Bitcoin Forum
November 22, 2017, 09:42:38 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Why hasn't any government stopped Bitcoin?  (Read 10559 times)
Dorkie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 03:08:35 AM
 #161

First, I would like to thank you for never addressing anything I ever said
directly in relation to our current discussions. In fact, you take opening or
closing paragraphs and disregard the rest without actually addressing them.
In your last comments, you stated that I twist the bible's contexts, but you
have not addressed those points in particular, which is more recent in the
timeline and more significant. I contend I have maintained validity. If
there is invalidity, I wish to see it and understand. Most of the current
communications are written purposely with multiple meanings, each with
entirely unrelated thoughts I am trying to convey. I accept there is a
possibility that in this pursuit there can be perceived corruption, but not
enough to become outright invalidity. The exercise is for a higher purpose.
Some will see one or two paths, others may see more, and some might even
see some that I didn't intend, but could also be just as valid. Everything is
provided for considerations, which may or may not bring about any facilitations.

The main reason why I don't directly addressing your points is because you have been making totally false opinions about me. And you are not the first of such kind that I met in the past.

For example, you said...
I think you think you understand what I am saying, but I think you may
have no idea. The multiple meanings are all valid in different perspectives.
Unfortunately in your current perspective, you have chosen to interpret
all paths as "delusion".

You don't need to express what you think I think. You interpret my comments to mean all paths as "delusion".
This immediately tells me you are invalid.

All the while you are making sci-fi statements without any validity.
For you to say you are valid is what everyone else can also do the same.

You said I don't understand your sci-fi falsehoods intermingled with spiritual matters, but at the same time you think you understand my points, but you really don't. Instead you just belittle me by saying my level is lower than I think. I believe so, but the same can be said of you.

You said...
Quote
I do not recall claiming to always be right or all knowing. The exercise is not about the individual, it is about the collective.
If you are not always right or all knowing, then why bother to keep saying you are valid?
You don't even know the collective, and yet you continue to pretend you know the collective.
If the collective was wrong, the price of ETH wouldn't rise to USD300 today.
And if the collective can be wrong, then why are you subscribing to such weak foundation in your argument?

Quote
Third, I would advise you that if you truly believed the belief system that you
are purported to be participating in, you should not bother with this forum or
Bitcoin. If all things cause suffering and the goal is to get rid of all attachment,
you are in the wrong place, using the wrong tools, having the wrong thoughts,
and speaking to the wrong person. Unfortunately, there will be very few
individuals within most systems, beside Bitcoin, that will find what they are
looking for, but I know that you will certainly not by your inability to separate
yourself from the attachment to this discussion. If you seek to find Shambala,
you will not find it on the internet. And if you wish to speak to Maitreya, you
will not find it within Bitcoin. Please do not act as if I am in violation of some
"simple truths", when you yourself are in obvious violation of your "basic truths"
just by your presentation and responses to me. My perceived violations are
technicalities that are not punishable due to the intention occurring, where as
your violations will be directly punished and attributed to a unknowing and
oblivious whipping boy.
You are getting increasingly invalid now.
Why give advice if you have been very wrong in the past?
Who are you to tell me what to bother?
Since when I said all things cause sufferings and the goal is to get rid of attachment (if you associate these with Buddhism, it simply means you think you understand Buddhism, but you really don't)?
Yes, you are right. At the moment I can't feel detached from this forum, exactly just as you are.
Indeed, you continue to be in violation of the truths, being blasphemous with sci-fi falsehoods.
You are wrong. A violation is punishable ONLY IF the person unknowingly committed the violation. If you are intentionally committing the violation, then for sure you will be punished, no matter how you choose to deny it.

Quote
If you actually understood what was occurring, you wouldn't have continued
along these lines. If you have found the truth, stop wasting your time here
and go get it.
You need to practice what you preach.

