"Proof of Human" Coin ?

[coin-investor]

solving captcha is a bad idea i guess

I think it is,raiblocks is all mess up in my opinion with to many people claiming but only the top 150 claimants can payout people wants an easy to get a coin and captchas are one of the easy and lazy way to work online .

[1715057269]

1715057269

[1715057269]

1715057269

[1715057269]

1715057269

[1715057269]

1715057269

[couture]

i think humans would find any way possible to manipulate this system for monetary reward. If someone could hack a computer a bit to emulate two humans to earn twice as much, then that system has a direct monetary reward.. and development shall begin.

Maybe it has to be proof of human with no computer hardware..

[TeamMollyMassive]

There are puzzles that a computer cant solve. Steganographic and cryptographic puzzles are a good place to start. Also there is a chess puzzle that a computer can not solve http://mashable.com/2017/03/14/solve-this-chess-puzzle/#xsRzI9xYgiq3

Could you explain how steganographic/cryptographic could be made to be immune from algorithms?

One immune puzzle will not work, as it would be easy to program the solution to that single puzzle into a bot's logic.

There is also a way to make a Human prove they are a human before they even have access to the puzzle

via ReCaptcha? It is not immune to computer algorithms either... Google shows numerous instances of research showing it being breakable.
via captchas? Plenty of literature showing they are even less immune than reCaptcha...

I agree that one puzzle would not work the puzzles would have to be different every time with completely different solutions and using different algorithms to encrypt the answers.I would steer away from anything captcha related. Think BIGGER and more dynamic.

The puzzles would have to be dynamic and created by a human with the answers encrypted by a computer and deployed at random by a computer.

[TeamMollyMassive]

i think humans would find any way possible to manipulate this system for monetary reward. If someone could hack a computer a bit to emulate two humans to earn twice as much, then that system has a direct monetary reward.. and development shall begin.

Maybe it has to be proof of human with no computer hardware..

the sequence would have to be something that can only happen once. Like a key to the next step would be in a database that purges itself once accessed once. if someone tried to hack the database they would receive a salted hash. Making them feels stupid because its a lot easier to prove they are human than to solve a salted hash.

[barnaba]

i think humans would find any way possible to manipulate this system for monetary reward. If someone could hack a computer a bit to emulate two humans to earn twice as much, then that system has a direct monetary reward.. and development shall begin.

Maybe it has to be proof of human with no computer hardware..

It just need to prove human activity - so something what it is hard to emulate or trick

some tests can be hidden from audience or be taken randomly during compilation, there is also a lot of possibilities and behavioural data to analyse.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1944481.0

Proof of Being HUMAN mixed with Proof of Work [ANN] [preICO] ICO Unicorns.WORLD

Obviously it need to be a inflation coin, but that is not a problem for currency as long as there is software build on it to boost popularity.