[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees

[OddEvenBets.com]

I love Bitcoin Cash.

I developed my Bitcoin Cash game with provably fair system.

Welcome to my main thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2069612.0 and game http://oddevenbets.com

Go ahead, build things, use Bitcoin Cash as it should be used!

Gaming is one good way of use - be fair and share the fun

 

Thanks!
Please try my game http://oddevenbets.com
Provably fair system.
No need registration.

[1713292747]

1713292747

[1713292747]

1713292747

[1713292747]

1713292747

[1713292747]

1713292747

[hv_]

https://twitter.com/token2049/status/976304435386204160?s=21

[soixantedix]

good news for those investing in precious metals. GoldSilver now accepts Bitcoin Cash https://i.imgur.com/yN1Ak9o.png

[Bazzzil86]

https://tothemoon.live/?IsPast=False&Page=1&Month=0&Year=0&CoinTypes=Bitcoin+Cash+%28BCH%29&SortBy=0

Tommorow starts Satoshi's Vision Conference!

[Crypt0m0nster]

Tomorrow Conference will show clear sign for BCH into Bull market and i hope 1BCH = 0.25 BTC.

[Sameffkakkare]

does bcc have privacy features

[kellog9000]

Tomorrow Conference will show clear sign for BCH into Bull market and i hope 1BCH = 0.25 BTC.

yepp yepp

[hv_]

does bcc have privacy features

Roadmapped.

[Scooby903]

I actually do recognize that this kind of non-mining choices add absolutely no value towards the network by itself. Whether Bitcoin Cash or even Bitcoin Segwit.

[classicsucks]

'Other cryptocurrencies are downright scams...like Bcash''-@jhamel's Testimony to the Canadian Standing Committee on Finance FINA

Hamel had then posted on Reddit prior to giving the crypto testimony, writing, “Spoiler: I'm gonna say ‘Bcash is a scam’ and it's gonna be archived forever in the Parliamentary records (not a blockchain but still...) Donations are welcome,”

Looks like Hamel's pandering statement was exactly that. Pathetic.

As another pointed out:

“Not to mention the fact that in terms of any governing body trying to distinguish between legitimate tech and true scams, Bcash does not clearly distinguish itself as a 'scam' while leaving Bitcoin legit. Both Bitcoin and Bcash are susceptible to influence by bad actors with enough capital to create a wake. So while assumptions being made about the motivations of actors like Roger Ver might be correct, if you seek to have the government recognize a forked chain of Bitcoin as a scam, how do you anticipate they are going to evaluate the parent technology from which Bcash forked?

The point is there is nothing inherent to Bcash protocol that makes it a ‘scam’ while Bitcoin is not.”

It's not the protocol it's the people pushing it

BCH was a contingency plan led by bitmain the main people pushing it are miners that needed something to protect their investment in mining equipment it was not certain if BTC would do a PoW switch effectively bricking the mining equipment they had invested in.

Why do you think Jihan pushes for BCH but also advocates that it is different to BTC and both should survive and both have their own merits.... If one dies he has just lost a huge sales market that's why

Sorry but being run by and pushed by for profit companies to protect their investments makes it a scam

Bitmain etc own a HUGE chunk of BCH that has yet to be touched in the last 8 month and sooner or later it will move and there just is not enough liquidity to support this I think once the users that have been stockpiling start moving there will be a huge panic sell as this could be them preparing for a exit

As opposed to the Blockstream faggots? Maxwell, Back, and Todd have all been compromised, and they work in VERY important development and decision-making positions. Ver and Jihan Wu haven't made any decisions about BCH other than the price, and price really is the least important factor in determining if a cryptocurrency is viable...


You need to grow a brain, tek. Propping up their increasingly thin propaganda and hyping the proven-to-be-insecure LN is really not doing you any good. /r/Bitcoin is really just for dummies now - they've censored and/or banned any reasonable discourse, so you're just lapping up drool from the masters of that tiny brain-dead universe known as Blockstream.