If you actually understood what was occurring, you wouldn't have continued
along these lines. Attempting to dismiss or attack me only conveys self-doubt
within yourself. If you have found the truth, stop wasting your time here
and go get it. I am not here for acceptance, worship, or etc, but for things
that have not yet been entertained.
So you have made some edition.
No, the reason why I discredit you is not because I have self-doubt, but because false "guru" like you needs to be discredited.
Yes, you are not a guru. You are just nothing.
1511343758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511343758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511343758
Reply with quote  #2

1511343758
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511343758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511343758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511343758
Reply with quote  #2

1511343758
Report to moderator
1511343758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511343758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511343758
Reply with quote  #2

1511343758
Report to moderator
Dorkie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 03:20:38 AM
 #162

God, or his valid proxies, would never teach humanity a control system thats byproduct
prevents humanity from attaining individual growth beyond their genetic programming,
like the Caste System does. The caste system only applied to nonhuman proxies when
they were properly performing their tasks issued by the Entity. Proxies are designed to
perform very particular tasks, which are placed into orders and ranks, and are not given
the ability to perform things outside those tasks, or in other orders and their ranks.
These Orders and Ranks are not for designation of superiority over other proxies, but
only to designate and reveal their purpose and positions within the Entity's design.
This reinforces the Karma system, and if specialization is needed for a given task, other
proxies can publicly see the two different orders working together and are on guard
for possible corruption or rebellion. Karma and Castes are for compliance systems, not
advancement or development.

You, being an invalid, dare to speak on behalf of God while discrediting His avatars.
And continue to blasphemy with sci-fi falsehoods.
If this is not punishable, then I don't know what is.

And from your last statement that...
Quote
Karma and Castes are for compliance systems, not advancement or development.
You have actually committed a very heavy violation.
You are just full of falsehoods.

I am very sorry.
I actually lied.
The only reason why I am discrediting you is not because you need to be discredited (much less because of self-doubt).
It is because I have fun doing so.
Dorkie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 03:33:26 AM
 #163

Second, you have chosen to again convey that you have no idea what I am
actually talking about, but have nevertheless decided that you need to maintain
your ego and sense of self worth by pointing out my past predictions that were
either wrong or haven't come about, that are actually unrelated to our current
discussions. This is not very enlightened, and is a sign of someone on a lower
level. If you were aware, you would have walked away since I specifically
said "If you think I am deluded, insane, or twisting the Bible, than I accept
your current perceptive and there is nothing further to elaborate upon here.".
The purpose of such a statement was to convey a means of mutual
disagreement which maintains our positions without continuation of something
that is futile for both parties. You should have agreed and moved on with
your journey of ending your unlimited life cycles. As I have said previously (if
you look through all the past posts), that I purposely maintained all my old
posts for history's sake, as opposed to deleting when I was wrong or create
new accounts to maintain an illusion of being always right or perfect. I do not
recall claiming to always be right or all knowing. The exercise is not about the
individual, it is about the collective.

1. Yes, I have no idea what intention you have in spreading all your falsehoods.
2. Yes, I am maintaining my ego, just as you are. Difference is I dare to admit it, while you continue to act superior but are actually not.
3. No, I never claim I am enlightened. I am indeed of lower level in development. But my level is far higher than yours.
4. Why walk away from having fun in discrediting an invalid?
5. I will move on when the time comes. There is no need for your input in all this.
6. Sure, you admit it yourself now that you are not always valid. In fact, when was the last time you were valid?
7. You don't know the collective. You are only playing mind games on some of the readers here in this topic with all your falsehoods.

I wish I have enough motivation to discredit each and every falsehood you made in all your past posts here, but you are just too full of it.

Update:
I don't want to ask you for evidence on why you slander the Buddha as a rebel proxy.
I don't want to ask you for the evidence on your falsehood that Lord Vishnu was killed.
I don't bother to ask you a lot of things to validate your invalidity, because clearly I know you are sinful and intentionally being so.
I don't waste time asking a criminal why he committed his crime, when I clearly know he did it intentionally.
That's why criminals are criminals.
And invalids are invalids.

