Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2021, 09:20:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Laurentia Pool - BAD risk for miners  (Read 2117 times)
minefarmbuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 207


We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
August 28, 2020, 03:15:20 PM
 #121

Marketing guy? We don’t have copywriters or the such. How unsurprisingly assumptive of you to speak on what we do.

Link your site again and deflect this thread isn’t about you or your pool.

Again, this is your/Kano’s narrative.

All I communicated was the results of my and others testing. Of course the pool or miner software don’t know cause to them it doesn’t matter that a unit hashes just what it produces. which with a well operating device should be on/close to spec. And sorry I choose to convey and communicate in a manner that isn’t pompous, belittling, or assumptive of peoples intelligence. Maybe that’s what makes me a “marketing guy”, being able to communicate well to broad audiences respectfully?

Laurentia Pool statistics are like all other pools statistics which it seems you may need a refresh on the definition. They are accurate but like all, they will have variance within a tolerable range to give users insight into their operations performance.

1% is the variance that was monitored overtime. If you’d like to talk about decay I’d reach out to ck. The long decay though is optimal for our environment in a service aspect as if a commitment doesn’t decide to comeback they still have potential for reward next block allowing us to compete more inline with PPS but incentivize continued participation to retain maximum payout potential.

And yes because of the decay hr pool side will appear higher, that’s a bit obvious and known to those who are familiar. Still the pool will have a set hr every diffadj as organized and stats would be better displayed for the pool on our dashboard page.

But back to marketing all these CI’s and customs decelerations just like on Mad Men.

Premier asic sourcing minefarmbuy.com #mineon
Twitter:@minefarmbuy -LN Tips-
Email: info@minefarmbuy.com PGP:1A1C A4D4 CE04 F57E 1C0C 5240 592A 09BF CCB4 F0C3
1624267238
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1624267238

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1624267238
Reply with quote  #2

1624267238
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. Server-assisted clients like blockchain.info rely on centralized servers to do their network verification for them. Although the server can't steal the client's bitcoins directly, it can easily execute double-spending-style attacks against the client.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3514
Merit: 1376


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 29, 2020, 01:37:39 AM
Last edit: August 29, 2020, 03:11:48 AM by kano
 #122

Well I guess the point that is relevant to all this is as follows:

In the past, for a very long time, I've been posting about pools that are doing their miners wrong, long before I ran a pool of my own.
-ck has been doing this also.

In the past those pools tended to not try and justify their wrong doing and we usually gave up on responding to their miners who would post like religious zealots, ignorant of the facts.
Some of these pools disappeared, some continued to run.
This is about money, so pools in general will do whatever they can to get some and not care too much about how they do it.
Miners will tend to see they are getting a reward and not really care too much if they are being filched - especially of course if they don't know.

Alas, mfb and -ck have fallen into this same arena of mismanagement, lies and deception, like those other pools we've made posts about in the past.

Your main problem has been trying to justify the crap you are going to do.
Which is it? Ignorance? You've been fed gospel by your god and won't check if it's correct? Money?

The service you will be running is sub-standard and probably better described as negligent due to your involvement with -ck in this.

I really am not interested in getting your miners, that you've misled into believing your pool will be of high quality and reliable.
They are of course already mining somewhere else, they wont come to my pool even if they do finally understand the deceptions your white paper is full of.
You are simply trying to misdirect the facts about your sub-standard offering and point this thread discussion at my pool.
Misdirection is a typical tactic of those trying to deceive others.

Pool: https://kano.is - lowest fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
minefarmbuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 207


We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2020, 08:06:31 PM
 #123

If it was about money likely we'd have a higher fee, gone for a high rent seeking score like pps. Looked at generic devs who just want a paycheck as well.

I don't expect everyone to fawn over what we're doing either. It would be nice if this could be more of a discussion than embarrassing ranting but I learned I can't control others along time ago and focus on what I'm doing/looking to achieve. I also could easily hammer, flame, and fud kano pool in retaliation. So consider the absence of that for a moment. 

I expect criticism, skepticism, but this is on another level. We knew this would happen and likely will continue to.

I'll put "the crap" we're going to do simply: Organize miners in a way to predict reward cadence and be paid directly from the network while looking push as much revenue we can directly to the users of our pool.
ckpool code and our support in organization is the best way we could achieve this.

If you don't agree with the whitepaper consider it an op-ed, and feel free to move along.
Still out of thousands of views we've only received minor critiques, outside Kano the Karen of btctalk. Which only solidifies the interpretation of the underlining motives of your relentless pursuit to discredit our, and more so, ck's work.

We can keep going around and around but the point of this thread is to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Stemming from your malice of ck predominantly. It's obvious, was expected, and as soon as we unlocked our thread you were first in line raring to go. So who is misdirecting, who's being deceptive? Maybe you're just being deceptive to yourself and your own motivations. idk, idc, but you're certainly all over the place and all over us.

I've directed you and others to reach out on our thread in an appropriate manner, reach out to ck directly on technicals. Which you like to twist and manipulate into being blind and following, in place of what it is, simply delivering the user experience side of service.

Our service is competitive in the current market, there's no negligence. If anything we're responsible and transparent enough to ensure every user knows exactly what they're getting into before hand. So more fud, more harassment, more malice, more slander, and still only specifically from you.

