hi fellow onioners, there's a relative new crypto like deeponion also in this bct, masternode, which was announced a week after the deeponion announcement. they also have deepsend feature and they also have airdrops. i wonder why they have less participation in their thread. deeponion has almost 12k posts while they have less than 1k. do we have information on mastercode features so we can come up with a healthy comparison. that way we can strengthen further our advantages and improve on our weaknesses.
Well my dear friend, the answer to that is very simple.
A project with awesome technical features and the community's engagement are 2 very distinct things that has nothing to do with each other. What differentiates tthe 2 projects you are mentioning is that here, the team has put significant effort to work on both fronts.
1) On the one hand, you have the technical side that is taken care of with the features you mention, following a roadmap.
2) On the second hand, you have community managers like crypto who are growth hacking, simply put.
As you can see, he is putting all his effort and creativity solely for the purpose of growing, engaging with, keeping our focus here, rewarding participation of the community. That is a job in itself. Every project that doesn't have much of attention or participation is a project that focuses mainly on the technical side.
Crypto and the team have understood that.
This is why your conclusions of "work on our weaknesses" is ill advised. We should work on our strength and make it so much better, that no other projects will follow on that. Success comes when you do something SO GOOD, that you are known for that, and that only. At that moment, nobody cares what you do less efficiently or whatever.
Forget your weaknesses, focus on your strengths! basic entreprenarial stuff.
