Evolution is a hoax

[IadixDev]

So the answer to the question is no, you haven't studied. Why is it that 100% of people evolution deniers never actually have studied about evolution lol

Yes ok you are right, you know everything, I didn't study anything, go play with your molecules in your lab, and make blanket statement out of the blue like it looks smart and scientific.

Im not even evolution deniers,  that's just how much you know about everything, and how much you study things before making statements.

But maybe you can point where I denied evolution. Or maybe your just a drones full of a priori on everything with zero capacity of analysis

[1714007826]

1714007826

[1714007826]

1714007826

[1714007826]

1714007826

[1714007826]

1714007826

[1714007826]

1714007826

[IadixDev]

it is not. It's a collection of facts from several different sciences...

Collection of facts is not science.


Science is not a collection of facts; it is a process of discovery. Robert Zubrin



The Scientist must set in order. Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house.

Henri point carré.



You dont even know what science is lol

[BADecker]

Here is some LOGIC for you ..

You know because of SCIENCE a man like being never went ZAP and everything was so..

Here is some logic for you ...

A non-man-like being SPOKE the universe into being.

But in YOUR manual it's says god is in the image of man?..

So according to your MANUAL you are a blasphemer..
Well your going to hell ..

No i never said your manual does ..

You are about as dense as they come. Don't you realize, yet, that man lost the image of God when man sinned? Wake up and see that you are talking from stupidity and lack of knowledge.

[BADecker]

What it shows is that is wrong. If they knew the real one, why not use that instead of using a simple example that is flawed?

No. What it shows is that you are afraid of saying anything that makes sense.

What what?
What it?
What showing?
Which that?
What is the wrongness?

They who?
which real what?
What that?
Which simple example of what?
What flaw?

You seem to be moving towards mindlessness.

http://www.icr.org/article/mathematical-impossibility-evolution/ This link is the argument against evolution.

This is the response: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/n832l/the_mathematical_impossibility_of_evolution_can/

I think it's pretty simple to understand that the calculated probability is simply wrong since it doesn't take in count many important factors and it's just assuming things.

It's kinda like taking a look at nature, and assuming there is any evolution at all. Since evolution has never been seen happening, and anything that somebody says is evolution can be shown to be other things instead, all of evolution is a make-believe story.

Now, if this were the only point against evolution, the odds that evolution was false would be astronomical. But add to it things like
- the probability against the parts coming together,
- Irreducible Complexity,
- the fact that nature must have been smarter than scientists to be able to do what scientists can't,
- machinery design of nature that points to an Intelligent Designer,
- cause and effect programming,
- entropy that shows that things devolve rather than evolve,
- the fact that in the few cases where nature makes complex chemicals that it destroys them almost immediately,
- and many other things that you can find when you Google search for them...
shows that the entire probability against evolution is way beyond what science considers necessary for there to even be a chance that evolution happened.

Evolution isn't just a hoax. It is a grand hoax.

- the probability against the parts coming together, (Which is what? What parts?) - Any and all the parts of anything that is considered to make up so-called evolution.
- Irreducible Complexity, (Which is debunked, you can google it for yourself) - The debunking is simply talk-arounds, thereby debunking itself, and showing that evolution is not real.
- the fact that nature must have been smarter than scientists to be able to do what scientists can't, (How is that a fact? Does nature have to be smarter than a scientist to create mountains?) - Yes. Mountains don't appear all over the place. But the DO exist. So, let a scientist make one. Or let someone show us the process whereby they were made. Nature must be way smarter to make something that scientists cannot... especially mountains and planets and stars and you-name-it... and so smart that science is only guessing about how all those things might have formed.
- machinery design of nature that points to an Intelligent Designer, (I don't know what that means) - Of course you don't. You can't seem to see the machines in nature all around us. The simple lever that we use is being used by nature all over the place, both macro, and micro.
- cause and effect programming, (?) - Science could not break the laws of physics and nature even in the hydrogen bomb. All they did was put together some cause and effect actions that they were caused to do by some other cause and effect... exactly as the cause and effect had them do it... according to the physics and laws of nature. Everything is programmed to exist and act the way it does by cause and effect. Our goal should be to find out what programmed the cause and effect process, and to find out if that programmer ever travels through time, back to the beginning, to remake it a little here and there.
- entropy that shows that things devolve rather than evolve, (You do not understand entropy, stop mentioning it xd) - Basically, entropy is the changing of complexity into simplicity without the loss or gain of any of the components of either. Entropy is universal on Earth. The few things we can see off-planet show us that it is universal out there as well.
- the fact that in the few cases where nature makes complex chemicals that it destroys them almost immediately, (Such as?) - My mistake. Nature doesn't make complex chemicals. No evolution.
- and many other things that you can find when you Google search for them... (Everything you said can be googled and you can find rebuttals to everything lol) - The rebuttals are not rebuttals. They are talk, backwards talk showing things that do not happen in nature, talk-arounds, non-proven talk, etc. The so-called rebuttals are part of the science that shows evolution to be impossible. They are part of the evolution hoax, because they are not rebuttals at all.
shows that the entire probability against evolution is way beyond what science considers necessary for there to even be a chance that evolution happened.

Evolution is a big, fat hoax. At best, it is a religion.

Your arguments are not arguments, they are talk, backwards talk showing that they are false. Your arguments are simply talk-arounds therefore debunking themselves and showing that evolution is real

If this is what you truly think, pick a point, and explain what is wrong with it. Using the words of other people to do this shows you do not personally, really know.

If that is what you think, pick a rebuttal and explain what is wrong with it using your own words and not other creationists who just use the same flawed arguments.

There you go. Copying what I say. 'Cause you can't do it yourself.

[Come on!]

Maybe or maybe not. There still lots of unanswered questions in order to convince myself whether this theory is a hoax or not. For example, If evolution is true, why there is no evolution of monkey to human from time to time? It should be still happening up until now right?

[messibesiy]

people just popped on the Earth surface sent by some mythological creature? i think no.

[Baconoid_]

We really haven't found any missing links.

[Lamzn6]

 Dawkins says in favor of evolution is provably false.

[justyeah]

there's no evidence.

[madman_sage]

i dont believe that we came from monkeys.

[bettie66]

I believe in evolution..

[messibesiy]

evolution is a proven fact for us humans,

[Baconoid_]

the scientific proof that evolution is not real lies basically in the fact that thinking scientists call it a theory rather than a law.

[Lamzn6]

I believe in evolution.. its science

[justyeah]

Evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution is what explains the fact

[madman_sage]

it is a theory. Do you have any evidence to support your opinion that evolution is a hoax?

[bettie66]

Intelligent Design is real,  not Evolution

[BADecker]

evolution is a proven fact for us humans,

Every proven thing that has been applied to the evolution idea, can be applied to other ideas that show it is not evolution.

[BADecker]

Evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution is what explains the fact

The holes in evolution theory are being closed. IF the things of evolution theory happened to be all that existed, evolution would be a fact.

The fact is, however, that there are many things in reality that don't fit the evolution theory. So, in reality evolution is not fact.

[BADecker]

it is a theory. Do you have any evidence to support your opinion that evolution is a hoax?

The fact that evolution is a theory is the basic proof that it is a hoax. If it were a fact, it would not be a theory.