Nekor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2017, 05:25:26 AM |
|
Is it possible to add DSTM miner (I get better hashrates with this over any CUDA miner) and m7m algo?
|
|
|
|
falsealarm_bf
|
|
November 06, 2017, 01:10:34 AM |
|
How do we exclude one of the GPUs from mining? Does that need to be done at each miner's binary level?
|
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2017, 11:51:52 AM |
|
Sorry for time out, changes in my life and a long holidays made me impossible answer questions. This changes in a future makes me very difficult to get new releases and follow thread daily.
Release 4.4
*Added option to miners file to launch a command before run (for example nvidiainspector, afterburner, etc) *Added Sgminer for Tribus and Veltor algos on AMD *Added X11gost to Sgminer for AMD *Added Skunk Algo to Whattomine virtual pool *Added Location to "Profits" and "Active Miner" sections *Added new pool Flypool (only manual mode Zcash mining) *Added PHI and HSR algos to Nvidia *Added CcminerAlexis-hsr, ccminerNanashi, ccminerPalgin, ccminerPalgin for nvidia *Optimized selected miner for each algo (thx MikeBuzz)
*Updated ccminer Tpruvot to 2.2.2 *Updated ccminer Klaust to 8.14b cuda9
*Fixed: GB location not choosing EUROPE pools always *Fixed: WTM virtual pool not getting same result as WTM web due to default hashrates changes on WTM Web *Fixed: Skein profit calculation error
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2017, 11:52:54 AM |
|
How do we exclude one of the GPUs from mining? Does that need to be done at each miner's binary level?
No global option, it needs to be done at each miner file
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2017, 12:23:12 PM |
|
Hey tutulfo, quick question for you buddy,
I've tried putting in the data equihash miner myself but due to the way it reads the server name, it doesn't like the stratum+top part at the beginning. For example it just wants zpool.ca instead of stratum+tcp//zpool.ca but can't figure out how to remove it without removing it for all the pools and miners any pointers on where I can include it?
Thanks mate.
If you are talking about DTSM, I´m trying integration now. If not, protocol is defined on each pool file not in miner file.
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
mushtuk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
November 09, 2017, 01:03:27 PM |
|
Can anyone help me configure this thing I have this for config.txt: @@WORKERNAME=***** @@CURRENCY=BTC @@USERNAME=***** @@INTERVAL=600 @@TYPE=NVIDIA @@LOCATION=EUROPE @@MANUALMININGAPIUSE=FALSE @@STARTSCREEN=PROFITS @@BENCHMARKTIME=200 @@GPUPLATFORM=1 @@WALLET_BTC=********************** @@WALLET_DCR=********************** @@WALLET_ETC=********************** @@WALLET_ETH=********************** @@WALLET_ZEC=********************** @@WALLET_XMR=********************** And I have this for AutoStart.bat: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 :LOOP del "Stats\*_Profit.txt" powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -command "&.\core.ps1 -MiningMode AUTOMATIC -PoolsName Mining_Pool_Hub,Suprnova,FLYPOOL -Coinsname Bitcoin,XMR,LBRY,SIA,Decred,MONA,ZEN,Zcash,Zclassic,Ethereum,EthereumClassic,Ubiq,Music,KMD,Komodo,DIGIBYTE,Expanse GOTO LOOP Configured like this, I am getting an error, that Flypool and Suprnova are not valid pools names and also "window cannot be wider than the screen buffer" error. If I remove pools names and leave only MPH it gives the same "window cannot be wider than the screen buffer" error, but kinda starts to download an benchmark different coins, but everything is displayed incorrectly, its not aligned and there are also other errors present. I setup some wallets in Suprnova and some in MPH, the one in flypool I can ignore. How should I properly setup this miner?
|
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2017, 01:07:54 PM |
|
Is it possible to add DSTM miner (I get better hashrates with this over any CUDA miner) and m7m algo?
M7M is cpu only algorithm, cpu mining is not suportted. DTSM will be included in next release, you can download files from github (include.ps1 and miner\dtsm.json) minutes ago.
