Mem has just started his second gambling list. This time he made it a self moderated topic, because he does not like the fact that people who he accuses might defend themselves. So then what happens? You receive a PM from the forum.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
I think it is crazy that people who are trying to run an honest business can be attacked out of the blue and denied any possibility to reply to these accusations. The more, because this individual is known for flaming multiple people and fighting personal crusades against certain websites he doesn't like, instead of doing what he pretends to do: runnng an honest and objective list of all the gaming sites in the bitcoin industry.
The fact that he closed his old topic, found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75883.msg2129880#msg2129880 shows what Mem's true colors are. While he pretends to run a list to judge gambling and gaming sites on their integrity and credibility, he closes his thread, sends threats thru PM and start a self-moderated topic.
So yet we found ourselves after buying a $50k software package and months of hard work flamed by a highly unstable guy with a self moderated list because he is angry we stated we didn't want to be on his old list. Yet he keeps screaming that we are angry for not being listed quickly enough, while the real reason he was angry was a post in his topic, where i said:
At this moment we are content not to be listed on it, as an unstable individual as him/her can do only more damage than good.
I understand that this individual has some creditbility because his list is around for a long time, but I also believe that when you accuse people on your list, you should allow them a chance to respond to it. If you don't do this, you lose all credibility in my eyes.
Mem, I have tried to respond to your accusations in your thread 3 times now and I am no longer going to bother. I hope you will understand that censoring critics to your list will not result in a higher credibility. It will only weaken it.
Im off now. Other than you, I have a business to run.
