Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2024, 03:18:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 51% attack and BTC price  (Read 1010 times)
giantdragon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002



View Profile
May 11, 2013, 09:47:49 PM
 #1

Just interesting, how much BTC price will fall if 2 largest mining pools will be hacked and double spend performed?
gweedo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 11, 2013, 09:52:22 PM
 #2

If double spending is performed, then the price will be $0, cause double spending is the biggest flaw you can have in a currency and all faith in it will be lost.
BubbleBoy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 11, 2013, 10:02:18 PM
 #3

The 50%+1 attack is probably the least vulnerable part of Bitcoin. If it's performed as the result of a hack, then nothing will come of it, maybe a shortterm price crash and a quick recovery. Someone who hacks 50% of the network stands to earn something like 300K/day from mining. I have no idea where would you double spend such a large amount of money and get away with it.

I would worry about a catastrophic client bug, like an integer overflow that goes unnoticed and allows millions of "fake BTC" be sold on mtgox  and flood the economy. Government regulation, equating the bitcoin network with running a terrorist or pedo site. Bitdust, massive DDoS on the P2P network. And many more.

                ████
              ▄▄████▄▄
          ▄▄████████████▄▄
       ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄
     ▄████▀▀            ▀▀████▄
   ▄████▀                  ▀████▄
  ▐███▀                      ▀███▌
 ▐███▀   ████▄  ████  ▄████   ▀███▌
 ████    █████▄ ████ ▄█████    ████
▐███▌    ██████▄████▄██████    ▐███▌
████     ██████████████████     ████
████     ████ ████████ ████     ████
████     ████  ██████  ████     ████
▐███▌    ████   ████   ████    ▐███▌
 ████    ████   ████   ████    ████
 ▐███▄   ████   ████   ████   ▄███▌
  ▐███▄                      ▄███▌
   ▀████▄                  ▄████▀
     ▀████▄▄            ▄▄████▀
       ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀
          ▀▀████████████▀▀
              ▀▀████▀▀
                ████
MIDEX
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ GET TOKENS ▂▂▂▂
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
BLOCKCHAIN BASED FINANCIAL PLATFORM                                # WEB ANN + Bounty <
with Licensed Exchange approved by Swiss Bankers and Lawyers           > Telegram Facebook Twitter Blog #
jhansen858
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2013, 10:14:11 PM
 #4

Don't double spends happen all the time?  I just don't know if they are successful or not.

http://blockchain.info/double-spends

Hi forum: 1DDpiEt36VTJsiJunyBc3XtG6CcSAnsQ4p
Le Happy Merchant
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 634
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 12, 2013, 05:41:27 AM
 #5

A malicious 51% attack has such a huge oppurtunity cost that no profit-seeking individual would be willing to forgo the chance to simply mine more coins.

Only someone who wanted to see Bitcoin fail would do it. This is an unsettling notion, but since only institutions (corps, governments) would want to do it, I'm not as worried that it will happen.

The recent lawsuit filed by Coinlabs against Mt.Gox shows that Bitcoins are at the verge of being something you can really sue about. Once that case plays out, Bitcoin will have legal precident. If an institution 51%-attacked the network to kill it, they would face legal trouble.

To answer your question though, if a double spend was successfully preformed, the price would either plummet to near zero, or have a major non-zero crash. It really depends on the size of the double-spend.

Zaih
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 10:29:38 AM
 #6

Scary s**t. One can only hope eh.

I'm sure everything is sorted though, it seems unlikely in reality.

As for your question, I think it'd be hard to disagree with everyone else above.. 0 seems like a pretty practical value for a situation like this eh Tongue
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!