Bitcoin Forum
September 18, 2018, 06:38:24 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 [130] 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Evolution is a hoax  (Read 79954 times)
Abil_Salman
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 260
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2018, 02:11:41 PM
 #2581

The theory of evolution States that all living beings are multiform derived from one common ancestor. According to this theory, the appearance of living beings that are so diverse occurs through small variations and gradual in the span of a very long time. This theory States that the one-celled living things originally formed. For hundreds of million years later, this single-celled creatures turned into fish and animal invertebrates (spineless rear) that live in the sea. These fish then allegedly appeared to land and turned into reptiles. This fairy tale continues, and so on until the statement that birds and mammals evolved from reptiles.
1537295904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537295904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537295904
Reply with quote  #2

1537295904
Report to moderator
1537295904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537295904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537295904
Reply with quote  #2

1537295904
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1537295904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537295904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537295904
Reply with quote  #2

1537295904
Report to moderator
1537295904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537295904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537295904
Reply with quote  #2

1537295904
Report to moderator
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 558


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
February 05, 2018, 10:47:32 AM
 #2582


You said:

''Yet, somehow, lots of non-scientists suddenly think that the scientists say that evolution is true''

I responded to that showing you statistics that we don't just think scientists say evolution is true, they actually do say evolution is true.

So, keep on talking religion. None of the speaking or writing scientists have any proof. The evidence fits creation better.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

If that was true we wouldn't have less than 5% of scientists that believe in creation.

But creation and religion aren't the point of this topic. Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it. They just don't know. But many of them are realizing that there is, scientifically understood, intelligent design shown in the universe. And they are beginning to realize that...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Oh, they just don't know. You know better than them badecker, go tell them!!

Thank you for the compliment. But you are mistaken. They, themselves, say that they don't know.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

I mean I can link more data showing virtually every scientist and all science agrees that evolution is true but you are going to say something stupid so it's pointless.

You are going to link their signed affidavits, with locations to where these are recorded in government recording offices, as well?

Polls can be twisted to show anything. Websites can proclaim anything. We are looking for proof. Let's see their signed affidavits, for starters.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Badecker is the type of guy that will say ''scientists do not believe in evolution'' without giving any type of evidence. I can link here 20 different polls and websites saying they do, can you link at least 1 that says most scientists think evolution is not true?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/07/13/creationism-evolution-template-for-easing-divisions-tom-krattenmaker-column/467800001/

Even religious people like you have to accept evolution now, most religions do already. They are forced to because the science supporting it is too strong, otherwise why do you think all these religious groups are accepting evolution more and more if they truly believe in god?

Let's see BADecker's signed affidavit with the location where it is recorded in government recording offices, as well. Other than that, how would you know that BADecker says something like that? You might claim it, but if you do without in-context evidence, you are proving to be one of those jokers that twists things to suggest something different than what the speaker said.

Since this is what you so often do, you are showing us all that you can't find any practical thing that proves that evolution exists. When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about enough to speak about it clearly, you have a religion going for yourself. And that is what evolution is... a religion, at best. But really...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.



.
.BITVEST DICE.
HAS BEEN RELEASED!


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1046


View Profile
February 05, 2018, 02:43:30 PM
 #2583


''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool
galactic123
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2018, 03:39:47 PM
 #2584

Evolution is a hoax

Heh. In reality we are characters inside some sort of simulation or videogame. Maybe some sort of jazzed up pixels, created to entertain our creators.  Or maybe I have been seeing too much Matrix and playing too much No Man's Sky...  Wink
andrino
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 05, 2018, 04:14:41 PM
 #2585

Monkeys were created with body, head, eyes, ears, hairs, tongue, feet, heart and mind or simply like a human in physical matter. Animals were created first before human being in this planet. If man was from ape what ugly man kind is. Human is human after 10 years, 20 yrs, 50 yrs, 100yrs, 500yrs and 1000yrs. I didn't see anything man turn to ape, or ape turn to man. The beliefs of evolution can make the students to amiss miserable lie thruth forever. Evolution seems good when the student doesn't have any idea regarding of creation. Most acceptable to believe man is man forever and ape is ape forever. Unless science make involve with this, there will be a big change of discovery.
Crazygreek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 251


View Profile
February 05, 2018, 08:01:47 PM
 #2586

Sometimes others evolve slowly than our race man Grin The problem is that we can't evolve and apopt but you can't even see this because you are stupid haha.

BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1046


View Profile
February 05, 2018, 11:56:43 PM
 #2587

The Religion of Evolution:
Quote from: //answersingenesis.org/public-school/religion-in-schools/the-religion-of-evolution/
The Religion of Evolution

Michael Ruse, professor of history and philosophy and author of The Darwinian Revolution (1979), Darwinism Defended (1982), and Taking Darwin Seriously (1986), acknowledges that evolution is religious:

    “Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion—a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit in this one complaint… the literalists [i.e., creationists] are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”



Professor Richard Lewontin, a geneticist and author of a number of books on Darwinian theory, illustrates the implicit metaphysical starting point of the evolutionary dogma. Even when the facts point away from a certain scientific explanation for a given theory, evolution must be followed because the materialistic religion of Darwin must be protected against any Divine intrusion:

    “We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”



Robert Jastrow, an internationally known astronomer, founder and director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Professor of Astronomy and Geology at Columbia University, and Professor of Earth Sciences at Dartmouth College, describes science as “religion” in the chapter where the following quotation is taken:

    “Consider the enormity of the problem. Science has proven that the Universe exploded into being at a certain moment. It asks, What cause produced this effect? Who or what put the matter and energy into the Universe? Was the Universe created out of nothing, or was it gathered together out of pre-existing materials? And science cannot answer these questions, because, according to the astronomers, in the first moments of its existence the Universe was compressed to an extraordinary degree, and consumed by the heat of a fire beyond human imagination. The shock of that instant must have destroyed every particle of evidence that could have yielded a clue to the cause of the great explosion. An entire world, rich in structure and history, may have existed before our Universe appeared; but if it did, science cannot tell what kind of world it was. A sound explanation may exist for the explosive birth of our Universe; but if it does, science cannot find out what the explanation is.”



Another proposed mechanism of evolution is that of “punctuated equilibrium” by Niles Eldredge and the late Stephen Jay Gould. “Punk Eek,” as it is affectionately called by some and derisively labeled by others, is a radical departure from the confessional statement of beliefs of the First Church of Charles Darwin. Where the Church of Darwin first suggested that changes occur gradually over long periods of time (equilibrium or stasis), Punk Eek adherents conjecture that the “abrupt appearance of species (in the fossil record) could be explained by the transition occurring quickly, geologically speaking, in small, isolated populations such that transitional forms would be highly unlikely to be preserved”. The change in doctrine came when transitional fossils could not be found to support the orthodox Darwinian dogma. Gould, a high priest of the movement before his death this year, had to confess:

    “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology… . [T]o preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.”



Sometimes the priesthood objects to one of its own members when he strays too far from the accepted dogma. Crick is one of them. When this happens, a very rare occurrence to be sure, the full force of inquisitional opposition from the scientific priesthood is brought to bear on the heretic. Consider Danish environmental scientist Bjorn Lomborg, a left-wing evolutionary scientist whose specialty is statistics, who dared to stray and state that “We are not running out of energy or natural resources.” A former member of Greenpeace and the author of The Skeptical Environmentalist (1998), Lomborg has been giving the leftist environmental lobby fits. Since his scientific paradigm does not correspond to the prevailing environmental religion, drastic measures had to be taken in an attempt to silence him:

    “Some scientists say they initially hoped to ignore Lomborg but in the wake of the book’s popularity have reacted with a fury rarely seen in academia… . A dozen esteemed environmental scientists, including [Peter] Raven and Harvard’s Edward O. Wilson, are demanding that Lomborg’s publisher cut him loose. - ‘We are deeply disturbed that Cambridge University Press would publish and promote an error-filled, poorly referenced and non-peer-reviewed work,’ they write in a letter calling on Cambridge to transfer publishing rights to a popular, nonscholarly press.”



