Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2024, 01:21:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ** NEW SITE bitgem.pw ** BTG BitGem 0.4.9.ALPHA1 | COLORED COINS | FAUCET  (Read 147646 times)
mineral (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 23, 2013, 06:04:23 PM
 #201

ok, weird situation. I have two boxes, one Debian Linux, one windoze.

Before Update:
Windoze box refuses to connect, can not d/l blockchain
Linux box works perfectly.

After Update:
Windoze box works perfectly
Linux box refuses to connect, can not d/l blockchain


Steps I took to update Linux box:
1. rm -rf  bitgem
2. cd .bitgem
3. mv wallet.dat ../
4. mv bitgem.conf ../
5. cd
6. rm -rf .bitgem
7. mkdir .bitgem
8. mv bitgem.conf .bitgem/bitgem.conf
9. mv wallet.dat .bitgem/wallet.dat
10. git clone git://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.git
11. cd bitgem/src
12. make -f makefile.unix bitgemd USE_UPNP=-
13. ./bitgemd -daemon

Result:
Code:
root@vps:~/bitgem/src# ./bitgemd getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.4.1-nvc-8-g4203e80-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "moneysupply" : 0.00000000,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "0.0.0.0",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1369326517,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Any assistance is greatly appreciated...

I think this is more or less well done. However, if two bitgem installtions share the same IP, you shoud to provide to Linux one (if it was the last run) a peers.dat file.

BTC: 1BTGghTiiqz2mQCYP2AiSv5ec5kcvkaJXu
LTC: LfgarrrLJgkZMSUCeScgHatxyfQtiggN9Z
BTG: gTpTt8d9rSejXDm4QX5vrLtPkrXkpwbrDL
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713576069
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713576069

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713576069
Reply with quote  #2

1713576069
Report to moderator
Malkov
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 23, 2013, 07:32:17 PM
 #202

what z the current trade rate per 100?

It's not on any exchanges yet except for google docs exchanges and the best offer there is 0.05 LTC, so 5 LTC per 100 BTG.
Jajajajajajaj all are crazy! Do not sell BTG save
Malkov
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 23, 2013, 07:34:59 PM
 #203

what z the current trade rate per 100?

It's not on any exchanges yet except for google docs exchanges and the best offer there is 0.05 LTC, so 5 LTC per 100 BTG.
Jajajajajajaj all are crazy! Do not sell BTG save
They have no fucking idea what they cost
mullick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002


View Profile
May 23, 2013, 07:35:53 PM
 #204

Why the helll has the blocked reward changed to .32707 Bitgems? My last 2 bocks are only .32707?!?!?!?!?!
KillaGT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:17:07 AM
 #205

same here last reward 0.38375 took me 8 hours to get him....found yesterday evening when i started to run solo-mining an orphan with 0.37 as well .....that makes mining absolutly nonsense if the current price of these gem's does not increase hard now =(
mullick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:53:32 AM
 #206

same here last reward 0.38375 took me 8 hours to get him....found yesterday evening when i started to run solo-mining an orphan with 0.37 as well .....that makes mining absolutly nonsense if the current price of these gem's does not increase hard now =(

It will just wait Wink
Balthazar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 02:06:06 PM
 #207

https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem/commit/38da3efd377e3383954f36ddb2b676080f69f88c#L0R2071

Quote
-    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? (GetProofOfWorkReward(nBits) - vtx[0].GetMinFee() + MIN_TX_FEE) : 0))
+
+    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK : 0))

Bloody hell  Shocked
skyangel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 301
Merit: 260


FLO dev


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 02:24:29 PM
 #208

https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem/commit/38da3efd377e3383954f36ddb2b676080f69f88c#L0R2071

Quote
-    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? (GetProofOfWorkReward(nBits) - vtx[0].GetMinFee() + MIN_TX_FEE) : 0))
+
+    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK : 0))

Bloody hell  Shocked

What's the implication of this?

Balthazar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 02:33:04 PM
Last edit: May 24, 2013, 04:16:42 PM by Balthazar
 #209

This "fix" allows a limited group of miners to generate blocks with a MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK (3 BTG) reward at any difficulty, using the modified client.
hope2907
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 02:35:41 PM
 #210

This "fix" allows a limited group of miners to generate blocks with a MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK (3 BTG) reward at any difficulty, using the modified client.

There are only two possible reasons of such change.
so it is good or bad?
Balthazar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 02:38:00 PM
 #211

It's good if you are user of modified client.
mineral (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 03:55:05 PM
Last edit: May 24, 2013, 04:39:11 PM by mineral
 #212

Thanks Balthazar, but it is an unlike scenario.

