Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 08:50:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Memory won't underclock with clocktweak on my "6970"  (Read 1679 times)
slaithe (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 19, 2011, 07:21:09 AM
 #1

I can't reply to the relevant thread because of my newbie restrictions, so here's hoping this reaches the right eyes.

I've flashed my reference Sapphire 6950 2GB to 6970.

ClockTweak thread
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9982.msg143526#msg143526

My command line:
clocktweak -a0 -c900 -m300 -y
While GPU-Z (Graphis Card tab) and the -r show the Memclock at 300, GPU-Z (Sensors tab) and CCC show the Memclock at the default 1375.

I first noticed the problem when setting Memclock with clocktweak seemed to have no impact at all, while small differences were noticed with Coreclock adjustments.

Suggestions?  If I modify the BIOS and flash to 900MHz/300MHz settings, can I use CCC or clocktweak to switch between 880/1375 and 900/300, easily?  This is a brand new card and I do plan on gaming with it, too.  So I'd like to easily switch between mining and gaming without having to reflash/reboot every time.

EDIT: Catalyst driver version is 11.6 (11-6_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe).

1714035014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035014
Reply with quote  #2

1714035014
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714035014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035014
Reply with quote  #2

1714035014
Report to moderator
1714035014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035014
Reply with quote  #2

1714035014
Report to moderator
1714035014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714035014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714035014
Reply with quote  #2

1714035014
Report to moderator
fascistmuffin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 19, 2011, 07:26:22 AM
 #2

I know that MSI Afterburner, after unlocking it via cfg files, you can under/over clock to flashed settings. It also has 5 profiles you can save to. Might be an easier program to use rather than using cmd.
slaithe (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 19, 2011, 07:57:29 AM
Last edit: June 19, 2011, 08:12:08 AM by slaithe
 #3

Thanks.
Nice GUI app, but the lower Memclock limit is 1035. :/  I followed this post's directions to add the "EnableUnofficialOverclocking = 1" line, but it was a no go and I still can't go below 1035.  Did I miss something?

http://www.overclock.net/8592866-post2.html

EDIT: I was using v1.10.  Now using v2.1 and can go down to 685, but no further. :/
slaithe (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2011, 08:06:04 AM
 #4

Sorry to double post, but I thought my discovery of resolution warranted the bump since no one else in the newbie section has provided this info.

ATI Tray Tools worked!  I was able to set my clocks to 900/300 on my "6970" changed my command line for my phoenix miner using some of the info on the following wiki page.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison

So, I've gone from about 290Mh/s to 379Mh/s. Smiley  Nice big tweak! after a little more tweaking and a case upgrade to accommodate more airflow, maybe I'll hit around 400Mh/s.  I haven't even messed with voltages, yet.
epg
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 63
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 20, 2011, 08:31:11 AM
 #5

@slaithe: Thanks for the update when you found a resolution. I've just recently unlocked the shaders on my 6950 2gb (getting ~355mh/s @ 840gpu/1250mem), but I'm weary of flashing straight up to the 6970 bios because I read some other people mentioning the different voltages between the 6950/6970. I'll look into doing something similar after I do more research into it.
Solution
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2011, 08:42:50 AM
 #6

Whoa
slaithe (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2011, 08:43:47 AM
 #7

@slaithe: Thanks for the update when you found a resolution. I've just recently unlocked the shaders on my 6950 2gb (getting ~355mh/s @ 840gpu/1250mem), but I'm weary of flashing straight up to the 6970 bios because I read some other people mentioning the different voltages between the 6950/6970. I'll look into doing something similar after I do more research into it.

Unlocked just the shaders?  You find a BIOS for that or did you have to modify your own?
From what I understand, the original reference 6950s were just locked down 6970s, hence the term "unlock."

I haven't had any other difficulties with my "6970" now other than heat considerations since I kept my GTX 285 in so I can do Hybrid PhysX.  In addition, and this is an issue with AMD's drivers, I can't watch accelerated vids or game while the 6970 is mining, even if I'm using CUDA off the GTX 285 to accel the vid via CoreAVC.  As hackneyed as it is, I have to switch over my DVI cable to my GTX 285 and then everything is fine, as long as I don't have to restart the miner.  That requires I switch the DVI back, unless I just need to learn something else.  I'm not new to cmd by any means, but the switches/parameters change whenever I move the DVI cable from gpu to gpu.

All in all, I'm happy with my purchase of this Sapphire 6950.  I'm a gamer, so bitcoin is more of a side hobby, for now.  As it is, the GTX 285 runs most of my games to my liking so I can still game while mining and take mining offline when I want to play something more demanding or better detail (more AA, DX11, etc.)

EDIT: And this all probably means I'll be seeking a refund on the 0.2 BTC I spent to get clocktweak. Wink
EDIT2: Another explanation I've read is the 6970s may have also been locked down to 6950s b/c they were too power hungry/wasteful when clocked up to 6970 speed.  No matter for me. I have 1000 watt PSU.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!