poclbm patch for json based remote control (eg famous bitHopper)

[joulesbeef]

maybe I am being throttled.. maybe it was a bad day at bitclockers.. as you see i only did 3 shares which isnt quite a test. i'll give it a more thorough test soon


are the miner idle warnings normal after each share?

[1714254386]

1714254386

[1714254386]

1714254386

[1714254386]

1714254386

[flower1024]

no, you shouldn't see any miner idle warnings.
miner idle means your miner was not able to get more work.

would like to now if you see this error with stock poclbm too.

[joulesbeef]

sorry took me so long to get back here.. was trying to break c00ws stuff, you understand.

yep it is a problem between me an poclbm

Code:

0
08/08/2011 01:27:51, 672d82e9, accepted
08/08/2011 01:27:55, warning: job finished, miner is idle
282257 khash/s

so no worries on your end.

[hawks5999]

flower - i've got some bandwidth to test out your mod.

Installing dependencies right now but quick question:
If there is an error in the json data will it kill your poclbm.

Currently getting this:
https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/164


Parse error on line 425: ...pi_key": "<span id="&quot;rs_round_shar -----------------------^ Expecting '}', ':', ',', ']'


but it's on a disabled mine so I'm hoping it doesn't matter

[hawks5999]

Appears that maybe it does break it:

Code:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "poclbm.py", line 70, in <module>
    miner = BitcoinMiner(devices[options.device], options, VERSION, HttpTranspor
t.HttpTransport)
  File "C:\BTC\flower1024-poclbm-current\BitcoinMiner.py", line 45, in __init__
    self.transport = transport(self, self.options.phatk2 or self.options.phatk2_
1)
  File "C:\BTC\flower1024-poclbm-current\HttpTransport.py", line 20, in __init__

    super(HttpTransport, self).__init__(miner)
  File "C:\BTC\flower1024-poclbm-current\Transport.py", line 53, in __init__
    say_line("adding server " + js["servers"][srv]["user"] + " @ " + js["servers
"][srv]["mine_address"])
KeyError: 'mine_address'