EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner with DevFee disabled

[suatdu]

  me too

Paying a fee isn't all that bad. I couldn't write a miner for myself so I don't mind paying a fee.

[1713255160]

1713255160

[matanco]

Version of EWBF's zec-miner without developer's fee...

... but has a cryptonix13's hidden patcher-fee:

asia1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 (139.99.8.65) -> t1Me2VtQxi3qJfx51yiv9UAx1jnrRkaLVjy.a1
fr-db1.suprnova.cc:2142 (46.105.114.185) -> abyrvalg.a
and so on...
 What the fucking hell?!!!

The original miner has following addresses for DevFee:
ns509963.ip-192-99-33.net:3333 (192.99.33.207) -> t1fJuHWrfcWnYMYyP9VAF96vRnvND2NziMG.u1
stratum-eu01.coinmine.pl:8008 (37.187.27.91) -> terraman.2

P.S. Пpивeт глaвpыбe! Oднaкo, нaёбывaть - нe ecть xopoшo! Пycть дaжe нaивныx бypжyeв...

 

thank you my good man MBuran

[bearqq]

In my linux/windows miners, 0.3.4b version has 'DevFee Accepted/Rejected share' message even with "--fee 0" argument passed.

Code analysis says the same. That's the part of windows version which processes --fee option. When it set to 0, variable gets assigned to some non-zero value, which influence program's behavior later:
 https://ibb.co/fVoJja

I tried to debug the code and I found the code in your pic. But when we put '--fee 0' argument, the eax is 0, which is less than 1000 and make the jbe jump. Then the mov xxx 1000 is skipped. I think these lines are checking whether the fee is set higher than 1000. If so, set it to 1000.
I found may people complaining about the devfee in EWBF but I really think code analysis will be more convincing.

[thepressure]

Can you actually turn off the dev fee then or not? im confused?

[duhjeff]

There is no DevFee string if you set --fee 0 it still works as he implemented it in 0.3.3b ..and leave him his devfee.

not trying to be a douche or anything because I think the developer deserves to make something for writing it.  However, does anyone know the percentage Dev Fees?     I just turned my mining rig one and almost 50% of the lines I see are "Dev Fees" is when I have a big problem with (had to turn the program off and turn it back on again to get rid of that).  It didn't happen to 1 of my rig but all 3 of my rigs....what's up with that?   If the developer really wants to make money for his hard work, why not just tell us the percentage and/or make us buy the damn software instead of secretly taking money?  I wouldn't be as mad if he say I get 5% of your earning...at least that now I can expect it instead of thinking half of my mining goes to him.....

does that make any sense?!?

Jeff-

[sdmrichie]

Version of EWBF's zec-miner without developer's fee...

... but has a cryptonix13's hidden patcher-fee:

asia1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 (139.99.8.65) -> t1Me2VtQxi3qJfx51yiv9UAx1jnrRkaLVjy.a1
fr-db1.suprnova.cc:2142 (46.105.114.185) -> abyrvalg.a
and so on...
 What the fucking hell?!!!

The original miner has following addresses for DevFee:
ns509963.ip-192-99-33.net:3333 (192.99.33.207) -> t1fJuHWrfcWnYMYyP9VAF96vRnvND2NziMG.u1
stratum-eu01.coinmine.pl:8008 (37.187.27.91) -> terraman.2

P.S. Пpивeт глaвpыбe! Oднaкo, нaёбывaть - нe ecть xopoшo! Пycть дaжe нaивныx бypжyeв...

lol, have you seen how much the dev is making?  I checked on coinmine and he's making 1.4BTC per day, not too bad.

[mettalmag]

nobody minds to pay dev fee, but it has it's limits right?
5% isn't a dev fee any more, when you are on public and have so many people using your product

[kr4zywar]

the version i use i found that with hex, the person who build it call his name of PC Gomer
idk if i use the original or a copy, can someone tell me
C:\Users\Gomer\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\equi 0.3.333b\x64\Release\miner.pdb