This commit https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem/commit/3b597f10df5fd60614ca65e31d1e2621af1f988d prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.

I will update client today.

BTC: 1BTGghTiiqz2mQCYP2AiSv5ec5kcvkaJXu
LTC: LfgarrrLJgkZMSUCeScgHatxyfQtiggN9Z
BTG: gTpTt8d9rSejXDm4QX5vrLtPkrXkpwbrDL
mineral (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 05:15:10 PM
 #213

NEW  UPDATE 2

Quote
Win32 installer: version_0.4.1_UPDATE 2  bitgem-0.4.1-UPDATE2-win32-setup.exe  [dropbox]

Source: https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem (up to date). * UPDATED 24.05.13


Instructions for install  0.4.1_ UPDATE_2 :

1.- Desinstall 0.4.1
2.- delete into C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\BitGem all files except wallet.dat and bitgem.conf. A pervious backup of this directory is recommended.
3.- install 0.4.1_ UPDATE_2version.


CHANGELOG

0.4.1_UPDATE_2:

 * added checkpoints,
 * Fix reward: prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.


BTC: 1BTGghTiiqz2mQCYP2AiSv5ec5kcvkaJXu
LTC: LfgarrrLJgkZMSUCeScgHatxyfQtiggN9Z
BTG: gTpTt8d9rSejXDm4QX5vrLtPkrXkpwbrDL
hope2907
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 25, 2013, 02:23:50 AM
 #214

this have active developer and no exchange add it
some bullshit coin with no Dev active and exc added it =.=
poor
mullick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 02:54:42 AM
 #215

what z the current trade rate per 100?

It's not on any exchanges yet except for google docs exchanges and the best offer there is 0.05 LTC, so 5 LTC per 100 BTG.

thats really low  Angry

yes .75% of all gems for 5Ltc Ridiculous
mullick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 03:06:19 AM
 #216

If anyone is having troubles syncing remove all add nodes from your .conf file. Lots of people still on old clients
c4n10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 25, 2013, 06:06:55 AM
 #217

ok, weird situation. I have two boxes, one Debian Linux, one windoze.

Before Update:
Windoze box refuses to connect, can not d/l blockchain
Linux box works perfectly.

After Update:
Windoze box works perfectly
Linux box refuses to connect, can not d/l blockchain


Steps I took to update Linux box:
1. rm -rf  bitgem
2. cd .bitgem
3. mv wallet.dat ../
4. mv bitgem.conf ../
5. cd
6. rm -rf .bitgem
7. mkdir .bitgem
8. mv bitgem.conf .bitgem/bitgem.conf
9. mv wallet.dat .bitgem/wallet.dat
10. git clone git://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.git
11. cd bitgem/src
12. make -f makefile.unix bitgemd USE_UPNP=-
13. ./bitgemd -daemon

Result:
Code:
root@vps:~/bitgem/src# ./bitgemd getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.4.1-nvc-8-g4203e80-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "moneysupply" : 0.00000000,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "0.0.0.0",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1369326517,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Any assistance is greatly appreciated...

I think this is more or less well done. However, if two bitgem installtions share the same IP, you shoud to provide to Linux one (if it was the last run) a peers.dat file.

My linux box and my windoze box use different ip's as the windoze box here is at my house and the linux box is a hosted VPS. All the other clents work fine, I have all the necessary ports open in iptables, I just don't understand what the problem is. Going to try the new update and see if it makes any difference somehow.
c4n10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 25, 2013, 06:23:52 AM
 #218

Hooray, connections!
KillaGT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 25, 2013, 08:22:10 AM
 #219

yay the reward up'ed to 0.4 the last two blocks i found =D

whats with the old blocks rewarded with 3BTG -> still waiting on 31 to mature in a mentional amount of blocks...can they mature still at all, or are they lost?

Killa
ssshhh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 12:54:13 PM
 #220

NEW  UPDATE 2

Quote
Win32 installer: version_0.4.1_UPDATE 2  bitgem-0.4.1-UPDATE2-win32-setup.exe  [dropbox]

Source: https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem (up to date). * UPDATED 24.05.13


Instructions for install  0.4.1_ UPDATE_2 :

1.- Desinstall 0.4.1
2.- delete into C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\BitGem all files except wallet.dat and bitgem.conf. A pervious backup of this directory is recommended.
3.- install 0.4.1_ UPDATE_2version.


CHANGELOG

0.4.1_UPDATE_2:

 * added checkpoints,
 * Fix reward: prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.



Could you provide an MD5 checksum of the windows-qt executable "you compiled" ?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!