|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tekmobile
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 04:50:03 PM |
|
if bitcoin developer is sathosi nakamoto, so who the developer or creator this bitcoin cash ? trying check the website but i get 404 not found https://www.bitcoincash.org/developers404 Not Found nginx/1.13.3 That's probably correct 404 developers not found |
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
October 03, 2017, 04:53:44 PM |
|
if bitcoin developer is sathosi nakamoto, so who the developer or creator this bitcoin cash ?
Satoshi Nakamoto Why are you trying to view a non-existent webpage? |
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:16:05 PM |
|
try to see Bitcoin Cash as the backup for Bitcoin 2.0 (Segwit). if anything goes wrong Bitcoin Cash will take over.
why would i choose another failure in case of failure? it's better to walk away from the whole thing and forget about it. if there has to be a 'replacement' then litecoin looks a lot more reassuring as a solid prospect. |
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3150
Merit: 4303
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:26:58 PM |
|
That was way before my time, I think. I can't even picture what you are talking about. But I was born after color broadcast was mainstream.
The old tube sets would drift, primarily with temperature, you would select the channel, which would get you in the ballpark, but then fine tune for best picture. As the set warmed up you would have to readjust. Once the transistor sets came in this was much reduced, and the advent of the phase lock loop pretty much put an end to it, though many sets did not implement a PLL in the UHF receiver right to the end of the CRT era. |
This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
|
|
|
cryptokangaroo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 3
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:27:31 PM |
|
I believe in Bitcoin Cash. The airdrop was nice and then made some good trades on the swings.
What is the future of Bitcoin Cash? The price seems to go down..
|
|
|
|
|
|
classicsucks
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:27:53 PM |
|
uh, and what of basic usability, development and a future worth mentioning? can anyone point to a single worthwhile contribution this abusive freak has made to bitcoin? i cannot. realistic fees are important but they're only a small part of a wider picture. We've been through this before. BCH usability is the same as Bitcoin (other than address confusion issues), but fees are more than 1000x lower. This means that all of the use cases that were wiped out by Kore's artificially high fee market are back with BCH. Development is solid, deadalnix gave one of the best talks on Bitcoin of 2017 and his code is respected by the top devs - the only criticism Maxwell could come up with was "copyright violations" for backporting some bugfixes... finally the EDA is weird, but it prevents a death spiral phenomenon that BTC is very vulnerable to if the SHTF in November. I understand that Wright is fake Satoshi and furthermore he's a dick, but that doesn't make his statement wrong. Wright is saying that we've gone back to 2014 with BCH because it's feasible to gamble again. Nobody is going to gamble $100 when the fees to do it are $10 or even $5. Is that what you mean by "realistic fees"? BTC almost priced itself out of the market with fees while everybody was moaning about all of the "attacks on Bitcoin". |
|
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:30:54 PM |
|
We've been through this before. BCH usability is the same as Bitcoin (other than address confusion issues), but fees are more than 1000x lower.
guess i wasn't there for it then. a block a minute is very usable. a block every two hours is not. the block lottery is fun but not very practical. either it settles down and then development can get to work or it remains a curio that's not going to attract users. |
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1518
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:43:20 PM |
|
try to see Bitcoin Cash as the backup for Bitcoin 2.0 (Segwit). if anything goes wrong Bitcoin Cash will take over.
why would i choose another failure in case of failure? it's better to walk away from the whole thing and forget about it. if there has to be a 'replacement' then litecoin looks a lot more reassuring as a solid prospect. we have now two routes to solve the scaling issue of Bitcoin/Blockchain technology. One is to solve it on-chain which was maybe in the mind of SN but nobody knows it for sure and he disappears before the decision. The other path is to solve it off-chain with Bitcoin 2.0 (Segwit+LN). Is it so difficult to accept the status quo now and hodl both currencies? I think it's not difficult and there is no need for fights with words against each other. The parties are splitted now. No further need of any HF (Bitcoin Segwit2x + Bitcoin Gold + Bitcoin Bcash). |
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1518
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:46:36 PM |
|
We've been through this before. BCH usability is the same as Bitcoin (other than address confusion issues), but fees are more than 1000x lower.
guess i wasn't there for it then. a block a minute is very usable. a block every two hours is not. the block lottery is fun but not very practical. either it settles down and then development can get to work or it remains a curio that's not going to attract users. there is also the possibility to use 0-confirmation transactions for small amounts. it was a use case for a long time and it worked quite well. |
|
|
|
|
gribble
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:49:36 PM |
|
ViaBTC is a well-known name in the world of cryptocurrency. Not only does the company operate a pool, but they also had an exchange platform. Plus, they still provide the transaction accelerator for Bitcoin. However, it is the mining pool which has seen most of the growth over the past few months. This spectacular growth is mainly caused by the launch of Bitcoin Cash. By being one of the first pools to provide BCH support, ViaBTC has made a big impact in quick succession. http://www.livebitcoinnews.com/bitcoin-cash-popularity-allows-viabtc-mining-pool-surpass-1-exahash/ even viabtc growth due to bitcoin cash  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
classicsucks
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:56:54 PM |
|
We've been through this before. BCH usability is the same as Bitcoin (other than address confusion issues), but fees are more than 1000x lower.
