[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)

[bigdaddymccarron]

When I try to mine ZClassic I get the following error:

Waiting for 0 seconds, press a key to continue ...
#  zm 0.5.6
#  GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070         MB: 8192  PCI: 0:6

#  GPU0  connected to: ny1.minez.zone:3054
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 0000ccccccccccccd0000000...
protocol version 01000020 not supported

[1713574250]

1713574250

[1713574250]

1713574250

[1713574250]

1713574250

[matovicv]

The new version is working great after reworking my overclock. The oc I had been using with previous versions was causing the miner to crash. Reducing the oc managed to keep about the same rate while slightly increasing efficiency from about 3.3 Sol/W to about 3.5.

Code:

ID	DEVICE NAME		°C	∅ Sol/s		∅ Sol/W		∅ Watt
0	GeForce GTX 1070	55	498.70		3.53		141.56

Keep up the good work. 

What settings are you using and what card is it?

MSI Gaming X  
+150 clock +610 mem 60% power

Efficiency is a little better at 60%, rate is closer to 510 Sol/s at 70% power.

What drivers are you using. My card is Gigabyte G1 and with this settings i get 470 sols max. Drivers 388.13.

Tnx

[mountaintoy]

I'm having issues with memory errors after 6 hours, is there a restart script i can use in my .bat ?

Look at previous pages, there is alot of scripts examples.

The new version is working great after reworking my overclock. The oc I had been using with previous versions was causing the miner to crash. Reducing the oc managed to keep about the same rate while slightly increasing efficiency from about 3.3 Sol/W to about 3.5.

Code:

ID	DEVICE NAME		°C	∅ Sol/s		∅ Sol/W		∅ Watt
0	GeForce GTX 1070	55	498.70		3.53		141.56

Keep up the good work.  

What settings are you using and what card is it?

MSI Gaming X  
+150 clock +610 mem 60% power

Efficiency is a little better at 60%, rate is closer to 510 Sol/s at 70% power.

3.53sols/w is pretty low tbh, except if you have great electricity price, my rigs have between 4.2 and 4.3s/w efficiency.

You're right, it's not the most efficient. You've definitely been working on efficiency more than I have.  I can get to 3.9 s/w by dropping the clock speed and lowering the power a bit more, but electricity is pretty cheap here and I've been using it to heat the room it's in. I turn the power up when it gets cool and turn it down when it's warm unless I'm testing.

I'm only running a single card for now. When I pick up a few more cards heat and power consumption will be a bigger issue.

[mountaintoy]

The new version is working great after reworking my overclock. The oc I had been using with previous versions was causing the miner to crash. Reducing the oc managed to keep about the same rate while slightly increasing efficiency from about 3.3 Sol/W to about 3.5.

Code:

ID	DEVICE NAME		°C	∅ Sol/s		∅ Sol/W		∅ Watt
0	GeForce GTX 1070	55	498.70		3.53		141.56

Keep up the good work. 

What settings are you using and what card is it?

MSI Gaming X  
+150 clock +610 mem 60% power

Efficiency is a little better at 60%, rate is closer to 510 Sol/s at 70% power.

What drivers are you using. My card is Gigabyte G1 and with this settings i get 470 sols max. Drivers 388.13.

Tnx

I'm using the same drivers. 388.13
Is it possible your card has a lower base speed?
Afterburner displays my memory as 4428MHz (+625) and GPU bounces around from 1848-1886MHz (+150) and voltage is around .889mV

[pilalove]

Dear envelopment team dstm ZM
Could you help me fix error follow this picture,
I cant mine ZM

............
Sever set difficulty to : .....

Any my PC lagging, need to be restart

Provide more information about your hardware and software
Launch config?

