1080Ti Specific - Best mining option

[Alba]

Anyone have any clocking suggestions for Skein and Skunk?

Doing 110% power limit, 85C limit, + 50 Core, -50 Mem

Giving me 1.03-1.05Gh/s on Skein and 54-57Mh/s on Skunk per card (Running 8x 1080ti EVGA FTW3)

Also, using sniffdog + Hashrefinery.. Is it normal that rejection rates can go up to 20% ??

Would it be more profitable running Zcash Mining instead if I can do 780 Sol per card? Anyone have good clock settings for that?

Cheers everyone, Thanks in advance

Try +160 core -1000 mem (-1000 usually if you want to save watts) let me know

try another pool and so you know if rejects are from hashrefinery or from all pool

MPH was a bit of a process so bailed on that - Zpool trying now, reject % is extremely low which is good but it seems to be reading a much less hashrate on their website link for my miner (2-3 GH/s but fluctuates to 6-7GH/s even though CCminer doing 8.3GH/s)

http://zpool.ca/?address=1LoZQEpppUi66JMyhi92xzV3Kvk9C9GizL

Not sure if I should go back to Hash and just leave it be

[1713921830]

1713921830

[1713921830]

1713921830

[timeshifter]

Would it be more profitable running Zcash Mining instead if I can do 780 Sol per card? Anyone have good clock settings for that?

Can you do 780 sols on Zcash?  If so, how?  Best I can get is about 750.

[lexele]

Anyone have any clocking suggestions for Skein and Skunk?

Doing 110% power limit, 85C limit, + 50 Core, -50 Mem

Giving me 1.03-1.05Gh/s on Skein and 54-57Mh/s on Skunk per card (Running 8x 1080ti EVGA FTW3)

Also, using sniffdog + Hashrefinery.. Is it normal that rejection rates can go up to 20% ??

Would it be more profitable running Zcash Mining instead if I can do 780 Sol per card? Anyone have good clock settings for that?

Cheers everyone, Thanks in advance

For better efficiency use 70 to 80 power limit unless you have free power.
I go +150 core -1000 mem on skein, +100 core -1000 mem on skunk.

[helloeverybody]

Anyone have any clocking suggestions for Skein and Skunk?

Doing 110% power limit, 85C limit, + 50 Core, -50 Mem

Giving me 1.03-1.05Gh/s on Skein and 54-57Mh/s on Skunk per card (Running 8x 1080ti EVGA FTW3)

Also, using sniffdog + Hashrefinery.. Is it normal that rejection rates can go up to 20% ??

Would it be more profitable running Zcash Mining instead if I can do 780 Sol per card? Anyone have good clock settings for that?

Cheers everyone, Thanks in advance

For better efficiency use 70 to 80 power limit unless you have free power.
I go +150 core -1000 mem on skein, +100 core -1000 mem on skunk.

What are you guys using to underclock your memory? Ive been using afterburner but the lowest i can put it is -502. It runs ok at that but maybe theres more to be saved by dropping it a bit further. For some reason everyone else seems to hash slightly higher than me too. At 110 power limit +150 and -502 all i can get is 920h/s . But im running at around 240w which is too high.

[swogerino]

I am not an expert so I don't know Skenk or the other coins who are being discussed here but as far as I know Zcash is a Nvidia friendly coin and 1080ti being the best card of Nvidia so far out I think mining Zcash can be one of the best options.

[ibinsad]

Anyone have any clocking suggestions for Skein and Skunk?

Doing 110% power limit, 85C limit, + 50 Core, -50 Mem

Giving me 1.03-1.05Gh/s on Skein and 54-57Mh/s on Skunk per card (Running 8x 1080ti EVGA FTW3)

Also, using sniffdog + Hashrefinery.. Is it normal that rejection rates can go up to 20% ??

Would it be more profitable running Zcash Mining instead if I can do 780 Sol per card? Anyone have good clock settings for that?

Cheers everyone, Thanks in advance

For better efficiency use 70 to 80 power limit unless you have free power.
I go +150 core -1000 mem on skein, +100 core -1000 mem on skunk.

What are you guys using to underclock your memory? Ive been using afterburner but the lowest i can put it is -502. It runs ok at that but maybe theres more to be saved by dropping it a bit further. For some reason everyone else seems to hash slightly higher than me too. At 110 power limit +150 and -502 all i can get is 920h/s . But im running at around 240w which is too high.

I use nvidia inspector

[allcryptominer]

What are you guys using to underclock your memory? Ive been using afterburner but the lowest i can put it is -502. It runs ok at that but maybe theres more to be saved by dropping it a bit further. For some reason everyone else seems to hash slightly higher than me too. At 110 power limit +150 and -502 all i can get is 920h/s . But im running at around 240w which is too high.

What miner are you using? My cards are doing 970 with 75% tdp, +120core and ´-502 mem using ccminer 1.1 palginmod.

[helloeverybody]

What are you guys using to underclock your memory? Ive been using afterburner but the lowest i can put it is -502. It runs ok at that but maybe theres more to be saved by dropping it a bit further. For some reason everyone else seems to hash slightly higher than me too. At 110 power limit +150 and -502 all i can get is 920h/s . But im running at around 240w which is too high.

What miner are you using? My cards are doing 970 with 75% tdp, +120core and ´-502 mem using ccminer 1.1 palginmod.

Im using ccminer alexis78. I was under the impression it was the best. When i cut it back to the same clocks as you have with this miner it only gives me 865h/s. Do you think i just have a slow/duff 1080 or would changing to a different miner or different drivers help up my hashrate a bit?

thanks

[bignevola]

After Signatum halving Im switching to LBRY mining, and hold mined signatums 

[hyet24]

I'm still mining SIGT till the end for POS

[swaneon]

so is sp8 a good idea if you undervolt your cards?

