  It's still hard to believe he would fall for Craig Wright's BS.
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1068


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 03:18:56 PM
 #24

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability,don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.

Pretty much this. His credibility in the bitcoin world is zero these days.

When this initially happened I assumed Gavin Andresen was in on the joke, or was intentionally trying to muddy the waters to protect Satoshi.  It's still hard to believe he would fall for Craig Wright's BS.

No, he genuinely thought Craig Wright was Satoshi... and by doing this...showed how easily he could be fooled. They would not have revoked

his commit access rights, if there were no merit for it.... after all... Satoshi trusted him enough to carry the flame... and he dropped it. Gavin

should just accept defeat and start working on his own projects and stop challenging people who actually know what they doing with Bitcoin.

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 04:05:21 PM
 #25



No, he genuinely thought Craig Wright was Satoshi... and by doing this...showed how easily he could be fooled. 

so Blockstream is great, then?

kreskko
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:23:35 PM
 #26



No, he genuinely thought Craig Wright was Satoshi... and by doing this...showed how easily he could be fooled. 

so Blockstream is great, then?
I do not even know how to answer your question, but the fact that many are already trying to speculate on the name of Satosh and others perhaps their creators Bitcoin.
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 2088



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:34:43 PM
 #27

Core devs should change the PoW algo and let BU shills eat shit.

Only then we can see who is more right/serious about bitcoin.

If Ver/Wu/Shills are really serious about their code (BU) then they would dump their bitcoins and fund their own altcoin (BTU) with that money and wait the community's support.
If bitcoin recovers after the PoW change, then the winner will be clear.





▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄                  ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ▀████████████████▄  ████                 █████   ▀████▄    ▄████▀  ▄██████████████   ████████████▀  ▄█████████████▀  ▄█████████████▄
              ▀████  ████               ▄███▀███▄   ▀████▄▄████▀               ████   ████                ████                   ▀████
   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████  ████              ████   ████    ▀██████▀      ██████████████▄   ████████████▀       ████       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
   ██████████████▀   ████            ▄███▀     ▀███▄    ████        ████        ████  ████                ████       ██████████████▀
   ████              ████████████▀  ████   ██████████   ████        ████████████████  █████████████▀      ████       ████      ▀████▄
   ▀▀▀▀              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀

#1 CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
  WELCOME
BONUS
.INSTANT & FAST.
.TRANSACTION.....
.PROVABLY FAIR.
......& SECURE......
.24/7 CUSTOMER.
............SUPPORT.
BTC      |      ETH      |      LTC      |      XRP      |      XMR      |      BNB      |     more
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1391


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 09:36:00 PM
 #28

Takes one to know one.


jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 1504


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 10:31:41 PM
 #29

Core devs should change the PoW algo and let BU shills eat shit steak.

FTFY.

please do.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:51:48 PM
 #30

Core devs should change the PoW algo and let BU shills eat shit steak.

FTFY.

please do.
so you admited, that you're BU shill, at last. Waitin for fyookboll's coming out...
digaran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 613

111113DUwES2ZNWSJztA3oBuhzfcdmiaG


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 12:23:17 AM
 #31

Core devs should change the PoW algo and let BU shills eat shit.

Only then we can see who is more right/serious about bitcoin.

If Ver/Wu/Shills are really serious about their code (BU) then they would dump their bitcoins and fund their own altcoin (BTU) with that money and wait the community's support.
If bitcoin recovers after the PoW change, then the winner will be clear.


Tell me you're joking right? do you really think changing POW is like changing a kitchen knife?
In order for such drastic change miners which are currently mining the POW algo will have to vote for the change of POW.
You can't go ask the president for example to sign a bill which will eventually lead to a new law that says we no longer need a president.

HOWEYCOINS   ▮      Excitement and         ⭐  ● TWITTER  ● FACEBOOK   ⭐      
  ▮    guaranteed returns                 ●TELEGRAM                         
  ▮  of the travel industry
    ⭐  ●Ann Thread ●Instagram   ⭐ 
✅    U.S.Sec    ➡️
✅  approved!  ➡️
ownageplocks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 12:26:52 AM
 #32

I appreciate the information, it's always difficult to stay on top of these sort of things. Is he the same guy that was involved with bitfinex before they crashed the market? Or am I thinking of the wrong person.
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 05, 2017, 12:40:21 AM
 #33

FUD Thread from Kiklo. = Lambie. Lambie's 9384673764th troll account. She's trolling only to try to get cheaper coins.

