rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
 |
October 24, 2017, 08:55:42 PM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
make sure you have fan RPM enough to keep memory cool. and gandalf's cast xmr does better with vega56 than xmr_stak
|
|
|
|
Ledipaa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2017, 10:00:26 PM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
Seems like a normal difference between 56 and 64(~3%)? Considering theres over 10% more shader cores on 64, 56s with 64s bios do well. Maybe your 56 cant handle 1100hbm? I have 2 64s, 1100 and other is 1065 hbm capable. You are right, Vega 56 is slower than Vega 64. But this is not what I am complaining about. I am complaining about, that the Vega 56 is going up and down in hashrate: between 1870 and 1940H/s. And I repeat, its not carved in stone every vega can do even 1100mhz hbm  Cool it down or lower the clocks like suggested.
|
|
|
|
Django69
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2017, 10:15:16 PM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
make sure you have fan RPM enough to keep memory cool. and gandalf's cast xmr does better with vega56 than xmr_stak
Can you provide a link please?
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
 |
October 24, 2017, 10:19:18 PM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
make sure you have fan RPM enough to keep memory cool. and gandalf's cast xmr does better with vega56 than xmr_stak
Can you provide a link please? It is a parallel thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2256917.0disclaimer - it is closed source and with devfee. But Wolf0 examined its internals and said it is interesting. Will hope it doesn't have some virus ))
|
|
|
|
Django69
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2017, 10:23:54 PM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
make sure you have fan RPM enough to keep memory cool. and gandalf's cast xmr does better with vega56 than xmr_stak
Can you provide a link please? It is a parallel thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2256917.0disclaimer - it is closed source and with devfee. But Wolf0 examined its internals and said it is interesting. Will hope it doesn't have some virus )) oh it's cast xmr, i allready have this working 
|
|
|
|
th00ber
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 03:40:25 AM |
|
FInally I got something functional !! 5 RX Vega - 8000 H/s - 750 W at wall I'll tweak later 
|
|
|
|
teuflor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 05:41:28 AM |
|
someone tried the new driver to solve the 4/x Vega HBCC problem?
|
|
|
|
Zakyn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 05:51:06 AM |
|
someone tried the new driver to solve the 4/x Vega HBCC problem?
It doesn't solve the 4x Vega HBCC problem. though for some rig...porn. This goes up/down literally :-( Test Rig https://i.imgur.com/1O5yMEk.jpg
|
|
|
|
teuflor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 06:21:18 AM |
|
someone tried the new driver to solve the 4/x Vega HBCC problem?
It doesn't solve the 4x Vega HBCC problem. though for some rig...porn. This goes up/down literally :-( Test Rig https://i.imgur.com/1O5yMEk.jpgdammit... but thanks for info!
|
|
|
|
Leon.S.Kenedy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 06:54:31 AM |
|
I will follow your topic , Im looking for new way to mine coin too
|
|
|
|
oskar_n8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 09:09:00 AM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
make sure you have fan RPM enough to keep memory cool. and gandalf's cast xmr does better with vega56 than xmr_stak I played round a lot, as well with cooling, GPU and HBM2 temps are below 60°C. Maybe I give cast xmr a try, later
|
|
|
|
oskar_n8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 09:33:44 AM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
Seems like a normal difference between 56 and 64(~3%)? Considering theres over 10% more shader cores on 64, 56s with 64s bios do well. Maybe your 56 cant handle 1100hbm? I have 2 64s, 1100 and other is 1065 hbm capable. You are right, Vega 56 is slower than Vega 64. But this is not what I am complaining about. I am complaining about, that the Vega 56 is going up and down in hashrate: between 1870 and 1940H/s. And I repeat, its not carved in stone every vega can do even 1100mhz hbm  Cool it down or lower the clocks like suggested. Temps are okay around below 60°C. I testet lower frequencys for GPU and HBM2. Even I flashed back stock V56 bios... (hashrate is between 1060H/s 990H/s) -> Same behavior :-/
|
|
|
|
oskar_n8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 10:46:58 AM |
|
Today I got my first VEGA 56.
