Bitcoin Forum
February 17, 2019, 09:18:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 [810] 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 ... 905 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees  (Read 638102 times)
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1188


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 31, 2018, 04:36:12 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2018, 04:46:20 PM by jbreher
 #16181

So they will be 3 BCH ?
Bitcoin Cobra, Bitcoin SV & Bitcoin Cash ?

And Bitcoin Unlimited's approach, which will implement whichever features of the above that accrue mining majority. At least, if I am still up to speed in this fast-moving area.

*such excitement!*

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Your Bitcoin transactions
The Ultimate Bitcoin mixer
made truly anonymous.
with an advanced technology.
Mix coins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1188


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 31, 2018, 04:45:40 PM
 #16182

What kinda coin is this?

I see you are new here. In answering your question, the best place to start is with: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
An excellent resource. just to be clear the real bitcoin is BTC    not BCH .

ATM, I guess. The future? Perhaps not.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Ryuuma
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 1


View Profile
August 31, 2018, 04:49:09 PM
 #16183

Sometimes I think that Bitcoin Cash does not reflect potential.It may be seen as the cause of copy.
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1069


youtu.be/O17f3lB7BFY


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 05:34:25 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2018, 05:59:43 PM by BitcoinFX
 #16184

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1035322235983159296?s=21

In all fairness, anyone with a background in common law will understand that no one wants to be take ownership of being Satoshi Nakamoto.


Indeed.

However, one cannot simply continue to pretend to be someone or something, especially when that very thing allows you to prove otherwise.

This is about cryptography. Financial cryptography at that. Sign and Verify.

I decided I should do this myself recently, it was really hard for me to do, not in practice (that's the really easy bit), but emotionally difficult.

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Ask yourselves - Why can't CSW login to this forum as Satoshi Nakamoto or just simply sign and verify somewhere? If a three letter agency has his keys or he requires a multi-party signing to do this then he needs to explain this. This is not a joke.

Like me, Craig was clearly around during Bitcoin's inception (even earlier on than myself and many others on this forum) - However, I have no knowledge of him mining. I do know that Dave Kleiman was mining.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg42180805#msg42180805

Bitcoin without polity !?! | Get a Gapcoin slice of Mathematically constant π + new world record and attempt ongoing! | "The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me (us all) money." | We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution Renaissance! for we are all Satoshi now? | Vision does not = Prescient | "the multiple and the multiplex!" | HODL BTC and/or buy Pizza's | Read the first chapter ... | P.S. "I Eye love found you!" 456 | Mostly harmless ... 42 | "INSERT COIN" break blocks!
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1331



View Profile
August 31, 2018, 06:56:36 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2018, 07:13:03 PM by bones261
 #16185

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1035322235983159296?s=21

In all fairness, anyone with a background in common law will understand that no one wants to be take ownership of being Satoshi Nakamoto.


Indeed.

However, one cannot simply continue to pretend to be someone or something, especially when that very thing allows you to prove otherwise.

This is about cryptography. Financial cryptography at that. Sign and Verify.

I decided I should do this myself recently, it was really hard for me to do, not in practice (that's the really easy bit), but emotionally difficult.

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Ask yourselves - Why can't CSW login to this forum as Satoshi Nakamoto or just simply sign and verify somewhere? If a three letter agency has his keys or he requires a multi-party signing to do this then he needs to explain this. This is not a joke.

Like me, Craig was clearly around during Bitcoin's inception (even earlier on than myself and many others on this forum) - However, I have no knowledge of him mining. I do know that Dave Kleiman was mining.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg42180805#msg42180805


If he is Satoshi, it would be best for BTC and BCH that he not verify. That would give him undue influence on how things turn out. Bitcoin is supposed to be based on Nakamoto consensus, which is basically proof of work. Nakamoto consensus should not be proof of who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
Also, Theymos locked the satoshi account. Theymos would need undeniable proof to allow anyone to sign in. This is good, since Bitcointalk was hacked back in 2015, and I believe the e-mails and passwords were compromised along with much more personal data.

BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1069


youtu.be/O17f3lB7BFY


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 08:06:13 PM
 #16186

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1035322235983159296?s=21

In all fairness, anyone with a background in common law will understand that no one wants to be take ownership of being Satoshi Nakamoto.


Indeed.

However, one cannot simply continue to pretend to be someone or something, especially when that very thing allows you to prove otherwise.

This is about cryptography. Financial cryptography at that. Sign and Verify.

I decided I should do this myself recently, it was really hard for me to do, not in practice (that's the really easy bit), but emotionally difficult.

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Ask yourselves - Why can't CSW login to this forum as Satoshi Nakamoto or just simply sign and verify somewhere? If a three letter agency has his keys or he requires a multi-party signing to do this then he needs to explain this. This is not a joke.

