adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1222


February 12, 2018, 08:26:10 PM 

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big! Check out his other bets: Bet:21,739,441,003 Bet:21,739,441,828 Bet:21,739,519,848 Bet:21,739,749,731 Bet:21,739,842,567 Bet:21,746,137,247 Bet:21,746,138,679 Bet:21,746,655,362 ~
I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC. Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is 0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row. How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x To hit on such big multiplier you should have tons of bankroll which you need to have lower than 9900 rolls to get on profit, although it is really huge payout but if you play more than 9900 bets, I called this as losing Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account. Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even. What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. But if they lose 1015 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.






Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.



Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1177


February 13, 2018, 02:30:39 PM 

~ Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is 0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.
How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x To hit on such big multiplier you should have tons of bankroll which you need to have lower than 9900 rolls to get on profit, although it is really huge payout but if you play more than 9900 bets, I called this as losing Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account. Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even. Exactly. And after losing 14 times in a row (which is not so rare to happen as it might seem) you would need 0.16 BTC for that. What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. But if they lose 1015 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.
I won my first 100k sats with that strategy. It was long time ago when PrimeDice was only starting and their faucet was 1,000 sats for newbies. It was growing pretty fast with your bets made and eventually when it was 1,500+ sats I won 6 times in a row hitting the MAX bet every time. I tried this today after seeing your post, but wasn't that lucky this time. The problem with this strategy is that when you lose you lose and when you win you lose all your winnings eventually since green can't last forever.




adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1222


February 13, 2018, 11:12:55 PM 

~ Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is 0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.
How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x To hit on such big multiplier you should have tons of bankroll which you need to have lower than 9900 rolls to get on profit, although it is really huge payout but if you play more than 9900 bets, I called this as losing Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account. Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even. Exactly. And after losing 14 times in a row (which is not so rare to happen as it might seem) you would need 0.16 BTC for that. What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. But if they lose 1015 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.
I won my first 100k sats with that strategy. It was long time ago when PrimeDice was only starting and their faucet was 1,000 sats for newbies. It was growing pretty fast with your bets made and eventually when it was 1,500+ sats I won 6 times in a row hitting the MAX bet every time. I tried this today after seeing your post, but wasn't that lucky this time. The problem with this strategy is that when you lose you lose and when you win you lose all your winnings eventually since green can't last forever. And this is one of the reasons why there are barely any faucets these days. Because people can program bots to perform this strategy and within enough rolls they can eventually hit 1BTC and withdraw without having to make a single deposit. Those captcha solver services and bots were what really killed the free faucets that were created during the early Bitcoin days .




BTCevo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008


February 14, 2018, 09:56:47 AM 

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big! Check out his other bets: ~~
I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC. Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is 0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row. How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x First of, it's not easy to get profit on martingale with just 2x. If it was easy I'd be a millionaire by now. ) There's no winning strategy and knowing that I just play at random and when I'm lucky I win. I never use martingale on 9900x and in fact I was always hitting the desired number before making 1000 bets. I even hit it after making only 24 bets once. I know that normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets from the chat, hui was posting about his hunting progress and other players too. Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01 But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easy




Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1177


February 14, 2018, 01:56:36 PM 

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big! Check out his other bets: ~~
I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC. Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is 0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row. How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x First of, it's not easy to get profit on martingale with just 2x. If it was easy I'd be a millionaire by now. ) There's no winning strategy and knowing that I just play at random and when I'm lucky I win. I never use martingale on 9900x and in fact I was always hitting the desired number before making 1000 bets. I even hit it after making only 24 bets once. I know that normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets from the chat, hui was posting about his hunting progress and other players too. Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01 But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easyI can't tell if you are even serious here I can't tell if you are even serious here because you sound like you know how to make money with gambling. 0.3 BTC per month is a huge profit many people dream of (me included) and you are saying that with martingale on 2x it's easy to get it. No, it's not. Did you read the reply by adaseb to your previous comment? And, what is more important, does this strategy work for you? Do you make 0.3 BTC / month by just playing dice aiming 0.01 each day with martingale on 2x? I love to play dice, especially on PD since I have a lot of friends in the chat there, but I do it for entertainment purposes only. It's imposible to make money with gambling on a regular basis.




veleten
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1101


February 14, 2018, 03:27:05 PM Last edit: February 14, 2018, 10:16:55 PM by veleten 

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. ufabet there is a special term clever people invented for this its called reverse Martingale,very undervalued betting strategy in general,I'm quite amazed by the lack of creativity of our gamblers an average gambler has no idea about bank management,betting strategies,self control and odds and then we read all the scam cries coming from players who got a 10 red streak on a double chance educate yourselves before betting,you will have more fun and much better chances to actually win something




huctalk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 1


February 14, 2018, 03:32:53 PM 

I lose plenty on reverse martingale. maybe even more than using regular martingale fml

