[ANN] xxxxx

[phanhoa]

I really want to invest in this project but the fact the devs are not being disclosed is putting me off big time.

tôi hi vọng dự án sẽ phát triển như mong đợi. . ý tưởng rất tốt và cần thiết cho thị trường.  nhưng có vẻ đội ngũ phát triển không minh bạch.  thật đáng lo ngại

[1713933880]

1713933880

[1713933880]

1713933880

[ht2003]

I have read more than 100 pages, and I will invest my fund in to WCX ICO, GO ON!

[Immobilising]

Really skeptical about this.. WCXofficial takes time to answer all these questions and that's great, however the same question and argument about the legitimacy of his project keeps popping up, on here, on twitter. Everywhere.

And well, you'd think that they would answer such a frequently asked question, especially since they are answering other less asked questions as well.

If this was legitimate they would've disclosed more information about the team members etc. already or at least replied to the question saying they aren't going to share that. (which would be stupid, since a lot of people aren't investing because of this exact lack of information).


Take your own conclusions and invest safely (or not).

Cheers.

[Crypto1982]

tha good thing is, that their plan is to release the plattform before the ICO took place. So let's wait for that.

[Grim149x]

tha good thing is, that their plan is to release the plattform before the ICO took place. So let's wait for that.

Well, that's definitely a good thing. I could be persuaded to invest in this if that's the case.

[andresmarulanda]

I'm waiting for improvements on beta release and more information about ICO and team. Maybe WCX tokens have a high price in few months.

[hamnchess]

about the team...

- Team identities have not yet been revealed for fund security reason - this has been explained A BILLION TIMES very LONG AGO. also don't you think if it WAS a scam theyd have create few fake linkedin profile, put "great" advisors on team and published some photos, like the scam ICOs, and avoided all these dumb Questions about the team?Huh use your brain for 2.5 seconds

[Coiner_]

I have read more than 100 pages

Seeing as there are only 100 pages, the 100th being the current page, this is not just an unsubstantiated claim but a demonstrably false one.

and I will invest my fund in to WCX ICO, GO ON!

What a lovely claim.



Whoever owns this alt account is really no more pathetic than whoever owns the bmwboi and co alt accounts.

[evergrow]

This thread is pretty weird, just like the project IMO. Seems great at first glance but the more you dig the stranger it seems. Following, still! Let's see how things turn out.

[metgohan]

From Twitter:

"The team will be revealed in time. Security is our top priority for the exchange. Our directors are custodians of customer funds and it's important to disclose their identities to the public responsibly without putting client funds or their personal safety at risk."

This makes sense. Not sure why they didn't say so in this topic, or maybe they did somewhere and I missed it. Maybe they omitted it on purpose. The mystery did after all generate a lot of activity, 101K views and 100 pages of conversation...

Team from Apple --> mystery is exactly what Apple uses for marketing because it gets people talking -- secrecy, no product announcements, rumors, leaks, etc. until the final product is revealed and puts all speculation to rest.

[cryptocointrading]

Team from Apple --> secrecy, no product announcements, rumors, leaks, etc. until the final product is revealed and puts all speculation to rest.

Apple leaks left and right these days months before revealing a product
But anyway not disclosing the developers makes total sense, having absolutely nobody as public face is another if you want to receive money
I want this project to succeed but the more you dig into it the fees are not that much lower and the team are ghosts no wonder people worry

[metgohan]

Team from Apple --> secrecy, no product announcements, rumors, leaks, etc. until the final product is revealed and puts all speculation to rest.

Apple leaks left and right these days months before revealing a product
But anyway not disclosing the developers makes total sense, having absolutely nobody as public face is another if you want to receive money
I want this project to succeed but the more you dig into it the fees are not that much lower and the team are ghosts no wonder people worry

To be honest it doesn't have to be that much different than a regular exchange. If they can just make a GOOD pure crypto exchange that's open internationally, then it's gold... none out there.

WCX fees are much lower than what already exists. Comparing WCX 0.1% net fee (both sides of the trades) to Poloniex 0.4% and Bittrex 0.5%, that's 4x and 5x lower respectively. And they're likely to attract good liquidity because makers are paid to place trades on the book. Which in turn attracts retail traders.

And the downside is pretty limited. No exchange I know has failed unless caused by external factor such as a hack. Which comes back to their point of "security is their top priority" which makes sense to focus on that since it's a big factor.

Basically the project is a slam dunk if they can pull it off.

[cryptocointrading]

How do you calculate those fees? poloniex for instance has 0.15%/0.25% maker/taker fees. Not to mention they go down the more you trade

[metgohan]

How do you calculate those fees? poloniex for instance has 0.15%/0.25% maker/taker fees. Not to mention they go down the more you trade

Poloniex: 0.15% + 0.25% = 0.4%
Bittrex: 0.25% + 0.25% = 0.5%
WCX: -0.05% + 0.15% = 0.1%

For WCX the maker fee is a payment to the maker, not a charge.

[cryptocointrading]

How do you calculate those fees? poloniex for instance has 0.15%/0.25% maker/taker fees. Not to mention they go down the more you trade

Poloniex: 0.15% + 0.25% = 0.4%
Bittrex: 0.25% + 0.25% = 0.5%
WCX: -0.05% + 0.15% = 0.1%

For WCX the maker fee is a payment to the maker, not a charge.

that is not how maker taker fees work both parties may be makers or takers in a trade. It is about making or removing liquidity. But ok 0.15% vs 0.25% taker fees, and no maker fees are decent not earth shattering

[metgohan]

How do you calculate those fees? poloniex for instance has 0.15%/0.25% maker/taker fees. Not to mention they go down the more you trade

Poloniex: 0.15% + 0.25% = 0.4%
Bittrex: 0.25% + 0.25% = 0.5%
WCX: -0.05% + 0.15% = 0.1%

For WCX the maker fee is a payment to the maker, not a charge.

that is not how maker taker fees work both parties may be makers or takers in a trade. It is about making or removing liquidity. But ok 0.15% vs 0.25% taker fees, and no maker fees are decent not earth shattering

That is how they work. Seems like you're unfamiliar with trading fees. Here's a primer: https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/63044/maker-taker-fees-can-somebody-explain-in-plain-english

On WCX the maker is PAID the maker fee, while on other exchange the maker is CHARGED the fee.

[identifyuser]

Long time ago no news from wcxofficial.. Sir What about the project, what stage it is now?

[easyrimka]

Long time ago no news from wcxofficial.. Sir What about the project, what stage it is now?

waiting for ICO finishing

[elpresidenteg23]

wanna see the platform and have some satisfying info about devs. then i may decide to invest some but somehow i have a good feeling about this project. lets see.

[DIYOR]

Probably the most controversial topic out there.
Hmm, lets see how it goes anyways