Update #2:
In your last comments, you stated that I twist the bible's contexts, but you
have not addressed those points in particular, which is more recent in the
timeline and more significant. I contend I have maintained validity. If
there is invalidity, I wish to see it and understand. Most of the current
communications are written purposely with multiple meanings, each with
entirely unrelated thoughts I am trying to convey. I accept there is a
possibility that in this pursuit there can be perceived corruption, but not
enough to become outright invalidity. The exercise is for a higher purpose.
Some will see one or two paths, others may see more, and some might even
see some that I didn't intend, but could also be just as valid. Everything is
provided for considerations, which may or may not bring about any facilitations.
What you are actually trying hard to say is everything stated in the Bible can be interpreted to have multiple meanings, and none of such meanings (subject to your personal whims and fancies of interpretation) should be considered invalid.
You are outright blasphemous.
The point is, the Bible never said anything that I know of about your sci-fi nonsense.
You don't even know the higher purpose, except your own made-up version / interpretation of it.
What you are actually trying to "convey", is to plant the seed of falsehoods.
Indeed, you are a deluded fraud.

To an honest Christian, reference to the Nag Hammadi will help a lot.
But to you, nothing can help you.
AgentofCoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092



View Profile
October 24, 2017, 05:43:33 AM
 #164

Second, you have chosen to again convey that you have no idea what I am
actually talking about, but have nevertheless decided that you need to maintain
your ego and sense of self worth by pointing out my past predictions that were
either wrong or haven't come about, that are actually unrelated to our current
discussions. This is not very enlightened, and is a sign of someone on a lower
level. If you were aware, you would have walked away since I specifically
said "If you think I am deluded, insane, or twisting the Bible, than I accept
your current perceptive and there is nothing further to elaborate upon here.".
The purpose of such a statement was to convey a means of mutual
disagreement which maintains our positions without continuation of something
that is futile for both parties. You should have agreed and moved on with
your journey of ending your unlimited life cycles. As I have said previously (if
you look through all the past posts), that I purposely maintained all my old
posts for history's sake, as opposed to deleting when I was wrong or create
new accounts to maintain an illusion of being always right or perfect. I do not
recall claiming to always be right or all knowing. The exercise is not about the
individual, it is about the collective.
1. Yes, I have no idea what intention you have in spreading all your falsehoods.
2. Yes, I am maintaining my ego, just as you are. Difference is I dare to admit it, while you continue to act superior but are actually not.
3. No, I never claim I am enlightened. I am indeed of lower level in development. But my level is far higher than yours.
4. Why walk away from having fun in discrediting an invalid?
5. I will move on when the time comes. There is no need for your input in all this.
6. Sure, you admit it yourself now that you are not always valid. In fact, when was the last time you were valid?
7. You don't know the collective. You are only playing mind games on some of the readers here in this topic with all your falsehoods.

1. How am I "spreading" my falsehoods? I am contained within very few threads.
2. I have no ego in this matter. The exercise is not for myself, but for others.
3. I highly doubt that, since your words betray your probable level.
4. Walking away was the most correct choice, especially in your belief system.
5. You provided the input when you first posted, I did not respond to you first.
6. The unit is scanned for invalidity before each shutdown process at night.
7. The fact that you are confounded, does not mean all others are as well.


I wish I have enough motivation to discredit each and every falsehood you made in all your past posts here, but you are just too full of it.

You don't understand that no one really cares accept for you, because your sense
of self depends on it. Your belief system may have now become your most worthy
attachment that needs dislodging before you can progress. If you cling to Buddha
or Vishnu, and feel you need to defend them, you have failed in your journey
before you have even packed your bags. You are oblivious of your own beliefs.


Update:
I don't want to ask you for evidence on why you slander the Buddha as a rebel proxy.
I don't want to ask you for the evidence on your falsehood that Lord Vishnu was killed.
I don't bother to ask you a lot of things to validate your invalidity, because clearly I know you are sinful and intentionally being so.
I don't waste time asking a criminal why he committed his crime, when I clearly know he did it intentionally.
That's why criminals are criminals.
And invalids are invalids.