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ EOZ.COM ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ WELL THOUGHT FINANCIAL TRADING PLATFORM AND CRYPTOCURRENCY 》 ICO STARTS ON 16th 《



Xylber
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 113
Translator


February 14, 2018, 11:51:11 PM Last edit: February 15, 2018, 12:13:24 AM by Xylber 

Sometimes I play an alternative tactic with Martingale, for example, repeat twice the first number (example, I bet 1, lose, bet again 1 instead of doubling it); in this way, I get one more shot before losing it all (thus reducing 50% the chance of bust). The other way is to limit yourself to a maximum row of loses, sometimes I limit myself to 8 in a row, and after reaching the limit, I keep betting there. BTW, minimum to extract our forum earning is 50K (it was 100k before)




adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1222


February 15, 2018, 09:00:50 AM 

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big! Check out his other bets: ~~
I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC. Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is 0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row. How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x First of, it's not easy to get profit on martingale with just 2x. If it was easy I'd be a millionaire by now. ) There's no winning strategy and knowing that I just play at random and when I'm lucky I win. I never use martingale on 9900x and in fact I was always hitting the desired number before making 1000 bets. I even hit it after making only 24 bets once. I know that normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets from the chat, hui was posting about his hunting progress and other players too. Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01 But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easyI can't tell if you are even serious here I can't tell if you are even serious here because you sound like you know how to make money with gambling. 0.3 BTC per month is a huge profit many people dream of (me included) and you are saying that with martingale on 2x it's easy to get it. No, it's not. Did you read the reply by adaseb to your previous comment? And, what is more important, does this strategy work for you? Do you make 0.3 BTC / month by just playing dice aiming 0.01 each day with martingale on 2x? I love to play dice, especially on PD since I have a lot of friends in the chat there, but I do it for entertainment purposes only. It's imposible to make money with gambling on a regular basis. He is either new to dice or hasn't been "cleaned out" yet getting 15 losses in a row. 0.3BTC is difficult. It might be possible if you got experience and lots of capital like >25 BTC. Hence you have a lot of cushion if you get into a huge losing streak. If it was this easy everybody would be buying lottery tickets instead of going to work.




Xylber
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 113
Translator


February 15, 2018, 08:58:45 PM 

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on. 15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000




iluvbitcoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1134
Freedom&Honor


February 16, 2018, 12:42:33 AM 

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.
Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.
What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. But if they lose 1015 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.
What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. ufabet Copy/paste much. Reverse sounds good in theory, but martingale does too Gotta admit though, reverse martingale won't swallow your whole balance in a minute, if it does, it's going to take a while. Btw, I see PD is pushing hard to get a following on their forum

 Betnomi  │  .300%.  . . █████████████████████ ████ ██ DEPOSIT BONUS ████ ████   ▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄ ▄██▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄██▄ █▀▀█▀███████████▀█▀▀█ █▄▄█▄███████████▄█▄▄█ ▀█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀ ▄▀█▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀█▀▄ ▀█▄▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀▄█▀ █▄▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀▄█ ▄▀█▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄█▀▄ ▀█▄▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀▄█▀ █▄▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀▄█ ▀█▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄█▀ ▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀   . UP TO  .20%.  . . █████████████████████ ████ ██ WEEKLY CASHBACK ████ ████   ▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄ ▄██▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄██▄ █▀▀█▀███████████▀█▀▀█ █▄▄█▄███████████▄█▄▄█ ▀█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀ ▄▀█▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀█▀▄ ▀█▄▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀▄█▀ █▄▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀▄█ ▄▀█▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄█▀▄ ▀█▄▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀▄█▀ █▄▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀▄█ ▀█▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄█▀ ▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀   .100%.  . . █████████████████████ ████ ██ . RAKEBACK . ████ ████  │  ..^{Play now!}.. 



adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1222


February 16, 2018, 07:23:49 AM 

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.
Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.
What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. But if they lose 1015 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.
What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. ufabet Copy/paste much. Reverse sounds good in theory, but martingale does too Gotta admit though, reverse martingale won't swallow your whole balance in a minute, if it does, it's going to take a while. Btw, I see PD is pushing hard to get a following on their forum Lol. It's weird because I read his reply and I was thinking "Wow he read my mind" and only after you copied his post and mine I realized that he copied my entire post.




buwaytress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1420
Join the worldleading crypto sportsbook NOW!


