romeshomey
|
|
October 06, 2017, 04:57:40 PM |
|
Also keep in mind that Bittex bases factors some of their delisting decisions on cost to maintain a currency and also how much time they spend doing tech support for users of a currency.
|
|
|
|
kacakkipri
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:15:31 PM |
|
Does anyone know the exact reason for Bittrex's deleting the BitShares project? S system that is essentially a rival to Bittrex is a decentralized stock exchange. Maybe that's why. it may be because there have been a lot of decentralized exchange projects in the recent period.
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 06, 2017, 06:55:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Hardniola
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 06, 2017, 07:04:26 PM |
|
How possible to trade on bts from mobile
|
|
|
|
|
molecularman
|
|
October 06, 2017, 09:20:39 PM |
|
I have to wonder if Bittrex will reverse course and either cancel the delist, or relist it in short time. Seems like they are just throwing money away.
|
Your signature here
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 06, 2017, 09:26:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
October 07, 2017, 07:50:08 AM |
|
Please take a look at this and tell me what you think. While I'm certainly not going to jump on anyone for positive feedback, what I'm most interested in hearing (with appropriate reasoning of course) are the reasons why I'm wrong, what I'm overlooking, why it's been tried and failed already (if that be the case), or even just to let me know that I've been asleep and that it's already being done. Many thanks in advance! https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cryptographic/what-bitshares-should-be-doingI like it and think it makes a lot of sense. In the stock markets they have activist investors that hold large chunks of the stock and use that as leverage to get the company directors to change direction/strategy. I could see something like this happening with crypto world and BTS specifically. They are suffering from a severe lack of recognition and need to get their name out in some marketing campaigns. I'm not sure if marketing could help here. If product is strong people will eventually come and support technology. Bitshares is veteran crypto and it is going down most of the time. Now delisted from Bittrex. What is next? You're right if you're referring to the Bittrex issue (and gimmick marketing too, as I mention in the post), but from a long term informative/educational point of view? For example, instead of so much effort directed at the relatively marginal Hero campaign, wouldn't a branding campaign highlighting key competitive advantages be more effective?
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 07, 2017, 08:28:30 AM |
|
Please take a look at this and tell me what you think. While I'm certainly not going to jump on anyone for positive feedback, what I'm most interested in hearing (with appropriate reasoning of course) are the reasons why I'm wrong, what I'm overlooking, why it's been tried and failed already (if that be the case), or even just to let me know that I've been asleep and that it's already being done. Many thanks in advance! https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cryptographic/what-bitshares-should-be-doingI like it and think it makes a lot of sense. In the stock markets they have activist investors that hold large chunks of the stock and use that as leverage to get the company directors to change direction/strategy. I could see something like this happening with crypto world and BTS specifically. They are suffering from a severe lack of recognition and need to get their name out in some marketing campaigns. I'm not sure if marketing could help here. If product is strong people will eventually come and support technology. Bitshares is veteran crypto and it is going down most of the time. Now delisted from Bittrex. What is next? You're right if you're referring to the Bittrex issue (and gimmick marketing too, as I mention in the post), but from a long term informative/educational point of view? For example, instead of so much effort directed at the relatively marginal Hero campaign, wouldn't a branding campaign highlighting key competitive advantages be more effective? HERO is run by a private project, the DAC does not pay for it.
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
October 07, 2017, 09:00:37 AM |
|
Please take a look at this and tell me what you think. While I'm certainly not going to jump on anyone for positive feedback, what I'm most interested in hearing (with appropriate reasoning of course) are the reasons why I'm wrong, what I'm overlooking, why it's been tried and failed already (if that be the case), or even just to let me know that I've been asleep and that it's already being done. Many thanks in advance! https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cryptographic/what-bitshares-should-be-doingI like it and think it makes a lot of sense. In the stock markets they have activist investors that hold large chunks of the stock and use that as leverage to get the company directors to change direction/strategy. I could see something like this happening with crypto world and BTS specifically. They are suffering from a severe lack of recognition and need to get their name out in some marketing campaigns. I'm not sure if marketing could help here. If product is strong people will eventually come and support technology. Bitshares is veteran crypto and it is going down most of the time. Now delisted from Bittrex. What is next? You're right if you're referring to the Bittrex issue (and gimmick marketing too, as I mention in the post), but from a long term informative/educational point of view? For example, instead of so much effort directed at the relatively marginal Hero campaign, wouldn't a branding campaign highlighting key competitive advantages be more effective? HERO is run by a private project, the DAC does not pay for it. I knew I could get you to chime in sooner or later. Sorry about the confusion, what with Stan being the the Godfather of the Hero too, it looks like I didn't catch that subtle fact. Is BTC-U also a private project? https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@stan/bitcoin-united-btc-u-offers-3-second-confirmations-and-massive-throughputWhat's your opinion regarding a branding effort to help investors clearly distinguish between entities, products, and functions so they can more easily focus on what satisfies their specific needs instead of being turned off by a confusing mishmash that looks like a poorly thought out and somewhat gimmicky marketing attempt? Any thoughts on keeping it simple and to the point with the key reasons why someone who wants to use an exchange would be best served using BitShares?
