[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees

[grasshpr]

Is this one of the reasons why the epic BCH pump has ended?
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/932247391788519425

[1714011708]

1714011708

[1714011708]

1714011708

[1714011708]

1714011708

[tekmobile]

Is this one of the reasons why the epic BCH pump has ended?
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/932247391788519425

Yes congrats all you BCH holders you now all own a share in a lambo

[chermah]

What you can't understand is that no one cares about the creator of any coin, no one care if vitalik is a pedophile or if satoshi in reality was i don't know a serial killer or whatever you want.

You have to judge any crypto by economic standards,

does BCH solves a real problem ? yes
is BCH a nice branding name ? yes
will more and more miners get on BCH ? if the prices continues to rise yesss
should i invest in it ? yes because i've already made 5x and didn't sell yet, businesses are getting in, there is a momentum here + the recent decline is due to massive
massive dumps on the market from various exchanges (just look at the volume which is huge and the amount of transactions on BCH which is small) that confirms this hypothesis

You have serious mental trouble if you go think that everyone is an angel lol ...if you are waiting for angel to buy food, crypto, ... from then i'm afraid you will not deal with anyone...
 

[Gyrsur]

does BCH solves a real problem ? yes
is BCH a nice branding name ? yes
will more and more miners get on BCH ? if the prices continues to rise yesss
should i invest in it ? yes because i've already made 5x and didn't sell yet, businesses are getting in, there is a momentum here + the recent decline is due to massive

will BTC be listed as a future on CME and BTC bubbles development coming to an end ? yes

1. buy BCH
2. BTC future golive
3.
4. profit!!

[player99]

business as usual, newly rich cryptographers.

[garytheasshole]

Is this one of the reasons why the epic BCH pump has ended?
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/932247391788519425

Yes congrats all you BCH holders you now all own a share in a lambo

From a few days ago talking about helping the poor to this picture... I must admit, I threw up a little in my mouth when I saw it.

Edit: You don't see Bill Gates taking such pictures, that's for sure.

Bill buys cities not lambos, lambos are for the nouveau riche.
https://nypost.com/2017/11/13/bill-gates-firm-buys-arizona-land-for-80-million-to-create-smart-city/

[jbreher]

You should check the latest tweet from the owner of BCH.

You should check yo sef. There is no 'owner of BCH'.

[jbreher]

The amount of people in this Thread that boast a Trust: -2: -1 / +0 Warning: Trade with extreme caution! is too high.

What with Lauda running roughshod though this thread, and tagging everyone who points out that Bitcoin Cash was Bitcoin before Bitcoin Segwit was Bitcoin with negative trust, what would you expect?

LoL, is this where you neg trust has its origin?

yeppers.

It's not fair they claim btc is the real Bitcoin

No Fair!

leavebritneybitcoinalone.gif

Maybe... they can get Barry at DCG to hop on board. Doesn't he need to buy up some BCH anyway by January 1, 2018 to compensate his Coinbase customers?

What makes you think that? Coinbase should already have all the BCH they need to make customers whole.

[Azazel333]

I'm loading up, Bitcoin Cash seems to be the future of bitcoin. What exactly is better about bitcoin core then cash?

Seems all the advantages lie in Cash other than Bitcoin has the simple "Bitcoin" name. I've done hundreds (probably close to a thousand) bitcoin transactions and its really not even useable as a currency, it takes too long with too big of fees.

[tiCeR]

I'm loading up, Bitcoin Cash seems to be the future of bitcoin. What exactly is better about bitcoin core then cash?

Seems all the advantages lie in Cash other than Bitcoin has the simple "Bitcoin" name. I've done hundreds (probably close to a thousand) bitcoin transactions and its really not even useable as a currency, it takes too long with too big of fees.

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution. BCH is prioritizing on-chain scalability while Bitcoin focuses on off-chain scalability. Up to you what you think is more sustainable (talking about the long-term). Quality of developers, existing ecosystem and other factors also play a role. And in the end it doesn't have to be "either" "or". Both could serve a purpose.

[BtcMan2009]

Everyone said that this is the pump and make it to the shear rams for money. Now it occurs gradually, and many will embrace a coin instead of money. Remember this time, it will go down in history. 

[jbreher]

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution.

Of course. 'Everybody knows that'. Of course, 'everybody' also knows that 'anything over 1MB is unsafe'. Funny that BCH is chugging along at 8MB.

[garytheasshole]

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution.

Of course. 'Everybody knows that'. Of course, 'everybody' also knows that 'anything over 1MB is unsafe'. Funny that BCH is chugging along at 8MB.

They're chugging along with about 20kb blocks, barely any transactions in their blocks.

[tekmobile]

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution.

Of course. 'Everybody knows that'. Of course, 'everybody' also knows that 'anything over 1MB is unsafe'. Funny that BCH is chugging along at 8MB.

They're chugging along with about 20kb blocks, barely any transactions in their blocks.