February 16, 2018, 10:14:17 AM 

Problem with martingale, is, it's martingale =) I think one of the things crypto gambling opened the doors to is widespread practise of martingale. I mean, any casino I've been to will have a min/max bet that at best allows you an 8streak martingale. But with microbetting thanks to 1 satoshi bets, people with 1 BTC back when it wasn't even $1000 were able to try long, long autobetting regimes that seemed to return consistent profits. If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on. 15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000
I've autobet enough on dice to know that those tiny chances of hitting the 15streak loss happens all too easily. I can do 33,000 rolls in a few hours  and have often done so. Even with the lowest dice edge online, you'll hit it even quicker. Lol.
It's weird because I read his reply and I was thinking "Wow he read my mind" and only after you copied his post and mine I realized that he copied my entire post.
Yeah, plenty of these alt accounts plagiarising people's posts. Reported =)




Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1177


February 16, 2018, 12:20:34 PM 

~
Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01 But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easyI can't tell if you are even serious here
I can't tell if you are even serious here because you sound like you know how to make money with gambling. 0.3 BTC per month is a huge profit many people dream of (me included) and you are saying that with martingale on 2x it's easy to get it. No, it's not. Did you read the reply by adaseb to your previous comment? And, what is more important, does this strategy work for you? Do you make 0.3 BTC / month by just playing dice aiming 0.01 each day with martingale on 2x? I love to play dice, especially on PD since I have a lot of friends in the chat there, but I do it for entertainment purposes only. It's imposible to make money with gambling on a regular basis. He is either new to dice or hasn't been "cleaned out" yet getting 15 losses in a row. 0.3BTC is difficult. It might be possible if you got experience and lots of capital like >25 BTC.Hence you have a lot of cushion if you get into a huge losing streak. If it was this easy everybody would be buying lottery tickets instead of going to work. Here's how one can lose 25 BTC aiming 0.3 BTC/month: Doing 2x martingale with 0.00001 (1k satoshis) as the initial bet you would need to make 30,000 bets in case all of them were green. But of course not all of them can be green even if there were no house edge. In short, it will surely take 60,000+ bets. Within so many bets anything can happen, even 21 reds in a row, and with that number of consecutive losses you lose 25 BTC.




btcfacebook
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1015
JACS.tech  Changing The Way Data Networks Work


February 16, 2018, 01:06:11 PM 

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on. 15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000
Well if you ask me to ,I'm better choose high risk high rewards method because I'm usually fit with those type method. Yes, every people have their own favourite method and because of my method, I can earn 0.09 with 0.01




Xylber
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 113
Translator


February 18, 2018, 01:05:30 AM 

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on. 15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000
I've autobet enough on dice to know that those tiny chances of hitting the 15streak loss happens all too easily. I can do 33,000 rolls in a few hours  and have often done so. Even with the lowest dice edge online, you'll hit it even quicker. You are right, the "15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000" is valid if you play only 15 times. In autobet you are playing multiple times a minute, after an hour you may have more than 500 rounds played, increasing the chance much higher than "0.003%. For example, the chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 2 rounds is 25%: OX XO XX << OO The chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 3 rounds is 37.5%: OOO OOX OXO XOO OXX << XOX XXO << XXX << That is why I prefer to play manually, and keep control of how much I bet, how much I win and lose.




adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1222


February 18, 2018, 03:23:03 AM 

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on. 15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000
I've autobet enough on dice to know that those tiny chances of hitting the 15streak loss happens all too easily. I can do 33,000 rolls in a few hours  and have often done so. Even with the lowest dice edge online, you'll hit it even quicker. You are right, the "15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000" is valid if you play only 15 times. In autobet you are playing multiple times a minute, after an hour you may have more than 500 rounds played, increasing the chance much higher than "0.003%. For example, the chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 2 rounds is 25%: OX XO XX << OO The chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 3 rounds is 37.5%: OOO OOX OXO XOO OXX << XOX XXO << XXX << That is why I prefer to play manually, and keep control of how much I bet, how much I win and lose. You are correct however the way that the rolls are determined they are determine by the hash function. Unless the SHA get exploited or there is a weakness discovered they are essentially completely and independently random results which are not dependent on the prior result. Hence many assume that since they got 15 losses in a row the next roll has to be a winner and that's how they go bust.




Stunna
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1164
Advisor @ Primedice.com, Stake.com


February 19, 2018, 05:14:11 AM Last edit: February 19, 2018, 07:26:09 AM by Stunna 

We're releasing an update soon and will be requiring users to change their Seed pair at some point today or tomorrow. When you place a roll it will simply allow you to set new provably fair seeds. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause, it will just take a few seconds and you can get back to playing immediately. We'll be doing this once every 3 months.
We will be down for 2030 minutes while we apply this update.




Minus7point5
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 1


February 19, 2018, 07:30:10 AM 

Still one of my favorite sites after all these years.




Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1177


February 19, 2018, 12:25:21 PM 

Took 5 seconds to change the seed. The site is working perfectly for me, I've won 1k+ satoshis in 2 minutes. ) Talking about the probability, just now hui has posted in the chat that he had 140k reds in a row hunting 99.99. Be careful, guys. It might look like you'd have to make 30k50k bets max to hit the number, but as we can see, sh*t happens. That's why I normally stop when I don't hit it within 200300 bets thinking it's just not my day.