I take a pict faile when mining via ZM "I'm using Mikrotik router board".
It is ok when i used another modem "not mikrotik"
Can you help me fix this problem

Thanks - Pila

https://uphinhnhanh.com/images/2017/11/29/dstmfailse.png

[philipma1957]

does this mining software work for smos?

on linux

[Biodom]

does this mining software work for smos?

on linux

works on Ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04, which probably means that it would.
0.5.5 version crashed on my Nvidia rigs once in 2 days.
0.5.6 version did not crash yet (one day).
maybe it's just my setup, but cards seems to take their time to take (maybe a min or two), producing initiation stop message in the interim.
no biggie.

seems slightly faster than EWBF, but EWBF was working without a glitch for a month (or more) at the time.
I would give it a day or two and see.

[dstm]

Hi. Thx for the miner.

Small suggestion about API: can you please add GPU model to JSON-RPC responce? Thx!

This was requested already. It seems like this information isn't available on linux. It's on my notes, I'll take a closer look at it later.

[dstm]

I was observing that thread since 0.3x version and your miner looks interesting.

Today finally I tested it. Unfortunately I noticed that I've a bit lower hashrate than on EWBF. ~520-525 vs 530-550 Sol/s. I've GTX 1080.

Temperatures and power use is similar (68C and 165-170W). 85% TDP. Memory +200mhz.
I set vcore to +80mhz. On EWBF maximum was +60mhz (it crashed even on 65mhz after 24h). I'm not testing your miner long time but looks more stable. On EWBF +80mhz gets me fast crash.

I hope that you will be able to increase performance for GTX 1080 too because as opposed to gtx 1060 and 1080ti, currently EWBF looks more efficient for me.

Also to my mind you could use some colors to make it more transparent to read and ability to run on background (--quiet/--background?). Thanks for your job

PS. Sol/W is great option. I'll be able to better OC my card with it.

----------
edit:
crash after 3-4 hours. I'll try with +75mhz..
---------

  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 518.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 525.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 7.76   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 516.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 7.46   1.00 47  ++
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a...
>  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 503.6  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 520.7  I/s: 269.7  Sh: 7.67   1.00 46  +++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.4  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 521.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.71   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 531.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.97   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 526.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.8  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 6.57   1.00 39  ++++
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 523.7  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.9  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.24   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.72   1.00 63
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.74   1.00 70  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.76   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.2  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.77   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.41   1.00 47
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.44   1.00 55  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 529.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.64   1.00 57  +++
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.6  Sh: 5.34   1.00 57
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.26   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 519.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.5  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.02   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 4.93   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.9  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 282.1  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  ++++

Thx for the report.                                                                                                           
Are you thinking about a unix daemon? This isn't available on windows, I don't want to diverge the versions without a good reason, I'll do ofc if there is one. If you're mainly interested in disabling the output you can redirect it to /dev/null or/and start it in your init system (e.g. using systemd).

What colors and where would improve readability?

[dstm]

I'm having issues with memory errors after 6 hours, is there a restart script i can use in my .bat ?

This might be helpful
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2021765.msg25337530#msg25337530

[dstm]

Dear envelopment team dstm ZM
Could you help me fix error follow this picture,
I cant mine ZM

............
Sever set difficulty to : .....

Any my PC lagging, need to be restart

Provide more information about your hardware and software
Launch config?

I take a pict faile when mining via ZM "I'm using Mikrotik router board".
It is ok when i used another modem "not mikrotik"
Can you help me fix this problem

Thanks - Pila

https://uphinhnhanh.com/images/2017/11/29/dstmfailse.png

There something wrong with the router, it sometimes even fails to resolve the dns name, sry can't help - you have to check what's going wrong on the router side.

[akuci]

You need to add some space betwen 2 groups of readings, like 2 line space in between after the total hash, and the first gpu stats in the next readout. I really have trouble to read the information from the miner quickly.
Also some colors will be nice. Temps green, yellow and red like in EWBF.

Some things to add also: fan precentage readout, power readout in W (in miner window, not in telemetry).

[k3rt]

I am currently reading through all 73 pages of this thread. Does ZM have some tools for overclocking or do you all use some other tools (xorg.conf)?

[shibob]

I am currently reading through all 73 pages of this thread. Does ZM have some tools for overclocking or do you all use some other tools (xorg.conf)?

Wow, you are so eager for learning. I dont think ZM integrates any overclocking function or tool.
So I think for most of us, we use MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision XOC.

