Eric Muyser
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
You can't kill math.
|
 |
September 07, 2017, 05:21:09 AM |
|
Rebrand to Xel imo
|
@EricMuyser | EricMuyser.com | OTC - "Defeat is a state of mind; no one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
xtrusion
|
|
September 07, 2017, 08:54:29 AM |
|
I bought some XEL coins via heatwallet a while ago, but as you can't trade with them meanwhile on the heat platform, I would like to transfer them for being more flexible, but unfortunately I don't know how to get the xel's away from heatwallet. Via slack a guy named oscurito23 messaged me following: ---------------------- I saw you TRansfer asset recipient fim2@heatwallet.com asset XEL amount amount Message YOUR WALLET fim2 is the automatic procesor for XEL of heat not my acount ty for trust in my --------------------- He mentioned that I will get a certain amount of heat's for the xel's after sending to the recipient. Questions: 1) How to get sure that "recipient fim2@heatwallet.com" is not a fake? Sounds like being the wallet from anyone else.. 2) Isn't it possible sending xel coins from heatwallet to f.e. bittrex? I don't want to sell coins yet as i would have to pay taxes Could not find any help so thanks for all useful answers. You are a bit boring, we have already explained in the slack, those are the official instructions to withdraw from heat. Sorry for being a pain, I could not really believe it at first, as it’s a strange way I think so, looks very improvised that process. Moreover the sell/ change force from xel to heat is a big disadvantage, as I have to pay taxes when I switch the coins now. After 1 year it would be free of taxes. However, thank you very much for your help! |
|
|
|
|
Epimetheus2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
September 07, 2017, 12:07:24 PM |
|
Stop the noob talks you guys. ElasticSearch is not a supercomputer. It's a distributed search engine based on Apache Lucene. I'm a dev using ElasticSearch for a while now. It has nothing to do with supercomputers  So I'd say Elastic should stay as the name. Logo is fine too. No need for any changes there. |
|
|
|
|
|
iGoodw1n
|
|
September 07, 2017, 01:08:14 PM |
|
Why elastic needs rebranding? Imo elastic is great name and XEL ticket is good too.
|
|
|
|
|
Alohaboy?!
|
|
September 07, 2017, 02:04:40 PM |
|
Why elastic needs rebranding? Imo elastic is great name and XEL ticket is good too.
please read the answers above. In my opinion there is no rebranding needed. Especially not in the near future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stupid_seb
|
|
September 08, 2017, 01:19:46 AM |
|
It's not fake FUD. It is an issue I have raised before. We should be conscious of it rather than dismissing it.
Well, we could decide to rename that thing - maybe just XEL? Or we could write it with a "k" at the end? We could also try to find out if this would be necessary first. It's up to you @community. Yes that would be one way to get round it. In fact I may be wrong but I think Elastic itself may be considered too generic to be copyrighted anyway. So Elastik (assuming nobody else has used it) would be better. Elastik.com is available for purchase ( https://uniregistry.com/market/domain/elastik.com). Of course, it's probably best to search trademarks databases (US / Europe, etc) and talk to a trademark specialist before doing anything like this. It might be cheaper to just research and create a new name that becomes valuable and unique to the project. There are naming consultants that help startups create unique names with domains and trademarks cleared. It's always an uphill battle to use a common word as a brand name. We changed logo several weeks ago, and now the name? I don't see the reason. Perhaps later, if it's really going to become an issue but now it's just not needed. Yay, its not a big deal and the name spelling does not mean that much. "Tech first, marketing later" as the wise people say) Putting them in any order is a strategic mistake. Today, both fuel each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
syclone
|
|
September 08, 2017, 04:09:13 AM |
|
The fud on this coin never dies. Great signs of what's coming up ahead. The development continues, just not always on this thread, but the devs are still working hard.
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptonomous
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
September 08, 2017, 10:06:41 AM |
|
I agree. Marketing is very important now. So much more than 2 or 3 years ago...
|
|
|
|
|
|
tortellino
|
|
September 09, 2017, 03:11:06 PM |
|
ever time i log into my lite wallet there come this message: Warning: You are most likely on a fork (base target is verhy high).
Is this normal or did something passes me by?
|
|
|
|
|
13Darko
|
|
September 09, 2017, 06:32:27 PM |
|
ever time i log into my lite wallet there come this message: Warning: You are most likely on a fork (base target is verhy high).
Is this normal or did something passes me by?
Nothing serious. Just a small warning. See an explanation here: https://talk.elasticexplorer.org/t/xel-forked/824 |
|
|
|
wwzsocki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1706
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
|
|
September 10, 2017, 09:14:31 AM |
|
There is no rebranding needed. Ticker and name are good I think. This makes only confusion for new investors. Development and progress that what is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
13Darko
|
|
September 10, 2017, 11:46:03 AM |
|
Hey, devs! Can you please give us a short summary of the development progress? Last time it was porting the C ElasticPL to Java ElasticPL. But as I can see it on GitHub you've probably done that and now working on some new Elastic wallet prototype (with large letters warning NOT even try to use it)? Really curious..  |
|
|
|
|
torrentco
|
|
September 11, 2017, 11:21:06 AM |
|
what was the ico price of this coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Redawn
Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2017, 11:28:16 AM |
|
what was the ico price of this coin?
There was NO ico in this project. Only donations! |
|
|
|
|
|
torrentco
|
|
September 11, 2017, 11:33:33 AM |
|
what was the ico price of this coin?
There was NO ico in this project. Only donations! so where did people get coins from? directly from devs on exchanges? |
|
|
|
|
|
badinvesterguy
|
|
September 11, 2017, 11:35:12 AM
Last edit: September 11, 2017, 03:52:39 PM by badinvesterguy |
|
what was the ico price of this coin?
I believe there was 700 btc raised, with 100 mil coins edited: had wrong numbers |
|
|
|
|
jr3951
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
September 11, 2017, 11:37:59 AM |
|
Haven't been here for a while. What is new?
|
|
|
|
|
Redawn
Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2017, 11:46:56 AM |
|
what was the ico price of this coin?
There was NO ico in this project. Only donations! so where did people get coins from? directly from devs on exchanges? The coins are part of the donations. It is a gift. So there is no such thing as "ico price" |
|
|
|
|
|
13Darko
|
|
September 11, 2017, 01:53:03 PM |
|
what was the ico price of this coin?
~710 btc were collected which are not accessible by the developers ( see here for more explanation). In worst case people got in at 1250 sats/xel with no guarantee to receive any xel, because it was a donation, not ICO - that's why people emphasize this point. |
|
|
|
|