Followed by BU troll Rawdog.

Followed by R.I.P BU troll Jonald Fyookball

Followed by copy/paste noob and paid shill Franky1.

@ Darkbot aka Mr. DumbAss,

It is a link to a news article, so if you want to cry fud like a retard, contact the reporter.
Maybe read a dictionary and learn more words than fud and troll.     Tongue


 Cool
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1780



View Profile
May 05, 2017, 12:46:23 AM
Last edit: May 05, 2017, 01:06:46 AM by franky1
 #34

Tell me you're joking right? do you really think changing POW is like changing a kitchen knife?
In order for such drastic change miners which are currently mining the POW algo will have to vote for the change of POW.
You can't go ask the president for example to sign a bill which will eventually lead to a new law that says we no longer need a president.

bad analogy
pools are not the president.

here is a better analogy

pools are more like a secretary that just collates data of the employee's and customers and has to file it in a certain way that regional bosses can read and accept

the nodes are the regional bosses they set the rules and read the secretaries work and sign off on if its acceptable or not. the bosses syncing up as a network to ensur they all have the same documents to hand that are all acceptable.
the secretary can type up chapter of files as fast as she likes.. but if the bosses/nodes dont like it. in the reject/orphan pile it ends up.

devs are the employee's they can make new product that the bosses may choose to adopt. but the bosses can still say nay/abstain.
devs are the employee's they can make new product and try to by pass the bosses and try getting the secretary to use the new products hoping it forces the bosses to change their mind..

but the secretary(pools) would still prefer to only do things the bosses(nodes) would accept. after all it affects the secretaries income(reward) if the bosses reject her work.


having many regional managers (diverse nodes) avoids a dictatorship
having many secretaries (diverse pools) avoids network delays if one pool(secretary) fouls up (offsick, resigns, makes mistakes, intentionally frauds the books)
having many employees (diverse dev teams) avoids devs going on strike or dictating what direction a company should move in. because the bosses can choose to avoid certain employee's idea's and find whats best for the company.

imagine the company as the symbiotic peer network.. there is no CEO .. just lots of regional managers(nodes) that ask many secretaries to give them a report of customer data(block of tx's) every ~10 minutes. the fastest secretary that sends the regional managers a good collection of data gets a reward


now..
to sack all the secretaries is not a soft decision. it requires the bosses(nodes) having to change who what and how the company(network) data is collated and distributed.

if this kind of event were to happen where the whole retail chain network has to change.. they might aswell use that opportunity to do the other stuff customers and employee's can all unite around too, which will make the (network) better for all.. rather than just sack the secretary because 65% of secretaries wont collate data in a way only one team of employee's from one region want.

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Chikako
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 01:19:44 AM
 #35

Andresen is a CIA informant, Satoshi disappeared because of him.  Sad

Don't be dumb, the ones that are CIA informants are the current Core/blockstream devs, Gavin put a step away precissely to avoid this.
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 01:39:52 AM
 #36

Core devs should change the PoW algo and let BU shills eat shit steak.

FTFY.

please do.
so you admited, that you're BU shill, at last. Waitin for fyookboll's coming out...

I know you might be slightly stupid, but did you know that I support many scaling proposals (not just Bitcoin Unlimited)?

Let me guess -- you support only one, and its the core roadmap.

Sadlife
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 268


★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 01:48:44 AM
 #37

Lol bitcoin unlimited viable?
Haven't you heard the news about the recent crashing down of nodes of BU these past few weeks ?
BU is not an solution, it's the road to destruction for bitcoin.

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1780



View Profile
May 05, 2017, 01:55:14 AM
 #38

what if i told you all the gmax/gavin/hearne was all drama and secretly in the background they are partners

gavin - Bloq
gmax - blockstream
IBM - government intelliagence
hearn - R3
samson mow - BTCC and blockstream

hyperledger members - bloq and blockstream and IBM and R3
https://www.hyperledger.org/about/members

DCG cartel - bloq and blockstream and BTCC
http://dcg.co/portfolio/#b

in the UK its well known the ties of IBM managing the police/defense and many public services including GCHQ(uk version of CIA)

read the names on the sign


its all just drama of distractions where hearne/gavin are used as the scapegoat. even now samson mow is becoming the scapegoat(face to point and scream at) to be the future person to point the finger at while the CTO gmaxwell carries on doing what he wants and blaming others

EG
gmax+luke, 'lets bypass nodes and make it a pool only vote'
gmax+luke, 'noo the pools have control blame the pools, PoW bomb the pools.'