Like me, Craig was clearly around during Bitcoin's inception (even earlier on than myself and many others on this forum) - However, I have no knowledge of him mining. I do know that Dave Kleiman was mining.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg42180805#msg42180805


If he is Satoshi, it would be best for BTC and BCH that he not verify. That would give him undue influence on how things turn out. Bitcoin is supposed to be based on Nakamoto consensus, which is basically proof of work. Nakamoto consensus should not be proof of who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
Also, Theymos locked the satoshi account. Theymos would need undeniable proof to allow anyone to sign in. This is good, since Bitcointalk was hacked back in 2015, and I believe the e-mails and passwords were compromised along with much more personal data.

No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.

He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.

I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.

I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

Bitcoin without polity !?! | Get a Gapcoin slice of Mathematically constant π + new world record and attempt ongoing! | "The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me (us all) money." | We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution Renaissance! for we are all Satoshi now? | Vision does not = Prescient | "the multiple and the multiplex!" | HODL BTC and/or buy Pizza's | Read the first chapter ... | P.S. "I Eye love found you!" 456 | Mostly harmless ... 42 | "INSERT COIN" break blocks!
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1331



View Profile
August 31, 2018, 08:46:28 PM
 #16187


No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.

He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.

I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.

I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.

Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1086


#BEL+++


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 09:09:04 PM
 #16188


No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.

He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.

I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.

I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.

He is NOT Satoshi.

If Craig Wright is Satoshi why did he disappear to come back?

Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1069


youtu.be/O17f3lB7BFY


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 09:11:46 PM
 #16189


No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.

He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.

I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.

I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.

Good. Realize that he has already put himself into this exalted position (Satoshi or not), by actually claiming to be Satoshi.

I to believe that Satoshi group is/was best preserved by myth and legend alone. This was Mythopoeia.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythopoeia

I don't imagine the real Satoshi would 'rage quit' in this regard. With a high probability the main drivers of original Bitcoin (BTC) are now unfortunately no longer with us (deceased).  Cry

Read the thoughts of some cypherpunks, these are the peers that Satoshi originally announced Bitcoin to.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk
- https://moxie.org/stories/money-machine/  <<<< really good read this one!

Peace.  Cool

Bitcoin without polity !?! | Get a Gapcoin slice of Mathematically constant π + new world record and attempt ongoing! | "The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me (us all) money." | We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution Renaissance! for we are all Satoshi now? | Vision does not = Prescient | "the multiple and the multiplex!" | HODL BTC and/or buy Pizza's | Read the first chapter ... | P.S. "I Eye love found you!" 456 | Mostly harmless ... 42 | "INSERT COIN" break blocks!
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1086


#BEL+++


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 09:17:52 PM
 #16190

I don't imagine the real Satoshi would 'rage quit' in this regard. With a high probability the main drivers of Bitcoin (BTC) are now unfortunately no longer with us (deceased).  Cry

Read the thoughts of some cypherpunks, these are the peers that Satoshi originally announced Bitcoin to.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk
- https://moxie.org/stories/money-machine/  <<<< really good read this one!

Peace.  Cool

he is still alive. LL@Microsoft

Therefore the first software was developed in Windows.

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1331



View Profile
August 31, 2018, 09:24:08 PM
 #16191


No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.

He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.

I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.

I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.

He is NOT Satoshi.

If Craig Wright is Satoshi why did he disappear to come back?

Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?

I must concur that I actually believe he is most probably not Satoshi. However, the above quote from reddit does not really prove that he is not Satoshi by contradiction. Human beings are not necessarily beings who are consistent in their behavior their entire life. It's not uncommon to hear someone say in the news, "that was so unlike him."

Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1086


#BEL+++


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 09:31:56 PM
 #16192


No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so.

He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date.

I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum.

I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads.

He is NOT Satoshi.

If Craig Wright is Satoshi why did he disappear to come back?

Its totally illogical. First he gives up the project and repository and then he comes back and wants to start a hash war?

I must concur that I actually believe he is most probably not Satoshi. However, the above quote from reddit does not really prove that he is not Satoshi by contradiction. Human beings are not necessarily beings who are consistent in their behavior their entire life. It's not uncommon to hear someone say in the news, "that was so unlike him."

ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:

Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.

CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.

conclusion: different persons with different personalities

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
bitcoinPsycho
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 193


$100,000 BTC in one hour🍄💊


View Profile
August 31, 2018, 09:41:38 PM
 #16193

What kinda coin is this?

I see you are new here. In answering your question, the best place to start is with: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
An excellent resource. just to be clear the real bitcoin is BTC    not BCH .

