I love democrats.

[BADecker]

Got the below in an email...

----------

    BRILLIANCE IN THREE PARTS


    Part I:

    A. Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men.
    B. Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women.
    C. Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies.
    In three generations, there will be no more Democrats.


    Part II:


    10 Poorest Cities in America (How did it happen?)
    City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level


    1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
    2. Buffalo, NY 29.9%
    3 Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
    4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
    5. Miami, FL 26.9%
    5 St. Louis, MO 26.8%
    7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
    8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
    9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
    10. Newark, NJ 24.2%

    (Now, watch closely... at no time will the fingers leave the hands...)
    What do these top ten cities (over 250,000 pop.) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?


    Detroit, MI - (1st on poverty rate list) no elected Republican mayor since 1961
    Buffalo, NY - (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954
    Cincinnati, OH - (3rd) not since 1984
    Cleveland, OH - (4th) not since 1989
    Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor
    St. Louis, MO - (6th) not since 1949
    El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor
    Milwaukee, WI - (8th) not since 1908
    Philadelphia, PA - (9th) not since 1952
    Newark, NJ - (10th) not since 1907

    Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'

    It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats ... yet they are still POOR.


    Part III:

    "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
    You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
    You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
    You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
    You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
    You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.
    You cannot help people permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves."
    ~ Abraham Lincoln

    "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him had better take a much closer look at the American Indian."
    ~ Henry Ford


    Please - Do something for your country - Pass this on to your Democrat buddies.

[1714928423]

1714928423

[1714928423]

1714928423

[1714928423]

1714928423

[1714928423]

1714928423

[1714928423]

1714928423

[1714928423]

1714928423

[GeZero]

"You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong"

Remarkable quote.

[suchmoon]

Well, there are two cities in the list that I know a little bit about and info on one of them (El Paso) is definitely wrong. It did have a Republican mayor just recently, who obviously did fuck all to address poverty. Not that I would expect any kind of factual information from BADecker.

Edit: Miami's wrong too, had a bunch of Republican mayors, including from 2009 to date.

[Poker Player]

Well, there are two cities in the list that I know a little bit about and info on one of them (El Paso) is definitely wrong. It did have a Republican mayor just recently, who obviously did fuck all to address poverty. Not that I would expect any kind of factual information from BADecker.

Edit: Miami's wrong too, had a bunch of Republican mayors, including from 2009 to date.

I have been checking what you say. It's not that I don't trust you. It's just that in general I don't trust what I see on forums. However, if I had to choose between blindly believing what you say or what TrollDecker says I would believe you.

Regarding El Paso, I have looked at the mayors backwards to 1991 and they came out Republican or no political affiliation. Another thing is that if you know the history you maybe know that such a mayor had an ideology closer to the Republicans even though he was not affiliated with the party but in theory he should be more independent.

Regarding Miami, if anyone doubts between what you say or what he says, you can see the following image to dispel doubts:

[Cnut237]

~

Part 1: Your conclusion is based on the assumption that all men want to marry men, all women want to marry women, and everyone who is pregnant wants an abortion. Utterly absurd.
Part 2: Cities with a poverty problem will vote for the candidate most likely to help them. This is unlikely ever to be a Republican.
Part 3: Advice from people born in the 19th century is perhaps not 100% relevant to people living in the 21st.

[Poker Player]

Part 2: Cities with a poverty problem will vote for the candidate most likely to help them. This is unlikely ever to be a Republican.

If you talk like that in absolute terms, it seems to me that we are going to have a lot to debate. Let's see if we can nuance and finally reach an agreement.

Correction:

Part 2: Cities with a poverty problem will vote for the candidate they believe most likely to help them. This is unlikely ever to be a Republican.

The best way to help poor cities is to create conditions for jobs and low taxes so that people can save. And not to spread the misery.

Democratic cities do more taxes, more regulations, make individual initiative more difficult, are more tolerant of crime (because poor people, society has failed them), make it more difficult to build housing, reducing supply and driving up prices, and so on and so forth. ´

In return they give the poor people crumbs that ensure that they do not starve but do not lift them out of misery. All this sweetened with a discourse of good guys and bad guys in which the politician of the day is the one who saves them from the bad guys, when he does nothing more than perpetuate misery. I am sure that you could give examples of cities well run by democrats in the USA or laborists in the UK or socialists in Europe, but to speak so bluntly I don't think Detroit is an example of how well Democrats have helped poor people in Detroit.

[suchmoon]

Regarding El Paso, I have looked at the mayors backwards to 1991 and they came out Republican or no political affiliation. Another thing is that if you know the history you maybe know that such a mayor had an ideology closer to the Republicans even though he was not affiliated with the party but in theory he should be more independent.

El Paso has non-partisan elections, where technically the candidates are not labeled so they may look like independents but they're not. Dee Margo (mayor from 2017 to 2020) was definitely a Republican, even Trump called him a RINO so you know that's true LOL.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/in-private-meeting-trump-calls-el-paso-mayor-a-rino/

I wonder which other e-mails BADecker trusts so blindly. He must have been on all those free cruises and have the longest penis ever.

[Cnut237]

Part 2: Cities with a poverty problem will vote for the candidate most likely to help them. This is unlikely ever to be a Republican.

If you talk like that in absolute terms, it seems to me that we are going to have a lot to debate. Let's see if we can nuance and finally reach an agreement.

