[ANN][ICO] Spectiv: DECENTRALIZED VIRTUAL REALITY (OLD THREAD)

[Ipwich]

Why was the ICO date changed from august to December?

Can't find any information about it.

EDIT: I just read their update.  I am happy that they have changed some things in their project.  I will be checking what is going on closer to the date so see what other changes have been made.  I still think that a ~$40m hard cap is too high though and is just going to deter investors.

There is no pint in rushing the ICO. I agree that 40M is a bit too much for the hard cap. They should reconsider that too.

It's a hard cap, I think it's good to see a high hard cap because if they cannot reach that and they were able to reach the
minimum cap they would still gonna start the development. They have prepared for this so we just have to trust the team, it will be successful.

[1713261286]

1713261286

[1713261286]

1713261286

[1713261286]

1713261286

[1713261286]

1713261286

[1713261286]

1713261286

[icorating]

The ICORating Agency gives the Basic Review of The Spectiv Project.

http://icorating.com/project/230/spectiv/review

Our Basic Review aims to give investors an overview of the project's strengths and weaknesses. The Basic Review is an analysis without audit and investment highlights rating estimation, giving only the rating grade for the project's long-term investment potential.

[BonTonPlease]

Why was the ICO date changed from august to December?

Can't find any information about it.

EDIT: I just read their update.  I am happy that they have changed some things in their project.  I will be checking what is going on closer to the date so see what other changes have been made.  I still think that a ~$40m hard cap is too high though and is just going to deter investors.

There is no pint in rushing the ICO. I agree that 40M is a bit too much for the hard cap. They should reconsider that too.

It's a hard cap, I think it's good to see a high hard cap because if they cannot reach that and they were able to reach the
minimum cap they would still gonna start the development. They have prepared for this so we just have to trust the team, it will be successful.

Why is that hard cap a bit too much? In the end it all depends on how they are going to use those funds assuming they really collect $40 mio. I wouldn't say that a hard cap is bad in any way if you have a responsible and talented dev team.

[jojobaron]

Sorry for my question, but can I participate these 2 months in other signature?

sorry, you can't

[Ipwich]

The ICORating Agency gives the Basic Review of The Spectiv Project.

http://icorating.com/project/230/spectiv/review

Our Basic Review aims to give investors an overview of the project's strengths and weaknesses. The Basic Review is an analysis without audit and investment highlights rating estimation, giving only the rating grade for the project's long-term investment potential.

Why can't I access the link here? it says, "400. That’s an error." "The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know."
Please fix it, I used  google chrome and opera to access it, but still error.

[mamse44]

Answer me 2 questions spectiv team

1) Why just 5 days ago you were going around asking for money from investors, giving them a 100 percent bonus in a desperate attempt at that time a few weeks before your ICO even started. This has scam written all over it. And now then to make matters worse, you move your date to December. There is no excuse for going around asking money from investors 3 weeks before you even make it public, and giving a 100 percent bonus to them and not that to everyone else.

2) How do you call that a preview, all you did was take a 360 youtube video, run a little overlay on it and paste it on your website. I would highly suggest getting some real developers on your team. With VibeHub lightyears ahead of you and about to spend a lot of money for there  official ICO which starts in 4 days. You guys really messed up here in so many ways.

Highly upsetting, and I'm not sure who the founders are but it seems to me the people running this ship have no clue what they are doing in crypto and better yet for Virtual Reality technology for that matter

[zlatochka]

Will it be possible to return to the signature later than on October 20? For example, in November?

[Saichoukyushin]

Soon some ICO on virtual reality will begin! Are there any similarities with Spectiv? Spectiv is doing very well, because she is worried about delivering a product and not words! ICO will take many days, that's the saddest part.

For sure there will be another competence to provide VR project other than spectiv soon. I saw this campaign is now pause way back this week or last week? but i think it is much better because they filnalize all legalities to provide best VR ico .

