Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2017, 08:24:17 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Should they cap transaction costs?  (Read 171 times)
thirdprize
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 237


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 02:16:02 PM
 #1

Read a few stories recently of companies leaving Btc and going where the transactions are cheaper.  $2.5 may be ok if you are moving a couple of hundred (or thousand) dollars but if you are buying something for $20 then how quickly would a 20 cent transaction be sorted? 

Surely if we don't want greedy bankers taking over and Btc becoming the sole domain of dealers and gangsters, we should cap fees at 50 cents or something.  Then all transactions would be treated equally.  Hashing power would be spread over all transactions, not just the rich ones thereby eliminating delays.


My own personal Altcoin Aggregated RSS News Feed     |||||     Blockchain Explorer for iOS     |||||     Need any Alt Coin devleopment?  Get in touch. ||||  I recommend HitTC Exchange for all your trading needs.
1513153457
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513153457

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513153457
Reply with quote  #2

1513153457
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
BrewMaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


There is trouble abrewing


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 02:21:00 PM
 #2

first let me tell you that fees are not $2.5, in the past 8 years they were only that much for about 3 months.

it is impossible to do what you propose, it opens up ways for easier attacks. block size is limited and it should be limited (to whatever number) and in case fees were capped at some very small number, it makes spam attacking bitcoin super cheap hence easy.
the limited block space will be filled with cheap spam.

with the way fees are now, an attacker needs to spend a lot of money to spam attack because fees keep rising as the attack continues happening. so it has to come to an end eventually.

you proposal may work for an altcoin and it will because the usage of an altcoin is very limited and small, and there is no incentive for spam attacking any of them.

thirdprize
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 237


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 02:27:02 PM
 #3

it is impossible to do what you propose, it opens up ways for easier attacks. block size is limited and it should be limited (to whatever number) and in case fees were capped at some very small number, it makes spam attacking bitcoin super cheap hence easy.

Good point.

My own personal Altcoin Aggregated RSS News Feed     |||||     Blockchain Explorer for iOS     |||||     Need any Alt Coin devleopment?  Get in touch. ||||  I recommend HitTC Exchange for all your trading needs.
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1330


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 03:03:53 PM
 #4

Well in a way I would want to agree with you, but for another reason. People should not be able to send 1 or 10 or 30 BTC miners fees by

mistake
, if I had any control over that. Yes, you are free to determine your own fees, but then you should be warned that it is much higher

than the recommended average. We recently saw Coinbase paying 100 times more than the suggested fees and that is simply stupid. { Again,

this seems to be on their internal system, but a warning should have been built into the protocol to prevent that }  Roll Eyes

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!