Russian Military Photos/Videos Thread:

[Croin]

Hi guys,

I want to make a Military Photos/Videos Thread analog to the one in Militaryphotos.net / Russiadefence / Spacebattles forum:
So our own Bitcointalk thread.


So post interesting pictures! Discussion allowed!  

[thebedside]

is the PAK FA operational now?

[Croin]

Still in testing phase!

[sindikat]

Another Kremlin fake. A tank generally similar to tank of the second world war. The aircraft is the modernization of the 4th generation. To 5 generation Russian was very far away, and after the introduction of new sanctions does not really. The ship will not say anything. But I am sure that this is the same fake as everything else.

[Sithara007]

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

[Croin]

Another Kremlin fake. A tank generally similar to tank of the second world war. The aircraft is the modernization of the 4th generation. To 5 generation Russian was very far away, and after the introduction of new sanctions does not really. The ship will not say anything. But I am sure that this is the same fake as everything else.

Really a tank similar to a tank of the second world war? Tell me more!


Syria bombing:
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cd1_1502297085

The first hit aftermath:

[stompix]

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

[rayneh]

ive seen russian army and i can say they looks strong only on photo lol

[AgonyPaid]

Another Kremlin fake. A tank generally similar to tank of the second world war. The aircraft is the modernization of the 4th generation. To 5 generation Russian was very far away, and after the introduction of new sanctions does not really. The ship will not say anything. But I am sure that this is the same fake as everything else.

And, look at a photo and see developments yet of the USSR. Probably except a pilotless aircraft. And that I think that he was worked out in Soviet Union.

[Croin]

Another Kremlin fake. A tank generally similar to tank of the second world war. The aircraft is the modernization of the 4th generation. To 5 generation Russian was very far away, and after the introduction of new sanctions does not really. The ship will not say anything. But I am sure that this is the same fake as everything else.

And, look at a photo and see developments yet of the USSR. Probably except a pilotless aircraft. And that I think that he was worked out in Soviet Union.

Everything I posted were projects started after the USSR to 100%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyaOCoU-kuQ

[Croin]

[Sithara007]

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

More than 200 F-35 have been built. But how many are operational? Ever since the first flight, a lot of bugs and operational issues are being uncovered everyday. It will take them another 10 years to make the F-35 fully functional.

[GideonGono]

All I just want to say is to fire all missiles of Russia and USA straight to Kim Jong Un's face! I also hope that if North Korea would decide to start a war which they are implying in the news, no one would ally with them.

By the way, can someone add some pictures in their military bases with the line of fleets, tanks, etc.

[mvidetto]

lets compare it to American army 

[Croin]

[Palmerson]

If you listen to all specifications and striking power of Russia's only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov that looks awesome, but the whole world laughed as it was dragged in tow to Syria so he fired several missiles and lost 2 aircraft. It is against him, no one fought! All Russia is a big fake and its army is no exception.

[Croin]

If you listen to all specifications and striking power of Russia's only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov that looks awesome, but the whole world laughed as it was dragged in tow to Syria so he fired several missiles and lost 2 aircraft. It is against him, no one fought! All Russia is a big fake and its army is no exception.

First:
1. It was not dragged.
2. Russia never had an aircraft carrier as it was never the doctrine of Russia to have one. It's a heavy aircraft carrying cruiser.

If Russia army is a big fake, how do you call this:
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2015/10/23/russias-military-is-proving-western-punditry-wrong/

“Russia’s fighter jets are, for now at least, conducting nearly as many strikes in a typical day against rebel troops opposing the government of President Bashar al-Assad as the American-led coalition targeting the Islamic State has been carrying out each month this year (emphasis added).

[thebedside]

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

More than 200 F-35 have been built. But how many are operational? Ever since the first flight, a lot of bugs and operational issues are being uncovered everyday. It will take them another 10 years to make the F-35 fully functional.

I wonder if the PAK FA has sensor fusion and that DAS technology.. The problem with the F-35 is that it has another variant for each of the branches of the US armed forces making it difficult to develop... And they paralled the testing and design phase with early production so they find a lot of bugs after production.

[Croin]

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

More than 200 F-35 have been built. But how many are operational? Ever since the first flight, a lot of bugs and operational issues are being uncovered everyday. It will take them another 10 years to make the F-35 fully functional.

I wonder if the PAK FA has sensor fusion and that DAS technology.. The problem with the F-35 is that it has another variant for each of the branches of the US armed forces making it difficult to develop... And they paralled the testing and design phase with early production so they find a lot of bugs after production.

[joebrook]

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

The unit cost of the F-35B plane is said to cost about $123M and they have spent close to $1.508 Trillion and they have so far manufactured about 231 units and the contract will run up to 2070. Even though its costly, i think its too late to abandon the project due to the amount of money spent on it and i really doubt NATO will purchase fighter jets from the Russians which individual unit cost about $50 M. Way cheaper than the F-35.