chrysophylax (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
August 06, 2017, 06:00:43 AM |
|
And something from the lower end of the line:
GTX 1050 Ti:
Power limit: 90%
GPU clock +200
Mem. clock -500
Fan 90%
temp 67 (quite cool considering there are 32 degrees outside night-time...)
Intensity 24
getting about 10-10.5 MH/s on it
67W - 156.25 kH/W
now this is what we have been waiting for - as far as testing is concerned ... nice hashrate - but more interestingly - the temps are very kool for this sort of clocking and hashing ... does -i 25 crash the mining? ... as we are assuming that the card is limited on onboard gddr ram ... care to share which model of cards these are please? ... tanx ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 06, 2017, 06:07:12 AM |
|
Do we have download link for this miner software? btw, how is this better compare to ccminer spmod3?
if you wish to test - pm me ... comparisons - we dont really concern ourselves with - especially with sp ... his copied work is NOT the benchmark for us ... we are focused ( as has been mentioned multiple times in the thread ) in the stability and use of the miner itself ... optimization will come later when CWIgm is considered by us to be completely stable and aggressively efficient at mining - with the ease of use for the person / farm using it ... CWIgm-0.9.8 is almost ready ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 06, 2017, 06:10:46 AM |
|
Not sure how useful this is to you. Intensity 25 has more stable power usage compared to intensity 24 as shown in the picture  32bit still has higher hashrate than 64bit on 0.9.7.1. internal testing proves the same ... but only on certain cards and compiles ... when cuda90 is released - this will change ... we will focus on 64bit only - unless there is a huge call for 32bit ... currently - x64 seems to be the more stable of the two with regards to the hashrate and longevity of the mining ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 06, 2017, 06:23:32 AM |
|
Hi!
At final version, it will be open source? Free/paid/f...ing-fee-based?
i have left this question till last - as we have been asked this too many times to ignore ... so i will copy and paste a response i gave in private message regarding this - and hope that if this question is ever raised again - then it will be answered conditionally by the response ... --- Question from Tester - 'When will the CWI Project Miner be able to be used on other pools?' Answer I gave ... there is no 'when' ... our intention is to create a solid powerful stable miner - and to do that - we need a platform to mine on that we control ... otherwise we introduce SO MANY other variables into the equation that we will not be able to control and suitably identify - if issues arise ... so it will stay locked on our pools for the foreseeable future ... CWIgm is built for CWI-Mining - and as such will remain tied to that until we can see that it will be suitable for use outside our environment .. and for the reasons explained - the optimization of the miner will come soon - which will make it one of the most powerful miners on the market with its own set of issues / bugs ... in an enclosed environment like ours - we can clarify the issues and distill the bugs much quicker than when we introduce other environmental factors such as other pools - other stratum settings - other difficulty systems - etc ... besides - our pool is just as stable and usable than most other pools - if not moreso with this vulnerability issue recently found in all yiimp installations who have consequently lost coins ... we are happy to accommodate those that do not want to use CWIgm on the pool also - as they can mine with almost any mining software they like as long as they have an account on the CWI-Pool system ... with NO fees to purchase the miner and NO fees to mine with our miner - it makes economical sense to focus the development process and mining to our closed system methodology ... in saying that tho - anything is possible ... and we are open to a number of scenarios with which we may work with ... for now - it will stay as it is ... --- this response remains as stated - and will do so for the foreseeable future ... this is now reinforced with the chitter chatter about sp - and 'his' mods ... opensource products that he copies and tweaks - then closes and resells to YOU - the community - and makes huge amounts of money in his pocket and for the growth of his farm ... opensource code that he is SUPPOSED to be releasing WITH the miner he is selling you - but doesnt ... and no one in FOSS is policing ... we will NOT lend ourselves with OUR code - to opensource to people like Rune ( sp ) - where he can copy OUR hard work - and OUR code - only for him to play with a few settings - close the compile and resell OUR work and call it his own like he does with all the other work ... not gonna happen ... CWIgm is a different miner ... original ideas taken from many many parts of the crypto world - AND from our extensive experience as global miners - but completely rewritten ... with new features - new systems encoded - and soon to be a very new way of mining ... if it takes us another year to copyright the code - we will ... so we have legal recourse again people like sp - who profit off other peoples work ... now thats been said - CWIgm and the CWI-Projects with do all the talking we need from now on ... #crysx |
|
|
|
alessandro10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2017, 06:41:38 AM |
|
Do we have download link for this miner software? btw, how is this better compare to ccminer spmod3?