guess i wasn't there for it then. a block a minute is very usable. a block every two hours is not. the block lottery is fun but not very practical. either it settles down and then development can get to work or it remains a curio that's not going to attract users. A block every 2 hours is not optimal, I agree. That's due to miners gaming the EDA for more block rewards. Then again, most BTC users got used to 24 hours to confirm some of their transactions this year, how's that for usability? The worst I experienced was 3 days... oh and I did I mention I paid $3 in fees? Wow. |
|
|
|
|
Mrpumperitis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1075
|
|
October 03, 2017, 06:38:02 PM |
|
Bitcoin cashers..... ITS TIME  Bring on the walls  |
Technically Bitcoin is a fork and Bitcoin Cash is the original blockchain.When the hard fork occurred, people had access to the same amount of coins on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.- NIST
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
|
October 03, 2017, 07:13:41 PM |
|
A block every 2 hours is not optimal, I agree. That's due to miners gaming the EDA for more block rewards.
Then again, most BTC users got used to 24 hours to confirm some of their transactions this year, how's that for usability? The worst I experienced was 3 days... oh and I did I mention I paid $3 in fees? Wow.
yep. that sucks too. luckily the creators of bch stopped spamming when they got what they wanted. in the meantime i hope something is done to make bitcoin itself less vulnerable to this in case they start up again. |
|
|
|
|
|
lonesomestranger
|
|
October 03, 2017, 07:40:47 PM |
|
I must say I was kind of embracing BCH when it first came up on the crypto market, it has real advantages over Bitcoin original blockchain and I still love the idea. But a second fork? Do we really need this? Does Bitcoin really needs this? Hard to say
|
|
|
|
Mrpumperitis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1075
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:04:37 PM |
|
I must say I was kind of embracing BCH when it first came up on the crypto market, it has real advantages over Bitcoin original blockchain and I still love the idea. But a second fork? Do we really need this? Does Bitcoin really needs this? Hard to say
2nd fork is crazy...and even worse for btc (no replay attack afiak) Bitcoin cash will be over $1k soon (i had a dream last night , bch was $960 lols ) |
Technically Bitcoin is a fork and Bitcoin Cash is the original blockchain.When the hard fork occurred, people had access to the same amount of coins on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.- NIST
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 2048
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:28:04 PM |
|
I must say I was kind of embracing BCH when it first came up on the crypto market, it has real advantages over Bitcoin original blockchain and I still love the idea. But a second fork? Do we really need this? Does Bitcoin really needs this? Hard to say
2nd fork is crazy...and even worse for btc (no replay attack afiak) Bitcoin cash will be over $1k soon (i had a dream last night , bch was $960 lols ) Yeah it's doing really well . At this rate it will hit 1000 cents.lol |
$100,000 BTC in one hour
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:43:20 PM |
|
try to see Bitcoin Cash as the backup for Bitcoin 2.0 (Segwit). if anything goes wrong Bitcoin Cash will take over.
why would i choose another failure in case of failure? it's better to walk away from the whole thing and forget about it. if there has to be a 'replacement' then litecoin looks a lot more reassuring as a solid prospect. I sense some denial here. In your mind, a coin that rockets to #4 essentially upon release is a failure? I mean, sure - it has not supplanted Bitcoin Core. But the ink ain't dry on this as of yet. Not by a long shot. That said, I'm not onboard with the 'backup' characterization, but whatevs... |
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
|
tekmobile
|
|
October 03, 2017, 09:12:10 PM |
|
try to see Bitcoin Cash as the backup for Bitcoin 2.0 (Segwit). if anything goes wrong Bitcoin Cash will take over.
why would i choose another failure in case of failure? it's better to walk away from the whole thing and forget about it. if there has to be a 'replacement' then litecoin looks a lot more reassuring as a solid prospect. I sense some denial here. In your mind, a coin that rockets to #4 essentially upon release is a failure? I mean, sure - it has not supplanted Bitcoin Core. But the ink ain't dry on this as of yet. Not by a long shot. That said, I'm not onboard with the 'backup' characterization, but whatevs... The only reason it went that high was due to the full bitcoin chain history Do it again and start from block 0 and see how high you get What will you do if the Bgold fork instantly reaches a higher CMC rank will you class that fork as more successful ? |
|
|
|
|
|