|
|
|
|
earthcoin
|
|
October 07, 2017, 09:02:42 AM |
|
Who else can't wait to see the first decentralized exchange built on EOS? Bitshares has some amazing tech specs, 180,000 tx per second maximum, over 1 million transactions per day, but w/e will be getting built on EOS will be even better.
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 07, 2017, 03:04:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
scaryvirus (OP)
|
|
October 07, 2017, 04:00:24 PM |
|
Who else can't wait to see the first decentralized exchange built on EOS? Bitshares has some amazing tech specs, 180,000 tx per second maximum, over 1 million transactions per day, but w/e will be getting built on EOS will be even better.
Not necessarily. It's not clear you want bandwidth limits on your trading speed. Additionally, the code for improved dpos is not out yet. There's no reason to not update if it makes sense. Finally, EOS is built around sidechains and there have been hints about combined efforts. For example, one of the recent bugs was fixed in part by Dan Larimer.
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
October 07, 2017, 07:32:03 PM |
|
Please take a look at this and tell me what you think. While I'm certainly not going to jump on anyone for positive feedback, what I'm most interested in hearing (with appropriate reasoning of course) are the reasons why I'm wrong, what I'm overlooking, why it's been tried and failed already (if that be the case), or even just to let me know that I've been asleep and that it's already being done. Many thanks in advance! https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cryptographic/what-bitshares-should-be-doingI like it and think it makes a lot of sense. In the stock markets they have activist investors that hold large chunks of the stock and use that as leverage to get the company directors to change direction/strategy. I could see something like this happening with crypto world and BTS specifically. They are suffering from a severe lack of recognition and need to get their name out in some marketing campaigns. I'm not sure if marketing could help here. If product is strong people will eventually come and support technology. Bitshares is veteran crypto and it is going down most of the time. Now delisted from Bittrex. What is next? You're right if you're referring to the Bittrex issue (and gimmick marketing too, as I mention in the post), but from a long term informative/educational point of view? For example, instead of so much effort directed at the relatively marginal Hero campaign, wouldn't a branding campaign highlighting key competitive advantages be more effective? HERO is run by a private project, the DAC does not pay for it. I knew I could get you to chime in sooner or later. Sorry about the confusion, what with Stan being the the Godfather of the Hero too, it looks like I didn't catch that subtle fact. Is BTC-U also a private project? https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@stan/bitcoin-united-btc-u-offers-3-second-confirmations-and-massive-throughputWhat's your opinion regarding a branding effort to help investors clearly distinguish between entities, products, and functions so they can more easily focus on what satisfies their specific needs instead of being turned off by a confusing mishmash that looks like a poorly thought out and somewhat gimmicky marketing attempt? Any thoughts on keeping it simple and to the point with the key reasons why someone who wants to use an exchange would be best served using BitShares? Am I thinking too outside the box?
|
|
|
|
KRAUSS
|
|
October 07, 2017, 09:38:56 PM |
|
Suggest please Bitshares Wallet. Need to move tokens from Bittrex ((
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
October 07, 2017, 09:48:49 PM |
|
Suggest please Bitshares Wallet. Need to move tokens from Bittrex ((
https://bitshares.org/download/
|
|
|
|
beatecoin
|
|
October 07, 2017, 10:42:40 PM |
|
I am trying to do exchange process through bitshares as long as it is possible. They have very good website and very fast transfering systems. For me, the present value is far below the deserved value. it needs to have a much higher value.
|
|
|
|
|
HasherMe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
October 08, 2017, 06:30:28 PM |
|
Bitshares was the first DEX and I don't think there are any others. Bitshares was delisted by Bittrex because it competes with centralized model. I would buy at the current prices. In the end, the centralized exchanges will be obsolete.
|
|
|
|
beatecoin
|
|
October 08, 2017, 06:50:32 PM |
|
Many projects are investing because they will produce dex. Bitshares has already done this project. I think they are very successful. but they did not do the marketing well. The prospect of marketing is understood here. very low prices from very high prices.
|
|
|
|
|