[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)

[dstm]

New Version 0.3.2

mp:  improve stability
con: support more pools
con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable
  servers which often drop the connection                                                                                   
ui:  report GPU temperature

Windows version, Windows version, Windows version     

As fast as I can

If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner.
The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible.

[1713880138]

1713880138

[1713880138]

1713880138

[1713880138]

1713880138

[abudfv2008]

New Version 0.3.2

mp:  improve stability
con: support more pools
con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable
  servers which often drop the connection                                                                                   
ui:  report GPU temperature

Windows version, Windows version, Windows version     

As fast as I can

If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner.
The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible.

No i'll wait. Rigs are working - no second to rest - mining 24/7/365

[dstm]

New Version 0.3.2

mp:  improve stability
con: support more pools
con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable
  servers which often drop the connection                                                                                   
ui:  report GPU temperature

Windows version, Windows version, Windows version     

As fast as I can

If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner.
The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible.

No i'll wait. Rigs are working - no second to rest - mining 24/7/365

You'll get support for more than 8GPUs out of the box

[abudfv2008]

You'll get support for more than 8GPUs out of the box

I don't have such rigs. 6*10x0 maximum.
And in linux less options for profitswitching programs.

[hatch789]

your new version 0.3.2 is working well for me right now. I'm testing it out in my build and no issues so far with zenmine.pro pool mining ZEN

[dstm]

New Version 0.4.0

temperature controller added
cpu: reduce CPU usage
con: improve pool support
minor performance improvement

Code:

--temp-target  
                     In °C - If set, enables temperature controller.
                     The performance of each GPU will be continuously
                     adjusted such that the temperature stays around
                     this value. It is recommended to set your fan speed
                     to 100% when using this setting.

[Rabinovitch]

Windows version, Windows version, Windows version     

As fast as I can

My 6x1070 rig is ready to test it. 

[dstm]

New Version 0.4.0

temperature controller added
cpu: reduce CPU usage
con: improve pool support
miner performance improvement

Code:

--temp-target  
                     In °C - If set, enables temperature controller.
                     The performance of each GPU will be continuously
                     adjusted such that the temperature stays around
                     this value. It is recommended to set your fan speed
                     to 100% when using this setting.

Very cool, thank you. Can't wait to try the windows version. Any ETA on that?

--ypsi

I plan to start working on it next week.

[Supercoiner111]

Cool alternative to ZWBF, always willing to give a new miner a go... I will do once I get home

[killerelite]

Nice Progress in such sort time .
It will be good to see a windows binary soon.
Anyways I hope your miner can over come ewfb and sp private ccminer soon

[farmtester1]

I'm waiting for the windows version. I want to pay fee's for a dev who actually deserves for once.

[QuaLiTyX]

Following this thread and waiting for a windows version. I got nothing against linux, but i have windows installed on my rigs 

[chefbauer]

Im trying v4 again, if someone also want to log the output für taking automated actions:

Code:

stdbuf -o 0 ./zm --server $ZPOOL --port $ZPORT --user $USER --temp-target 82 | tee -ia `hostname`.log

[ShowMeCoins]

   GPU0 59°C  Sol/s: 754.9  Avg: 725.8  I/s: 402.5  Sh/s: 0.193  +++
   GPU1 65°C  Sol/s: 766.5  Avg: 769.1  I/s: 411.4  Sh/s: 0.244  +
   GPU2 60°C  Sol/s: 753.9  Avg: 758.0  I/s: 406.3  Sh/s: 0.207  +++++
   GPU3 59°C  Sol/s: 762.3  Avg: 765.4  I/s: 410.8  Sh/s: 0.204 
   GPU4 58°C  Sol/s: 746.0  Avg: 757.6  I/s: 405.2  Sh/s: 0.200  ++++
   GPU5 58°C  Sol/s: 764.4  Avg: 766.7  I/s: 410.5  Sh/s: 0.159  ++++
   ========== Sol/s: 4548.0 Avg: 4542.6 I/s: 2446.8 Sh/s: 0.159


Shouldn't the highlighted section be the SUM of all cards combined?

[dstm]

   GPU0 59°C  Sol/s: 754.9  Avg: 725.8  I/s: 402.5  Sh/s: 0.193  +++
   GPU1 65°C  Sol/s: 766.5  Avg: 769.1  I/s: 411.4  Sh/s: 0.244  +
   GPU2 60°C  Sol/s: 753.9  Avg: 758.0  I/s: 406.3  Sh/s: 0.207  +++++
   GPU3 59°C  Sol/s: 762.3  Avg: 765.4  I/s: 410.8  Sh/s: 0.204 
   GPU4 58°C  Sol/s: 746.0  Avg: 757.6  I/s: 405.2  Sh/s: 0.200  ++++
   GPU5 58°C  Sol/s: 764.4  Avg: 766.7  I/s: 410.5  Sh/s: 0.159  ++++
   ========== Sol/s: 4548.0 Avg: 4542.6 I/s: 2446.8 Sh/s: 0.159


Shouldn't the highlighted section be the SUM of all cards combined?

Right, thx

[dstm]

New Version 0.4.1

improve performance

[ShowMeCoins]

   GPU0 54°C  Sol/s: 749.2  Avg: 755.2  I/s: 405.7  Sh/s: 0.190  +
   GPU1 59°C  Sol/s: 783.0  Avg: 774.9  I/s: 414.1  Sh/s: 0.176  +++
   GPU2 54°C  Sol/s: 769.7  Avg: 770.2  I/s: 409.8  Sh/s: 0.133  +
   GPU3 53°C  Sol/s: 777.9  Avg: 776.0  I/s: 414.3  Sh/s: 0.162  +++
   GPU4 53°C  Sol/s: 764.1  Avg: 762.5  I/s: 408.9  Sh/s: 0.186 
   GPU5 52°C  Sol/s: 776.7  Avg: 772.7  I/s: 414.6  Sh/s: 0.181  ++
   ========== Sol/s: 4620.7 Avg: 4611.6 I/s: 2467.5 Sh/s: 1.029

 

Just a tip. A 'renice' of -5 helps to stabalize the output (at least on my 2-core system)

[dstm]

   GPU0 54°C  Sol/s: 749.2  Avg: 755.2  I/s: 405.7  Sh/s: 0.190  +
   GPU1 59°C  Sol/s: 783.0  Avg: 774.9  I/s: 414.1  Sh/s: 0.176  +++
   GPU2 54°C  Sol/s: 769.7  Avg: 770.2  I/s: 409.8  Sh/s: 0.133  +
   GPU3 53°C  Sol/s: 777.9  Avg: 776.0  I/s: 414.3  Sh/s: 0.162  +++
   GPU4 53°C  Sol/s: 764.1  Avg: 762.5  I/s: 408.9  Sh/s: 0.186 
   GPU5 52°C  Sol/s: 776.7  Avg: 772.7  I/s: 414.6  Sh/s: 0.181  ++
   ========== Sol/s: 4620.7 Avg: 4611.6 I/s: 2467.5 Sh/s: 1.029

 

Just a tip. A 'renice' of -5 helps to stabalize the output (at least on my 2-core system)

That's how bug fixing should be

Concerning the output: The miner uses an asynchronous design. Everything (each GPU, networking etc.) is independent and separated. This design should scale well even on large systems. So you're right, the scheduler affects the output.

[qwep1]

what about win

[chtat12]

I think adding a power efficiency table would be a nice feature? Most ppl are used to EWBF style anyway.