gregfromo
Member
 Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 10, 2017, 05:18:32 PM |
|
@krnlx
thank you for sharing with us.
is there a chance to reduce CPU load for ccminer, like CWI claims do have done? I can't confirm if it's true, as I don't have ther binary to test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cashen
|
|
August 10, 2017, 05:23:37 PM |
|
My miner is showing great results but the pool side hash rate dropped.
gonna let it run a little bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real_Unhooked
|
|
August 10, 2017, 05:43:12 PM |
|
I get best results with 32Bit and 7.5Cuda for my 1070s
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 10, 2017, 05:45:10 PM |
|
what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25?
Set intensity to 25.  68~69 MH/s now.  yeah but i get 27.7 MH versus 28.5 on sp mod 5 tried our miner amph? ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
preda
|
|
August 10, 2017, 05:47:03 PM |
|
It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ManuBBXX
|
|
August 10, 2017, 06:15:33 PM |
|
Best skunk miner EVER !
Even compairing with Sp mod #5
|
|
|
|
|
botmanside
Member
Offline
Activity: 138
Merit: 10
|
|
August 10, 2017, 06:28:02 PM |
|
It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
not sure of retarded, or just cant do the basic math though..... |
RTFF && RTFM...
|
|
|
|
preda
|
|
August 10, 2017, 06:33:27 PM |
|
It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
not sure of retarded, or just cant do the basic math though..... Retarded to me??? Lmao you talk without use the brain really... I always help ppl without offending |
|
|
|
|
|
ManuBBXX
|
|
August 10, 2017, 06:51:10 PM
Last edit: August 10, 2017, 08:43:29 PM by ManuBBXX |
|
I just compiled on Windows, latest version
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
Man, you're the KING ! Would love to test it on my win10 install  EDIT : What's the best mining pool between suprnova, sigt.POOL.MN, and yiimp sigt ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Brucelats
|
|
August 10, 2017, 09:18:39 PM |
|
I just compiled on Windows, latest version
40MH on 1080 on stock settings.
Good job mate!
Man, you're the KING ! Would love to test it on my win10 install EDIT : What's the best mining pool between suprnova, sigt.POOL.MN, and yiimp sigt ? I wonder that also. All pools are really bad, that i am aware of. Calculations sux, no monitoring, no estimated earning and such. |
|
|
|
relayd
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 12
|
|
August 10, 2017, 10:47:39 PM |
|
I get near identical 17MH/s with -i 18 on a GTX 1060 6GB with this when compared to spmod5, however check your power usage this miner is very erratic (it goes up and down quite a bit) while spmod is stable. Anyone else noticed anything like this?
|
|
|
|
|
calculatorduck
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
August 10, 2017, 11:11:43 PM |
|
I get near identical 17MH/s with -i 18 on a GTX 1060 6GB with this when compared to spmod5, however check your power usage this miner is very erratic (it goes up and down quite a bit) while spmod is stable. Anyone else noticed anything like this?
Ya my power usage is all over the place. |
|
|
|
|
relayd
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 12
|
|
August 10, 2017, 11:35:40 PM
Last edit: August 10, 2017, 11:46:22 PM by relayd |
|
I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/EDIT: Actually nevermind, the hash stabilizes to near identical across all miners for me which is around 17.11 to 17.33 MH/s, but the temperature difference appears to be real down to 68C versus 70-72C on others, ambient is a stable 25C don't think that's a factor. A bit odd that at same settings I get different temps on different miners. |
|
|
|
|
|
preda
|
|
August 10, 2017, 11:47:08 PM |
|
I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/The best performance i am getting with the New ccminer skunk-krnlx Fork With Faster SkunkHash Performance is giving me with gtx 1060 +140 core +0 memory +100% tdp 19mh each The proof  Just the problem is mining at 95mh whattomine say i should get 4.70 hour instead i get 3.8 coin hour |
|
|
|
|
|
ManuBBXX
|
|
August 10, 2017, 11:59:44 PM |
|
With skunk-krnlx, I have 20.3 mhs on my 1060 6gb at 75% power limit, +137 core - 400mem best result ever for me 32 mhs on my 1070 at 75% power limit too MarcuDe spoke about a version of the miner wich is 40mhs on 1080.. That's insane hashrate ! |
|
|
|
|
philux
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
August 11, 2017, 12:02:01 AM |
|
Performance with Asus gtx 1070 +180 core -500 memory +85% tdp i 25 = 29.51mh
I am far away of the 35mh ...but the guy who said he had 35mh did not published his settings...
|
|
|
|
|
relayd
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 12
|
|
August 11, 2017, 12:54:19 AM |
|
What do u get without any changes to clocks and intensity set to -i 18?
I can reach to 20 MH/s but computer is not responsive at 24/25.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sundownz
|
|
August 11, 2017, 02:28:14 AM
Last edit: August 11, 2017, 02:49:20 AM by sundownz |
|
ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z
and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible)
I just say: i love you!  24 MH/s for 33 MH/s in my 1080. 65~66 MH/s in total (2x 1080).  The link shared by Epsylon is working for me under Windows 10 as well & is faster than the other ccminer. Went from 36 to 48 so far on my 1080 Ti in my home office PC. ** Update : Increased TDP on the card and up to 51 now. |
|
|
|
relayd
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 12
|
|
August 11, 2017, 02:45:34 AM |
|
More objective testing, GTX 1060 6GB, intensity set to 18, all defaults except fan speed set to 67% & Memory Clock -202. I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx.  |
|
|
|
|
|