The case remains you'll flame anything ck touches, you pump yourself and your pool here consistently in almost every reply but are even consistent in this in every thread you touch on the forum. These are just very easy observations to make. Like calling me a "marketing guy" isn't deceptive or misdirection, calling Laurentia Pool negligent when no incidents have occurred, intentionally flaming our thread with accusations and assumptions. You have some weird interpretation of what it is to be a white knight if your true goal is expose some sort of wrong doing, which doesn't even exist.

I would love to have a genuine conversation with you about the pool, still because of our division of labor and expertise you are better off speaking with ck. So reach out to him if you really want to help the pool or others. Otherwise without an honest genuine effort there is clearly malice of intent/motive with every one of your posts and you simply can't deny that.

If people think we're being deceiving, disingenuous, then I wish them the best and can only say that's far from the truth.

Premier asic sourcing minefarmbuy.com #mineon
Twitter:@minefarmbuy -LN Tips-
Email: info@minefarmbuy.com PGP:1A1C A4D4 CE04 F57E 1C0C 5240 592A 09BF CCB4 F0C3
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3514
Merit: 1376


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
September 04, 2020, 10:32:12 AM
 #124

The point of this thread is to point out to your 'prospective' miners that they are agreeing to a sub-standard quality, risky pool.
The white paper is full of issues that suggest the person who wrote it doesn't even understand Bitcoin properly.
Some of these have been pointed out in this thread and ignored.
You wont and can't backup/fix the issues you have with your white paper, so the thread goes on.

No idea why you think someone must be a white knight to point out such things.
Like many, my interests are Bitcoin's prosperity, and not passing off lies to fill my wallet.

Clearly you like to turn a blind eye yourself at people risking other's money by lying to them.
I don't - and I'm pretty sure there are many people like that ... unless you consider most people to be scammer?
Again there is no gain for my pool making this thread though you kept saying over and over there was - without providing any.

Pool: https://kano.is - lowest fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
minefarmbuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 207


We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
September 05, 2020, 08:26:08 PM
 #125

Since this thread is on repeat every post I might as well just quote myself in reply. Maybe next time I'll simply do that entirely.

We can keep going around and around but the point of this thread is to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Stemming from your malice of ck predominantly. It's obvious, was expected, and as soon as we unlocked our thread you were first in line raring to go. So who is misdirecting, who's being deceptive?

We'll just let our service and whitepaper speak for itself, feel free to disagree with our take on mining and the pooled environment as it is presented. Your critique, from your perspective holds no weight being incredibly biased, maliciously motivated, and intentionally inflammatory. Still you wonder why everything you spout is ignored.

There's no need for me to defend our whitepaper. It's simply our perspective, you can take it or leave it as it is. Just like every other in existence. There's nothing to hide or change. So embrace, consider, or get on with your life.

This thread only exists because you can't handle any genuine interaction or achieve any sort of discourse, while still continuing to manipulate the situation. As -ck is the dev for the pool and wont interact with you.

Kano wants to pretend that we're hiding something when his posts were simply deleted because he can't interact anywhere near civilly and always has -ck in his crosshairs. If he could pose a genuine query to the pool thread he wouldn't have had to come here to throw a tantrum as we would love nothing more than to have genuine, thoughtful conversation and inquiry outside this grotesque atmosphere Kano enjoys marinating in.

The gain is for your ego Kano, which includes pumping your pool and self constantly. All you're doing is baselessly slandering reputations publicly now and for what? What you call no personal gain? Then why all of this if not a "white knight'? I'm a lair, a marketing guy, out to deceive people, blinding following. . . You keep altering your narrative to suit, that's fine. Ours is always the same. You literally have no argument and it shows now that you're slandering and name calling like a child who has nothing to comeback with.

We have a great product where no one is at more risk using our service than they would be anywhere else. If anything we've eliminated risk as much as we could for all parties. We're not in the business of losing clients money, we're not in business of extreme rent seeking services. If anything we have an extremely great track record of taking care of all our clients and being very transparent.

So call me what ever you like. I'll take anything you throw at me and continue to point out your hypocrisy in fud you wish to spread and baseless lies, an now attacking my character of late. This is your bed here, sleep in it or wake up and get on with your life. But likely you'll just get bored from someone who's happy to defend themselves in public and move on to your next victim poised for harassment.

So again. .. .Please feel free to make genuine inquiries to our pool operations in our thread, for technical questions ck is our lead but will handle what I can. Again, it's our organizational expertise, the server we both picked, ck's code and maintenance. If you want to support his, our, or both our work please reach out anytime.

Kano can deflect, slander, continue spreading fud. We'll just keep this mentally ill circus going as long as he likes till he grows up and learns to interact like an adult or like I mentioned move on to his next victim. Likely someone more meek and weak cause your ego is going to need an easy win. If anything maybe he might learn some iota of professionalism and that would be a net gain for everyone here.

Premier asic sourcing minefarmbuy.com #mineon
Twitter:@minefarmbuy -LN Tips-
Email: info@minefarmbuy.com PGP:1A1C A4D4 CE04 F57E 1C0C 5240 592A 09BF CCB4 F0C3
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!