Satoshi Nakamoto

[Darker45]

What do u know interesting anout Satoshi? Do u think he is the new Steve Jobs?

They're very far from each other, like a world apart. They are both peculiar in their own ways. Satoshi Nakamoto was a pseudonym to hide the real identity from. Steve Jobs on the other hand is giving talks, interviews, lectures and speeches even. Very open to the world, in other words. Satoshi didn't even give a hint on his or her or their identity/ies. But both of them have contributed a huge improvement to the world.

Up until now the name Satoshi Nakamoto is both a legend and a shadow. Let it be.

[1714592252]

1714592252

[1714592252]

1714592252

[1714592252]

1714592252

[senin]

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto does not know anybody, since no one has seen him. In this regard, even believe that he can be an artificial mind.

[CryptoBry]

Satoshi's true identity may have been David Kleiman.

Unfortunately Kleiman died in 2013 and we may never know the truth or facts regarding whether he was Satoshi.

Here is an article on it.

https://seebitcoin.com/2016/05/everything-makes-sense-if-david-kleiman-was-satoshi-nakamoto-heres-why/

This is the first time for me to read something about this man who might have been the real Satoshi Nakamoto. A lot of people are saying that the name Satoshi Nakamoto is just a code name and that he may not really be Japanese after all. Anyway, the mystery surrounding this Satoshi Nakamoto is just as exciting as Bitcoin. Dead man can not tell any tale anymore.

[cjmoles]

If the intrigue and mystery surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto goes away, then bitcoin wouldn't be as much fun....I think that part of the value of the bitcoin network is directly related to the mystery surrounding the person who put together the pieces that made the platform work.  While the true value of the platform is undoubtedly more directly attributed to the robustness of the network and the participation of the community, the mystique encircling its creation induces an excitement and a motivation to be a part of that community which produces the network's value....For that reason, I hope the mystery surrounding bitcoin's creation is never solved and these questions continue to be debated.

[landrizok]

satoshi nakamoto is founder of bitcoin,but he never shows his face.bitcoin is became very popular currency in the world.he is great man.

[orions.belt19]

There has been a lot of controversy as to who Satoshi Nakomoto is. One of the theories is that the name "Satoshi Nakomoto" came from the meaning of Satoshi which is "clear thinking, quick witted, wise" and Naka meaning "medium, inside, or relationship" while Moto means "origin or foundation". Another theory is that Satoshi is a mere pseudonym used by some or more computer geniuses.

[SvenBomvolen]

The most interesting thing that I know is that nobody know Satoshi in face, people are just supposing who he might be. I doubt that Satoshi is next Jobes, if he would be so he already would be media face and play his role on all this presentations about changings like SegWit. But he is not.
I believe that Satoshi, if he is really exist, just a very modest man who doesn't like the attention.

[AGD]

Kleiman  was in and out of hospital many times .. including times where 'satoshi' was healthily writing code and posts online, thus cant be the same person.

kleiman was heavily interested in investigating and identifying people and was a government man.... 'satoshi' was interested in a non government non identity.. thus cant be the same person

the 'trust' kleiman set up for craig wright (the only 'claim' of linkage) was quickly debunked via proof that the trust only contained PUBLIC keys(anyone can copy) and was only (falsely)validated using a signature that is public knowledge(pre-existing) and part of the blockchain and nothing to do with 'millions of coins' but a transaction PUBLICLY visible in the blockchain that anyone can copy and paste.

in short the 'signature' amounts simply to someone doing a search for an existing signature and then claiming its proof of identity to millions of things that a certain identity might be linked to. to which if i done something similar, i could simply do

thank you google and 1 second of effort
i am bill gates i own everything from microsoft or medical cures



so can we drop the klieman/wright myth. as thats drama that got debunked 1-2 year ago

if the only requirement to being satoshi is having said signature
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=
we are all satoshi

Though you are completely right here, your posting will sadly be forgotten in a few hours due to a flood of sig spamming. A new topic will pop up soon: "Proof that Kleiman was Satoshi!". In that one you will find somebody quoting Satoshi's "I am not Dorian Nakamoto" post as a proof, that Satoshi was alive at that time and another one, that refers to CW as in "Maybe he wants us to believe that he is not Satoshi" and so on and on and on ...

[basesaw]

Satoshi Nakamoto till know is still not identified. We dont know why he did not want him to be known for his work. maybe lets just thank him and respect his decision to be anonymous.

[mindrust]

What do u know interesting anout Satoshi? Do u think he is the new Steve Jobs?

But Steve Jobs is dead. Maybe the new Elon Musk perhaps?

satoshi is dead too.