if you wish to test - pm me ... comparisons - we dont really concern ourselves with - especially with sp ... his copied work is NOT the benchmark for us ... we are focused ( as has been mentioned multiple times in the thread ) in the stability and use of the miner itself ... optimization will come later when CWIgm is considered by us to be completely stable and aggressively efficient at mining - with the ease of use for the person / farm using it ... CWIgm-0.9.8 is almost ready ... #crysx crysx,can you reply my pm,from start until now i just use palgin mod,and still find any better mining software with ZERO FEE AND FREE not like SPmod with to much fee and 0.05 btc donation,actually 0.05 btc is my 2 weeks mining revenue,that really hard to get spmod since im a poor man,please can i get download link from you thx |
|
|
|
|
TraianT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2017, 06:50:07 AM |
|
And something from the lower end of the line:
GTX 1050 Ti:
Power limit: 90%
GPU clock +200
Mem. clock -500
Fan 90%
temp 67 (quite cool considering there are 32 degrees outside night-time...)
Intensity 24
getting about 10-10.5 MH/s on it
67W - 156.25 kH/W
now this is what we have been waiting for - as far as testing is concerned ... nice hashrate - but more interestingly - the temps are very kool for this sort of clocking and hashing ... does -i 25 crash the mining? ... as we are assuming that the card is limited on onboard gddr ram ... care to share which model of cards these are please? ... tanx ... #crysx Well...as far as 1050Ti-s they run quite cool from what I've seen, i have 3 of them in total. 2 from gainward, model 426018336-3828 and one from palit, i don't know the model number on that. Yes, I 25 crashes it. ----- Now for GTX 1060 3Gb Power limit 90 core +100 mem - 500 Fan 90 temp 67-73 (depends on the card, msi's run the hottest) Intensity 24 Speeds depend on the card vendor: GPU#0: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 18.18 MH/s (GIGABYTE GeForce® GTX 1060 G1 Gaming) GPU#3: ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 17.61 MH/s (ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 Dual ) GPU#2: MSI GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 17.16 MH/s (MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 AERO ITX 3G OC ) GPU#4: MSI GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 16.98 MH/s (MSI GEFORCE® GTX 1060 OC ) |
|
|
|
|
|
buzzkillb
|
|
August 06, 2017, 07:14:57 AM |
|
CWI skunk running with less problems than palgin so far today. Wanted to try this out in anticipation of the tribus Denarius miner. Is tribus improved over ccminer 2.2?
|
|
|
|
|
blackoreo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2017, 07:59:10 AM |
|
Its running on my rig for 24h very stabel no crasheh nothing! Faster then other miners GREAT JOB !
|
|
|
|
|
Xaba05xaba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2017, 09:26:34 AM
Last edit: August 06, 2017, 01:24:33 PM by Xaba05xaba |
|
Hi.  I'd like to participate in beta testing. (2x4x1080ti) Can you share dnload link? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
pikatju
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
https://wallet.merit.me/?invite=Pikachu
|
|
August 06, 2017, 05:07:39 PM |
|
Everything running fine with the miner, but the payout from the pool is less than what I get from suprnova. I have a miner running at 45MH/s on suprnova paying out 93 SIGT/day while 55-60MH/s on CWI is only paying out 86. I will stay on the pool for a while in hopes that it is just fluctuations. If it persists, I dont see the point of a more efficient miner, when the pool is less efficient.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 06, 2017, 05:41:07 PM |
|
Everything running fine with the miner, but the payout from the pool is less than what I get from suprnova. I have a miner running at 45MH/s on suprnova paying out 93 SIGT/day while 55-60MH/s on CWI is only paying out 86. I will stay on the pool for a while in hopes that it is just fluctuations. If it persists, I dont see the point of a more efficient miner, when the pool is less efficient.
like has been mentioned MANY times before ... its not about the payout - or the comparison of other pools ... its about the stability of the miner AND the growth of it as a development for the use ( and ease of use ) of the miner ... but appreciate your test ... #crysx |
|
|
|
OcVaad
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
ALTCOM AKYfKGnUy7eJs5iF52khPdyNzVMybAy8Yh
|
|
August 06, 2017, 09:26:40 PM
Last edit: August 06, 2017, 09:54:39 PM by OcVaad |
|
Win 10X64 + 1080 (+100 Core/-200 Memory/PL 100%) : Version 0.9.7.1 results: cwigm_x64 ~ 38.8 MH/s average  cwigm_x86 ~ 39.8 MH/s average http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=6620544CWI_X86.jpgIt would be nice to have pool configuration option as an .exe argument or as part of config file/json/whatever you select to be the right way. Is it possible to configure workers amount per GPU ? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
pikatju
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
https://wallet.merit.me/?invite=Pikachu
|
|
August 07, 2017, 12:19:56 AM |
|
Everything running fine with the miner, but the payout from the pool is less than what I get from suprnova. I have a miner running at 45MH/s on suprnova paying out 93 SIGT/day while 55-60MH/s on CWI is only paying out 86. I will stay on the pool for a while in hopes that it is just fluctuations. If it persists, I dont see the point of a more efficient miner, when the pool is less efficient.