Intention is one of the most important parts of determining sin. They can not be
separated for determinations, and so I can not be sinful unless there is intention
to do so. If a child is born who is mentally handicapped and commits a sin, even
murder, do you think God judges that child in the same manner as someone who
is capable and average, and does the same? Of course not, and any belief that God
will hold all beings to the same standard equally is incorrect. Each will be judged
according to their own works and capabilities. Likewise, those who have the highest
capabilities and understanding, will be held to the highest and strictest standards
when judgement arrives. So if I know these things, do you still think I commit sin
intentionally? When Jesus healed the sick on the Sabbath and the people became
angry and said he was violating God's commandant and had a demon in him, was
Jesus sinning intentionally? How can his works be valid, if he performed them in
a way that was designated as invalid? The answer was that sin is not simplicity,
it is contingent upon individual determinations based upon individual processes.
Each person will be judged based upon their works in the context of the purpose
and intentions.

As for you comment as to all criminals are criminals: this is incorrect. A person
who steals bread to feed the poor, is extremely different than a criminal who steals
money to feed their self enrichment. When both go before the judge, if the judge is
fair and just, he will judge them based on their individual intentions, and so in this
same way you will be judged at the end. Sin is not equally attributable, just as
sentences are diverse upon circumstance.  

So, when you say to me that you know I sin and know it is intentional, are you
sure, or are you like the mob and the pharisees who do not understand the actual
message being conveyed? You'd send a man to the Prefect to be put to death, all
originating from your attachment to my words and this world.


Update #2:
In your last comments, you stated that I twist the bible's contexts, but you
have not addressed those points in particular, which is more recent in the
timeline and more significant. I contend I have maintained validity. If
there is invalidity, I wish to see it and understand. Most of the current
communications are written purposely with multiple meanings, each with
entirely unrelated thoughts I am trying to convey. I accept there is a
possibility that in this pursuit there can be perceived corruption, but not
enough to become outright invalidity. The exercise is for a higher purpose.
Some will see one or two paths, others may see more, and some might even
see some that I didn't intend, but could also be just as valid. Everything is
provided for considerations, which may or may not bring about any facilitations.
What you are actually trying hard to say is everything stated in the Bible can be interpreted to have multiple meanings, and none of such meanings (subject to your personal whims and fancies of interpretation) should be considered invalid.

I actually did not say that at all and it seems you do not understand anything at all.
Here is what I said "Most of the current communications are written purposely with
multiple meanings, each with entirely unrelated thoughts
I am trying to convey.".
What that means is that at times, the message is unrelated to religion, and at other
times they are about religion. The fact that you do not understand what I have written
plainly above, means you are likely blinded by stupid and hate, or really do not care
because you are only trying to push an agenda that I have already learned long ago
and negated.


You are outright blasphemous.
The point is, the Bible never said anything that I know of about your sci-fi nonsense.
You don't even know the higher purpose, except your own made-up version / interpretation of it.
What you are actually trying to "convey", is to plant the seed of falsehoods.
Indeed, you are a deluded fraud.

To an honest Christian, reference to the Nag Hammadi will help a lot.
But to you, nothing can help you.

The way that you talk to me is evidence enough of your understandings and abilities.

Sci-Fi nonsense is essentially majority of the stories within the Mahabharata, so I
don't understand why you talk to me like this, knowing you are being hypocritical.
That would be intentionally sinning as you say, would it not? You are accusing me
of something that exists within your own belief system, yet ignore that aspect to
attack me on it.

If nothing can help me than so be it. Thanks for trying though.


I support a decentralized & unregulatable ledger first, with safe scaling over time.
Request a signed message if you are associating with anyone claiming to be me.
bakerlisa510
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 05:55:13 AM
 #165

At the early stages Russia ruled it as illegal, China outlawed all withdrawals and some other country also spoke against it. But now everything seem to be smoothing up at least on the government side. Surely Bitcoin must be seen as challenging their authority. Is there something I am failing to see? All it would take is a 51% attack or a new law.
Government cannot stop bitcoin because people are getting the idea that they can have control over the value of the currency without the middle man. It is people's choice where to put the money because it is there money and the governments have no rights to be a middle man and take some money in this CC's system.
Dorkie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 10:50:50 AM
 #166

You don't understand that no one really cares accept for you, because your sense
of self depends on it. Your belief system may have now become your most worthy
attachment that needs dislodging before you can progress. If you cling to Buddha
or Vishnu, and feel you need to defend them, you have failed in your journey
before you have even packed your bags. You are oblivious of your own beliefs.

