Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 09:32:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2017-05-08] Unconfirmed Bitcoin Transactions Reach 150k  (Read 6411 times)
tyz (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3360
Merit: 1530



View Profile
May 07, 2017, 08:57:23 PM
 #1

Unconfirmed Bitcoin Transactions Reach 150k

As Bitcoin continues to grow in popularity and value, the network’s capacity issues are becoming even more evident with the number of unconfirmed transactions reaching record-breaking figures.

It is well-known that the Bitcoin network is currently running at full capacity. With two popular scaling proposals competing for miner approval, there seems to be no resolution in sight. In the meanwhile, the situation is getting worse every day with the number of unconfirmed transactions reaching a record figure of 155k transactions yesterday.

http://bitcoinist.com/unconfirmed-bitcoin-transactions-reach-150k/
1713562351
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562351

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562351
Reply with quote  #2

1713562351
Report to moderator
1713562351
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562351

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562351
Reply with quote  #2

1713562351
Report to moderator
1713562351
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562351

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562351
Reply with quote  #2

1713562351
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713562351
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562351

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562351
Reply with quote  #2

1713562351
Report to moderator
1713562351
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562351

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562351
Reply with quote  #2

1713562351
Report to moderator
karmakeddon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 251



View Profile
May 07, 2017, 08:59:42 PM
 #2

That looks bad. Really bad. It will discourage new comers to bitcoin if that happens a lot.

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
TraderTimm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121



View Profile
May 07, 2017, 09:06:53 PM
 #3

This is primarily because ONE address was being used to send to itself 174,000 times.

Its fucking spam, and anyone who has been following these non-organic patterns in mempool flooding knows it.

I suspect Ver and company, because he's the only unhinged rich asshole that has enough funds to screw with Bitcoin, and the agenda to do it.

Reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/69k199/mempool_flooded_today_with_address_paying_itself/

fortitudinem multis - catenum regit omnia
Slow death
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1098


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 10:34:05 PM
 #4

Unconfirmed Bitcoin Transactions Reach 150k

As Bitcoin continues to grow in popularity and value, the network’s capacity issues are becoming even more evident with the number of unconfirmed transactions reaching record-breaking figures.

It is well-known that the Bitcoin network is currently running at full capacity. With two popular scaling proposals competing for miner approval, there seems to be no resolution in sight. In the meanwhile, the situation is getting worse every day with the number of unconfirmed transactions reaching a record figure of 155k transactions yesterday.

http://bitcoinist.com/unconfirmed-bitcoin-transactions-reach-150k/

This is very bad, a few days ago I transferred bitcoin to neteller so I could withdraw to my country, it was a huge embarrassment, I waited for hours to confirm and this time neither viabtc was able to solve the problem early.


..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
1Referee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 10:38:18 PM
 #5

I suspect Ver and company, because he's the only unhinged rich asshole that has enough funds to screw with Bitcoin, and the agenda to do it.

Ver & Co could indeed play a major role, but don't rule out the hidden agendas of the larger mining farms that have absolutely no moral problems with forcing people to pay a higher fee by choking the network with rubbish transactions - especially if it is a combined effort. Rubbish transactions will likely not confirm, and thus drop with the result that the entity behind the spam attack doesn't lose anything. In that regard, to a certain extent it's free to do for them, with a major impact on the network as result.
fiscorcle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 502


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 11:08:24 PM
 #6

I suspect Ver and company, because he's the only unhinged rich asshole that has enough funds to screw with Bitcoin, and the agenda to do it.

Ver & Co could indeed play a major role, but don't rule out the hidden agendas of the larger mining farms that have absolutely no moral problems with forcing people to pay a higher fee by choking the network with rubbish transactions - especially if it is a combined effort. Rubbish transactions will likely not confirm, and thus drop with the result that the entity behind the spam attack doesn't lose anything. In that regard, to a certain extent it's free to do for them, with a major impact on the network as result.

I doubt they're the ones originating the issue, but I wouldn't put it past them to compound the problem
1Referee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427


View Profile
May 08, 2017, 08:55:28 AM
 #7

I doubt they're the ones originating the issue, but I wouldn't put it past them to compound the problem

Problem is that there are several entities that will benefit from choking the network with rubbish transactions.

Ver & Co; Making Bitcoin in its current form look bad as it can't cope with the large number of transactions. (hint...hint.... BU is the solution!!)
Pools; Forcing people to pay a higher fee.
Investors; By choking the network they hope to force people to move to the altcoin side, where they buy extremely overpriced coins.

And there may possibly be a few more scenarios, but the first two mentioned options are the most likely ones. Bitcoin in current days is infested with people only looking to nurse their own greed. These people will take every step necessary to accomplish their goal. If they have to make Bitcoin look bad for that, they will have no problems in doing so. As always, it's money that's the main driver.
coolcoinz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 1102



View Profile
May 08, 2017, 03:05:37 PM
 #8

I suspect Ver and company, because he's the only unhinged rich asshole that has enough funds to screw with Bitcoin, and the agenda to do it.

Ver & Co could indeed play a major role, but don't rule out the hidden agendas of the larger mining farms that have absolutely no moral problems with forcing people to pay a higher fee by choking the network with rubbish transactions - especially if it is a combined effort. Rubbish transactions will likely not confirm, and thus drop with the result that the entity behind the spam attack doesn't lose anything. In that regard, to a certain extent it's free to do for them, with a major impact on the network as result.
Such spam can not only be used to push an agenda like BU, but it could also be an attempt to crash the price. It's all about the money, do not forget that.
If you look at charts it worked. Bitcoin went up by $200 and down by about $150 when the spam started. Somebody made a lot of money on that move.

1Referee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427


View Profile
May 08, 2017, 11:17:59 PM
 #9

Such spam can not only be used to push an agenda like BU, but it could also be an attempt to crash the price. It's all about the money, do not forget that.
If you took the effort to actually read through my other post in this thread (post 7 to be precise, but you obviously didn't read it), then you would have known that I mentioned that it doesn't have to be solely BU causing this spam attack. I gave several examples too... Roll Eyes

If you look at charts it worked. Bitcoin went up by $200 and down by about $150 when the spam started. Somebody made a lot of money on that move.
Doesn't say anything. It's impossible to state the exact reason of these spam attacks. People can only speculate.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!