I been given negative feedback for no important reason

[ripplehd1]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans and i'm trying to scam which i have not or will not even think of doing in the future he has no proof that i will and I think it should be removed as i'm not even a newbie asking for loans either.

[1524590941]

1524590941

[1524590941]

1524590941

[1524590941]

1524590941

[Vod]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans

You asked for a $3,500 loan.  That is a pretty important reason!

[ripplehd1]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans

You asked for a $3,500 loan.  That is a pretty important reason!

Not really no i asked for someone to invest in my project and if they were to i would of gave them equity back, never mind now i have to refrain from posting threads like this otherwise my feedback will turn to smudges

[kiklo]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans

You asked for a $3,500 loan.  That is a pretty important reason!

Did he get the loan and not pay it back or was your DT trigger finger just itchy?


 


FYI:
Asking & Receiving are two different things.
Example , I asked theymos to fix his broken ass trust system ,
as of yet, I have yet to even receive a reply.


FYI2:
DT members claim to Police the Non-DT members.
So who polices the DT members, not a damn soul.

[The Pharmacist]

OP, suck it up.  You would know proper loan and other etiquette had you waited before asking for a ridiculous loan and the trust and all that.  Kiklo, you make all of these threads about you and your grudge.  Be practical.   It's in your best interest right now to pipe down, lest you go the way of mixan (I think he got banned if I'm not mistaken).  It's not the end of the world for either of you,  but railing against the system at top volume never ends well for the railee.

Edit:  I totally understand--the trust system is completely messed up and I've never seen a wackier system on any other forum.   

[kiklo]

OP, suck it up.  You would know proper loan and other etiquette had you waited before asking for a ridiculous loan and the trust and all that.  Kiklo, you make all of these threads about you and your grudge.  Be practical.   It's in your best interest right now to pipe down, lest you go the way of mixan (I think he got banned if I'm not mistaken).  It's not the end of the world for either of you,  but railing against the system at top volume never ends well for the railee.

Edit:  I totally understand--the trust system is completely messed up and I've never seen a wackier system on any other forum.   

Pharmacist , I don't need you to tell me what my best interests are.
One False Negative Rating was all it took, I have nothing left to lose.

You admit the trust system is broken, and you expect me to cower like the rest of you bitches,
you really don't know who you are dealing with.

Evil continues because Good Men do nothing.

I have no fear of theymos or a  ban or any other bullshit Blazed & Lauda might pull.
So fuck off telling me to pipe down and mind your own business.

 

[Vod]

He is a child and needs to cry himself to sleep.  I suggest everyone ignore him and let him do just that.   

[kiklo]

He is a child and needs to cry himself to sleep.  I suggest everyone ignore him and let him do just that.  

Says the overzealous DT member that tries to make himself feel like a man by pathetically negative rating on his pitiful whims. What's a matter fat man, truth hurt?

Maybe you should take a self esteem class , so you don't have to be such a prick.

 

FYI:
Maybe you should just scratch that itchy DT trigger finger, next time.
Instead of just negging someone to try and make yourself feel important.
Really quite pathetic vod.

[Vod]

He is a child and needs to cry himself to sleep.  I suggest everyone ignore him and let him do just that.   

Says the overzealous DT member that tries to make himself feel like a man by pathetically negative rating on his pitiful whims. What's a matter fat man, truth hurt?

Maybe you should take a self esteem class , so you don't have to be such a prick.

 

I don't think your nap was long enough... you are still cranky. 

[2girls]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans and i'm trying to scam which i have not or will not even think of doing in the future he has no proof that i will and I think it should be removed as i'm not even a newbie asking for loans either.

Wow, just forget about it, no one cares about the trust and haven't sent it started being abused a year or more back. Once they click through, if they care to they will see that it is just some people, a known abuser of the system. 

[kiklo]

I don't think your nap was long enough... you are still cranky.  

And you will still be a pathetic DT Member prick whether I take a nap or not.    


 

[ripplehd1]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this  so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

[sbogovac]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response [...]

Isn't it obvious...? It really says so in the trust rating itself: "Trust farming."