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2017, 01:12:22 PM |
|
Can anyone help me configure this thing I have this for config.txt: @@WORKERNAME=***** @@CURRENCY=BTC @@USERNAME=***** @@INTERVAL=600 @@TYPE=NVIDIA @@LOCATION=EUROPE @@MANUALMININGAPIUSE=FALSE @@STARTSCREEN=PROFITS @@BENCHMARKTIME=200 @@GPUPLATFORM=1 @@WALLET_BTC=********************** @@WALLET_DCR=********************** @@WALLET_ETC=********************** @@WALLET_ETH=********************** @@WALLET_ZEC=********************** @@WALLET_XMR=********************** And I have this for AutoStart.bat: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 :LOOP del "Stats\*_Profit.txt" powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -command "&.\core.ps1 -MiningMode AUTOMATIC -PoolsName Mining_Pool_Hub,Suprnova,FLYPOOL -Coinsname Bitcoin,XMR,LBRY,SIA,Decred,MONA,ZEN,Zcash,Zclassic,Ethereum,EthereumClassic,Ubiq,Music,KMD,Komodo,DIGIBYTE,Expanse GOTO LOOP Configured like this, I am getting an error, that Flypool and Suprnova are not valid pools names and also "window cannot be wider than the screen buffer" error. If I remove pools names and leave only MPH it gives the same "window cannot be wider than the screen buffer" error, but kinda starts to download an benchmark different coins, but everything is displayed incorrectly, its not aligned and there are also other errors present. I setup some wallets in Suprnova and some in MPH, the one in flypool I can ignore. How should I properly setup this miner? You are triying start manual mode pools (suprnova and flypool) on automatic mode. If you use start.bat you can see what mode has each pool. A valid automatic line will be for example powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -command "&.\core.ps1 -MiningMode AUTOMATIC -PoolsName Mining_Pool_Hub,zpool,nicehash "window cannot be wider than the screen buffer" is due to low resolution screen config, check your terminal server parameters before connect
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2017, 01:13:39 PM |
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (E)nd Interval (P)rofits (C)urrent (H)istory (W)allets | Next Interval: 280 secs -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------ACTIVE MINERS----------------------------------------------------------
Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers ----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- ----------- 9.70 MHs 0.00198 11.21 LYRA2Z zcoin ccminerNanashi MPH US
----------------------------------------------------PROFITS------------------------------------------------------------ (B)est Miners/All (T)op 40/All
Algorithm Coin Miner Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Pool Location --------- ---- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---- -------- TRIBUS CcminerTpruvot 279.46 MH/s 0.00482 27.31 H.RFRY US X17 ccminerAlexis78 46.95 MH/s 0.00246 13.97 ZPOOL US PHI CcminerTpruvot 90.87 MH/s 0.00197 11.16 ZPOOL US LYRA2Z zcoin ccminerNanashi 9.31 MH/s 0.00190 10.76 MPH US LYRA2Z zcoin ccminerDJM34 9.26 MH/s 0.00189 10.70 MPH US VELTOR ccminerAlexis78 158.90 MH/s 0.00183 10.38 ZPOOL US
Anyone tells me how it possible? Megaminer buzz 4.6 Best algo is tribus but lyra2z still mining WTF?
this situation continues after interval end?
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 11, 2017, 11:29:23 AM |
|
Release 4.5
*Added DTSM equihash miner *Added AHASHPOOL Pool (No registration, Autoexchange) *Added UNIMINING Pool (No registration, No autoexchange, need wallet for each coin on config.txt) *Added to Suprnova: ELECTRONEUM (ETN),SMARTCASH (SMART),BITCOINZ (BTCZ),BITCOIN GOLD (BCG)
*Fixed: Some pools-algo combination are ignored on multiple pool executions *Fixed: Blocks Factory skein port *Fixed: Hash Refinery "HR_request" error *Fixed: Other small bugs
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
liomojo1
|
|
November 11, 2017, 03:00:28 PM |
|
Why benchmarking the same miner for different pools and continent? It is a waste of time and power , it tests ebfw or other miners for zpool eu and zpool us and other pools - the result is the same why benchmarking?
|
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 11, 2017, 03:46:53 PM |
|
Why benchmarking the same miner for different pools and continent? It is a waste of time and power , it tests ebfw or other miners for zpool eu and zpool us and other pools - the result is the same why benchmarking? Each miner is only benchmarked one time for each algo
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
|
OverEasy
|
|
November 12, 2017, 12:16:51 PM |
|
I was wondering if you have consider support for users to add their own pools?
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
|
|
|
|
Marijn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2017, 12:39:05 PM |
|
I love the idea of this software. I am however experiencing network instability when i use it. When i start it, it works fine. But after some time the hashrates go down, and it looks like to overload my wifi connection. Even RDP is not working anymore at that time so i am forced to restart the machine.
If i use the same config to start a miner without megaminer then is keeps on running stable. So it is not a hardware or settings issue.
I have no ability to get a wired network to test. The Wifi however is stable untill i run megaminer.
Any ideas on this issue? Is megaminer opening loads of simultanious connections or something? Data thruput is not the issue.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 12, 2017, 02:47:13 PM |
|
I love the idea of this software. I am however experiencing network instability when i use it. When i start it, it works fine. But after some time the hashrates go down, and it looks like to overload my wifi connection. Even RDP is not working anymore at that time so i am forced to restart the machine.
If i use the same config to start a miner without megaminer then is keeps on running stable. So it is not a hardware or settings issue.
I have no ability to get a wired network to test. The Wifi however is stable untill i run megaminer.
Any ideas on this issue? Is megaminer opening loads of simultanious connections or something? Data thruput is not the issue.
Thanks!
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity. I´ll try to investigate open connections.
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
Marijn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2017, 05:20:35 PM |
|
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity.
I´ll try to investigate open connections.