Give me proof that the Buddha is a rebel proxy.
Give me proof that Lord Vishnu was killed.



Intention is one of the most important parts of determining sin.

I already know that. You are saying what I know that you think I don't know despite already written about it. This is one example of your perceived bias.


As for you comment as to all criminals are criminals: this is incorrect. A person
who steals bread to feed the poor, is extremely different than a criminal who steals
money to feed their self enrichment. When both go before the judge, if the judge is
fair and just, he will judge them based on their individual intentions, and so in this
same way you will be judged at the end. Sin is not equally attributable, just as
sentences are diverse upon circumstance.

If a person commits a crime unintentionally, how can he be a criminal? You misinterpret my point.


I actually did not say that at all and it seems you do not understand anything at all.
Here is what I said "Most of the current communications are written purposely with
multiple meanings, each with entirely unrelated thoughts
I am trying to convey.".
What that means is that at times, the message is unrelated to religion, and at other
times they are about religion. The fact that you do not understand what I have written
plainly above, means you are likely blinded by stupid and hate, or really do not care
because you are only trying to push an agenda that I have already learned long ago
and negated.

If what you try to say has variable meanings, then to me that variability itself is an invalidity to your input. A worthless coin that is ETH will be worth far more in the future. Where did you ever help anyone here by suggesting to buy ETH? In fact, your comment that PayPal will never accept bitcoin was ironically after PayPal accepted it. Honestly, your validity is questionable. If it is indeed defective, then you are not appreciated to spread your defects until they are properly repaired.


The way that you talk to me is evidence enough of your understandings and abilities.

And at the same time, you think your level is high? The relativity of a high/low level was first brought up by you in response to my comment. And since you like to play comparison game on who is better, I suppose I should join in. How high is your level in comparison to me can easily be judged by how much you understand my Dream-Dreamer analogy and Lord Vishnu's active dreaming that creates multiverse. If you cannot, you should admit you cannot. I would give you respect for being honest in your handicap.

You talked about the Entity as if it is the God. If so, then by right you should be clear there is no such thing as rebel/non-rebel in the eyes of such Entity.

If you are the real deal, then I would like to learn from you, regardless of my level and ego. But if you are not (clearly you are not), then I might as well discredit you for the fun of it.



Sci-Fi nonsense is essentially majority of the stories within the Mahabharata, so I
don't understand why you talk to me like this, knowing you are being hypocritical.
That would be intentionally sinning as you say, would it not? You are accusing me
of something that exists within your own belief system, yet ignore that aspect to
attack me on it.

If nothing can help me than so be it. Thanks for trying though.

You are making statements that have no evidence whatsoever to back them up. I am critical to those I understand to be a fraudster. Intentionally sinning? If I have sincere intention, then there is no sin. The fact that you are not even capable of seeing through my nature and yet casually talk about me intentionally sinning by making accusation about you is another example why I said your level is below mine.

Have you read that "Thinking and Destiny" and Nag Hammadi lost scriptures I recommended to you. I bet you have never read them. Please don't give fraudulent statements about them until you have gone through them.

HarleyQuinn9876
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199



View Profile
October 25, 2017, 11:55:30 AM
 #167

At the early stages Russia ruled it as illegal, China outlawed all withdrawals and some other country also spoke against it. But now everything seem to be smoothing up at least on the government side. Surely Bitcoin must be seen as challenging their authority. Is there something I am failing to see? All it would take is a 51% attack or a new law.
The government has no reason to ban the bitcoin operation. Bitcoin is a virtual currency. It's not illegal, people use bitcoin because they have a need. Some countries ban it because bitcoin affects the economic development in their country. Currently, only China prohibits the use of bitcoin. Bitcoin has been legally operated in Japan