And you did say (as referenced in the trust rating):

hi i'm offering a [Signature campaign] management service for your signature campaign so i can build trust and become more reputable in the community. [...]

Trust farming is against the BCT forum policy...  

[ripplehd1]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response [...]

Isn't it obvious...? It really says so in the trust rating itself: "Trust farming."

And you did say (as referenced in the trust rating):

hi i'm offering a [Signature campaign] management service for your signature campaign so i can build trust and become more reputable in the community. [...]

Trust farming is against the BCT forum policy...  

i know now and won't do it again so if someone can remove the trust please do

[stiffbud]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response [...]

Isn't it obvious...? It really says so in the trust rating itself: "Trust farming."

And you did say (as referenced in the trust rating):

hi i'm offering a [Signature campaign] management service for your signature campaign so i can build trust and become more reputable in the community. [...]

Trust farming is against the BCT forum policy...  

i know now and won't do it again so if someone can remove the trust please do

If words like I won't do it again is a valid way to get a negative trust remove then all scammers in this forum will do the same. Prove whoever sent you that feedback that you have no intention to scam or do shits again and maube he'll reconsider.

[sbogovac]

[...] if someone can remove the trust please do

Sorry man, doesn't really work that way...  

The only one who can remove it is the one who posted it. And "knowing" these two it will take time. Time that you can use to show you are a constructive member of this (Bitcointalk) community...

We've got a saying here (where I'm from): "trust comes by foot, but goes by horse", meaning something like: you can easily lose trust, but it is hard to gain...

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, man... But hope you genuinely sort it out...

[Vod]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this  so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

Making threats won't help get the negative trust removed either.

I suggest you go from this forum and mature for a couple years before returning.  Don't spend your youth in front of a computer screen. 

[8xbt.com]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

[ripplehd1]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

i understand your a dog so i wont proceed with the conversation 

[kiklo]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

You do realize your English Grammar is not perfect.   

玻璃屋裡的人不應該投擲石塊     


 

[8xbt.com]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

You do realize your English Grammar is not perfect.  

玻璃屋裡的人不應該投擲石塊    


 

I have a MA degree in linguistics in a top 50 uni, there is no such thing as perfect grammar, because even within England, there are some regional differences in grammar. Also language changes over time.

Your usage of the word 擲 shows that you are not a standard Chinese user.

[8xbt.com]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

i understand your a dog so i wont proceed with the conversation 

No one wants you to proceed with any conversations as you are a amazing dog with -8 rating.

[kiklo]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

You do realize your English Grammar is not perfect.   

玻璃屋裡的人不應該投擲石塊     


 

I have a MA degree in linguistics in a top 50 uni, there is no such thing as perfect grammar, because even within England, there are some regional differences in grammar. Also language changes over time.

Your usage of the word 擲 shows that you are not a standard Chinese user.

I prefer the traditional style over the simplified  , ancients have a tenancy to do that. 

 

[8xbt.com]

now Lauda has given me negative trust and i messaged why with no response if that negative trust doesn't get removed ill give her negative trust and keep making threads about this   so lauda you best respond back you think your big on here but i don't think so.

I think member with poor English grammar significantly lowers the quality of the forum and should be excluded.

You do realize your English Grammar is not perfect.   

玻璃屋裡的人不應該投擲石塊     


 

I have a MA degree in linguistics in a top 50 uni, there is no such thing as perfect grammar, because even within England, there are some regional differences in grammar. Also language changes over time.

Your usage of the word 擲 shows that you are not a standard Chinese user.

I prefer the traditional style over the simplified  , ancients have a tenancy to do that. 

 

No one use traditional Chinese in this forum, so you can see who is pathetic.

[kiklo]

No one use traditional Chinese in this forum, so you can see who is pathetic.

Hmm,
I did , you must not be as bright as you claim.
The way you keep trying to talk about my junk, you must be some sort of Chinese pervert.
Are you a LadyBoy?   

Sorry not into the freaking hermaphrodite scene, you will have to look elsewhere,
from what I hear Vod is hard up , try him. You could be his madama butterfly. 


 

[Iranus]

No one use traditional Chinese in this forum, so you can see who is pathetic.