C. S. Lewis was astounded at Watson’s frank admission and responded: “Has it come to that? Does the whole vast structure of modern naturalism depend not on positive evidence but simply on an a priori metaphysical prejudice? Was it devised not to get in facts but to keep out God?” Evolutionists Gould and Eldredge are not reluctant to admit that “The general preference that so many of us hold for gradualism is a metaphysical stance embedded in the modern history of Western cultures: it is not a high-order empirical observation, induced from the objective study of nature.” Gould adds:

    “But our ways of learning about the world are strongly influenced by the social preconceptions and biased modes of thinking that each scientist must apply to any problem. The stereotype of a fully rational and objective ‘scientific method’, with individual scientists as logical (and interchangeable) robots, is self-serving mythology.”


Read more at https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/religion-in-schools/the-religion-of-evolution/.


Cool
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 558


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
February 05, 2018, 11:59:57 PM
 #2588


''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work.'' Where is the evidence for this, though?

''We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution.'' It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...

Evolution is a fact, explained by the evolution theory which is a scientific theory. A hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don't change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.



.
.BITVEST DICE.
HAS BEEN RELEASED!


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1046


View Profile
February 06, 2018, 12:44:47 AM
 #2589


''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work.'' Where is the evidence for this, though?

''We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution.'' It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...

Evolution is a fact, explained by the evolution theory which is a scientific theory. A hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don't change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.

You ask "Where is the evidence for this, though?" But your eyes forget to look at the post directly above the one wherein you ask this question, to find the answer.

That same post presents a smattering of evolutionists talking about how evolution is little more than faith in its theory. Evolution theory exists; that is fact. The other fact is that it is kept alive as a theory by people who want it to be true... not by any fact of the existence of evolution.

Tanner talks about evolution. He bases his points on the idea of evolution that has been shown to be a metaphysical thing rather than a factual thing. There are reasons other than evolution for Tanner's "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact..." The "overarching theories about evolution" are simply that so little evolution fact exists that evolution is a religion for lack of these fact. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg29686165#msg29686165, which is only a smattering of logic expressed by the great thinkers of evolution and science.

Cool
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 558


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
February 06, 2018, 04:14:33 PM
 #2590


''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work.'' Where is the evidence for this, though?

''We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution.'' It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...

Evolution is a fact, explained by the evolution theory which is a scientific theory. A hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don't change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.

You ask "Where is the evidence for this, though?" But your eyes forget to look at the post directly above the one wherein you ask this question, to find the answer.

That same post presents a smattering of evolutionists talking about how evolution is little more than faith in its theory. Evolution theory exists; that is fact. The other fact is that it is kept alive as a theory by people who want it to be true... not by any fact of the existence of evolution.

Tanner talks about evolution. He bases his points on the idea of evolution that has been shown to be a metaphysical thing rather than a factual thing. There are reasons other than evolution for Tanner's "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact..." The "overarching theories about evolution" are simply that so little evolution fact exists that evolution is a religion for lack of these fact. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg29686165#msg29686165, which is only a smattering of logic expressed by the great thinkers of evolution and science.

Cool

''It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...'' And what does badecker do, post a link of a creationist website, what a surprise eh?



.
.BITVEST DICE.
HAS BEEN RELEASED!


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1046


View Profile
February 06, 2018, 05:04:18 PM
 #2591


''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work.'' Where is the evidence for this, though?

''We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution.'' It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...

Evolution is a fact, explained by the evolution theory which is a scientific theory. A hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don't change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.

You ask "Where is the evidence for this, though?" But your eyes forget to look at the post directly above the one wherein you ask this question, to find the answer.

That same post presents a smattering of evolutionists talking about how evolution is little more than faith in its theory. Evolution theory exists; that is fact. The other fact is that it is kept alive as a theory by people who want it to be true... not by any fact of the existence of evolution.

Tanner talks about evolution. He bases his points on the idea of evolution that has been shown to be a metaphysical thing rather than a factual thing. There are reasons other than evolution for Tanner's "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact..." The "overarching theories about evolution" are simply that so little evolution fact exists that evolution is a religion for lack of these fact. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg29686165#msg29686165, which is only a smattering of logic expressed by the great thinkers of evolution and science.

