█【ANN】【DAPP】█ 🌟🌟🌟 BLOCKLANCER 🌟🌟🌟 ██ JOIN GIG ECONOMY BOOM

[Mokel]

maybe bounty and signautre attendees to date have to be patient to wait for the division that will be done by the project and I think the project has a lot of investors and I can not wait to wait for the market that will sell token to buy from the project

[napyfak]

5613sig

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Blocklancer is officially in a cooperation with the Ties.Network.

Looks interesting. Is the Ties.DB from Q1 going to be enough to get Blocklancer operational? Or what exactly is the plan for the implementation of the Blocklancer platform with respect to the Ties.Network?

[Sweet_Angel]

Please fix my twitter campaign, it's still zero stake.

Thank you so much 

[Blocklancer]

Please fix my twitter campaign, it's still zero stake.

Thank you so much 

Hi,

what is your email with which you registered on Blocklancer?

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

[Blocklancer]

Blocklancer is officially in a cooperation with the Ties.Network.

Looks interesting. Is the Ties.DB from Q1 going to be enough to get Blocklancer operational? Or what exactly is the plan for the implementation of the Blocklancer platform with respect to the Ties.Network?

Thank you for the interesting question

As you see in our roadmap, we want to fully decentralize the Blocklancer platform. Unfortunately there is currently no optimal solution out there to decentralize the data storage tier of  Dapps. Basically there is IPFS (as a decentralized filesystem), BigChainDB and Ties.DB, who are working on solutions to decentralize the data storage of Dapps. In our opinion Ties.DB is the most promising solution at the moment therefore we are cooperating with them to create a great solution for decentralized data storage.

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

[Blocklancer]

When the end bounty campaign

After the ICO

When the end ico.  ?is this project still running?

ICO has not started yet, it is currently scheduled for Winter 2017/2018

But my facebook and twiter bounty campaign not counted?

Hi,

we try to update the stakes at least once a week.

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

[Kayaman85]

5563sig

[4x4et]

Blocklancer is officially in a cooperation with the Ties.Network.

Looks interesting. Is the Ties.DB from Q1 going to be enough to get Blocklancer operational? Or what exactly is the plan for the implementation of the Blocklancer platform with respect to the Ties.Network?

Thank you for the interesting question

As you see in our roadmap, we want to fully decentralize the Blocklancer platform. Unfortunately there is currently no optimal solution out there to decentralize the data storage tier of  Dapps. Basically there is IPFS (as a decentralized filesystem), BigChainDB and Ties.DB, who are working on solutions to decentralize the data storage of Dapps. In our opinion Ties.DB is the most promising solution at the moment therefore we are cooperating with them to create a great solution for decentralized data storage.

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

How do you want to decentralize it?

What does it mean to people who are participating in this?

[niklasmato]

Blocklancer is officially in a cooperation with the Ties.Network.

So if I get it correctly, you will use the database of Ties and IPFS to operate the Blocklancer network?

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Looks interesting. Is the Ties.DB from Q1 going to be enough to get Blocklancer operational? Or what exactly is the plan for the implementation of the Blocklancer platform with respect to the Ties.Network?

Thank you for the interesting question

As you see in our roadmap, we want to fully decentralize the Blocklancer platform. Unfortunately there is currently no optimal solution out there to decentralize the data storage tier of  Dapps. Basically there is IPFS (as a decentralized filesystem), BigChainDB and Ties.DB, who are working on solutions to decentralize the data storage of Dapps. In our opinion Ties.DB is the most promising solution at the moment therefore we are cooperating with them to create a great solution for decentralized data storage.

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

Thanks for the quick response!

Does the cooperation have any implications on your timeline though? As far as I recall you were originally not intending to cooperate with Ties.DB, so that presents a new and exciting change to the development of your platform.

What I'm curious about though, is whether or not this new cooperation will change the time at which you expect to go live with the Blocklancer platform.

Will everything remain the same or get a little delayed due to the new cooperation, or will it perhaps even accelerate your plans?

[thealex12]

Blocklancer is officially in a cooperation with the Ties.Network.

Looks interesting. Is the Ties.DB from Q1 going to be enough to get Blocklancer operational? Or what exactly is the plan for the implementation of the Blocklancer platform with respect to the Ties.Network?