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
The One
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 05, 2017, 02:27:58 AM
 #39

Tell me you're joking right? do you really think changing POW is like changing a kitchen knife?
In order for such drastic change miners which are currently mining the POW algo will have to vote for the change of POW.
You can't go ask the president for example to sign a bill which will eventually lead to a new law that says we no longer need a president.

bad analogy
pools are not the president.

here is a better analogy

pools are more like a secretary that just collates data of the employee's and customers and has to file it in a certain way that regional bosses can read and accept

the nodes are the regional bosses they set the rules and read the secretaries work and sign off on if its acceptable or not. the bosses syncing up as a network to ensur they all have the same documents to hand that are all acceptable.
the secretary can type up chapter of files as fast as she likes.. but if the bosses/nodes dont like it. in the reject/orphan pile it ends up.

devs are the employee's they can make new product that the bosses may choose to adopt. but the bosses can still say nay/abstain.
devs are the employee's they can make new product and try to by pass the bosses and try getting the secretary to use the new products hoping it forces the bosses to change their mind..


Nope.

Imagine a circle called Bitcoin. Imagine a circle called Dodgy Bank. Imagine a circle called Monsanto supermarket.

Inside a circle.
Miners/cashiers/till operators are employees of Bitcoin/Dodgy/Monsanto and get subsidy/wage plus btc/shares.
Noders/managers/managers are employees of Bitcoin/Dodgy/Monsanto and protect their btc/shares.
Users/customers/customers uses Bitcoin/Dodgy/Monsanto services but do next to nothing to protect their btc/shares. Their contribution is most probably screaming "to da moon."

Devs are outside the circle, same as all centralised companies such as exchanges etc. They can propose changes but only those inside the circle can decide whether they want the changes. However devs and companies can be users/noders/miners too. They have a dual role. Devs can compete with other devs. None are employees.

Bitcoin in the free market compete with altcoins. Dodgy bank competes with other banks. Monsanto supermarket competes with organic supermarket.

The idea that inside the Bitcoin circle there is a free-market fee market is hilarious. User Alice jumping the queue by paying a higher fee - stupid. Those inside the circle work as a team for the greater good of Bitcoin.

The idea that inside the Dodgy bank circle there is a free-market fee market doesn't exist. Alice can not jump the queue as those in front will tell her to piss off to the back of the queue. Cashiers do not accept queue jumping. Those inside the circle work as a team for the greater good of the bank.

The idea that inside the Monsanto supermarket circle there is a free-market fee market doesn't exist. Alice can not jump the queue as those in front will tell her to piss off to the back of the queue. Till operators do not accept queue jumping. Those inside the circle work as a team for the greater good of the supermarket.


..C..
.....................
........What is C?.........
..............
...........ICO            Dec 1st – Dec 30th............
       ............Open            Dec 1st- Dec 30th............
...................ANN thread      Bounty....................

jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 1504


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 02:36:29 AM
 #40

Core devs should change the PoW algo and let BU shills eat shit steak.

FTFY.

please do.
so you admited, that you're BU shill, at last. Waitin for fyookboll's coming out...

Shill? How do you figure? Nobody pays me to shill BU. I advocate BU because so much of my personal net worth is in BTC. Which needs to eliminate the stupid centrally planned production quota in order to release its true potential.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
digaran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 613

111113DUwES2ZNWSJztA3oBuhzfcdmiaG


View Profile
May 06, 2017, 12:35:11 AM
 #41

Tell me you're joking right? do you really think changing POW is like changing a kitchen knife?
In order for such drastic change miners which are currently mining the POW algo will have to vote for the change of POW.
You can't go ask the president for example to sign a bill which will eventually lead to a new law that says we no longer need a president.

bad analogy
pools are not the president.

here is a better analogy

pools are more like a secretary that just collates data of the employee's and customers and has to file it in a certain way that regional bosses can read and accept

the nodes are the regional bosses they set the rules and read the secretaries work and sign off on if its acceptable or not. the bosses syncing up as a network to ensur they all have the same documents to hand that are all acceptable.
the secretary can type up chapter of files as fast as she likes.. but if the bosses/nodes dont like it. in the reject/orphan pile it ends up.