Even if his physical body still lives in somewhere (which i doubt somehow) his bitcointalk  forum profile is dead just like Steve. So satoshi and Steve have some thing in common. They are both dead.

If you want to know more about satoshi, just read his forum posts. They still exist.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3

[GideonGono]

I think Satoshi Nakamoto to stay as it is i.e. to let his identity to be hidden is for the sake of himself and the entire Bitcoin world. There are many speculations but I wish that these speculations will also stay as it is though they may continue to disprove each others speculation but prove will be unlikely and should be unlikely to happen.

[Mpamaegbu]

Satoshi's true identity may have been David Kleiman.
Unfortunately Kleiman died in 2013 and we may never know the truth or facts regarding whether he was Satoshi.

It may be possible that he faded away from public space because of his personal reasons regarding his health and if he was to die he could have left behind a legacy and cult following and it is possible that he chose to have privacy rather than exposure and one more interesting thing is that even if the real man behind the alias come forward no one is going to accept it ,unless we see the initial coins moving.

Or maybe he doesn't want a lot of public attention due the fact that he himself is holds a ton of pre-mined bitcoins which would be a fortune at this period. If his identity is known, people will definitely target the man for his money or maybe even knowledge or secrets about bitcoin. Who knows?

This is the only logical reason I see for the sudden disappearance or lying low of Satoshi. Of course he knew that it was either he did that or took a fatal hit from nowhere. You don't hold such a wealth involving codes and keys and walk freely on the streets without someone trying to force them out of you. I don't believe Satoshi is dead. He's only hiding his identity.

[Smarty14392]

Satoshi Nakamoto is the name used by the unknown person or persons who designed bitcoin and created its original reference implementation. As part of the implementation, he also devised the first blockchain database
Reference- Google

[YOYOY]

Some say hes just a creation and only a screen name of the real one who made the bitcoin. Satoshi Nakamoto is considered the most enigmatic character in cryptocurrency world. Until now it is unclear if he or she is a single person, or if the name is a moniker used by a group. What is known is that Satoshi Nakamoto published a paper in 2008 that jump started the development of cryptocurrency. That's all we know about him and the fact is we will never be able to know who is Satoshi Nakamoto unless he or she reveals himself, but there are person/s who said they are but we can't conclude if it's true.

[Palmerson]

I think that there is no such person as Satoshi Nakamoto. Perhaps behind this name hides a team. No one knows what the consequences will cause the idea of crypto currency. I wonder if this will change the entire world economy. For the better or worse only time will tell.

[BluRPie]

Sure it was a team. ANB or CIA or FBI. "Satoshi" has provided finalised payment solution and did not try discuss it with community, it is very strange

[YuginKadoya]

I think that there is no such person as Satoshi Nakamoto. Perhaps behind this name hides a team. No one knows what the consequences will cause the idea of crypto currency. I wonder if this will change the entire world economy. For the better or worse only time will tell.

Well actually you can be right with your deduction towards satoshi because I also think the same way, that Satoshi Nakamoto is a code name that he uses the entire time he Activated Bitcoin, and in my opinion we don't really need to know about the identity of a legend even thought if he is dead, if he is? he already provide us with a great concept of technology that let's us grab and grind the future of getting an income with Cryptocurrencies and that is really astonishing and I think it is better this way.

[cjmoles]

This is what I know....Nobody is going to be Satoshi Nakamoto without a signed transaction, a REAL signed transaction.  There's too many frauds, crazy theories, and bullshit stories to believe anything without the proof.  The whole intent of the blockchain was to create a device which can prove and verify ownership without the interference of a third party --->  No key ---> No signature ---> No Satoshi

[SaShiRaJaVu]

Satoshi's true identity may have been David Kleiman.
Unfortunately Kleiman died in 2013 and we may never know the truth or facts regarding whether he was Satoshi.

How about Satoshi emerging from the darkness once again,if there is a chain split then i am pretty much sure that we will see Satoshi coming back to move his coins ,i really think we could see the real person behind this great technology during these situation,so the following weeks are really interesting to see what will happen to bitcoin.

[Pettuh4]

Satoshi's true identity may have been David Kleiman.
Unfortunately Kleiman died in 2013 and we may never know the truth or facts regarding whether he was Satoshi.

How about Satoshi emerging from the darkness once again,if there is a chain split then i am pretty much sure that we will see Satoshi coming back to move his coins ,i really think we could see the real person behind this great technology during these situation,so the following weeks are really interesting to see what will happen to bitcoin.

Exactly but I read somewhere there isn't going to be a split so hopefully satoshi needn't have to move his coins yet under these same conditions. It's strange but he's a great dude and I wish to see him.