[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)

[VSVfreedom]

Hello!
After update the pool statistc at flypool does not show a name of rig! Could you fix it

Sorry! Was my mistake. All working good

[1713575623]

1713575623

[Brzina]

There is nice 1070 TI TEST. Use these setings. He is using EWBF. With Zm miner he would get 20-30 more sols......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tQDcwZA7GQ&t=75s

[MostWanted]

Why --logfile C:\ZEC-dstm\minerlog.txt don't work? I need txt extension.

[RealSwissMiner]

@Kompik: Thanks for questioning. I changed my settings and here are the results:



Efficiency is still good but all cards hashing higher. GTX 1070 and GTX 1070 Ti have similar GPU frequency. I will leave the settings like this

[QuintLeo]

There is nice 1070 TI TEST. Use these setings. He is using EWBF. With Zm miner he would get 20-30 more sols......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tQDcwZA7GQ&t=75s

 He had almost identical results to my testing of the 1070 ti - though I tested more settings than he did, the 60% TDP (106 watt) +200 core +700 memory settings in Afterburner were the most efficient I found as well for the EVGA SC card.
 Cooling on that card is very very good - I never got it over 66C at about 72% fan no matter WHAT I tried on it (though I didn't go over 100% of factory TDP (180 watts) at any point in my testing).

 I didn't think to test it on DSTM, as my results to date on my very limited testing of DTSM gave LOWER hashrate at the same settings on the same card vs EBWF.

[Kompik]

There is nice 1070 TI TEST. Use these setings. He is using EWBF. With Zm miner he would get 20-30 more sols......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tQDcwZA7GQ&t=75s

 He had almost identical results to my testing of the 1070 ti - though I tested more settings than he did, the 60% TDP (106 watt) +200 core +700 memory settings in Afterburner were the most efficient I found as well for the EVGA SC card.
 Cooling on that card is very very good - I never got it over 66C at about 72% fan no matter WHAT I tried on it (though I didn't go over 100% of factory TDP (180 watts) at any point in my testing).

 I didn't think to test it on DSTM, as my results to date on my very limited testing of DTSM gave LOWER hashrate at the same settings on the same card vs EBWF.

There should be significant increases with the DTSM miner for the 1070. Not for the 1080 though.

[dstm]

dstm, what about problem with incorrect API info (in case of disconnect and crashing of GPU) - have you fixed it in the recent version?

Telemetry reflects this properly now.

[dstm]

New Version 0.5.4

fix: device selection
fix: latency reporting
add logfile support
add option to disable auto reconnect
handle disconnect periods in web/json stats
add basic GPU responsiveness infrastructure
ui: change timestamps to ISO 8601 format
webui: report: uptime contime server user port
json: report: uptime contime server user port version


I've restructured some internal parts of zm in this release so pls report if anything doesn't work as expected. Terminal ui has some minor changes most notable the timestamp format - I've changed it to ISO 8601 since it's easier to parse. Logfiles are always appended such that you never lose your previous logs - if you don't want this just delete the previous logfile before starting zm in your scripts.

Ok, thank you.
But no upgrade about the hashrate we are allway at the 0.5.2 version level ?
Improving the hashrate is still the most important.

Most likely not, however keep in mind - there are limits to it.

[dstm]

Speed is nice but i have problem it still reconnecting +- 3 min over and over.... anyone now how to fix it?

2017-11-05 13:31:03|#  connection closed by server r:0
2017-11-05 13:31:03|#  reconnecting
2017-11-05 13:31:13|#  GPU0  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:15|#  GPU1  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:17|#  GPU2  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:18|#  GPU3  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:20|#  GPU4  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:21|#  GPU5  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:24|#  GPU6  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618

You might try a different server to make sure it's not your network - some servers might have temporary issues.

[dstm]

Why --logfile C:\ZEC-dstm\minerlog.txt don't work? I need txt extension.

I guess you forgot the '=' sign, try : '--logfile=C:\ZEC-dstm\minerlog.txt'

[dstm]

Hello!
After update the pool statistc at flypool does not show a name of rig! Could you fix it

Sorry! Was my mistake. All working good

Thx for reporting it back, this saves time for development.

[crazydane]

I upgraded all my rigs to 0.5.4 and the only issue I have noticed is that my 1050Ti rig is not reporting power usage via the telemetry interface.

I see it here:



But not here:



The odd thing is that none of my other rigs have this issue:



Go figure.

[QuintLeo]

There should be significant increases with the DTSM miner for the 1070. Not for the 1080 though.

 1070 ti is a lot closer to the 1080 than the 1070.

 It's a "one compute unit disabled" 1080 GPU with GDDR5 instead of GDDR5x for ram.

[tazmako]

im use 1050ti Version 0.5.4 it faster than EWBF around 10-15sol/s

Nice work.

[dstm]

I upgraded all my rigs to 0.5.4 and the only issue I have noticed is that my 1050Ti rig is not reporting power usage via the telemetry interface.

There is something wrong with power usage readings on this system, the terminal ui doesn't report Sol/W properly too. You might check if nvidia-smi reports proper values on this system.

[toptek]

nice add api access an I'm sold or allow the Command

Code:

--api

if it has api all ready ? .... . SO Awesome miner can monitor it .....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676942.0

My 1060 6 gb runs about 325  Sol/s  with dstm's and 310 Sol/s  with  EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b

over clocked at

PL 100
CCB 100
MCB 820
Fan  75
temp holding @ 60 to 61 C

got a 1080 coming today . I'm gonna try with dstm's.!!!

[Makak4R]

There should be significant increases with the DTSM miner for the 1070. Not for the 1080 though.

so my watercoolred 1070 can push 490-495 sols, sometimes I can see like 500 sols
but very rare, but is 85pl /+50 core +300 mem
so does it good enough ?
what do you think?

[vezu4iy]

when I m using --user name.rig0 it reports unknown method client.reconnect  recv failed: 10054 and doesnt works

[dstm]

nice add api access an I'm sold or allow the Command

Code:

--api

if it has api all ready ? .... . SO Awesome miner can monitor it .....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676942.0

My 1060 6 gb runs about 325  Sol/s  with dstm's and 310 Sol/s  with  EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b

over clocked at

PL 100
CCB 100
MCB 820
Fan  75
temp holding @ 60 to 61 C

got a 1080 coming today . I'm gonna try with dstm's.!!!

ZM supports stats via json-rpc, take a look at the --telemetry option.

[dstm]

when I m using --user name.rig0 it reports unknown method client.reconnect  recv failed: 10054 and doesnt works

Thx for reporting. ZM doesn't support the reconnect method currently. I'll add support for it in the next release. What pool are you using?