Thank you for the interesting question

As you see in our roadmap, we want to fully decentralize the Blocklancer platform. Unfortunately there is currently no optimal solution out there to decentralize the data storage tier of  Dapps. Basically there is IPFS (as a decentralized filesystem), BigChainDB and Ties.DB, who are working on solutions to decentralize the data storage of Dapps. In our opinion Ties.DB is the most promising solution at the moment therefore we are cooperating with them to create a great solution for decentralized data storage.

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

How do you want to decentralize it?

What does it mean to people who are participating in this?

As the Dev mentioned, the storage will be decentralized through Ties, IPFS or one of these solutions. Imagine these data storages like a second layer of the blockchain, still secure and decentralized but much faster. How does this affect you? Well, your data on the platform will be safe and  will load a lot faster than if it was direclty on Blockchain.

If there is anything else or something I should complete please tell

[thealex12]

Looks interesting. Is the Ties.DB from Q1 going to be enough to get Blocklancer operational? Or what exactly is the plan for the implementation of the Blocklancer platform with respect to the Ties.Network?

Thank you for the interesting question

As you see in our roadmap, we want to fully decentralize the Blocklancer platform. Unfortunately there is currently no optimal solution out there to decentralize the data storage tier of  Dapps. Basically there is IPFS (as a decentralized filesystem), BigChainDB and Ties.DB, who are working on solutions to decentralize the data storage of Dapps. In our opinion Ties.DB is the most promising solution at the moment therefore we are cooperating with them to create a great solution for decentralized data storage.

Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team

Thanks for the quick response!

Does the cooperation have any implications on your timeline though? As far as I recall you were originally not intending to cooperate with Ties.DB, so that presents a new and exciting change to the development of your platform.

What I'm curious about though, is whether or not this new cooperation will change the time at which you expect to go live with the Blocklancer platform.

Will everything remain the same or get a little delayed due to the new cooperation, or will it perhaps even accelerate your plans?

The Alpha will be running this month and the beta launch will be in winter 17/18 soon after the ICO, the decentralized storage will be included very soon after the main release. Due to we don't have an exact date yet, we can't really announce if it will come a little bit sooner or later. Also, a short term roadmap will be published soon.

[NeuroticR]

Is it basically a family project? Kaiser family? Three out of four co-founders have same family name. Who is the founder btw?

[centrum]

hi, may i know when is the date of your tokens sale? have you already started it?

[thealex12]

hi, may i know when is the date of your tokens sale? have you already started it?

Our ICO will start in December

[thealex12]

Is it basically a family project? Kaiser family? Three out of four co-founders have same family name. Who is the founder btw?

In Blocklancer the team is hired because of qualifications, and if someone knows trustful people that is perfectly able to acomplish their job that is always the best option. Please don't think negatively about this in any way. Only because three team members share the surname doesn't mean that this project isn't taken seriously, at the oppossite, it guarantees trust between the team members.

Thanks for your attention.

[NeuroticR]

Is it basically a family project? Kaiser family? Three out of four co-founders have same family name. Who is the founder btw?

In Blocklancer the team is hired because of qualifications, and if someone knows trustful people that is perfectly able to acomplish their job that is always the best option. Please don't discriminate the team in any way. Only because three team members share the surname doesn't mean that this project isn't taken seriously, at the oppossite, it guarantees trust between the team members.

Thanks for your attention.

I am not trying to discriminate the team by any means or questioning their qualification. Rather once visiting the website, I was quite surprised and got the impression that it is more likely to be a family project. I am now curious to know about the unpublished founder.
Sometimes, there are more qualified persons out there with different surnames!

[spopovss]

Why doesn't consider a staks in an office, several weeks I perform tasks but considers nothing that maidens not so Dev?
https://twitter.com/spopovss
https://www.facebook.com/sergey.popov.9461799

[thealex12]

Is it basically a family project? Kaiser family? Three out of four co-founders have same family name. Who is the founder btw?

In Blocklancer the team is hired because of qualifications, and if someone knows trustful people that is perfectly able to acomplish their job that is always the best option. Please don't discriminate the team in any way. Only because three team members share the surname doesn't mean that this project isn't taken seriously, at the oppossite, it guarantees trust between the team members.

Thanks for your attention.

I am not trying to discriminate the team by any means or questioning their qualification. Rather once visiting the website, I was quite surprised and got the impression that it is more likely to be a family project. I am now curious to know about the unpublished founder.
Sometimes, there are more qualified persons out there with different surnames!

There are only co-founder titles, there is not a unique founder. The four co-founders work toguether to create the best platform possible. You can always look deeper into the team members to find more information.