|
|
|
Vanmandan
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 1
|
|
April 03, 2018, 10:56:11 AM |
|
Want to get in touch with us directly and have a specific concern? Email us: Info@bitjob.io
|
|
|
|
Cameron_ws
Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
|
|
April 03, 2018, 07:52:00 PM |
|
The best place to ask questions and comment on our project is our Telegram channel: https://t.me/bitjob
|
|
|
|
cryptochuck
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 1
|
|
April 04, 2018, 01:51:49 AM |
|
STU can be traded on HitBtc, YoBit, Coinexchnge, qryptos, IDEX and Radar Relay, please find all relevant links here https://goo.gl/npAg44
|
|
|
|
|
chefket
|
|
April 04, 2018, 08:07:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptochuck
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 1
|
|
April 05, 2018, 12:42:10 AM |
|
Looking for something to watch on a random Thursday morning? Check out our YouTube videos: https://goo.gl/UuzWuV
|
|
|
|
|
PrimeStar_Support
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2018, 02:02:00 PM |
|
It seems to be a great project! For anyone interested in movies and Hollywood projects with list-A actors in particular, we welcome you to our topic for more information! PrimeStar bitcointalk topic
|
|
|
|
Kuala Lumpur
Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 69
|
|
April 05, 2018, 04:37:31 PM |
|
Someone actively stuffs posts with multi-accounts)) From the outside it looks ridiculous. I hope the creator of the topic poudalyaet all these spam messages.
|
|
|
|
Cameron_ws
Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
|
|
April 05, 2018, 05:33:59 PM |
|
Someone actively stuffs posts with multi-accounts)) From the outside it looks ridiculous. I hope the creator of the topic poudalyaet all these spam messages.
What do you mean?
|
|
|
|
mirekti
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 07:59:59 PM |
|
These threads are funny, so here's my view on the project.
The team knows what they are doing i.e. it is not a scam, but their goals are much different then those of contributors so here's my opinion on this.
1. Initial whitepaper had 64% of tokens dedicated for Presale & Crowfunding
Only about 5% tokens were actually sold, maybe even less. So the team decided to use those tokens for something else. There was an airdrop, but it only moved ICO contributors to some 12% *maybe the numbers are not correct as it was long time ago, but they are close to what I wrote.
Basically, those who participated in ICO and started up the project, ended up holding minority of the tokens. Large amount of tokens were given away through bounties and not sure what else.
End result, those who didn't contribute didn't have any motivation to hold the token so there was a lot of low sell. Who was the loser, of course ICO contributors. The price of token is so low that it is a very good entry point for potential investors, but the price for it was paid from initial contributors, and I consider this disrespectful (my opinion).
Cheers!!!
BTW It's not about the fast return, as my point is: Had the team burned unsold tokens, there would have been less tokens for them to give away, and the project would probably need even more time to develop. Yet they decided to use those tokens to further develop project in a way that hugely impacted ICO contributors. It should have been planned better.
|
|
|
|
Cameron_ws
Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
|
|
April 06, 2018, 08:38:22 PM |
|
These threads are funny, so here's my view on the project.
The team knows what they are doing i.e. it is not a scam, but their goals are much different then those of contributors so here's my opinion on this.
1. Initial whitepaper had 64% of tokens dedicated for Presale & Crowfunding
Only about 5% tokens were actually sold, maybe even less. So the team decided to use those tokens for something else. There was an airdrop, but it only moved ICO contributors to some 12% *maybe the numbers are not correct as it was long time ago, but they are close to what I wrote.
Basically, those who participated in ICO and started up the project, ended up holding minority of the tokens. Large amount of tokens were given away through bounties and not sure what else.
End result, those who didn't contribute didn't have any motivation to hold the token so there was a lot of low sell. Who was the loser, of course ICO contributors. The price of token is so low that it is a very good entry point for potential investors, but the price for it was paid from initial contributors, and I consider this disrespectful (my opinion).
Cheers!!!
BTW It's not about the fast return, as my point is: Had the team burned unsold tokens, there would have been less tokens for them to give away, and the project would probably need even more time to develop. Yet they decided to use those tokens to further develop project in a way that hugely impacted ICO contributors. It should have been planned better.
These decisions were made in order to increase interest in the project and demand for the token - it is still our belief that this will work out best in the long term for our contributors who held through the dip.
|
|
|
|
|
greenco
|
|
April 07, 2018, 10:38:39 AM |
|
When I first found out about this project, it looked very interesting and promising. I believe that in future BitJob will enjoy greater popularity
|
|
|
|
Darney1
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
|
|
April 07, 2018, 11:01:14 AM |
|
When I first found out about this project, it looked very interesting and promising. I believe that in future BitJob will enjoy greater popularity
Thank you for the support, As development continues and when the platform is ready popularity should follow, The team is hard at work for now. You can see the roadmap here - https://bitjob.io/#roadmap
|
|
|
|
Darney1
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
|
|
April 07, 2018, 11:19:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptdev
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 1
|
|
April 07, 2018, 07:48:59 PM |
|
A great read for those who are looking to get a quick understanding of bitJob and some of it's features and benefits!
|
|
|
|
|