Cool

''It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...'' And what does badecker do, post a link of a creationist website, what a surprise eh?

Any website can post factual information... even a religious website. However, not all religious websites post factual information.

For example, the religious website that I posted (https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/religion-in-schools/the-religion-of-evolution/) has factual info in it. One of the pieces of factual info in it, is that honest evolutionists know that evolution doesn't really have a leg to stand on.

What does this mean? It means that all the websites and books that promote evolution as fact are religious websites and books. Why? Because they are promoting something (evolution) that doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The hoax of evolution isn't in the theory of evolution, or the talk about supposed evolution findings. The hoax is when the theory and the findings are promoted as fact by evolutionists who know that evolution doesn't have a leg to stand on. For people who believe that evolution is fact, without knowing it from personal observation, study, and thought... these people are religious people regarding evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.
Zandar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 161



View Profile
February 06, 2018, 05:27:56 PM
 #2592

Evolution is indeed the biggest hoax there is. If there was it would still be ongoing and yet every human all over the planet is still the same. The changes in nature aren't evolution, it is adaptation. Most scientific facts turn out to be nonsense when examined closely anyway. They are just theories voted by other scientists to be promoted as facts.
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 558


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
February 07, 2018, 11:47:20 AM
Merited by Vod (2)
 #2593


''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work.'' Where is the evidence for this, though?

''We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution.'' It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...

Evolution is a fact, explained by the evolution theory which is a scientific theory. A hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don't change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.

You ask "Where is the evidence for this, though?" But your eyes forget to look at the post directly above the one wherein you ask this question, to find the answer.

That same post presents a smattering of evolutionists talking about how evolution is little more than faith in its theory. Evolution theory exists; that is fact. The other fact is that it is kept alive as a theory by people who want it to be true... not by any fact of the existence of evolution.

Tanner talks about evolution. He bases his points on the idea of evolution that has been shown to be a metaphysical thing rather than a factual thing. There are reasons other than evolution for Tanner's "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact..." The "overarching theories about evolution" are simply that so little evolution fact exists that evolution is a religion for lack of these fact. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg29686165#msg29686165, which is only a smattering of logic expressed by the great thinkers of evolution and science.

Cool

''It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...'' And what does badecker do, post a link of a creationist website, what a surprise eh?

Any website can post factual information... even a religious website. However, not all religious websites post factual information.

For example, the religious website that I posted (https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/religion-in-schools/the-religion-of-evolution/) has factual info in it. One of the pieces of factual info in it, is that honest evolutionists know that evolution doesn't really have a leg to stand on.

What does this mean? It means that all the websites and books that promote evolution as fact are religious websites and books. Why? Because they are promoting something (evolution) that doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The hoax of evolution isn't in the theory of evolution, or the talk about supposed evolution findings. The hoax is when the theory and the findings are promoted as fact by evolutionists who know that evolution doesn't have a leg to stand on. For people who believe that evolution is fact, without knowing it from personal observation, study, and thought... these people are religious people regarding evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.

Well, let's dissect the information given in your religious link shall we?

1. Michael Ruse acknowledges that evolution is religious.

Surely just because a professor in philosophy and history says he doesn't believe in evolution it doesn't mean that almost all scientists don't believe in it too.

2. But since evolution asks the same questions as religion—telling us where we came from, where we’re going, and what we should do on the way.

Does evolution tell us where we came from? Not really, that's still up to debate, there are various scientific fields trying to explain how we originated but that's not part of evolution.
It also doesn't tell us where we are going, no one knows what's going to happen, I don't really understand this point.
When does evolution tell you what to do along the way exactly? This is just plain stupid.


So to recap, you claim that 95% or more scientists do not believe in evolution yet you failed to provide evidence for it. The only thing you did is post a link of a religious websites that talks about 3-4 people that do not believe in evolution.



.
.BITVEST DICE.
HAS BEEN RELEASED!


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1046


View Profile
February 07, 2018, 07:32:25 PM
 #2594

EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.

