LOW priced cryptocoins with BIG time potential

[clickerz]

Before I click the article, I thought it would suggesting all the low priced altcoins. But in fact, it's actually saying AVOID for most of them. 

Yes, those low priced altcoins has always the potential,they have nothing to do but to go  up or stop development and disappear.The trend now as I observed is reviving those old coins, giving them a new breath,platform,brand etc  and pump. Be alert to check before you invest, it might be another pump and dump drama.

[irwanjabryg]

One of the surprises is RDD, if you know maybe today has become a rich man.
Not all believe and strong to hold that long.

[willyum]

NXT! It is ready to return to the top 10..

[xapwxrm5742]

I think we should pay attention to the twitter of the developer
you can choose the better coin in the plo

[2bfree]

I'm holding from the chepa coins:

iCash
Espers
Tesla
ExtraBytes
SafeEx
BAT
1337
Karma

All long shots.

[bitbob82]

Before I click the article, I thought it would suggesting all the low priced altcoins. But in fact, it's actually saying AVOID for most of them. 

Yes, those low priced altcoins has always the potential,they have nothing to do but to go  up or stop development and disappear.The trend now as I observed is reviving those old coins, giving them a new breath,platform,brand etc  and pump. Be alert to check before you invest, it might be another pump and dump drama.

i think most of cheep coin whose price is under 1 satosh are dead, investing there keep no meaning. while few have chances to go up and get accelerator. therefor we should try to invest our assets in such coins who have good potential to increase and are not dead.

[fistfullofbtc]

I'm holding from the chepa coins:

iCash
Espers
Tesla
ExtraBytes
SafeEx
BAT
1337
Karma

All long shots.

didn't 1337 do a 1000x yesterday and you are still holding it? you do know most of those coins are dead and pump and dump fodder.

[crypto98]

Before I click the article, I thought it would suggesting all the low priced altcoins. But in fact, it's actually saying AVOID for most of them. 

Yes, those low priced altcoins has always the potential,they have nothing to do but to go  up or stop development and disappear.The trend now as I observed is reviving those old coins, giving them a new breath,platform,brand etc  and pump. Be alert to check before you invest, it might be another pump and dump drama.

How is fastest and reliable way of checking this? Twitter?

[sulendra12]

...
1337
...
All long shots.

didn't 1337 do a 1000x yesterday and you are still holding it? you do know most of those coins are dead and pump and dump fodder.

Yes, yesterday was a big day for 1337 holders because it pumped up to 1000x yesterday and for those who missed them were unlucky.

ExtraBytes
BAT

I'm holding XBY and BAT now, although BAT already dead but XBT seems has a potential to grow up their price like a while ago (to 1700 satoshi).

[Vishnu.Reang]

Byteball may be one of the low priced altcoins with big potential in the near future. They are conducting air drops every month, and a lot of people are taking part in those. Stellar Lumens are also conducting an airdrop this month, and they have even tied up with many Bitcoin exchanges for the same. These coins have big potential, as their current market caps are less than $1 billion.

[CoinFoxs]

Does anyone have any recommendations similar to this post 9 months ago?

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@gjsteele71/low-priced-crypto-coins-with-big-time-potential

I suggest you.

Digibyte (See the graph before investing)
Siacoin (Little bit risky or depend on luck)
Icn (Price is high bit has great potential to increase and will double your investment)
Ripple (A good currency for investment purpose)
Ae (Not on exchange yet but has great potential to increase in future)

[toknormal]

When pontificating on undervalued assets I think it's instructive to separate out technology assets from monetary ones.

The distinction is huge when you think about it because one the former has massive exposure to technological obsolescence while the latter doesn't. In that regard I propose Peercoin as the single most significant undervalued asset right now. Following that I'd propose Unobtanium (UNO).



Have a look down the 1st page of coinmarketcap.com. There are only a few pure monetary assets left: BTC, LTC, DASH, XMR, ZEC, DOGUE, PIVX, PPC

The ones that survive will be huge and only one of them is still in relative 'stealth' mode - that is Peercoin. Meanwhile, Peercoin happens to have been designed with solutions well ahead of their time, in particular that of addressing the scaling issue. Sonny King foresaw the current crisis in expansion of uptake in cryptos and created Peercoin to act as a 'trunk' monetary exchange vehicle. Everything about that design was created for that purpose: intentionally high transaction fees, first proof of stake etc.



