Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 06:37:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: BFL's site is incredibly amateur...  (Read 2841 times)
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
May 12, 2013, 05:25:59 PM
 #21

Quote
I agree, it's the responsibility of the designer/programmer.  I am displeased with this and will be investigating it going forward.  Sometimes it feels like I have to do everything myself.

The guy claims to do everything, but denies being the Project Manager, even though BFL doesn't officially have one, with him being the COO taking up that role.

I fed your chicken, Jody.
Sonny, I let the gardener go home early, therefore I'll finish planting the flowers.
I'll get that pallet, Dave.
This is the way we mop the floors, mop the floors, mop the floors...
"Cocksucker!" I love answering the emails.
"Any questions, folks, before we end the daily tour at BFL?"
"Acme Components? Yes, we would like to double our order. Make that 40 resisters, 10 power packs..."
So many anniversaries this month, luckily they have me in charge of the party supplies.
"Therefore, Bob, if you cancel your order, you'll lose your place in the queue. Do you really want to cancel, for we is about to ship. Honest Abe! Fine, and for not canceling we're sending you a 10% off coupon to offset the next price increase." Click! "Fuckin' cocksucker!"
Note to self: Make sure there's no known anomalies on the website today.
"One, two, three, four, five... I love counting fans in the warehouse."
Shoutbox: I confirm that bet.
Twitter: I AND BFL confirm our bets.
BT: It's a bet.
BFL Forum: That is why we bet...
Bum on the street: Sorry, bud. I gave my last real money at CES to some dude with a camera.
All my bags are pack, and I'm on the road again, (different song-->) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cfc3rCQOuU
1713551837
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713551837

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713551837
Reply with quote  #2

1713551837
Report to moderator
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713551837
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713551837

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713551837
Reply with quote  #2

1713551837
Report to moderator
1713551837
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713551837

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713551837
Reply with quote  #2

1713551837
Report to moderator
1713551837
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713551837

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713551837
Reply with quote  #2

1713551837
Report to moderator
sgbett
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1087



View Profile
May 15, 2013, 01:12:27 PM
 #22

sense disagree with mope-pr. ALERT! seek clarification?

are you saying its good practice to out people's security vulnerabilities without contacting them first?

I can appreciate the theoretical outlook you're coming from. Here's what happens when you try to contact idiots first: http://www.google.com/search?q=bitdaytrade+reddit

Look through the posts there, you have actually competent people trying to talk the guy into safety and some strutting imbecile puffing a lot of smoke about the imaginary experts he's hired, the imaginary expertise he has and on and on.

Thus I can certainly appreciate the practical outlook of warning the community first. I guess in the end it all comes down to a judgement call. Did the OP think the failed site is administered by sane people likely to take appropiate measures in a timely and effective manner, or did the OP think the failed site is a scam run by patent liars (Vleisides, Zerlan etc)?

Yes I certainly agree its a tough call between protecting the innocent, and tarring and feathering incompetent admins into taking action.

I think the way that guy did it was better, "you register, ill show you I can get your pw hash" a good mix of publicly outing them, without actually posting the vulnerability itself letter by letter.

(also sorry for MPOE typo on my previous post... autocorrect :/  )

Maybe my opinion is coloured by me having an outstanding order with BFL, but I'm still giving them the benefit of the doubt, in that I understand what they are doing is hard. Maybe that makes me a sucker, time will tell, and if I do lose that money well that will be another one to chalk up to experience. I'm not so naive as to think that every btc 'investment' I make is gonna pay out. Anyway I think thats a different subject!

Me I'd have contacted them at first, and *then* when they didn't do anything start escalating.

"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" - Satoshi Nakamoto
*my posts are not investment advice*
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!