Correction:

Part 2: Cities with a poverty problem will vote for the candidate they believe most likely to help them. This is unlikely ever to be a Republican.

Well yes, they'll vote for the one they think is most likely to help them, as everyone votes for candidates they think will act in a certain way.
But certainly the one who is most likely to help them is unlikely ever to be a Republican.

Yes, we would be on opposite sides on this discussion, and have a lot to debate... but it's probably a matter for another thread. By which I mean a serious thread, not halfway down a BADecker one.

[Gyfts]

Subscribing to those political email lists will be the death of on your inbox, you should know this.

I always laugh at how hyperbolic and alarmist the headers are - "HILLARY CLINTON WANTS TO TAKE YOUR GUNS" "JOE BIDEN IS GOING TO THROW YOU IN THE DUNGEON "

And without pause, there will always be a donation link at the bottom of the page that lets you know "Give us money for________ and we'll put a stop to _______". I would say don't read too far into them, but maybe it's a bit too late for that.

[BADecker]

Some of you jokers are too funny. Just because I posted an email, doesn't mean I believe it or everything that is in it is true. But what's funny is how you are so easily hurt. So thanks for showing me that you believe it. Lol. Besides, this is kinda an old email. I've seen it before. Glad you are getting all that much pleasure out of it.

However, they left the biggest one out. Vaxxed people are dying. Some of them actually die almost on the spot of the jab. Some within the first week after. Most of them will be dead in 2 - 5 years.  And Dems are getting vaxxed at double the rate of Reps and most others.

Bye-bye, Democrat Party.

[suchmoon]

Some of you jokers are too funny. Just because I posted an email, doesn't mean I believe it or everything that is in it is true.

I guess it's fine if posting blatantly false nonsense helps you cope when the following doesn't happen:

Most of them will be dead in 2 - 5 years.

Nice switch from "everyone dead in 2 years" to "most dead in 5 years".

[Cnut237]

Subscribing to those political email lists will be the death of on your inbox, you should know this.

I always laugh at how hyperbolic and alarmist the headers are - "HILLARY CLINTON WANTS TO TAKE YOUR GUNS" "JOE BIDEN IS GOING TO THROW YOU IN THE DUNGEON "

Are these the email titles, or his thread titles?

Vaxxed people are dying.

Can't be bothered to post the US data and then watch your eyes slide right across inconvenient facts as if you can't see them, so I'll just link to a previous post discussing the pattern in the UK.

[BADecker]

Some of you jokers are too funny. Just because I posted an email, doesn't mean I believe it or everything that is in it is true.

I guess it's fine if posting blatantly false nonsense helps you cope when the following doesn't happen:

Most of them will be dead in 2 - 5 years.

Nice switch from "everyone dead in 2 years" to "most dead in 5 years".

Different post. Different thread. Different context. Info from without is different.

VAERS shows us over 12,000 vaxx dead within the first so far.

Alabama attorney suing US gov. for 45,000 vaxx dead so far.

Many doctors say the vaxx is completely safe.

Doctors suggest different periods for death, from almost immediately after the vaxx, to 10 years... and maybe something else.

Seems that your problem is that you only tend to believe the latest info that you hear/see... and can't figure out that nobody knows the future, but that everybody makes educated guesses about everything.

I know, I know. It's difficult for you to evaluate all this info that seems so contradictory. But if you keep on trying, my EDUCATED GUESS is that you will get better and better at it... except when/after you die from your vaxx.

[suchmoon]

I know, I know. It's difficult for you to evaluate all this info that seems so contradictory. But if you keep on trying, my EDUCATED GUESS is that you will get better and better at it... except when/after you die from your vaxx.

It's not difficult at all. I'm absolutely certain that most of the vaccinated individuals will die within the next 100 years.

[BADecker]

I know, I know. It's difficult for you to evaluate all this info that seems so contradictory. But if you keep on trying, my EDUCATED GUESS is that you will get better and better at it... except when/after you die from your vaxx.

It's not difficult at all. I'm absolutely certain that most of the vaccinated individuals will die within the next 100 years.

Wow! You even recognize that 0 to 5 years is within 100 years. Congratulations.

[Alfreed]

I think that democracy is the most perfect political system. it gives people the right to choose how to build their lives. in many countries, democracy in many countries has shown its effectiveness. the most powerful world powers have a democratic political system. even in ancient rome, democracy showed us an excellent example of how to make a strong state

[suchmoon]

I think that democracy is the most perfect political system. it gives people the right to choose how to build their lives. in many countries, democracy in many countries has shown its effectiveness. the most powerful world powers have a democratic political system. even in ancient rome, democracy showed us an excellent example of how to make a strong state

You managed to out-stupid BADecker in this thread, congrats. Your translator failed you, dipshit.

[cmg777]

I think that democracy is the most perfect political system. it gives people the right to choose how to build their lives. in many countries, democracy in many countries has shown its effectiveness. the most powerful world powers have a democratic political system. even in ancient rome, democracy showed us an excellent example of how to make a strong state

You managed to out-stupid BADecker in this thread, congrats. Your translator failed you, dipshit.

And you managed to out-mean everybody proving BD's point about the demz being petty tyrants. He is just trying to speak highly of the western world through translation.

[suchmoon]

And you managed to out-mean everybody proving BD's point about the demz being petty tyrants. He is just trying to speak highly of the western world through translation.

Yep, makes perfect sense that you would believe that a copy-pasta spammer is "trying to speak" and that BADecker has a point.