Jamal's overwhelming managed altcoin campaign

[Kurohige]

Is Jamal's currently handled campaigns really worth to put some risks?

Campaign managers should not just managed the campaign properly but make sure that their handled campaigns will really pay their bounty participants and investors.

What are your insights?

[1713481171]

1713481171

[1713481171]

1713481171

[1713481171]

1713481171

[1713481171]

1713481171

[1713481171]

1713481171

[1713481171]

1713481171

[actmyname]

Don't participate if it's not escrowed. Easy.

[Kurohige]

Almost all ICO projects are not escrowed.

Thanks for suggestion.

[minifrij]

Almost all ICO projects are not escrowed.

Then stop joining shitty ICOs and supporting their existence here. This goes for both any bounties/campaigns they have and the ICOs themselves.

[robelneo]

Almost all ICO projects are not escrowed.

Then stop joining shitty ICOs and supporting their existence here. This goes for both any bounties/campaigns they have and the ICOs themselves.

That's the risk if you are joining without an escrow had a friend who is participated in a signature campaign for two months turn out to be a scam coin now his rewards or bounty is a useless token so better do a research on the coin you are investing.

[actmyname]

Almost all ICO projects are not escrowed.

Then stop joining shitty ICOs and supporting their existence here. This goes for both any bounties/campaigns they have and the ICOs themselves.

That's the risk if you are joining without an escrow had a friend who is participated in a signature campaign for two months turn out to be a scam coin now his rewards or bounty is a useless token so better do a research on the coin you are investing.

How's this for research:

If they don't even bother to escrow the signature campaign then how can they seriously be trusted to have a legitimate ICO?

Honestly, if you're allowing an escrow-free environment to flourish, then it only creates a precedent and leads to problems in the future. Yeah?


But if we allow these ICOs to perpetuate spam, escrow-free with their scams, then any complaints after the fact are meaningless.

[chaser15]

Is Jamal's currently handled campaigns really worth to put some risks?

Campaign managers should not just managed the campaign properly but make sure that their handled campaigns will really pay their bounty participants and investors.

What are your insights?

Joining ICO projects, even it will be handled by the most respective person in the forum might not give you an assurance that you are safe. But Im agree that campaign managers especially on ICO projects just not grabbing opportunities to managed the project but they must make sure that everything will end up fine.

I don't know about some of Jamal's handled campaign and if some of them succeed.

That's the risk if you are joining without an escrow had a friend who is participated in a signature campaign for two months turn out to be a scam coin now his rewards or bounty is a useless token so better do a research on the coin you are investing.

Research is useless if the development, plan, whitepaper and goals of a certain projects are pretty good and can attract investors and bounty hunters. No way everyone can tell if the project is scam (given with no escrow as usual). That's how risky joining some of the bounties providing you will spend lots of time before the token distribution.

[Pearls Before Swine]

The most pathetic campaign manager that I have ever seen is Jamal.

BlackMambaPH is a close second, I'll add.  I concur with actmyname; if one doesn't bother with escrow,  that is asking to be scammed.  I've never been in one of jamalezazzezaxxa's campaigns (or whatever his name is), and given his reputation for lousy management,  I never will be.  Go with escrowed funds and responsible managers like Edwardard, Lutpin, Lauda, Yahoo62278, and a small handful of others.

[hilariousetc]

There seems to be a couple of campaign managers who are getting greedy and taking on far too many campaigns  and/or users. It's practically impossible to look after a campaign with several hundred users unless you're doing this full time but this has become pretty standard practice for most ico campaigns but even worse is most of them don't even have a manager at all. Poorly run campaigns and their managers (if they even have one) should meet the same fate as sig spammers and be banned if they can't run their campaign adequately.

Have any campaigns Jamal has run not paid out?

[Lauda]

There seems to be a couple of campaign managers who are getting greedy and taking on far too many campaigns  and/or users.

As someone who is extremely good at time management, I can only concur with this statement.

Poorly run campaigns and their managers (if they even have one) should meet the same fate as sig spammers and be banned if they can't run their campaign adequately.

Most definitely. It's cancerous to see unmanaged or badly managed campaigns. I even offered some help for free, but they did not accept it (Waves).

Have any campaigns Jamal has run not paid out?

I'd like to see exact numbers. If there have, then he deserves to be tagged (due to a combination of several reasons).

[Lutpin]

Have any campaigns Jamal has run not paid out?

Jamal managed the TaaS campaign, where miscalculations happened and apparently some users were not paid at all.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1922777.0

[Lutpin]

THIS PERSON JASON IS SCAM, HE RUN AWAY WITHIN FEW MINUTES AFTER TAKING ADVACNCE OF 0.25 BTC.
~snip~

That's off-topic.
Create a dedicated scam accusation in the approrpiate board (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) if you want to point out something.