Well, let's dissect the information given in your religious link shall we?

1. Michael Ruse acknowledges that evolution is religious.

Surely just because a professor in philosophy and history says he doesn't believe in evolution it doesn't mean that almost all scientists don't believe in it too.

2. But since evolution asks the same questions as religion—telling us where we came from, where we’re going, and what we should do on the way.

Does evolution tell us where we came from? Not really, that's still up to debate, there are various scientific fields trying to explain how we originated but that's not part of evolution.
It also doesn't tell us where we are going, no one knows what's going to happen, I don't really understand this point.
When does evolution tell you what to do along the way exactly? This is just plain stupid.


So to recap, you claim that 95% or more scientists do not believe in evolution yet you failed to provide evidence for it. The only thing you did is post a link of a religious websites that talks about 3-4 people that do not believe in evolution.

Ninety-five percent is way to generous of a number. It is actually so close to 100% that it is almost 100%. The thing that isn't said is that scientists who seem to believe in evolution, don't really. What they believe is that they have found evidence of evolution.

Zandar says it well when he says that they have found evidence of adaptation rather than evolution. If any and all scientists would examine their their so-called evolution in the light of adaptation, they would see that they are only attempting to believe.

If I were to show you and explain to you thousands of websites and books where so-called evolutionists were really only attempting to believe in evolution, but were not really believing it, according to the writings that they provided, you would only downplay the things that I showed you.

You are kinda right in talking religious talk. You are only doing the one thing that you can do... continue to promote evolution in a religious way. What else do you have? Certainly you don't have real evolution science on your side.

I am not going to provide you with more evidence for scientists who believe rather than know. Why not? Because essentially all evolution scientists are believers rather than those who know. Whatever of their writings you look at, you will find that the language they use shows that they are believers rather than knowledgeable "understanderers." It's in the language they use.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 558


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
February 08, 2018, 11:04:11 AM
 #2595

EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.

Well, let's dissect the information given in your religious link shall we?

1. Michael Ruse acknowledges that evolution is religious.

Surely just because a professor in philosophy and history says he doesn't believe in evolution it doesn't mean that almost all scientists don't believe in it too.

2. But since evolution asks the same questions as religion—telling us where we came from, where we’re going, and what we should do on the way.

Does evolution tell us where we came from? Not really, that's still up to debate, there are various scientific fields trying to explain how we originated but that's not part of evolution.
It also doesn't tell us where we are going, no one knows what's going to happen, I don't really understand this point.
When does evolution tell you what to do along the way exactly? This is just plain stupid.


So to recap, you claim that 95% or more scientists do not believe in evolution yet you failed to provide evidence for it. The only thing you did is post a link of a religious websites that talks about 3-4 people that do not believe in evolution.

Ninety-five percent is way to generous of a number. It is actually so close to 100% that it is almost 100%. The thing that isn't said is that scientists who seem to believe in evolution, don't really. What they believe is that they have found evidence of evolution.

Zandar says it well when he says that they have found evidence of adaptation rather than evolution. If any and all scientists would examine their their so-called evolution in the light of adaptation, they would see that they are only attempting to believe.

If I were to show you and explain to you thousands of websites and books where so-called evolutionists were really only attempting to believe in evolution, but were not really believing it, according to the writings that they provided, you would only downplay the things that I showed you.

You are kinda right in talking religious talk. You are only doing the one thing that you can do... continue to promote evolution in a religious way. What else do you have? Certainly you don't have real evolution science on your side.

I am not going to provide you with more evidence for scientists who believe rather than know. Why not? Because essentially all evolution scientists are believers rather than those who know. Whatever of their writings you look at, you will find that the language they use shows that they are believers rather than knowledgeable "understanderers." It's in the language they use.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

You keep saying that and yet you fail to provide any meaningful data to sustain your argument. I also pointed out numerous times that not only scientists say that evolution is a fact, religious people, like you, also accept evolution as fact. In fact more and more every year. Pope Francis and several other popes also accept evolution as a fact and why wouldn't they? It's really hard to keep denying evolution with all the evidence out there. Take a step back and think about that.



