Bitcoin Forum
December 17, 2017, 12:59:54 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE]  (Read 37658 times)
blissz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 10:02:21 PM
 #301

yes it's krnlx, my mistake...
Let's see the results after 12 hours  Cool
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513515594
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513515594

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513515594
Reply with quote  #2

1513515594
Report to moderator
1513515594
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513515594

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513515594
Reply with quote  #2

1513515594
Report to moderator
1513515594
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513515594

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513515594
Reply with quote  #2

1513515594
Report to moderator
firesec
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 151

Knowledge must be free !


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 10:37:32 PM
 #302

6xgtx 1070 130 MH/s ? this doesn't look good
blissz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 10:46:38 PM
 #303

6xgtx 1070 130 MH/s ? this doesn't look good

heavily undervolted / hardmod voltage. Each card runs at ~70 watt each from the wall to save power / heat and increase the lifetime of the cards.
You can run a gtx 1070 upto 30 Mh/s per card, but then they draw about 175 watt per card. I prefer to run them a bit cooler / less hot.
bigjee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154



View Profile
August 13, 2017, 12:04:44 AM
 #304

yes it's krnlx, my mistake...
Let's see the results after 12 hours  Cool

Perfect! Cheesy
seasonw
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


AGw8H3S73qpR6fecRUr5dYUpwvcvMeQfbL


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 01:15:33 AM
 #305

so what I did:

  • 2 identical rigs (6x undervolted gtx 1070 both at same clocks / hashrate when using an identical miner)
  • both running on the same pool with static diff set to 1.0
  • started miners exactly at the same time
  • stopped the miners after one hour

apparently the skunk miner seems to work a bit better on my rig, but this comparison is more for checking the reported hashrate vs accepted shares. Since people feel the reported hashrate is not fair on the skunk miner.
Actually this test is running for a too short time to draw conclusions, but it gives an idea already. Next update will be after 12 hours of mining

I will do more testing. I will test some more miners on request. Please PM me when you want me to test a private miner (ie. spmod 6 or something else) or give me a link to a public miner if you want it to be tested.




my mistake: skunk = krnlx miner Smiley I will update the graphics on the next update

Well, nice detailed info sharing. Seems like skunk miner is way much ahead of spmod5.



 █████  ██      ████████  ██████  ██████  ███    ███ ███    ███ ██    ██ ███    ██ ██ ████████ ██    ██      ██████  ██████  ██ ███    ██
██   ██ ██         ██    ██      ██    ██ ████  ████ ████  ████ ██    ██ ████   ██ ██    ██     ██  ██      ██      ██    ██ ██ ████   ██
███████ ██         ██    ██      ██    ██ ██ ████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ██    ██ ██ ██  ██ ██    ██      ████       ██      ██    ██ ██ ██ ██  ██
██   ██ ██         ██    ██      ██    ██ ██  ██  ██ ██  ██  ██ ██    ██ ██  ██ ██ ██    ██       ██        ██      ██    ██ ██ ██  ██ ██
██   ██ ███████    ██     ██████  ██████  ██      ██ ██      ██  ██████  ██   ████ ██    ██       ██         ██████  ██████  ██ ██   ████

   ▄█████▄▄      ▄▄█▄▄      ▄▄█████▄   
 ▄██████████▄  █████████  ▄██████████▄
█████████████▄ █████████ ▄█████████████
 ████████████  █████████  ████████████
  ▀████████▀  ███████████  ▀████████▀   
 ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀   █████████████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▄ 
 ██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██ 
▄██████████████████ ██████████████████▄
██████████████████   ██████████████████
█████████████████     █████████████████
███████████████         ███████████████
 ████████████             ████████████
 ███████████               ███████████
  █████████▀               ▀█████████ 
   ████████                 ████████   
     █████▀                 ▀█████     
      ▀███                   ███▀       
         █                   █           