[tekmobile]

'Other cryptocurrencies are downright scams...like Bcash''-@jhamel's Testimony to the Canadian Standing Committee on Finance FINA

Hamel had then posted on Reddit prior to giving the crypto testimony, writing, “Spoiler: I'm gonna say ‘Bcash is a scam’ and it's gonna be archived forever in the Parliamentary records (not a blockchain but still...) Donations are welcome,”

Looks like Hamel's pandering statement was exactly that. Pathetic.

As another pointed out:

“Not to mention the fact that in terms of any governing body trying to distinguish between legitimate tech and true scams, Bcash does not clearly distinguish itself as a 'scam' while leaving Bitcoin legit. Both Bitcoin and Bcash are susceptible to influence by bad actors with enough capital to create a wake. So while assumptions being made about the motivations of actors like Roger Ver might be correct, if you seek to have the government recognize a forked chain of Bitcoin as a scam, how do you anticipate they are going to evaluate the parent technology from which Bcash forked?

The point is there is nothing inherent to Bcash protocol that makes it a ‘scam’ while Bitcoin is not.”

It's not the protocol it's the people pushing it

BCH was a contingency plan led by bitmain the main people pushing it are miners that needed something to protect their investment in mining equipment it was not certain if BTC would do a PoW switch effectively bricking the mining equipment they had invested in.

Why do you think Jihan pushes for BCH but also advocates that it is different to BTC and both should survive and both have their own merits.... If one dies he has just lost a huge sales market that's why

Sorry but being run by and pushed by for profit companies to protect their investments makes it a scam

Bitmain etc own a HUGE chunk of BCH that has yet to be touched in the last 8 month and sooner or later it will move and there just is not enough liquidity to support this I think once the users that have been stockpiling start moving there will be a huge panic sell as this could be them preparing for a exit

As opposed to the Blockstream faggots? Maxwell, Back, and Todd have all been compromised, and they work in VERY important development and decision-making positions. Ver and Jihan Wu haven't made any decisions about BCH other than the price, and price really is the least important factor in determining if a cryptocurrency is viable...


You need to grow a brain, tek. Propping up their increasingly thin propaganda and hyping the proven-to-be-insecure LN is really not doing you any good. /r/Bitcoin is really just for dummies now - they've censored and/or banned any reasonable discourse, so you're just lapping up drool from the masters of that tiny brain-dead universe known as Blockstream.

Blockstream don't run bitcoin they contribute a tiny percentage to it's development but that's all

As for r/Bitcoin I don't use Reddit I don't even have an account there

Here's another useful Bitcoin cash link

https://doublespend.cash/

[hv_]

So this 'tiny' percentage ended up to be SW.

Sure any other input of BS can be maby ignored, but not SW, the splitting point.

How much is the weighted percentage of that, you smallbrainer over there?

You still are lying any shit into the world because you need.

[tekmobile]

So this 'tiny' percentage ended up to be SW.

Sure any other input of BS can be maby ignored, but not SW, the splitting point.

How much is the weighted percentage of that, you smallbrainer over there?

You still are lying any shit into the world because you need.

Yes segwit was the brainchild of a blockstream development so what they didn't force anyone to use it plus was active on litecoin way before Bitcoin and blockstream has nothing to do with litecoin

Segwit was proposed to the community as a malleability fix for bitcoin the community agreed and it was merged.

Lightning has nothing to do with blockstream though that came from lightning labs yes blockstream has a client that is compatible but they didn't invent it in fact the whole premise of lightning came from early writings from Satoshi himself

I have tried all 3 eclair seems to work ok but not done any extensive testing, c-lightning from blockstream works ok but is still lacking in some ways and now I'm using LND from lightning labs this is very reliable not a single issue so far and has some neat features

Just because some huge development comes from a company does not mean they are now in control

The whole UASF movement that helped segwit to be enabled was not even supported by blockstream

[Mrpumperitis]

^
"The whole UASF movement that helped segwit to be enabled was not even supported by blockstream " LOL

Was it really a uasf?...seems closer to a uahf  

[hv_]

We do not need to repeat all that over and over.