.
.BITVEST DICE.
HAS BEEN RELEASED!


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
Rsocks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2018, 11:54:36 AM
 #2596

The theory of evolution is an invention to confuse people's brains
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1046


View Profile
February 08, 2018, 04:01:09 PM
 #2597

EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.

Well, let's dissect the information given in your religious link shall we?

1. Michael Ruse acknowledges that evolution is religious.

Surely just because a professor in philosophy and history says he doesn't believe in evolution it doesn't mean that almost all scientists don't believe in it too.

2. But since evolution asks the same questions as religion—telling us where we came from, where we’re going, and what we should do on the way.

Does evolution tell us where we came from? Not really, that's still up to debate, there are various scientific fields trying to explain how we originated but that's not part of evolution.
It also doesn't tell us where we are going, no one knows what's going to happen, I don't really understand this point.
When does evolution tell you what to do along the way exactly? This is just plain stupid.


So to recap, you claim that 95% or more scientists do not believe in evolution yet you failed to provide evidence for it. The only thing you did is post a link of a religious websites that talks about 3-4 people that do not believe in evolution.

Ninety-five percent is way to generous of a number. It is actually so close to 100% that it is almost 100%. The thing that isn't said is that scientists who seem to believe in evolution, don't really. What they believe is that they have found evidence of evolution.

Zandar says it well when he says that they have found evidence of adaptation rather than evolution. If any and all scientists would examine their their so-called evolution in the light of adaptation, they would see that they are only attempting to believe.

If I were to show you and explain to you thousands of websites and books where so-called evolutionists were really only attempting to believe in evolution, but were not really believing it, according to the writings that they provided, you would only downplay the things that I showed you.

You are kinda right in talking religious talk. You are only doing the one thing that you can do... continue to promote evolution in a religious way. What else do you have? Certainly you don't have real evolution science on your side.

I am not going to provide you with more evidence for scientists who believe rather than know. Why not? Because essentially all evolution scientists are believers rather than those who know. Whatever of their writings you look at, you will find that the language they use shows that they are believers rather than knowledgeable "understanderers." It's in the language they use.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

You keep saying that and yet you fail to provide any meaningful data to sustain your argument. I also pointed out numerous times that not only scientists say that evolution is a fact, religious people, like you, also accept evolution as fact. In fact more and more every year. Pope Francis and several other popes also accept evolution as a fact and why wouldn't they? It's really hard to keep denying evolution with all the evidence out there. Take a step back and think about that.

The goal of Pope Francis and the Church leaders is to rule the world as a nation under their control. They will say anything to achieve this goal.

Since, as Steven Gould said, there is so extremely little SOLID scientific evidence for evolution, and essentially no fact at all, we see that any Church that accepts evolution as fact, is simply a deceptive church.

This is the basis of the fact that evolution is a religion right along with the Pope who supports it. Evolution is part of the religion of the Church.

Wake up and see that you are part of the Church by believing the religion of evolution that the Church supports. And thank you for prompting me to bring the logic of this evolution/Church religion to light, along with the fact that you are a religious person, right in the wording that you used. You said it yourself.

Now that we know that the Church and evolution are not righteous...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 558


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
February 08, 2018, 04:58:08 PM
 #2598

EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.

Well, let's dissect the information given in your religious link shall we?

1. Michael Ruse acknowledges that evolution is religious.

Surely just because a professor in philosophy and history says he doesn't believe in evolution it doesn't mean that almost all scientists don't believe in it too.

2. But since evolution asks the same questions as religion—telling us where we came from, where we’re going, and what we should do on the way.

Does evolution tell us where we came from? Not really, that's still up to debate, there are various scientific fields trying to explain how we originated but that's not part of evolution.
It also doesn't tell us where we are going, no one knows what's going to happen, I don't really understand this point.
When does evolution tell you what to do along the way exactly? This is just plain stupid.


So to recap, you claim that 95% or more scientists do not believe in evolution yet you failed to provide evidence for it. The only thing you did is post a link of a religious websites that talks about 3-4 people that do not believe in evolution.

