Adam Back of Blockstream thinks you should pay $100 fees

[jonald_fyookball]

Blockstream employs the most influential core developers.  They are in the business of "scaling solutions".  They don't want Bitcoin to be allowed to scale with simple block increases like Satoshi wanted.  They need to go. 

[1714031179]

1714031179

[1714031179]

1714031179

[1714031179]

1714031179

[25hashcoin]

This is extremely disconcerting and I don't believe the bitcoin community is taking these words as seriously as they should be. This is exactly what Gavin, Jeff and Mike have been warning us about.

[jonald_fyookball]

and Bruce Fenton helping the nonsense...isn't helping.

[franky1]

they now know people are willing to pay $2..

so if they push onchain upto $100 they can then let their LN hubs offer $1 a 'payment' to help repay their $75mill debt faster..

while still proclaiming LN is 100x cheaper than onchain..

its tooo obvious
barry and alan silbert are getting very itchy feet and wanting to start getting returns on their investments in the BS cartel

[European Central Bank]

thinks you 'will' does not think you 'should'.

i will not.

[franky1]

adam back although writing code for the 2014 segwit altcoin. he has not been a direct coder for bitcoin
he should have no say at all in anything bitcoin.
but atleast the puppeteer is revealing his puppet strings

anyone suggesting bitcoin should be high TX fee has obvious BScartel involvement. and yes bruce fenton the organiser of the BS cartel funded round tables had already been spotted years ago as part of that crew of bitcoin dismantlers

[25hashcoin]

anyone suggesting bitcoin should b high TX fe has obvious BScartel involvement. and yes bruce fenton organisers of th BS cartl funded round tables had already been spotted years ago as part of that crew of bitcoin dismantlers

Have to QFT