I would like to comment on this service and the OP. Several days ago the OP received a negative feedback "
Use caution. Look for alternatives. Caveat Emptor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick" from DannyHamilton based solely on his personal opinion that this service
might not be totally "ok" or that the OP
might be just fishing for reputation in order to have it easier to scam in the future. OP then started a
topic questioning this and DannyHamilton explained himself there: "
Personally, since there are so many people that lack knowledge about bitcoin, I think ALL accounts at bitcoin talk should carry the same warning that I put on yours. They don't, and I don't have the time or motivation to comment on EVERY new account as it is created.". Well, I think this doesn't need any further comment as DannyHamilton's shocking attitude is very clear. But then some other users came with their own accusations against OP and again solely based on their personal opinions with no proof at all. Since the OP eventually locked that topic I cannot comment there so I am posting my comment here.
I don't know the OP, never used his service and never will (need to because I always use very high fees). I don't know how he does it and whether everything he says about it is true. It is true that he didn't explain in detail how exactly he does what he does but he is also correct in saying that he doesn't have to explain himself, after all his "know-how" is what he is selling.
But what strikes me so much about all this is that beside DannyHamilton several other people had the audacity to accuse the OP of
sneaking these transactions into various mining pools in a "not ok" way but none of them actually provided any proof whatsoever supporting their accusations, it was always just their personal opinion backed by absolutely nothing. Yet it would be so simple to actually contact given pool and ask:
"Hey Antpool, how is it possible that you included transaction XYZ with such a low fee? We have a suspicion here that there is a person who somehow hacked into your system and sneaked this transaction in without your consent. Can you shed some light on this, please?".
It would be so simple to ask that and yet not a single one of all those accusers actually bothered to do that. What does that tell me? It doesn't say whether the OP and his service is legit or not but it does say a lot about character of all those people accusing the OP. I will never deal with the OP simply because I won't need to but I sure as hell will
never want to deal with any of those accusers because they
behave in an untrustworthy and unreliable manner (which is by the way an exact wording of another of DannyHamilton's fictitious negative feedbacks, this time against a user whose only "crime" was saying out loud the truth).