ATM, I guess. The future? Perhaps not.
thats right . who knows what the future holds. but for now BTC is Bitcoin and for good reason.
I swapped my bch for bitcoin at .2  so I want BTC to succeed lol

THE NEXT 24 YEARS ARE CRITICAL
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1331



View Profile
August 31, 2018, 09:46:57 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2018, 09:57:16 PM by bones261
 #16194



ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:

Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.

CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.

conclusion: different persons with different personalities



OR




 Cheesy

PS. "Most probably" is most probably the best that you are going to do with me. For me, most probably, is an even higher level of convinced than "beyond a reasonable doubt." 

jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1188


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 31, 2018, 11:16:16 PM
 #16195

Also, Theymos locked the satoshi account. Theymos would need undeniable proof to allow anyone to sign in. This is good, since Bitcointalk was hacked back in 2015, and I believe the e-mails and passwords were compromised along with much more personal data.

I don't really see how having an anointed gatekeeper for thought leadership on who may or may not be satoshi is goodness. Be it Theymos or anyone else.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1188


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 31, 2018, 11:22:00 PM
 #16196

ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:

Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.

CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.

conclusion: different persons with different personalities

I don't have a dog in this hunt. I'm not even sure the outcome means anything.

I must admit some puzzlement, however, as to what you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone". Care to elucidate?

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1304


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
September 01, 2018, 03:48:33 AM
 #16197

ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:

Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.

CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.

conclusion: different persons with different personalities

I don't have a dog in this hunt. I'm not even sure the outcome means anything.

I must admit some puzzlement, however, as to what you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone". Care to elucidate?

The "outcome"? There is no outcome yet to be determined. Bitcoin Craig failed to provide actual proof he was Satoshi, then wormed his way out of his claim by issuing a half-apology. What he definitely is, however, is one of the biggest egomaniacs bitcoin has ever seen. Now he's hellbent on breaking Bitcoin Cash apparently. If he actually cared about anything other than himself, he would simply shut up for a bit. There's your elucidation.

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1188


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
September 01, 2018, 04:25:25 AM
 #16198

ok, try to convince you with the next consideration:

Satoshi left and was so mental strong to leave his baby in the arms of others.

CSW is so mental weak he can't step back to put Bitcoin Cash (which he claims is the original Bitcoin version) in the save zone again to avoid a HF.

conclusion: different persons with different personalities

I don't have a dog in this hunt. I'm not even sure the outcome means anything.

I must admit some puzzlement, however, as to what you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone". Care to elucidate?

The "outcome"? There is no outcome yet to be determined. Bitcoin Craig failed to provide actual proof he was Satoshi, then wormed his way out of his claim by issuing a half-apology. What he definitely is, however, is one of the biggest egomaniacs bitcoin has ever seen. Now he's hellbent on breaking Bitcoin Cash apparently. If he actually cared about anything other than himself, he would simply shut up for a bit. There's your elucidation.

I really don't give a damn about your opinion of CSW.

I guess my point of confusion was unclear. Allow me to be very specific: What do you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone"?


Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1304


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
September 01, 2018, 08:04:56 AM
Last edit: September 01, 2018, 08:44:17 AM by nutildah
 #16199


I guess my point of confusion was unclear. Allow me to be very specific: What do you mean by "put Bitcoin Cash in the save zone"?


You have several points of confusion. But lets clear this one up: Obviously he meant "safe zone."

How do you expect anybody to take you seriously if you actually believe Bitcoin Craig is Satoshi?

Now I know why you don't like Theymos. He has the things you crave the most, yet are sorely lacking: control and influence.

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
Mrpumperitis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1070


View Profile
September 01, 2018, 08:06:14 AM
Merited by nutildah (1)
 #16200

Dr Craig S Wright

Verified account
 
@ProfFaustus
Follow Follow @ProfFaustus
More
I shall provide sufficent evidence to enable a criminal fraud prosecution against "Scronty".
This material shall be compiled and released in Sept. It shall include his extortion attempt and far more.

Sorry. He has nothing to do with Bitcoin, and his fall will be an example.

2:12 pm - 31 Aug 2018



Dr Jones...if your going to enable a criminal fraud prosecution against "Scronty".....
then why are you announcing it to the world before doing it?

Scronty , just like all of us has alot to do with Bitcoin...




I got red trust because i speak the truth....This thread shows why many long term users are being tagged red, ...https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2399315.msg24593043#msg24593043 ,nullius and lauda are scammers.Bitcoin cash is the real upgrade bitcoin needed, not segwit.
How The Banks Bought Bitcoin  The Lightning Network - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g&feature=youtu.be&repost= Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Pages: « 1 ... 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 [810] 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 ... 905 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!