Hmm,
I did , you must not be as bright as you claim.
The way you keep trying to talk about my junk, you must be some sort of Chinese pervert.
Are you a LadyBoy?   

Sorry not into the freaking hermaphrodite scene, you will have to look elsewhere,
from what I hear Vod is hard up , try him. You could be his madama butterfly. 


 

If you're really as old as you say you are, is this all you have to do with your time?

Fighting over and over again with a stranger over some petty dispute on a forum for cryptocurrencies?  Coming up with loads of bullshit methods to attack the forum for your personal dispute?  Are you really that pathetic?

If so, I feel sorry for you.

The trust system is screwed up, but the main way to fix it is to change your trust list and not include Lauda or hilariousandco on it if you hate them that much...

[kiklo]

No one use traditional Chinese in this forum, so you can see who is pathetic.

Hmm,
I did , you must not be as bright as you claim.
The way you keep trying to talk about my junk, you must be some sort of Chinese pervert.
Are you a LadyBoy?   

Sorry not into the freaking hermaphrodite scene, you will have to look elsewhere,
from what I hear Vod is hard up , try him. You could be his madama butterfly. 


 

If you're really as old as you say you are, is this all you have to do with your time?

Fighting over and over again with a stranger over some petty dispute on a forum for cryptocurrencies?  Coming up with loads of bullshit methods to attack the forum for your personal dispute?  Are you really that pathetic?

If so, I feel sorry for you.

The trust system is screwed up, but the main way to fix it is to change your trust list and not include Lauda or hilariousandco on it if you hate them that much...

Here let me modify that for you .

If you're really are younger than me ,  is this all you have to do with your time, is read what I type?

Watching an 84 year old Fight over and over again with a Gang of DT thugs.

If so, I feel sorry for you. Go the Fuck outside , make love to a woman.
Get the Fuck away from the keyboard.

Oh , one more thing shut the fuck up about how I spent my time, it is really none of your damn business ,
I suggest you worry more about yourself than me , nancy.

If anyone is pathetic it is your whiny ass, don't read the damn forum.

You admit : The trust system is screwed up.
I think the way to bring down lies is to shine the light on it.
and I got the time so shine shine this little light of mine.

Don't like it , don't read it and go cry over something else, your generation is too damn sensitive.


 

[Mrbates]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans

You asked for a $3,500 loan.  That is a pretty important reason!

I think anyone willing to lend someone 3500 without a full doxx and collateral probably needs more help than the community can provide.

However labeling an action before it is confirmed, is kind of extreme.  Its like... Castrating a child because they may give birth to hitler 20 years later.


/Shrug

@iranus
I think you're one of the few neg trust legends I've ever seen lol.

[Vod]

However labeling an action before it is confirmed, is kind of extreme.  Its like... Castrating a child because they may give birth to hitler 20 years later.

If we were to tag scammers only after they scammed, this place would be overrun.  Trust is useless once someone has scammed!  It's trivial for a scammer to make a new account and do it again and again.

By recognizing the signs of a potential scam, we tag in advance and stop them from happening.

[kiklo]

However labeling an action before it is confirmed, is kind of extreme.  Its like... Castrating a child because they may give birth to hitler 20 years later.

If we were to tag scammers only after they scammed, this place would be overrun.  Trust is useless once someone has scammed!  It's trivial for a scammer to make a new account and do it again and again.

By recognizing the signs of a potential scam, we tag in advance and stop them from happening.

You are so Full of Shit, we should call you Toilet!



I have scammed no one, the only one pulling the scam is Lauda & Blazed by using their status as DT members to stifle their competition for Escrow services and signature campaigns.

Your DT gang is just a bunch of cheaters that can't compete in an argument or in providing a service unless you smear others with a lying bullshit trust system.

You asshats only neg people you either lose an argument too, or want to stop them from offering a competing service, DT members like you are the lowest form of scum the virtual world has to offer, and you hide behind theymos and those lying ass green trust ratings which are completely worthless to anyone that knows how your  bitscam works.



 

[ripplehd1]

i don't understand Lauda removed my feedback yesterday and today my feedback is back on -4 again. is this some sort of glitch on bitcointalk?