The advantages of monetary assets over non-monetary ones are as follows:

 • they don't have exposure to technological obscolescence (since their value doesn't derive from their technological advantage)
 • they don't suffer from the "airgap" problem, like say Ethereum does, (where buying the blockchain token gives no direct exposure to the equity held in meta tokens)
 • they derive their primary basis for existence from store of value and not transient business equity (like corporate stocks)

The disadvantages of non-monetary assets (technologies of equity stocks ), i.e. everything else on that list are:

 • they go obsolete as soon as 'something better comes along'
 • smart contract chains in particular suffer from the 'airgap' problem (see above)
 • they are exposed to endless competition
 • in monetary assets, "being first" counts as being an original = high value, whereas in technology assets, being first is a massive disadvantage because you will also be first into obsolescence (witness the imminent arrival of a tsunami of tech which will prove a more effective platform in many aspects for meta tokens than Ethereum: Tezos, Rootstock, Lisk, Ark...on into the distance)

Finally, think forward 100 years. One aspect of crypto that consolidates its "irreproducibility' is time. The more time that passes the greater the distinction between an original and a clone. In 100 years, the difference between a Bitcoin clone and the Bitcoin that was created on January 9th 2009 will be like comparing gold with sand - even though they may have the same code. In that vein I see certain 'originals' as starting to gain value with time and one in particular more than any other - Unobtanium. It has a supply that seems to be perfectly pitched to be large enough to support significant trading liquidity, small enough to be considered extremely rare, function as an effective store of value and finally originated early enough to be considered part of the Bitcoin "supernova" period. (Gold was created in a supernova originally, that's why it's near impossible to synthesise).

Current price for UNO: $32
Target price: $230,000 per coin

[fistfullofbtc]

loads of low supply coins went up in april/may, was it to do with actual usage or people seeing that low supply coins offer better rewards, i think the later.

[Fantum]

Cachcoin, cv2, xtrabytes, espers2, insanecoin, verge, riptobux, uis, moon, ldoge, mercury, and coexist just forked to waves i believe. You could also try buying some high stake coins like 1337, 808, tesla and stake for a few months or year until they have a major pump. 1337 did just have a pump, speculation based on their upcoming fork, buy once it drops again, it give pretty good rewards for pos.

[dissident]

Bitsend is doing well today. Nice move for me on that one. The rest are doing rather mediocre.  (Xtrabytes, Pascalcoin, VIA, Blackcoin, Shift, Bitbay, NEM, Ark)  All these bring something useful to the table and have active developers though. I try to buy the tech if I can, and not just pump ones that are completely dead.  Moves up go in phases after the whales accumulate so I'm not worried. There's a whale here that owns a lot of VIA, so aside from I already owned it when I found this out, that makes me feel fuzzy inside.

I have this gut feeling LTC is going to shoot up to a $3B market cap in the next 7 days. I should probably buy some since I have cash laying around in the GDAX account. People are too bearish on it, so that's when I usually buy (note to self, take my own advice)

I see future potential in Ardor, if they don't milk the child chain thing by issuing ICOs for each one that comes out.  I didn't buy NXT at $80M like I was supposed too. Sigh.

[georgefw]

Very good argument and the imageof tech vs money assets is a strong one

However the gains on the tech in the shorter tech curve term  are much higher. (i dont mean day trading. I mean month and year trading)  You do have to remain aware.  And the tech cycle in coins seems to be about  well 2 years according to the ethereum debut and its approach to bitcoin valuation?  I would argue bitcoin is a tech asset  and its falling behind which is why relative to ethereum and monero gains it is losing. although all cryptos are being raised by the huge flood of new money investing into cryptos. And there is much much more new money to come. Total crypto marketcap is tiny.

I think the thing here is to find an easy way to find out which existing coins are about to release new features. Also find announcements (like in this announcement place) and ico pages and air drops quickly.  Another thought is that an investment into an abandoned coin raising its marketcap migjt trigger the original developer to get active again because suddenly its worth their while and that might lead to higher value from new development. Furthermore indentifying both coin leadership and coin programmers. Bill gates was a good rutheless leader and didnt need to be a good programmer.  However ethereum also benefitted from having a great programming developer. Both coin startups can do well. We need to identify both. Do wehave a good list of coin personnel - leaders and programmers?


Only about 40 of us responded to this original post. If we could get together on discovering the best way to do these research things then it migjt really benefit all of us.

Great post.

When pontificating on undervalued assets I think it's instructive to separate out technology assets from monetary ones.