██     ██ ███████     ██████  ███████  ██████ ██ ██████  ███████     ████████ ██   ██ ███████     ███████ ██    ██ ████████ ██    ██ ██████  ███████
██     ██ ██          ██   ██ ██      ██      ██ ██   ██ ██             ██    ██   ██ ██          ██      ██    ██    ██    ██    ██ ██   ██ ██     
██  █  ██ █████       ██   ██ █████   ██      ██ ██   ██ █████          ██    ███████ █████       █████   ██    ██    ██    ██    ██ ██████  █████   
██ ███ ██ ██          ██   ██ ██      ██      ██ ██   ██ ██             ██    ██   ██ ██          ██      ██    ██    ██    ██    ██ ██   ██ ██     
 ███ ███  ███████     ██████  ███████  ██████ ██ ██████  ███████        ██    ██   ██ ███████     ██       ██████     ██     ██████  ██   ██ ███████
 ANN  BOUNTY  SONOHUB  eSPORTS  WEBWALLET 
altfinance
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 140



View Profile
August 13, 2017, 02:55:31 AM
 #306

If you have two identical rigs, a simple way could be to create two accounts in suprnova, then run palgin on one rig and krnlx on the other. (Or  krnlx and spmod3, whatever you prefer) Same settings for each of the miners. Run both at the same time and after several hours, compare the coins mined.

As soon as I read about krnlx, I installed it because it gave me more hash rate as compared to spmod3. But the coins I mined per day fell with krnlx. I thought it was due to the higher difficulty and number of miners. But when I switched back to spmod3, it seems I'm mining more coins with the latter. I have the same experience with the other two posters who mentioned this.  However, I would still like to confirm my unscientific observation with more tests.

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
seasonw
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


AGw8H3S73qpR6fecRUr5dYUpwvcvMeQfbL


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 05:24:38 AM
 #307

If you have two identical rigs, a simple way could be to create two accounts in suprnova, then run palgin on one rig and krnlx on the other. (Or  krnlx and spmod3, whatever you prefer) Same settings for each of the miners. Run both at the same time and after several hours, compare the coins mined.

As soon as I read about krnlx, I installed it because it gave me more hash rate as compared to spmod3. But the coins I mined per day fell with krnlx. I thought it was due to the higher difficulty and number of miners. But when I switched back to spmod3, it seems I'm mining more coins with the latter. I have the same experience with the other two posters who mentioned this.  However, I would still like to confirm my unscientific observation with more tests.


I think this is what Blissz did now. 2 mining rig with same configuration on same pool. Comparing krnlx and spmod5. And the second chart is the shares comparison.



 █████  ██      ████████  ██████  ██████  ███    ███ ███    ███ ██    ██ ███    ██ ██ ████████ ██    ██      ██████  ██████  ██ ███    ██
██   ██ ██         ██    ██      ██    ██ ████  ████ ████  ████ ██    ██ ████   ██ ██    ██     ██  ██      ██      ██    ██ ██ ████   ██
███████ ██         ██    ██      ██    ██ ██ ████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ██    ██ ██ ██  ██ ██    ██      ████       ██      ██    ██ ██ ██ ██  ██
██   ██ ██         ██    ██      ██    ██ ██  ██  ██ ██  ██  ██ ██    ██ ██  ██ ██ ██    ██       ██        ██      ██    ██ ██ ██  ██ ██
██   ██ ███████    ██     ██████  ██████  ██      ██ ██      ██  ██████  ██   ████ ██    ██       ██         ██████  ██████  ██ ██   ████

   ▄█████▄▄      ▄▄█▄▄      ▄▄█████▄   
 ▄██████████▄  █████████  ▄██████████▄
█████████████▄ █████████ ▄█████████████
 ████████████  █████████  ████████████
  ▀████████▀  ███████████  ▀████████▀   
 ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀   █████████████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▄ 
 ██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██ 
▄██████████████████ ██████████████████▄
██████████████████   ██████████████████
█████████████████     █████████████████
███████████████         ███████████████
 ████████████             ████████████
 ███████████               ███████████
  █████████▀               ▀█████████ 
   ████████                 ████████   
     █████▀                 ▀█████     
      ▀███                   ███▀       
         █                   █           