[Mrbates]

i don't understand Lauda removed my feedback yesterday and today my feedback is back on -4 again. is this some sort of glitch on bitcointalk?

Did the same thing to me as well, it reppeared as negative after like 5 days though.

[Pearls Before Swine]

i don't understand Lauda removed my feedback yesterday and today my feedback is back on -4 again. is this some sort of glitch on bitcointalk?

Removed, you say?  I still see the trust farming feedback that Lauda left.  I don't see that what you said was all that bad, but you should probably have known that announcing that you're looking to build trust is viewed with suspicion by a lot of people here.  You might in fact be trustworthy,  but one of the tactics scammers use is to farm trust in order to pull off an exit scam.  Oops!  Hopefully you'll learn from that.

[Lauda]

You obviously do not understand the trust system. I have never removed any feedback on you, nor do I plan to. What happened is that I, for whatever reason, got excluded from DT for a couple of days (?) which made my rating not visible by default (thus not affecting your score by default either). Now that I am back in DT, my rating is visible again.

[ripplehd1]

You obviously do not understand the trust system. I have never removed any feedback on you, nor do I plan to. What happened is that I, for whatever reason, got excluded from DT for a couple of days (?) which made my rating not visible by default (thus not affecting your score by default either). Now that I am back in DT, my rating is visible again.

well you sent me a private message saying you will remove it in a few months, i still have proof if you want me to show you 

[Lauda]

I have placed you on ignore for wasting space in my PM box with this matter. A couple of months != several messages in =< 2 months.

[ripplehd1]

Ok now no one is doing anything for me so when can my feedback be removed; i will also bump this everyday because i don't see the point of having negative feedback if i'm not doing anything untrustworthy

[ripplehd1]

bump still need my feedback removed i'm not suspicious on bct

[ripplehd1]

I have placed you on ignore for wasting space in my PM box with this matter. A couple of months != several messages in =< 2 months.

so you did tell me that i'd get my negative feedback removed its been 3 months

[Affilate User]

right now this user thinks i have asked for loans and i'm trying to scam which i have not or will not even think of doing in the future he has no proof that i will and I think it should be removed as i'm not even a newbie asking for loans either.

Offering to build trust can lead you to the opposite, you do not have to offer trust, trust will come naturally.
Look at this person : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=896353 got negatif trust because it wants to be escrow.

[dieselfrank]

Wow, just forget about it, no one cares about the trust and haven't sent it started being abused a year or more back. Once they click through, if they care to they will see that it is just some people, a known abuser of the system. 

You are correct, CryptoDevil is a perfect example.....hundreds of negative ratings of others, not one fucking positive rating. Abusing the rating system is all he does. I'm curious if he has ever posted a single positive thing. Over in the Sigt thread he has been exposed as a piece of shit scammer, it fits. The one yelling scam the loudest typically are the biggest scammers around. I'm curious though, who he paid off to not be banned. Hundreds of ridiculous negative ratings, no positives. Is that really the kind of scum this forum holds up on a pedestal?

[ripplehd1]

i still want to know why my trust is not changing, i have zero scams against me

[ripplehd1]

bump

[KWH]

i still want to know why my trust is not changing, i have zero scams against me

Your answer is in plain red:

Lauda   2017-06-21   0.00000000   Reference   Trust farming.
EcuaMobi   2017-06-20   0.00000000   Reference   Several red flags: farming trust, trying to offer an escrow service without previous trust, asking for a loan without collateral. Always use an escrow if dealing with this user. Never lend without valid collateral worth more than the loan plus interest
Lone Shark   2017-06-10   0.00000000   Reference   //Trust Farming//

User is operating services for the sole purpose of gaining trust, which may or may not lead to scamming due to trust gain.

[snedyolo]

Why would anyone give a negative feedback for no particular reason. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people who think that they can get away with anything that they want to do. Let’s not tolerate this kind of behavior.

[actmyname]

Why would anyone give a negative feedback for no particular reason. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people who think that they can get away with anything that they want to do. Let’s not tolerate this kind of behavior.

Why would anyone not read the thread and instead just comment based on the title. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people that think that they can get away with any bullshit vague and general post that they want to type. Let's not tolerate this kind of behavior.