like has been mentioned MANY times before ... its not about the payout - or the comparison of other pools ... its about the stability of the miner AND the growth of it as a development for the use ( and ease of use ) of the miner ... but appreciate your test ... #crysx Ya makes sense. Looking forward to new builds and optimizations from you! |
|
|
|
zero_sight
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
August 07, 2017, 01:26:49 AM
Last edit: August 07, 2017, 01:38:03 AM by zero_sight |
|
Getting increased difficulty from stratum that put me with no shares between blocks found on a rig (*when the pool got luck and found 2 block in 10min)
**I found the black too! lol
port 2000
start at diff 0.25
my single 1080ti ended up on stratum difficulty of over 50
this put it to about 15 minutes between shares.
port 2000
start at 0.25
6x1060 3gb rig is currently on stratum diff 5.434
7 minute gap between shares
would be great if we could lock in the difficulty via the config/bat file
edit:
Oh and GTX970
80TDP
+100 Core (~1290MHz)
Mem +0
15.8Mhs
124w
|
|
|
|
|
josywong
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 07, 2017, 04:59:57 AM |
|
plz remove default --lodiff in the bat. some ppl juz being lazy. 3x 1050ti hardly find a share for 30mins  |
|
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
|
August 07, 2017, 10:22:13 AM
Last edit: August 07, 2017, 11:04:20 AM by abudfv2008 |
|
I see 74Mh/s reported in miner
Added another 70Mh/s. So it should be 144MH/s
Worker Hashrate Difficulty
abudfv2008.Rig5 35,791.39 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 50,107.95 112
5 minutes later
Worker Hashrate Difficulty
abudfv2008.Rig5 21,474.84 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 42,949.67 128
Total 64,424.51
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 28,633.12 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 28,633.12 128
Total 57,266.24
5 minutes later
Worker Hashrate Difficulty
abudfv2008.Rig5 28,633.12 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 35,791.39 128
Total 64,424.51
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 78,741.07 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 35,791.39 128
Total 114,532.46
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 57,266.23 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 42,949.67 256
Total 100,215.90
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 78,741.07 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 57,266.23 256
Total 136,007.30
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 71,582.79 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 28,633.12 256
Total 100,215.91
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 64,424.51 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 28,633.12 256
Total 93,057.63
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 35,791.39 128
abudfv2008.Rig6 14,316.56 256
Total 50,107.95
I understand luck, ddosing and other factors but for 30 minutes there was no reported hashrate. On suprnova/yiimp i get fluctations with 100-200+Mh/s at the top. But not on your pool.
For comparison suprnova. From the start:
abudfv2008.Rig5 53,559.14 21.28
abudfv2008.Rig6 21,065.79 18.83
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 75,211.57 80.69
abudfv2008.Rig6 70,697.29 44.62
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 71,180.43 80.69
abudfv2008.Rig6 79,014.62 44.62
abudfv2008.Rig5 66,745.89 47.74
abudfv2008.Rig6 82,928.15 55.61
5 minutes later
abudfv2008.Rig5 72,953.18 47.74
abudfv2008.Rig6 71,354.27 55.61
I even recieve such values sometimes
abudfv2008.Rig5 100,202.38 43
abudfv2008.Rig6 134,679.29 72.25
I really really hope that it is a problem of beta version of your miner, and nothing worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapuo
|
|
August 07, 2017, 10:28:09 AM |
|
It's from too high sher diff. For some hidden reason, no one want change this...
|
|
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
|
August 07, 2017, 11:01:09 AM |
|
It's from too high sher diff. For some hidden reason, no one want change this...
No it is not. I start from scratch. And have low difficulty 0.25 at the beginning. So the shares are accepted several in a minute. After 30minutes diff was only 1.xxx (don't remebmer exactly) and 0.5 on another rig. P.S. Those who make 15Gh/s, i'd double check whether you really get your hashrate. It is something wrong with this miner/pool or else. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mapuo
|
|
August 07, 2017, 11:13:09 AM |
|
It's from too high sher diff. For some hidden reason, no one want change this...
No it is not. Yes it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
