[ANN] xxxxx

[Coiner_]

Nice, I give you early access that nobody else has, and you just can't believe it.

So, I was right, they fixed one of the "flaws". That link won't work anymore. They clearly watch this thread like a hawk.
They even deleted my account... so I made another one. Had to get a little creative. Still, pretty simple to bypass.

I gave you proof. Your hating on the picture of the platform you're buying into. lol.  (they took the scroll bars out.)

For all those doubters, PM me, I will give you my fake email and password so you can log-in to the demo. Will even tell you how to
sign up for yourself.

Suppose, even if it's true, then what? It's just a demo version, a raw beta test. If you hacked their admin for example or something like that - it would be a different conversation. The current "vulnerability" even if it is - does not give any efficiency, in addition to registering an account and touching - look at the test product? Hmm.

I understand that you are trying to smear a competitive product by advertising your project and your ICO through subscription and profile information.

Not just that. His very first post on this thread (and in 2 years for his once dormant account) was explicitly a marketing post. As should be obvious, this thread affords him the opportunity to shill his product via smear campaigns which is why the majority of his posts are in this particular thread.

[1713986121]

1713986121

[1713986121]

1713986121

[1713986121]

1713986121

[1713986121]

1713986121

[benjismarket]

Ok, I can upload a gif or video. Even though I offer you direct access to their beta. Which seems like better proof. Not my fault they keep fixing holes that I mention.


Nice picture, can we say, photoshopped? Taking the words right out of your mouth.

[MrLitex]

Nice, I give you early access that nobody else has, and you just can't believe it.

So, I was right, they fixed one of the "flaws". That link won't work anymore. They clearly watch this thread like a hawk.
They even deleted my account... so I made another one. Had to get a little creative. Still, pretty simple to bypass.

I gave you proof. Your hating on the picture of the platform you're buying into. lol.  (they took the scroll bars out.)

For all those doubters, PM me, I will give you my fake email and password so you can log-in to the demo. Will even tell you how to
sign up for yourself.

Suppose, even if it's true, then what? It's just a demo version, a raw beta test. If you hacked their admin for example or something like that - it would be a different conversation. The current "vulnerability" even if it is - does not give any efficiency, in addition to registering an account and touching - look at the test product? Hmm.

I understand that you are trying to smear a competitive product by advertising your project and your ICO through subscription and profile information.

Yes, a beta, but they are running an untested, probably very buggy "real" exchange. Real money! They can't even make a simple closed beta program. I just don't see how that is ok to people. Guess you don't have any $$ on the line or demo access.

Seriously though, PM me, will give you access so you can see I'm not making crap up.

But there was no announcement that the invites were sent or the work of the beta version is stable? Then what is the boiling point? Do you prufayte raw product, when all this is well understood and even the official representatives said that they finish it?

I do not understand what you are trying to prove? That your product is better and that people are coming to you or what?

[benjismarket]

Nice, I give you early access that nobody else has, and you just can't believe it.

So, I was right, they fixed one of the "flaws". That link won't work anymore. They clearly watch this thread like a hawk.
They even deleted my account... so I made another one. Had to get a little creative. Still, pretty simple to bypass.

I gave you proof. Your hating on the picture of the platform you're buying into. lol.  (they took the scroll bars out.)

For all those doubters, PM me, I will give you my fake email and password so you can log-in to the demo. Will even tell you how to
sign up for yourself.

Suppose, even if it's true, then what? It's just a demo version, a raw beta test. If you hacked their admin for example or something like that - it would be a different conversation. The current "vulnerability" even if it is - does not give any efficiency, in addition to registering an account and touching - look at the test product? Hmm.

I understand that you are trying to smear a competitive product by advertising your project and your ICO through subscription and profile information.

Not just that. His very first post on this thread (and in 2 years for his once dormant account) was explicitly a marketing post. As should be obvious, this thread affords him the opportunity to shill his product via smear campaigns.

Wasn't a marketing post, I brought up concerns, you didn't like to hear it. Still no receipt of investment from you. Wonder why... afraid of something?

[benjismarket]

Nice, I give you early access that nobody else has, and you just can't believe it.

So, I was right, they fixed one of the "flaws". That link won't work anymore. They clearly watch this thread like a hawk.
They even deleted my account... so I made another one. Had to get a little creative. Still, pretty simple to bypass.

I gave you proof. Your hating on the picture of the platform you're buying into. lol.  (they took the scroll bars out.)

For all those doubters, PM me, I will give you my fake email and password so you can log-in to the demo. Will even tell you how to
sign up for yourself.

Suppose, even if it's true, then what? It's just a demo version, a raw beta test. If you hacked their admin for example or something like that - it would be a different conversation. The current "vulnerability" even if it is - does not give any efficiency, in addition to registering an account and touching - look at the test product? Hmm.

I understand that you are trying to smear a competitive product by advertising your project and your ICO through subscription and profile information.

Yes, a beta, but they are running an untested, probably very buggy "real" exchange. Real money! They can't even make a simple closed beta program. I just don't see how that is ok to people. Guess you don't have any $$ on the line or demo access.

Seriously though, PM me, will give you access so you can see I'm not making crap up.

But there was no announcement that the invites were sent or the work of the beta version is stable? Then what is the boiling point? Do you prufayte raw product, when all this is well understood and even the official representatives said that they finish it?

I do not understand what you are trying to prove? That your product is better and that people are coming to you or what?

People are asking to see their demo. Their demo is clearly open. I can show you how to access it. What happened to wanting transparency.

[Coiner_]

Ok, I can upload a gif or video. Even though I offer you direct access to their beta. Which seems like better proof.

You mean like you claimed earlier? Tried that, didn't work. Get started on that video.