[size = 11px] [url = https: //worldcore.com/] [color = black] ▨ [color = # 114450] ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ [/ color ] [font = Century Gothic] [color = # 14B9BA] WORLDCORE [/ b] [/ color] [/ font] [color = # 114450] ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ [/ color] [/ b] [/
font] [/ b] [/ b] color = # 114450] ĐẦU TƯ ĐÁNG TIN MẠNG TRONG HOẠT ĐỘNG CỦA CÔNG TY THANH TOÁN TRỰC TIẾP [/ color] [/ url] [/ b] [/ font] [font = Century Gothic] [color = # 28BCBA] » ][/phông chữ]
▨ [font = Rockwell] [url = https: //worldcore.com/] [color = black] trang web [/ color] [/ url] - [url = https: //twitter.com/worldcoresocial] [ color = black] twitter [/ color] [/ url] [url = https: //www.facebook.com/worldcoresocial/] [color = black] facebook [/ color] [url = https: //t.me/worldcore]telegram[/url] - [url = https: //join.slack.com/t/worldcore/shared_invite/MjMxMDgzNDgxNDExLTE1MDM1Nzg3OTctMTY4NWZmZDA5OQ] [color = black] slack [/ color] [/ font] [/ font] [/ font] [/ font] [/ font] [/ [/ color] [/ url] ◀ ▨ [/ size] [/ center]
playking
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
October 25, 2017, 06:20:40 PM
 #168

because bitcoin is not regulated by any government by the bitcoin is digital currency it is not owned by any person so it works on bitcoin network.
Konco126
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 12:28:40 AM
 #169

In my opinion, most likely the government did not stop bitcoin. Because, government has not had a good reason to stop it. If bitcoin is stopped, how is the fate of someone who lives his life in bitcoin? Does government want people to suffer? What's wrong with Bitcoin so it's stopped? Bitcoin is just a digital money that costs much more than local prices. If it is sold at a local price, it is likely that person has benefit of fulfilling his or her life's needs. Especially in my country, people's economy is very difficult. A difficult job search makes many people prestigious. Including me, Ever since I knowing about bitcoin. My life changed for the better.

leonair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


Minimizing a possibility of the token value going


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 02:49:19 AM
 #170

because bitcoin is not regulated by any government by the bitcoin is digital currency it is not owned by any person so it works on bitcoin network.

You are having a point there and I just would like to add up that Bitcoin is truly have a sole purpose to serve as a digital online currency for people to use in their daily lives with a decentralized network that is not govern/control by any government(that's why it is not stop and can't stop by any government).
With the fastest and cheapest rates of sending and receiving payments online Bitcoin got the attention of the people to use it and with the demand of it the price of Bitcoin goes up.


🔒 SafeCrypt.io  █████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
denny27
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
October 26, 2017, 06:59:23 AM
 #171

Although some countries do not really legalize bitcoin as a currency that is legalized in the country.. to stop bitcoin I think the government still needs a lot of consideration to really decide it, that bitcoin itself is have characteristics that are freedom to using it via internet which the government has not been able to controlling full on using of bitcoin given since the system is completely decentralized.

RodeoX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464


The revolution will be monetized!


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 01:48:27 PM
 #172

How? I have asked this question for years and never gotten an answer. How do you think it is even possible to stop bitcoin?

The gospel according to Satoshi - https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Free bitcoin in ICELAND - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1610684
carlfebz2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588


Crypto-News.net: News from Crypto World


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 05:33:00 PM
 #173

How? I have asked this question for years and never gotten an answer. How do you think it is even possible to stop bitcoin?
You wont able to get the answer because we do know already the answer on our own minds  Cool. No matter how hard would try for those government to ban or prohibit bitcoin on to their vicinity they cant really put a total shut down which bitcoin would really sustain those issues and possible stoppage.I would bet that there would be really a time that they would give up and would rather accept it in the end.