Thanks for your reply. I am using a 600 sec. interval. Sometimes mij CPU and mem usage get suspiciously high. I sometimes get the feeling that there might be multiple processes running. So when it starts a new miner, the old one might keep doing something in the background (although i can't find anything to back my feeling up) Maybe i should download MM all fresh and new to be sure that there is nothing screwed up in the previous download.
|
|
|
|
jbonifacio
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:16:47 PM Last edit: November 13, 2017, 08:43:14 PM by jbonifacio |
|
When launching with Nicehash the benchmark process hangs the script. The miner is running away but the script never updates. I started with "-PoolsName AHASHPOOL,HASH_REFINERY,NICEHASH,ZPOOL". If I disable NICEHASH the other pool benchmark and run just fine. Any suggestions to debug would be appreciated. Thanks. Windows 10 NVIDIA 1080, 1070, 1060 Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers ----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- ----------- 0.00 PH/s|0.00 PH/s Benchmarking Benchmarking ETHASH|BLAKE2B ethereum|siacoin Nvidia-ClayDual140 NH|NH US
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v10.0 ║ ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified Main Ethereum pool is daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 SC: 1 pool is specified Main Siacoin pool is sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360 AMD OpenCL platform not found Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current pool CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 3 CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.1/8.0 GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080, 8192 MB available, 20 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 3 ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3353 ETH: Stratum - Connected (daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353) DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN SC: Stratum - connecting to 'sia.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3360 ETH: nicehash stratum mode "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details. Watchdog enabled Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SC: Stratum - Connected (sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360) ETH: Authorized Setting DAG epoch #151... SC: Authorized SC: Share accepted! Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1 Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0 Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2 Create GPU buffer for GPU1 Create GPU buffer for GPU0 Create GPU buffer for GPU2 ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:07 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s GPU1 DAG creation time - 6846 ms GPU0 DAG creation time - 7200 ms GPU2 DAG creation time - 9185 ms Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1 done Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0 done Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2 done SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) SC: Share accepted (110 ms)! GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45% SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) SC: Share accepted (110 ms)! GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45% ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:32 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s SC: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) SC: Share accepted (125 ms)!
|
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 14, 2017, 12:10:27 PM |
|
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity.
I´ll try to investigate open connections.
Thanks for your reply. I am using a 600 sec. interval. Sometimes mij CPU and mem usage get suspiciously high. I sometimes get the feeling that there might be multiple processes running. So when it starts a new miner, the old one might keep doing something in the background (although i can't find anything to back my feeling up) Maybe i should download MM all fresh and new to be sure that there is nothing screwed up in the previous download. For me, the powershell process: CPU is less than 25% on a pentium G4560 Memory occupped is less than 100Mb
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
tutulfo (OP)
|
|
November 14, 2017, 12:15:29 PM |
|
When launching with Nicehash the benchmark process hangs the script. The miner is running away but the script never updates. I started with "-PoolsName AHASHPOOL,HASH_REFINERY,NICEHASH,ZPOOL". If I disable NICEHASH the other pool benchmark and run just fine. Any suggestions to debug would be appreciated. Thanks. Windows 10 NVIDIA 1080, 1070, 1060 Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers ----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- ----------- 0.00 PH/s|0.00 PH/s Benchmarking Benchmarking ETHASH|BLAKE2B ethereum|siacoin Nvidia-ClayDual140 NH|NH US
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v10.0 ║ ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified Main Ethereum pool is daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 SC: 1 pool is specified Main Siacoin pool is sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360 AMD OpenCL platform not found Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current pool CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 3 CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.1/8.0 GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080, 8192 MB available, 20 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 3 ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3353 ETH: Stratum - Connected (daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353) DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN SC: Stratum - connecting to 'sia.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3360 ETH: nicehash stratum mode "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details. Watchdog enabled Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SC: Stratum - Connected (sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360) ETH: Authorized Setting DAG epoch #151... SC: Authorized SC: Share accepted! Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1 Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0 Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2 Create GPU buffer for GPU1 Create GPU buffer for GPU0 Create GPU buffer for GPU2 ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:07 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s GPU1 DAG creation time - 6846 ms GPU0 DAG creation time - 7200 ms GPU2 DAG creation time - 9185 ms Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1 done Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0 done Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2 done SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) SC: Share accepted (110 ms)! GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45% SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) SC: Share accepted (110 ms)! GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45% ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:32 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353 ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s SC: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) SC: Share accepted (125 ms)!
I just test same launch conditions and bechmarks runs well. If miner shows speed but ActiveMiner section on MM dont it seems api comunication problem, I see for your post 3333 port is used, it is correct. I can´t get same bug on development enviroment, I only can tell you to use other pools for benchmarking.
|
Megaminer - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059039.0BTC: 1AVMHnFgc6SW33cwqrDyy2Fug9CsS8u6TM ------- LTC: LVwuYbAvbMDVapheQBA7o2qQ2mKTEXVDbX BCH: 1N7wsg4JmWJLP6BuHUP5rwsAXnQjTWPBjr -------- ETH: 0x9b7A01Bf5bD29c66d228d372B5bD1C43cDb78AcC
|
|
|
|