[killerelite]

So sigt halved with no apparant increase in value , This is Sad

[allcryptominer]

Im using ccminer alexis78. I was under the impression it was the best. When i cut it back to the same clocks as you have with this miner it only gives me 865h/s. Do you think i just have a slow/duff 1080 or would changing to a different miner or different drivers help up my hashrate a bit?

thanks

Try change miner and see if any difference.

Seems odd if it could differ that much from diffrent brands of 1080ti cards. Unless its the FE versiom you using?

[pikatju]

So sigt halved with no apparant increase in value , This is Sad

Best to keep mining. This will keep the difficulty and community up. Don't lose hope this coin will become great!

[dbc23]

So... what is currently the most efficient non-paid (sp) skunk miner?  I'm seeing about 51mh on cc 2.2, palgin is still around 47 from what I see.

[easyrimka]

So... what is currently the most efficient non-paid (sp) skunk miner?  I'm seeing about 51mh on cc 2.2, palgin is still around 47 from what I see.

im using alexis at 53 mh/s

[jareso]

So... what is currently the most efficient non-paid (sp) skunk miner?  I'm seeing about 51mh on cc 2.2, palgin is still around 47 from what I see.

im using alexis at 53 mh/s

If you are mining on Windows 64-bit version best free skunk miner is tpruvot's ccminer 2.2, 32-bit, x86 version.
It is about 5% faster than x64 – that's deference of about 3MH/s, just by running/compiling x86!

Also more hashes can be achieved fine-tuning miner intensity to decimal numbers, until you reach best results for your setup.
Try it, go by really really small decimal steps for intensity, it can make some pretty BIG differences.

I found out that for me intensity of 21.0956 makes difference of about 1-2MH/s more per every single 1080 Ti compared to default skunk intensity of 21!
But when I set intensity to higher than that, my skunk hashing speeds just go slightly down from there.
Simply for me intensity of 21.0956 is the best possible maximum for skunk algorithm.

I mean intensity of 21.0956 mining skunk in tpruvot's ccminer 2.2, 32-bit, x86 version gives me about 59MH/s, sometimes it jumps even little bit over 60MH/s per 1080 Ti card in contrast to plain default intensity of 21 which gives just about 2MH/s less with the same OC settings. I described my OC settings some posts ago.
Skunk hashes on my Aorus 1080 Ti Xtremes faster with overclocking/underclocking at core +120 (1841MHz) and memory -2000 (9010MHz) with power limit at 85%.

Also compiling tpruvot's ccminer 2.2 with CUDA 9 gives a little bit better performance.

[pikatju]

So... what is currently the most efficient non-paid (sp) skunk miner?  I'm seeing about 51mh on cc 2.2, palgin is still around 47 from what I see.

I think CWI is still the best! Check out the thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2054431.0

[Alba]

What are you guys using to underclock your memory? Ive been using afterburner but the lowest i can put it is -502. It runs ok at that but maybe theres more to be saved by dropping it a bit further. For some reason everyone else seems to hash slightly higher than me too. At 110 power limit +150 and -502 all i can get is 920h/s . But im running at around 240w which is too high.

What miner are you using? My cards are doing 970 with 75% tdp, +120core and ´-502 mem using ccminer 1.1 palginmod.

For Skein I use CCminer Alexis which is found in Sniffdog download file, search user fromage in this forum and click his signature link, his work is specific to optimization of the 1080ti

Hope that helps

[Alba]

So... what is currently the most efficient non-paid (sp) skunk miner?  I'm seeing about 51mh on cc 2.2, palgin is still around 47 from what I see.

im using alexis at 53 mh/s

If you are mining on Windows 64-bit version best free skunk miner is tpruvot's ccminer 2.2, 32-bit, x86 version.
It is about 5% faster than x64 – that's deference of about 3MH/s, just by running/compiling x86!

Also more hashes can be achieved fine-tuning miner intensity to decimal numbers, until you reach best results for your setup.
Try it, go by really really small decimal steps for intensity, it can make some pretty BIG differences.

I found out that for me intensity of 21.0956 makes difference of about 1-2MH/s more per every single 1080 Ti compared to default skunk intensity of 21!
But when I set intensity to higher than that, my skunk hashing speeds just go slightly down from there – simply for me intensity of 21.0956 is the best possible maximum for skunk algorithm.

I mean intensity of 21.0956 mining skunk in tpruvot's ccminer 2.2, 32-bit, x86 version gives me about 59MH/s, sometimes it jumps even little bit over 60MH/s per 1080 Ti card in contrast to plain default intensity of 21 which gives just about 2MH/s less with the same OC settings. I described my OC settings some posts ago. Skunk hashes on my Aorus 1080 Ti Xtremes faster with overclocking/underclocking at core +120 (1841MHz) and memory -2000 (9010MHz) with power limit at 85%.

Also compiling tpruvot's ccminer 2.2 with CUDA 9 gives a little bit better performance.

Any Recommendations for Intensity on Skein algo on Hashrefinery, using CCminer Alexis and default intensity is 27.. Would any different number improve it?

Heres my stats; sometimes I get 5-7% rejections, changed difficulty from 0.8 to 4 based on recommendation of hashrefinery owner and rejections went down from 25% to around 5-7%

http://pool.hashrefinery.com/?address=1LoZQEpppUi66JMyhi92xzV3Kvk9C9GizL