██     ██ ███████     ██████  ███████  ██████ ██ ██████  ███████     ████████ ██   ██ ███████     ███████ ██    ██ ████████ ██    ██ ██████  ███████
██     ██ ██          ██   ██ ██      ██      ██ ██   ██ ██             ██    ██   ██ ██          ██      ██    ██    ██    ██    ██ ██   ██ ██     
██  █  ██ █████       ██   ██ █████   ██      ██ ██   ██ █████          ██    ███████ █████       █████   ██    ██    ██    ██    ██ ██████  █████   
██ ███ ██ ██          ██   ██ ██      ██      ██ ██   ██ ██             ██    ██   ██ ██          ██      ██    ██    ██    ██    ██ ██   ██ ██     
 ███ ███  ███████     ██████  ███████  ██████ ██ ██████  ███████        ██    ██   ██ ███████     ██       ██████     ██     ██████  ██   ██ ███████
 ANN  BOUNTY  SONOHUB  eSPORTS  WEBWALLET 
alel
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 12:28:04 PM
 #308

Which one of the compiled binaries are you using for the test? x32 or x64 and which cuda version
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 12:32:08 PM
 #309

Hi guys, i have a newbie question. How can u grab the detailled number of share u get ?
I dont find this details stats on pool page ...

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
igotek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Online Security & Investment Corporation


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 12:36:39 PM
 #310

After 24 hours:

Calculated profit: $47.78
Signatum suprnova.cc (SIGT): 600.84 SIGT ($39.75)
Total pool profit: $39.75
Total hashrates: CCMiner: 571.7 Mh/s
Hot market: SIGT-BTC (Cryptopia)

I would have around 720 coin. But huh ? only 600 coin.

I think this ccminer report the hashrate wrong.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  SATILIK  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
⎩           Baikal X10 Miner     ♦♦♦♦     Simple Mining Rig Resetter v2     ♦♦♦♦     Diğer Satılık Ürünler          ⎭
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 12:44:57 PM
 #311

After 24 hours:

Calculated profit: $47.78
Signatum suprnova.cc (SIGT): 600.84 SIGT ($39.75)
Total pool profit: $39.75
Total hashrates: CCMiner: 571.7 Mh/s
Hot market: SIGT-BTC (Cryptopia)

I would have around 720 coin. But huh ? only 600 coin.

I think this ccminer report the hashrate wrong.

Hum u miss a solid 20% ... that the way i feel, i gona wait the result from blissz, but i gona back to palginmod ... He have release a new version by the way, but only window Sad

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
blissz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 01:03:45 PM
 #312

And here is the update after 14 hours of mining.



What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off

looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5
looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod.

It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod.

Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now.
yunihuni
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 02:03:25 PM
 #313

I share my hashrate test result.

6x1080

Spmod5 230Mhash
Krnlx 242Mhash.

That's really good different.

SATILIK MSI Geforce GTX1080 GAMING X 8GB [2 AYLIK]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140881
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 02:09:16 PM
 #314

And here is the update after 14 hours of mining.



What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off

looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5
looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod.

It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod.

Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now.

Do u use the spmod5 fix ? If i remeber right, this first release of spmod5 get a low share report, if u have this one. This test is non sense Sad

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
bigjee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154



View Profile
August 13, 2017, 03:05:06 PM
 #315

And here is the update after 14 hours of mining.



What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off

looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5
looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod.

It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod.

Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now.

Thank you blissz.
Could you please run test till 24 hours so we have valid results.
Unfortunately I dont have access to sp mod 5 (the one I had reported lower hashrate compared to mod 3 so I didnt use it)
 
I would like the following combos tested if possible:
a) sp mod 3 vs. cwi 0.9.8 ( have this file and can forward to you)
b) sp mod 3 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86)
c) cwi 0.9.8 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86)

Also any way you could track coins generated instead of share rate please, with data labels so we can calculate % difference b/w miners.

Might need to edit the test length for the cwi miner since miner pool and diff can vary. But ultimately need to find out which one generates more coin.  
Thanks again for posting the results.

chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 03:58:01 PM
 #316

Simple calculation:

1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT.

2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined.

3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner.

4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner.

Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4)

Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes....

Agreed.  I have been using spmod for the past few days.  I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher.  Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed.  The earned coins also reflected this.  Switched back to spmod which fixed everything.

a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results

Dont take my word for it; try it out yourself.
i just posted so ppl can learn themselves rather than be sheep.

So sick of this newbie account banter btw. I guess all senior members post gospel 24/7

no mate ...

not gospel ... but we have been around for years - and have delved into the nether regions of code and core ... so we 'sorta' know what we are talking about ...

as for a newbie account - i am in total agreement ... the newbie level is so restrictive that you cant do much - or post much - or be much on here ... just keep at posting and doing what you do - it will gain momentum - dont worry ... before you know it - the account is a junior memebr - and even tho thats restrictive - its nothing like the newbie level ...

anyway - need to get back to work ...

got another holy book to write Wink ...

#crysx

grn - Gfz2cXMkhMZYWSFvLEMnM8bXk7X5Mtq2J2 . exchange - https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=GRN_BTC . cwi thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1563601 . email - crysx@gnxs.com .
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 04:07:55 PM
 #317

And here is the update after 14 hours of mining.



What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off

looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5
looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod.

It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod.

Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now.

Thank you blissz.
Could you please run test till 24 hours so we have valid results.
Unfortunately I dont have access to sp mod 5 (the one I had reported lower hashrate compared to mod 3 so I didnt use it)
 
I would like the following combos tested if possible:
a) sp mod 3 vs. cwi 0.9.8 ( have this file and can forward to you)
b) sp mod 3 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86)
c) cwi 0.9.8 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86)

Also any way you could track coins generated instead of share rate please, with data labels so we can calculate % difference b/w miners.

Might need to edit the test length for the cwi miner since miner pool and diff can vary. But ultimately need to find out which one generates more coin.  
Thanks again for posting the results.



btw mate ...

we will be putting of CWIgm-0.9.9 some time the end of the week or early next week by the looks of it ...

IF we can get a number of issues fixed in the miner ...

CWIgm-0.9.9 will not only have skunkhash and tribus in it ( like CWIgm-0.9.8 does ) - but we will also be adding timetravel10 to it ( bitcore - btx ) ... i know that a little off topic regarding other coins - but stability and hashrate will be a better in the next version ...

either way - we would be interested in these results also ...

#crysx

grn - Gfz2cXMkhMZYWSFvLEMnM8bXk7X5Mtq2J2 . exchange - https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=GRN_BTC . cwi thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1563601 . email - crysx@gnxs.com .
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 04:21:45 PM
 #318

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
August 13, 2017, 04:39:20 PM
 #319

The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.
This seems to be correct, from my experience.

    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   
   ████████████████████████████████  
     ▀██████████████████████████▀    
        ▀████████████████████▀       
          ████████████████▀         
            █████████████           
            ▀████████████▀           
             ▀██████████▀            
              ██████████             
               ████████              
               ▀██████▀              
                ██████               
                  ▀                  
.
.trade.io.
██████
██████
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
██████
██████

▄██████████████████▄
███       ▀███████
███       █████████
███       █████████
███       █████████
███              ██
███   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ███
███   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ███
███              ███
███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███
██████████████████▀

▄██████████████████▄
███████████▀ ███████
█████████▀   ███████
███████▀     ██▀ ███
███ ▀▀       █▄▄████
███          █▀▀▀▀██
███ ▄▄       ███████
██████▄     █▄ ▀███
█████████▄   ███▄███
███████████▄ ███████
▀██████████████████▀

▄██████████████████▄
████████████████████
███████████████▀▀ ██
█████████▀▀     ███
████▀▀     ▄█▀   ███
███▄    ▄██      ███
█████████▀      ▄██
█████████▄     ████
█████████████▄ ▄████
████████████████████
▀██████████████████▀
██████
██████
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
██████
██████
.
.Join the Trading Revolution.
blissz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 04:40:44 PM
 #320

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.

send me spmod 6 and I will run the test again. It can be that there is an issue on variable diff. I didn't test that yet as I set it to static 1.0 diff.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!