The distinction is huge when you think about it because one the former has massive exposure to technological obsolescence while the latter doesn't. In that regard I propose Peercoin as the single most significant undervalued asset right now. Following that I'd propose Unobtanium (UNO).

https://i.imgur.com/8cWbRvs.png









Have a look down the 1st page of coinmarketcap.com. There are only a few pure monetary assets left: BTC, LTC, DASH, XMR, ZEC, DOGUE, PIVX, PPC

The ones that survive will be huge and only one of them is still in relative 'stealth' mode - that is Peercoin. Meanwhile, Peercoin happens to have been designed with solutions well ahead of their time, in particular that of addressing the scaling issue. Sonny King foresaw the current crisis in expansion of uptake in cryptos and created Peercoin to act as a 'trunk' monetary exchange vehicle. Everything about that design was created for that purpose: intentionally high transaction fees, first proof of stake etc.

https://i.imgur.com/HbiufIR.png

The advantages of monetary assets over non-monetary ones are as follows:

 • they don't have exposure to technological obscolescence (since their value doesn't derive from their technological advantage)
 • they don't suffer from the "airgap" problem, like say Ethereum does, (where buying the blockchain token gives no direct exposure to the equity held in meta tokens)
 • they derive their primary basis for existence from store of value and not transient business equity (like corporate stocks)

The disadvantages of non-monetary assets (technologies of equity stocks ), i.e. everything else on that list are:

 • they go obsolete as soon as 'something better comes along'
 • smart contract chains in particular suffer from the 'airgap' problem (see above)
 • they are exposed to endless competition
 • in monetary assets, "being first" counts as being an original = high value, whereas in technology assets, being first is a massive disadvantage because you will also be first into obsolescence (witness the imminent arrival of a tsunami of tech which will prove a more effective platform in many aspects for meta tokens than Ethereum: Tezos, Rootstock, Lisk, Ark...on into the distance)

Finally, think forward 100 years. One aspect of crypto that consolidates its "irreproducibility' is time. The more time that passes the greater the distinction between an original and a clone. In 100 years, the difference between a Bitcoin clone and the Bitcoin that was created on January 9th 2009 will be like comparing gold with sand - even though they may have the same code. In that vein I see certain 'originals' as starting to gain value with time and one in particular more than any other - Unobtanium. It has a supply that seems to be perfectly pitched to be large enough to support significant trading liquidity, small enough to be considered extremely rare, function as an effective store of value and finally originated early enough to be considered part of the Bitcoin "supernova" period. (Gold was created in a supernova originally, that's why it's near impossible to synthesise).

Current price for UNO: $32
Target price: $230,000 per coin

https://i.imgur.com/EzuNWpD.png

[ccs5t]

Wings. Definitely see it over $5 in the next year

[Minecache]

Does anyone have any recommendations similar to this post 9 months ago?

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@gjsteele71/low-priced-crypto-coins-with-big-time-potential

Siacoin. It's about 1cent. If it goes to 2cent you've doubled your money.

[adhitthana]

Heat is my pick.

http://heatledger.com/

[crypto98]

Very good argument and the imageof tech vs money assets is a strong one

However the gains on the tech in the shorter tech curve term  are much higher. (i dont mean day trading. I mean month and year trading)  You do have to remain aware.  And the tech cycle in coins seems to be about  well 2 years according to the ethereum debut and its approach to bitcoin valuation?  I would argue bitcoin is a tech asset  and its falling behind which is why relative to ethereum and monero gains it is losing. although all cryptos are being raised by the huge flood of new money investing into cryptos. And there is much much more new money to come. Total crypto marketcap is tiny.

I think the thing here is to find an easy way to find out which existing coins are about to release new features. Also find announcements (like in this announcement place) and ico pages and air drops quickly.  Another thought is that an investment into an abandoned coin raising its marketcap migjt trigger the original developer to get active again because suddenly its worth their while and that might lead to higher value from new development. Furthermore indentifying both coin leadership and coin programmers. Bill gates was a good rutheless leader and didnt need to be a good programmer.  However ethereum also benefitted from having a great programming developer. Both coin startups can do well. We need to identify both. Do wehave a good list of coin personnel - leaders and programmers?


Only about 40 of us responded to this original post. If we could get together on discovering the best way to do these research things then it migjt really benefit all of us.

Great post.

I absolutely think the bolded part is vital if anyone wants to make long term profit with cryptocurrencies. Maybe making it's own thread where people post "big daily news" would help as there would be at least an attemp to try to get sort of "information base".