Not my fault they keep fixing holes that I mention.

Unsubstantiated holes, in a beta no less, are evidence of nothing.

Nice picture, can we say, photoshopped? Taking the words right out of your mouth.

Coinigy is not exactly terrible looking so, duh?

Nice, I give you early access that nobody else has, and you just can't believe it.

So, I was right, they fixed one of the "flaws". That link won't work anymore. They clearly watch this thread like a hawk.
They even deleted my account... so I made another one. Had to get a little creative. Still, pretty simple to bypass.

I gave you proof. Your hating on the picture of the platform you're buying into. lol.  (they took the scroll bars out.)

For all those doubters, PM me, I will give you my fake email and password so you can log-in to the demo. Will even tell you how to
sign up for yourself.

Suppose, even if it's true, then what? It's just a demo version, a raw beta test. If you hacked their admin for example or something like that - it would be a different conversation. The current "vulnerability" even if it is - does not give any efficiency, in addition to registering an account and touching - look at the test product? Hmm.

I understand that you are trying to smear a competitive product by advertising your project and your ICO through subscription and profile information.

Yes, a beta, but they are running an untested, probably very buggy "real" exchange. Real money! They can't even make a simple closed beta program. I just don't see how that is ok to people. Guess you don't have any $$ on the line or demo access.

Seriously though, PM me, will give you access so you can see I'm not making crap up.

But there was no announcement that the invites were sent or the work of the beta version is stable? Then what is the boiling point? Do you prufayte raw product, when all this is well understood and even the official representatives said that they finish it?

I do not understand what you are trying to prove? That your product is better and that people are coming to you or what?

People are asking to see their demo. Their demo is clearly open. I can show you how to access it. What happened to wanting transparency.

The moment you shilled your "competitor" product in this thread right after a smear campaign was the moment it became glaringly obvious that transparency is the last thing on your mind.

[evergrow]

Oh now I see a login screen when I go to that link but I can't log in with my personal details there

[MrLitex]

People are asking to see their demo. Their demo is clearly open. I can show you how to access it. What happened to wanting transparency.

So when the administration of the project says that the deme is open and works stably, then it will be interesting, but now it is not. You do not understand this apparently, as the owner of the competitor's project, who advertises himself here, and we here are simple participants of the project and the investor.

[benjismarket]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

[o48o]

Oh well, maybe i'll wait for public launch, unless someone posts a youtube video of it

[MrLitex]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

Well ok and what? It proves the contrary that there is a beta version and it works. So all is well.

[onlytemporary]

Oh well, maybe i'll wait for public launch, unless someone posts a youtube video of it

Not all the invitations have gone out yet, I haven't received but hoping I do. The dev said the emails will go out throughout the weekend, so there is still some hope

[evergrow]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

Interesting, thanks for the video. What is the point?

How did you get through, did you have an invite link?

[benjismarket]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

Well ok and what? It proves the contrary that there is a beta version and it works. So all is well.

Yes, that's what I have been getting at. If you want to try the beta, PM me. Will give you my access since I doubt they check IP access for the beta. Still waiting for them to block my IP, probably don't know how.

I was just raising awareness about their lack of security. Apparently, nobody cares about that. Mt. Gox 2.0

[benjismarket]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

Interesting, thanks for the video. What is the point?

How did you get through, did you have an invite link?

Only said this like 10 times. lol. Just bypassed their access code sign up stuff. PM me, can tell you how

[benjismarket]

Oh well, maybe i'll wait for public launch, unless someone posts a youtube video of it

Not all the invitations have gone out yet, I haven't received but hoping I do. The dev said the emails will go out throughout the weekend, so there is still some hope

PM me your email. Will send you access. Or just PM me, can tell you an easy way to get access.

[MrLitex]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

Well ok and what? It proves the contrary that there is a beta version and it works. So all is well.

Yes, that's what I have been getting at. If you want to try the beta, PM me. Will give you my access since I doubt they check IP access for the beta. Still waiting for them to block my IP, probably don't know how.

I was just raising awareness about their lack of security. Apparently, nobody cares about that. Mt. Gox 2.0

"Radical" security problem - access to the demo version? Really?

[Joking313]

Surprising everyone is missing the point.

Here's your video link. Again, easier to just see it for yourself. Weird you could care less to see the beta for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6xrionrweokbk6k/WCEX.webm?dl=0

Well ok and what? It proves the contrary that there is a beta version and it works. So all is well.

Yes, that's what I have been getting at. If you want to try the beta, PM me. Will give you my access since I doubt they check IP access for the beta. Still waiting for them to block my IP, probably don't know how.

I was just raising awareness about their lack of security. Apparently, nobody cares about that. Mt. Gox 2.0

Um, I understand that this shows that there could be other security holes, however that is why this is called the Beta version.  Discovering bugs is basically guaranteed and there is still a long way to go until the actual release.

[hamnchess]

Well that looks good if true. I don't understand it @benjismarket, you been saying WCX scam all the time, and you are first to prove they completely legitimate!! lol!

[benjismarket]

Well that looks good if true. I don't understand it @benjismarket, you been saying WCX scam all the time, and you are first to prove they completely legitimate!! lol!

Again... Never said scam. You're the one that said scam. Not saying it is or isn't. But, based on playing around with the platform, would suggest to beta testers not to put much $ in for testing. They don't have a password reset set up, so forget your pass, you're locked out. Not very secure right now, even though they do keep fixing issues, but more like duct tape, vs permanent. One other issue will bring up later after I get an email back.

Anyways, they deleted my temp account again, will have to make another one later. probably since I just emailed the details to a fresh account user that was probably secretly wcex. Got to run errands, but enjoy the video, arguing, complaining, whatever you like to do.