devs are the employee's they can make new product that the bosses may choose to adopt. but the bosses can still say nay/abstain.
devs are the employee's they can make new product and try to by pass the bosses and try getting the secretary to use the new products hoping it forces the bosses to change their mind..

but the secretary(pools) would still prefer to only do things the bosses(nodes) would accept. after all it affects the secretaries income(reward) if the bosses reject her work.


having many regional managers (diverse nodes) avoids a dictatorship
having many secretaries (diverse pools) avoids network delays if one pool(secretary) fouls up (offsick, resigns, makes mistakes, intentionally frauds the books)
having many employees (diverse dev teams) avoids devs going on strike or dictating what direction a company should move in. because the bosses can choose to avoid certain employee's idea's and find whats best for the company.

imagine the company as the symbiotic peer network.. there is no CEO .. just lots of regional managers(nodes) that ask many secretaries to give them a report of customer data(block of tx's) every ~10 minutes. the fastest secretary that sends the regional managers a good collection of data gets a reward


now..
to sack all the secretaries is not a soft decision. it requires the bosses(nodes) having to change who what and how the company(network) data is collated and distributed.

if this kind of event were to happen where the whole retail chain network has to change.. they might aswell use that opportunity to do the other stuff customers and employee's can all unite around too, which will make the (network) better for all.. rather than just sack the secretary because 65% of secretaries wont collate data in a way only one team of employee's from one region want.
You are over-complicating/confusing things.
Nodes and miners are one and the same.
You think if majority of nodes start a new protocol then miners will sit back and allow it? some one invested enough money to be a miner in the first place will spend more to have enough nodes to avoid the majority take over.

You say diversification of node versions while we all know that all the results across the entire network must be identical otherwise not accepted.

Lets have 50 different versions, they will all have to follow only one rule and that is the Bitcoin's code, and as we know running a program on different platforms is much harder and requires more work to be done just like when you have a software which can be executed in Linux/Windows/Mac but for a developer is much easier to just compile it to run on Windows, regardless it's still the same software only runs in different OS systems and that's a feature which makes the software available for all kinds of people.
In Bitcoin's case it's something else, if you are trying to run the node on any platform you are free to do so but what is your goal to run different versions of a software in the same network with same internet ports and same brand name?

How could anyone change POW without the majority of hash power support/vote?
Why would miners vote for something that makes their mining machines useless?

If I have 1BTC no matter the versions of nodes I still have my coin sitting in my address, devs and miners should notice this fact that end user doesn't really care about those stuff what we care is when we send a transaction with a normal fee it gets confirmed after 30 minutes no matter what.

10 hours ago I sent some bitcoins to an exchange to buy some cheap alts but now while my transaction is pending and there are 150K unconfirmed TX I have lost a perfect opportunity. I don't want that, so what other choice do I really have besides moving to another alt?

Moreover we have diversification already but that seems not the issue with you rather you want both, you can't have heads and tails in one side of the coin.

HOWEYCOINS   ▮      Excitement and         ⭐  ● TWITTER  ● FACEBOOK   ⭐      
  ▮    guaranteed returns                 ●TELEGRAM                         
  ▮  of the travel industry
    ⭐  ●Ann Thread ●Instagram   ⭐ 
✅    U.S.Sec    ➡️
✅  approved!  ➡️
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
May 06, 2017, 12:46:08 AM
 #42

anyone who knew nothing about the background would surmise that samson mow is an asshole purely by reading his tweets.

over aggressive and derisory. I don't think he's a good recruitment by them.
iluvpie60
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


WOLF.BET - Provably Fair Dice Game


View Profile
May 18, 2017, 11:55:43 PM
 #43

Good to see Gavin say this. He needs to come more out to the forefront and challenge the fudders who are being toxic.

We need more insightful explanations and podcasts or something from Gavin. We need some reasonable people getting back to the forefront and less of the Jihan drama crap.

.WOLF.BET.▄███████████▄
███████    ████████████▄
███████    ███████   ▀██
██████████████████    ██
██    ██████████████████
██    ███████    ███████
█████████████    ███████
███████    █████████████
███████    ███████    ██
██████████████████   ▄██
██        ▀███████████▀
██
██

█████
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
  ███
█████


Pages: 1 2 3 [All]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!