[k3rt]

So I think for most of us, we use MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision XOC.

What if I have a plain Ubuntu without the GUI? Just a terminal

Since I want to control everything via SSH, without any GUI.

[crazydane]

Hi. Thx for the miner.

Small suggestion about API: can you please add GPU model to JSON-RPC responce? Thx!

This was requested already. It seems like this information isn't available on linux. It's on my notes, I'll take a closer look at it later.

You should be able to do something like this to at least get the vendor added:

Code:

#!/bin/bash

DEVICE_IDS=$(nvidia-smi --query-gpu=pci.sub_device_id --format=csv,noheader,nounits)
i=0

for ID in $DEVICE_IDS
do
   VENDOR_ID=${ID:6:5}
   
   # GPU Query, 3842=EVGA, 1462=MSI, 10DE=Nvidia, 19DA=Zotac, 807D=Asus, 1458=Gigabyte
   case $VENDOR_ID in
      3842) VENDOR_ID="EVGA";;
      1462) VENDOR_ID="MSI";;
      10DE) VENDOR_ID="NVIDIA";;
      19DA) VENDOR_ID="ZOTAC";;
      807D) VENDOR_ID="ASUS";;
      1458) VENDOR_ID="GIGABYTE";;
   esac
   
   MODEL=$(nvidia-smi -i $i --query-gpu=name --format=csv,noheader,nounits | tail -1)
   
   echo "$i,$VENDOR_ID,$MODEL"
   
   i=$(($i + 1))
done

[abudfv2008]

I was observing that thread since 0.3x version and your miner looks interesting.

Today finally I tested it. Unfortunately I noticed that I've a bit lower hashrate than on EWBF. ~520-525 vs 530-550 Sol/s. I've GTX 1080.

Temperatures and power use is similar (68C and 165-170W). 85% TDP. Memory +200mhz.
I set vcore to +80mhz. On EWBF maximum was +60mhz (it crashed even on 65mhz after 24h). I'm not testing your miner long time but looks more stable. On EWBF +80mhz gets me fast crash.

I hope that you will be able to increase performance for GTX 1080 too because as opposed to gtx 1060 and 1080ti, currently EWBF looks more efficient for me.

Also to my mind you could use some colors to make it more transparent to read and ability to run on background (--quiet/--background?). Thanks for your job

PS. Sol/W is great option. I'll be able to better OC my card with it.

----------
edit:
crash after 3-4 hours. I'll try with +75mhz..
---------

  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 518.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 525.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 7.76   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 516.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 7.46   1.00 47  ++
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a...
>  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 503.6  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 520.7  I/s: 269.7  Sh: 7.67   1.00 46  +++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.4  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 521.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.71   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 531.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.97   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 526.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.8  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 6.57   1.00 39  ++++
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 523.7  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.9  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.24   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.72   1.00 63
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.74   1.00 70  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.76   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.2  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.77   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.41   1.00 47
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.44   1.00 55  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 529.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.64   1.00 57  +++
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.6  Sh: 5.34   1.00 57
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.26   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 519.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.5  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.02   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 4.93   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.9  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 282.1  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  ++++

Agree with some space for improvements with 1080. But for me dsmt is slighlty faster. (maybe because with the same settings GPU is running on higher frequency)

[lolmining]

Small, 2.6% improvement over EWBF.

Code:

   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 773.2  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 767.5  I/s: 411.1  Sh: 5.37   1.00 104 ++
   GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.34   1.00 105 +
   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 775.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 6.73   1.00 94  +
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 763.2  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.8  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 7.12   1.00 95  +++
>  GPU4  58C  Sol/s: 715.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 384.9  Sh: 7.15   1.00 82
   ========== Sol/s: 3788.6 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2029.5 Sh: 31.72  1.00 96
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 754.5  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.36   1.00 93  +
>  GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 774.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 5.36   1.00 99  +++
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 767.6  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 6.72   1.00 109 +
   GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 759.5  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.8  I/s: 408.3  Sh: 7.13   1.00 103 +++
   GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 788.9  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.2  I/s: 424.2  Sh: 7.16   1.00 104 +++
   ========== Sol/s: 3844.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2065.7 Sh: 31.72  1.00 101
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.4  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 5.33   1.00 93
>  GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 767.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.36   1.00 94  ++
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 6.70   1.00 110 +
>  GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 760.5  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.7  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 7.11   1.00 93  +
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 807.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 425.6  Sh: 7.14   1.00 94  +
   ========== Sol/s: 3876.8 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2069.6 Sh: 31.64  1.00 96
   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 752.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 411.2  Sh: 5.32   1.00 94  +
   GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 770.6  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.39   1.00 101 ++++
   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 767.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.2  Sh: 6.69   1.00 102 ++
>  GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 755.2  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.7  I/s: 408.6  Sh: 7.12   1.00 96  +++
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 796.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 425.5  Sh: 7.19   1.00 90  ++++++
   ========== Sol/s: 3841.6 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2069.3 Sh: 31.72  1.00 96

[cTnko]

@dstm Is there any reason why the process wouldn't exit on its own under such condition?

[lolmining]

Code:

#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.9  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.21   0.99 110
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.5  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.91   1.00 94
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 765.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.9  I/s: 412.7  Sh: 5.41   1.00 125
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 761.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.0  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.65   1.00 109
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 791.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.9  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.38   0.98 98
========== Sol/s: 3859.5 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.1 I/s: 2073.2 Sh: 26.56  0.99 107
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
#  GPU2  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 765.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.8  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.32   0.97 94
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.5  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.89   1.00 94
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 769.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.8  I/s: 413.1  Sh: 5.45   1.00 99
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 774.0  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.62   1.00 110
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 805.8  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.39   0.98 101
========== Sol/s: 3886.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.6 Sh: 26.67  0.99 99
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 756.6  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.6  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.40   0.96 85
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 777.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.6  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 4.87   1.00 93
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 771.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.8  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.46   1.00 93
GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 762.1  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 5.62   1.00 101
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 802.3  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 424.9  Sh: 5.36   0.98 109
========== Sol/s: 3870.1 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2068.9 Sh: 26.70  0.99 96
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 771.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.40   0.96 94
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 771.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.84   1.00 109
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 776.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.9  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.47   1.00 109
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 755.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.0  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.63   1.00 109
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 797.6  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 425.5  Sh: 5.33   0.98 93
========== Sol/s: 3873.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.67  0.99 102
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 771.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.44   0.95 109
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 773.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 4.82   1.00 109
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 783.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 413.1  Sh: 5.57   1.00 88
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 774.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.6  Sh: 5.60   1.00 78
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 796.3  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 426.2  Sh: 5.31   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3898.4 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.74  0.99 98
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 768.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.6  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 5.48   0.94 86
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 769.5  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 4.81   1.00 94
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 771.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.60   1.00 89
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 767.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 408.6  Sh: 5.60   1.00 110
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 789.2  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 424.6  Sh: 5.25   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3866.2 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2067.2 Sh: 26.74  0.98 97
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 776.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.58   0.92 109
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 774.4  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.82   1.00 101
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 777.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.1  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.54   1.00 89
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 765.9  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.57   1.00 94
>  GPU4  60C  Sol/s: 797.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 426.2  Sh: 5.23   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3892.5 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.7 I/s: 2074.0 Sh: 26.74  0.98 100
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 773.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 5.68   0.92 97
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 768.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 4.83   1.00 78
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 772.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.1  I/s: 413.0  Sh: 5.58   1.00 88
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 765.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.9  Sh: 5.58   1.00 86
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 790.9  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.20   0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3869.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2072.7 Sh: 26.87  0.98 85
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.68   0.92 78
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 774.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.8  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.78   1.00 78
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 768.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 412.7  Sh: 5.52   1.00 88
GPU3  50C  Sol/s: 763.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.9  Sh: 5.55   1.00 94
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 798.4  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 424.6  Sh: 5.15   0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3873.7 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2071.7 Sh: 26.68  0.98 83
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 764.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 5.65   0.91 94

#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]

whats that?