The hashrate is max at 1940H/s but frequently it drops down to 1870H/s and then rises to 1940H/s back and so on. Average hashrate (15min) is 1915H/s.
I am just wondering, because my Vega 64s with the same setup/mod have quite stable hasrates around 1980H/s +/-3H/s
This my setup: Vega 56 with Vega64LC bios to 1408/1100@905mV (regmod) and August 23th blochchain drivers "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 2016, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1736, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ],
Any ideas?
Thanks and cheers
make sure you have fan RPM enough to keep memory cool. and gandalf's cast xmr does better with vega56 than xmr_stak Meanwhile: -I flashed the V56 back to stock bios -removed all reg-mods -Tested with xmr-stak -> same behavior NO constant hashrate. -Downloaded and configured cast xmr and make it run with the stock & unflashed V56: -> constant hashrate  -> with stock V56 hashrates above 2000 H/s possible. BUT it gets quite hot and more than 200Watt per card - undervolting etc. required  I guess the behavior is related to the combination of V56 and xmr-stak.
|
|
|
|
|
jmumich
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 12:30:50 PM |
|
Hmm, I noticed that each additional card would add marginally more to my draw from the wall. Not as much as you're reporting - maybe about 5W/GPU (that is 1 GPU adds 130, 2 adds 135 (265 total), 3 adds 140 (405 total), etc.). I just chalked it up to extra CPU, lowered PSU efficiency, or something. Are you saying 2 cards bumps you by 260W, but 4 cards bumps you by 640W?
|
|
|
|
oomurashin
Member

Offline
Activity: 195
Merit: 15
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 12:34:40 PM |
|
i think that, psu efficiency.
|
|
|
|
aid77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 12:35:11 PM |
|
Hmm, I noticed that each additional card would add marginally more to my draw from the wall. Not as much as you're reporting - maybe about 5W/GPU (that is 1 GPU adds 130, 2 adds 135 (265 total), 3 adds 140 (405 total), etc.). I just chalked it up to extra CPU, lowered PSU efficiency, or something. Are you saying 2 cards bumps you by 260W, but 4 cards bumps you by 640W? 370W and 720W total.
|
|
|
|
oskar_n8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 12:40:07 PM |
|
Hmm, I noticed that each additional card would add marginally more to my draw from the wall. Not as much as you're reporting - maybe about 5W/GPU (that is 1 GPU adds 130, 2 adds 135 (265 total), 3 adds 140 (405 total), etc.). I just chalked it up to extra CPU, lowered PSU efficiency, or something. Are you saying 2 cards bumps you by 260W, but 4 cards bumps you by 640W? 370W and 720W total. are you sure, that you applied the same settings etc. to all of your cards, even to the new ones? BUT: 370W for 2 VEGA and 720W for 4 VEGA seems OKAY for my opinion. I assume: 165-170W per card and 40W for the rest w/o VEGA cards
|
|
|
|
jmumich
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 12:40:34 PM |
|
Hmm, I noticed that each additional card would add marginally more to my draw from the wall. Not as much as you're reporting - maybe about 5W/GPU (that is 1 GPU adds 130, 2 adds 135 (265 total), 3 adds 140 (405 total), etc.). I just chalked it up to extra CPU, lowered PSU efficiency, or something. Are you saying 2 cards bumps you by 260W, but 4 cards bumps you by 640W? 370W and 720W total. Your numbers are a bit off, then - what PSU are you using? Most are most efficient around 50% load (something like that, going from memory).
|
|
|
|
aid77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2017, 12:42:32 PM |
|
Hmm, I noticed that each additional card would add marginally more to my draw from the wall. Not as much as you're reporting - maybe about 5W/GPU (that is 1 GPU adds 130, 2 adds 135 (265 total), 3 adds 140 (405 total), etc.). I just chalked it up to extra CPU, lowered PSU efficiency, or something. Are you saying 2 cards bumps you by 260W, but 4 cards bumps you by 640W? 370W and 720W total. Your numbers are a bit off, then - what PSU are you using? Most are most efficient around 50% load (something like that, going from memory). PSU 1500W https://www.citilink.ru/catalog/computers_and_notebooks/parts/powersupply/486159/
|
|
|
|
|