This is about bitcoin cash here and now.

This is not about SW and LN. We know how that happend to btc.

Miners had done most of their scaling tasks long time ago. They were ready to go for bigger blocks.

Blockstopp stepped in and fudded around to fear the miners and now btc 'needs' to run little recon nodes for everybody (lol) to pari against 'evil' miners. (Divide and conquer at work)

Mearchants were ready as well and tried the SW2X...  aaand stopped by brainstoppers

Bitcoin Cash was ready for the full industrial scale, HF, on-chain scaling and open dev - including all parts in the crypto world (ex Blockstoppers)


So let it compete and see what will attract the masses over the next years.

[tekmobile]

We do not need to repeat all that over and over.

This is about bitcoin cash here and now.

This is not about SW and LN. We know how that happend to btc.

Miners had done most of their scaling tasks long time ago. They were ready to go for bigger blocks.

Blockstopp stepped in and fudded around to fear the miners and now btc 'needs' to run little recon nodes for everybody (lol) to pari against 'evil' miners. (Divide and conquer at work)

Mearchants were ready as well and tried the SW2X...  aaand stopped by brainstoppers

Bitcoin Cash was ready for the full industrial scale, HF, on-chain scaling and open dev - including all parts in the crypto world (ex Blockstoppers)


So let it compete and see what will attract the masses over the next years.

S2X was DOA some even followed through and it failed to even fork it stalled it didn't even make it to the fork block due to the incompetence of those trying so "if" the ones that rallied against it just accepted it like we was "supposed" to then it would have set Bitcoin back a whole lot more than what is going off now

Time will tell but right now things are looking rather bleak for BCH

[hv_]

Again, you need to be clearer for reasoning.

The 2x part was just Blockstopped again and damned down to a single dev under max shitstorm.

The last chance to hinder a titanic to sink.

We might agree that with the existence of BCH the stopping task was easier for all the left shitstormers and so it finally went down and lot of old bitcoiners switched over to the bigger boat.

[tekmobile]

Again, you need to be clearer for reasoning.

The 2x part was just Blockstopped again and damned down to a single dev under max shitstorm.

The last chance to hinder a titanic to sink.

We might agree that with the existence of BCH the stopping task was easier for all the left shitstormers and so it finally went down and lot of old bitcoiners switched over to the bigger boat.

There is no reason why both can't coexist you take your path with a more centralised ecosystem and we will take ours more decentralized and with routing protocols

I have no issues with both coexising the issue I have is that BCH seems to think it's the be all and end all and should be #1 and the constant smear campaign to try and convince everyone that is it the one true bitcoin when it is in fact just a fork trying to leverage the Bitcoin name just the same as any other Bitcoin fork except they all acknowledge that they are just forks and don't try to convince people otherwise.

If BCH would just accept it is a fork and let the technology do the talking more people may be a bit more open minded but when it's being pushed and manipulated by a bunch of criminals to support their agenda then it looses much respect

[hv_]

The masses decide what 'Bitcoin' is by the adoption and usage exactly how they decide what their search engine or web browser is.

With SW as a SF BTC is a fork as well and it might be the NetscapeAltavista for the masses.

[tekmobile]

The masses decide what 'Bitcoin' is by the adoption and usage exactly how they decide what their search engine or web browser is.

With SW as a SF BTC is a fork as well and it might be the NetscapeAltavista for the masses.

It still follows the same chain though is didn't fork off you decide it is not forced on you if you don't trust or want to use segwit then you don't have to you decide by the type of address you use

If you carry on using legacy addresses then you are using the exact same Bitcoin as you were several years ago nothing changed in that respect the data is still stored in the block in the exact same way as before.

The only time the data structure changes is when you use a segwit enabled address which in laymens terms just moves the signature data from the transaction field to a separate merkle tree that's pretty much it