[legendbtc]

Legal terms are always good when launching a good project but I have seen many projects after the restart they never opened anything because they left the project. Here you are still responding to people question but how can people believe you without checking them before launching it.

[mamse44]

Answer me 2 questions spectiv team

1) Why just 5 days ago you were going around asking for money from investors, giving them a 100 percent bonus in a desperate attempt at that time a few weeks before your ICO even started. This has scam written all over it. And now then to make matters worse, you move your date to December. There is no excuse for going around asking money from investors 3 weeks before you even make it public, and giving a 100 percent bonus to them and not that to everyone else.

2) How do you call that a preview, all you did was take a 360 youtube video, run a little overlay on it and paste it on your website. I would highly suggest getting some real developers on your team. With VibeHub lightyears ahead of you and about to spend a lot of money for there  official ICO which starts in 4 days. You guys really messed up here in so many ways.

Highly upsetting, and I'm not sure who the founders are but it seems to me the people running this ship have no clue what they are doing in crypto and better yet for Virtual Reality technology for that matter

Please don't ignore my question. Also nobody is doing what you are doing? Seriously, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRMSlbKOum0 Your whole business model is a feature on VibeHub and they already have 360 videos integrated in Virtual Reality to make it amazing. It would be smart for you to be in contact with them in the future

Sorry to be bashful but I can't sit here and let you lie to the community like this, I am deeply concerned with your teams awareness of Virtual Reality Technology and how it works

[filipo]

If I understand correctly to get payment for the work done, we can not participate in the captions of other companies in the next two months?

[coin_1122]

If I understand correctly to get payment for the work done, we can not participate in the captions of other companies in the next two months?

They have given the option for you because if you want to participate again on Oct 20th you can join again and they will pay the coins for the work you have done till now. But the only problem is whether they will launch again or not nobody doesn't know because previously I have seen something like Tasike.

[shenjing85]

Will it be possible to return to the signature later than on October 20? For example, in November?

Yes, of course it will. October 20th will likely just be the first day we relaunch the bounty.

OK, so there are two months left and I will choose to join in another bounty campaign. And before October 20th, I will be back to this signature bounty.

[Freezingel]

Answer me 2 questions spectiv team

1) Why just 5 days ago you were going around asking for money from investors, giving them a 100 percent bonus in a desperate attempt at that time a few weeks before your ICO even started. This has scam written all over it. And now then to make matters worse, you move your date to December. There is no excuse for going around asking money from investors 3 weeks before you even make it public, and giving a 100 percent bonus to them and not that to everyone else.

2) How do you call that a preview, all you did was take a 360 youtube video, run a little overlay on it and paste it on your website. I would highly suggest getting some real developers on your team. With VibeHub lightyears ahead of you and about to spend a lot of money for there  official ICO which starts in 4 days. You guys really messed up here in so many ways.

Highly upsetting, and I'm not sure who the founders are but it seems to me the people running this ship have no clue what they are doing in crypto and better yet for Virtual Reality technology for that matter

Please don't ignore my question. Also nobody is doing what you are doing? Seriously, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRMSlbKOum0 Your whole business model is a feature on VibeHub and they already have 360 videos integrated in Virtual Reality to make it amazing. It would be smart for you to be in contact with them in the future

Sorry to be bashful but I can't sit here and let you lie to the community like this, I am deeply concerned with your teams awareness of Virtual Reality Technology and how it works

What are you talking about? The ico is postponed to December, so there's still a few months for them to fix things and show better demo etc. I agree though about the demo part.

[rusmana62]

people will not come again to this ICO. you should be programme these thing before.

Do not be too negative-minded like that because everyone believes this is a good project just maybe dev holding ICO until October because it has a very reason in the calculation and I hope that later on everyone starts going here

[mamse44]

Answer me 2 questions spectiv team

1) Why just 5 days ago you were going around asking for money from investors, giving them a 100 percent bonus in a desperate attempt at that time a few weeks before your ICO even started. This has scam written all over it. And now then to make matters worse, you move your date to December. There is no excuse for going around asking money from investors 3 weeks before you even make it public, and giving a 100 percent bonus to them and not that to everyone else.