Ninety-five percent is way to generous of a number. It is actually so close to 100% that it is almost 100%. The thing that isn't said is that scientists who seem to believe in evolution, don't really. What they believe is that they have found evidence of evolution.

Zandar says it well when he says that they have found evidence of adaptation rather than evolution. If any and all scientists would examine their their so-called evolution in the light of adaptation, they would see that they are only attempting to believe.

If I were to show you and explain to you thousands of websites and books where so-called evolutionists were really only attempting to believe in evolution, but were not really believing it, according to the writings that they provided, you would only downplay the things that I showed you.

You are kinda right in talking religious talk. You are only doing the one thing that you can do... continue to promote evolution in a religious way. What else do you have? Certainly you don't have real evolution science on your side.

I am not going to provide you with more evidence for scientists who believe rather than know. Why not? Because essentially all evolution scientists are believers rather than those who know. Whatever of their writings you look at, you will find that the language they use shows that they are believers rather than knowledgeable "understanderers." It's in the language they use.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

You keep saying that and yet you fail to provide any meaningful data to sustain your argument. I also pointed out numerous times that not only scientists say that evolution is a fact, religious people, like you, also accept evolution as fact. In fact more and more every year. Pope Francis and several other popes also accept evolution as a fact and why wouldn't they? It's really hard to keep denying evolution with all the evidence out there. Take a step back and think about that.

The goal of Pope Francis and the Church leaders is to rule the world as a nation under their control. They will say anything to achieve this goal.

Since, as Steven Gould said, there is so extremely little SOLID scientific evidence for evolution, and essentially no fact at all, we see that any Church that accepts evolution as fact, is simply a deceptive church.

This is the basis of the fact that evolution is a religion right along with the Pope who supports it. Evolution is part of the religion of the Church.

Wake up and see that you are part of the Church by believing the religion of evolution that the Church supports. And thank you for prompting me to bring the logic of this evolution/Church religion to light, along with the fact that you are a religious person, right in the wording that you used. You said it yourself.

Now that we know that the Church and evolution are not righteous...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Your whole argument is starting to sound like: everyone is wrong but me. All scientists are wrong but they don't know it, all religious people that also support evolution (the majority) are also wrong, even the pope is wrong.

Some people like badecker think that in science, you have a theory, and once it's proven, it becomes a law because laws are the absolute best. That's not how it works. In science, we collect facts, or observations, we use laws to describe them, and a theory to explain them. You don't promote a theory to a lawby proving it. A theory never becomes a law.
Just because it's called a theory of gravity, doesn't mean that it's just a guess. It's been tested. All our observations are supported by it, as well as its predictions that we've tested. Evolution is the same.
The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is our best explanation for the fact of evolution. It has been tested and scrutinised for over 150 years, and is supported by all the relevant observations.

If you really wanted to research, you would. There are a ton of examples and evidence that supports evolution.

''There is a species of fish currently in the process of becoming two separate species. There are multiple species of fish which have evolved to tolerate short periods on land.

There is a species of mini horse on an island off America's east coast which genetic testing shows evolved from European stock. (From survivors of a ship wreck.)

In the last 10,400 years evolution has produced a mutation in humans called lactase persistence. Some 90% of adult humans continue to produce this enzyme essential to digesting milk sugar.

And then there are genetic throwbacks who exhibit atavistic characteristics not seen in species for thousands or even millions of years. The webbing between human fingers is generally vestigial, but in some people it is pronounced enough that they may opt for surgical reduction. And others have more than the usual compliment of nipples, and even breasts.''



.
.BITVEST DICE.
HAS BEEN RELEASED!


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
leevine77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2018, 05:12:22 PM
 #2599

I guess the theory of evolution pump up to the question where human come from.? The answered is base on what they think it was, in a possible right solution just to prove human came from this line of evolution. No need to argue with this coz the author was silent.
GamingBro
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 251


View Profile
February 08, 2018, 09:30:52 PM
 #2600

I don't think so because evolution of human and evolution of monkey is different stuff and when i'm looking at my self i can see that many years ago people wasn't the same.

Pages: « 1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 [130] 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!