I say we set up a spam group and see how BCH really performs with constant 8MB blocks really make use of those 1sat transactions not hard to write a bash script to query blitcoin-cli to get/create addresses to send/receive from and just run transactions around and around in an infinite loop to different addresses you already own for next to nothing get confirmed and go again and again

Give me 2 mins and ill knock something up quick

Before you claim 8MB blocks are working at least try running the network with them


EDIT
Here you go don't know how well it will work lol but something like this would probably do the job

1.Set fee to nothing if its allowed
2. Get a new address
3. Send a random low amount to the new address
4. Repeat forever as fast as the system will allow until killed (CTRL+C)

Code:

#!/bin/bash
/locaiontoyour/bitcoin-cli -conf=/locationtoyourconf/bitcoin.conf settxfee 0.00000000
while true
do
        NEWADDR="$(/locaiontoyour/bitcoin-cli -conf=/locationtoyourconf/bitcoin.conf getnewaddress)"	
	SENDAMT=0.000000$(( $RANDOM % 99 + 1 ))
	/locaiontoyour/bitcoin-cli -conf=/locationtoyourconf/bitcoin.conf sendtoaddress "${NEWADDR}" ${SENDAMT}
done

[sylph93]

I'm loading up, Bitcoin Cash seems to be the future of bitcoin. What exactly is better about bitcoin core then cash?

Seems all the advantages lie in Cash other than Bitcoin has the simple "Bitcoin" name. I've done hundreds (probably close to a thousand) bitcoin transactions and its really not even useable as a currency, it takes too long with too big of fees.

Sure, the current fee level of BTC can not support micro transaction. even big transaction. Too expensive.

[Bitbobb]

I'm loading up, Bitcoin Cash seems to be the future of bitcoin. What exactly is better about bitcoin core then cash?

Seems all the advantages lie in Cash other than Bitcoin has the simple "Bitcoin" name. I've done hundreds (probably close to a thousand) bitcoin transactions and its really not even useable as a currency, it takes too long with too big of fees.

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution. BCH is prioritizing on-chain scalability while Bitcoin focuses on off-chain scalability. Up to you what you think is more sustainable (talking about the long-term). Quality of developers, existing ecosystem and other factors also play a role. And in the end it doesn't have to be "either" "or". Both could serve a purpose.

http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/nChain-and-Bitcoin-Unlimited-Launch-Gigablock-Testnet-for-Larger-Bitcoin-Block-Sizes-1002059546

 the exact same thing you falsely said about bitcoin cash (the real bitcoin) is actually true about your altcolon sewit.  the fact is that lightning network is not able to scale.  

[concern trolling]

[serby10101010001100010]

funny how this passed unoticed https://cryptopanic.com/news/464884/click/?pid=464884&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FCryptoCurrency%2Fcomments%2F7e2seb%2Fbitfinextether_must_prove_solvency_refuse%2F

[serby10101010001100010]

I'm loading up, Bitcoin Cash seems to be the future of bitcoin. What exactly is better about bitcoin core then cash?

Seems all the advantages lie in Cash other than Bitcoin has the simple "Bitcoin" name. I've done hundreds (probably close to a thousand) bitcoin transactions and its really not even useable as a currency, it takes too long with too big of fees.

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution. BCH is prioritizing on-chain scalability while Bitcoin focuses on off-chain scalability. Up to you what you think is more sustainable (talking about the long-term). Quality of developers, existing ecosystem and other factors also play a role. And in the end it doesn't have to be "either" "or". Both could serve a purpose.

http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/nChain-and-Bitcoin-Unlimited-Launch-Gigablock-Testnet-for-Larger-Bitcoin-Block-Sizes-1002059546

 the exact same thing you falsely said about bitcoin cash (the real bitcoin) is actually true about your altcolon sewit.  the fact is that lightning network is not able to scale.  

[concern trolling]

Roger Ver Declares Bitcoin Cash to Be True Bitcoin, Market Forces Bring More Attention
https://cointelegraph.com/news/roger-ver-declares-bitcoin-cash-to-be-true-bitcoin-market-forces-bring-more-attention

[EMWEE]

I'm loading up, Bitcoin Cash seems to be the future of bitcoin. What exactly is better about bitcoin core then cash?

Seems all the advantages lie in Cash other than Bitcoin has the simple "Bitcoin" name. I've done hundreds (probably close to a thousand) bitcoin transactions and its really not even useable as a currency, it takes too long with too big of fees.

Problem is that on-chain scalability is no sustainable scalability solution. BCH is prioritizing on-chain scalability while Bitcoin focuses on off-chain scalability. Up to you what you think is more sustainable (talking about the long-term). Quality of developers, existing ecosystem and other factors also play a role. And in the end it doesn't have to be "either" "or". Both could serve a purpose.

http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/nChain-and-Bitcoin-Unlimited-Launch-Gigablock-Testnet-for-Larger-Bitcoin-Block-Sizes-1002059546

 the exact same thing you falsely said about bitcoin cash (the real bitcoin) is actually true about your altcolon sewit.  the fact is that lightning network is not able to scale.  

[concern trolling]

Roger Ver Declares Bitcoin Cash to Be True Bitcoin, Market Forces Bring More Attention
https://cointelegraph.com/news/roger-ver-declares-bitcoin-cash-to-be-true-bitcoin-market-forces-bring-more-attention

I wasn't really surprised to see the message about Roger's support to BCH this morning. The movement of his BTC last week was probably just a heads up. No idea what's going to happen now. Personally i would expect the price of BTC but it didn't...or maby if will later today.

[WhatsBitcoin]

Scammers gonna scam. No news here.
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/932247391788519425