2) How do you call that a preview, all you did was take a 360 youtube video, run a little overlay on it and paste it on your website. I would highly suggest getting some real developers on your team. With VibeHub lightyears ahead of you and about to spend a lot of money for there  official ICO which starts in 4 days. You guys really messed up here in so many ways.

Highly upsetting, and I'm not sure who the founders are but it seems to me the people running this ship have no clue what they are doing in crypto and better yet for Virtual Reality technology for that matter

Please don't ignore my question. Also nobody is doing what you are doing? Seriously, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRMSlbKOum0 Your whole business model is a feature on VibeHub and they already have 360 videos integrated in Virtual Reality to make it amazing. It would be smart for you to be in contact with them in the future

Sorry to be bashful but I can't sit here and let you lie to the community like this, I am deeply concerned with your teams awareness of Virtual Reality Technology and how it works

What are you talking about? The ico is postponed to December, so there's still a few months for them to fix things and show better demo etc. I agree though about the demo part.

What am I talking about??? Do you pay attention to the market, Decentraland just raised 30 million and VibeHub by the end of their campaign will do well also, even looq is doing ok at this point. Spectiv is going to be too far behind by Decemeber, they  have no real developers yet by the looks of that demo, and with theeirdesperate attempt last week to offer 100 bonus to people they obviously have no money to hire any. IMO the only reason why they moved their sale was to avoid taxes by setting it up in africa. That is the only reason that makes sense,

i was supportive of this project, but from what ive seen tech wise, offering 100 percent discounts on an ico that isn't till December (very scammy) , moving dates to avoid taxes, other VR companies miles ahead in tech and funding. This is not good for spectiv.

They have stated in numerous interviews on Youtube, they began this concept in 2015. There is zero excuse for this level of immaturity with that amount of time working on it, everyone supporting this project should be very concerned

[sud]

i was supportive of this project, but from what ive seen tech wise, offering 100 percent discounts on an ico that isn't till December (very scammy) , moving dates to avoid taxes, other VR companies miles ahead in tech and funding. This is not good for spectiv

What 100% discount scammy attempt are you talking about exactly?

[mamse44]

i was supportive of this project, but from what ive seen tech wise, offering 100 percent discounts on an ico that isn't till December (very scammy) , moving dates to avoid taxes, other VR companies miles ahead in tech and funding. This is not good for spectiv

What 100% discount scammy attempt are you talking about exactly?

Last week the spectiv team was going around to certain investors offering them a 100 percent discount on bulk orders for that day only, Their ICO at that time wasn't for 3 weeks and now is moved till December. I have no idea how they thought they could pull this off without people hearing about it, it came off very desperate im told

[luksbit]

So, when will the tokens be sold? This date reported here in the ANN changed correct? Spectiv VR Crowdsale: 08/14/17 

[shenjing85]

What am I talking about??? Do you pay attention to the market, Decentraland just raised 30 million and VibeHub by the end of their campaign will do well also, even looq is doing ok at this point. Spectiv is going to be too far behind by Decemeber, they  have no real developers yet by the looks of that demo, and with theeirdesperate attempt last week to offer 100 bonus to people they obviously have no money to hire any. IMO the only reason why they moved their sale was to avoid taxes by setting it up in africa. That is the only reason that makes sense,

i was supportive of this project, but from what ive seen tech wise, offering 100 percent discounts on an ico that isn't till December (very scammy) , moving dates to avoid taxes, other VR companies miles ahead in tech and funding. This is not good for spectiv.

They have stated in numerous interviews on Youtube, they began this concept in 2015. There is zero excuse for this level of immaturity with that amount of time working on it, everyone supporting this project should be very concerned

It is the truth that  Decentraland and some other similar projects have finished the ICO and it seems the ICOs are successful, VR market is a hot market, but it is better to start to join in ASAP.