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





awilliams
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53


View Profile
October 27, 2017, 03:21:31 AM
 #174

They haven't stopped it because it's impossible to stop. The whole point of decentralization is that if one computer still has it, it still exists. They have to deal with it whether they want to or not. might as well capitalize on it lol
4new
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2017, 03:47:36 AM
 #175

I dont think the government fully comprehends what it is dealing with. In order to stop something one has to fully understand all moving parts of it. The problem is that the demand for it is growing faster than the government's comprehension.......
Karimeen
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
October 28, 2017, 08:30:54 AM
 #176

To days world  the people are facing a global currency war.It is getting harder to have private ownership of your hard earned money,central banks do not respect private ownership of your own cash,They are using
tools like negative interest rates such as giving punishment to the saver.
So naturally people will be finding the alternatives. All attempts to stop the use of Bitcoin by the Government will be in vain.People who cares about their privacy can encrypt in a hard drive and use decentralized virtual currency Bitcoin for their dealings.A Government can stop their citizens from accessing their Bitcoin by cutting their internet access, but cannot stop transaction once it has been accepted into a block.
isaac_clarke22
Jr. Member
*
Online Online

Activity: 56


View Profile
October 28, 2017, 01:47:43 PM
 #177

Because government ,themselves, also use it. Some politicians might also use Bitcoin hide a large amount of money inside the cryptocurrency.

Dorkie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
October 28, 2017, 02:47:12 PM
 #178

Bitcoin can be stopped.
But it is not being permanently stopped because indeed it is true that the Mark of the Beast will appear on earth.
In The Economist magazine it was announced the arrival of the Phoenix currency in 2018.
In the entire world of finance, the rothschilds are the lords that run the whole show.
All financial innovations are the works of the banksters.
Bitcoin will usher the advent of the Mark of the Beast.
Many people will worship the Mark of the Beast.
These people will lose their spiritual foundation.
Bitcoin (and all the other cryptocurrencies) will die someday.
The day such event comes is the day where human civilization starts entering a Dark age without recourse.
The reason why Bitcoin is not being stopped is precisely because it is the work of the banksters that will enslave everyone when the time comes.
Bitcoin is far more efficient on enslavement and the enforcement of obedience than fiat money and physical gold.
Watch out anyone who says Bitcoin is the saviour is either fucking deluded, or is part of the bankster's agenda.
The one and only salvation for humanity has always been religion and spiritual foundation at their purest form (i.e. no false master, no false guru, no twisting of the truth, no biased interpretation, no blasphemy, etc).

Update:
Before Bitcoin (and every other cryptocurrencies) dies, the entire conventional system that we have now will be totally displaced by the world of digital currency and blockchain, i.e. everything will be based on the blockchain, no more cash.
Everyone that is into cryptocurrencies will be filthy rich while the transition is ongoing.
But as they say, the more money a person has, the more corrupt he becomes.
In the future, the world will continue to be much darker than ever, no golden age whatsoever.
Those who have lose their spiritual foundation will commit many heavy sins.
These heavy sins will cause the perpetrator to be reborn into a world with much worse condition as punishment.
Recovery will be very hard.
Many will be severed from the Divine and retrogress beyond recognition.

Update #2:
Question: Why do the banksters and governments keep trying hard to stop bitcoin and yet they continue to fail?
Answer: They are nothing but drama, fake news, lip service, distraction, falsehood. If you want to trap a rat into a cage, you will not tell the rat that the cage is a trap. If you think the governments and banksters are straightforward in their actions and speeches, then I say you are so pitiful you probably were born yesterday.

Update #3:
Don't be a follower. Be a leader.
Don't accept every news as if they are the outright truth.
Question everything you read, hear, and see.
balanghai
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


View Profile
October 28, 2017, 06:36:18 PM
 #179

Because government ,themselves, also use it. Some politicians might also use Bitcoin hide a large amount of money inside the cryptocurrency.

My government is not legalized bitcoin instead they forbid bitcoin for using as transaction.
Luckily I still can own bitcoin without fear getting arrest by law enforcer because they still not make the regulation toward bitcoin

It's sad to see my government choosing this way ...

1 BITCOIN bisa beli Berapa Bungkus MICIN ?
yyz13857180757
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88


View Profile
October 31, 2017, 02:28:52 AM
 #180


bitcoin  seen as challenging their authority,so some conntry forbid it.but they also see the enormous potential of bitcoin

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!