Q: Should hilariousandco *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no

[Blazed]

I assume I will be dragged into this next so here is my answer...no need for a special Blazed thread  

You assume correct:

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list.  

The thread will be pretty boring. I think he will be pretty hard pressed to find any person I have ever screwed/scammed/wronged/etc... in this space. If the point of the thread is simply about having Lauda in my list then do not bother as I have stated he helps a lot more than hurts the community. I never gave QS a negative for the same reasons when he got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

[1714160119]

1714160119

[1714160119]

1714160119

[1714160119]

1714160119

[1714160119]

1714160119

[Joel_Jantsen]

If hilariousandco is the reason why an extortionist is on Default Trust, then what is the basis for trusting him to impartially moderate the forum?

Because forum moderation has nothing to do with adding people to the trust list ? I don't see no correlation between trusting someone and deleting shitty posts ? 

For as long as lauda remains on hilariousandco's trust list, I believe it be appropriate to both remove hilariousandco from being a Global Moderator, and remove him from Default Trust.

I don't see no point in that.Plus hilariousandco is the only moderator who responds to a lot of mod related queries on the forum.

I move to have hilariousandco removed from being a moderator and being on Default Trust effective immediately.  

For as long as both hilariousandco remains a moderator and on Default Trust, and lauda remains on hilariousandco's trust list, I understand theymos agrees this behavior is acceptable.

You need to understand Default Trust Lists has nothing to do with the moderation.

[Quickseller]

I think h&c has done a lot for the forum and community over the years and is normally someone I would place a lot of trust in.

Lauda admits upthread his extortion attempt and the facts lauda has admitted to would allow any reasonable person with an understanding of the law to conclude lauda attempted to extort zeroaxel. The fact that no specific amount was asked for is not relevant. The fact that lauda did not receive any money only means his attempt was unsuccessful (his crime is attempted extortion instead of extortion).

Ignoring the above, lauda has a history of trolling those who question him and refuses to have a public discussion about any of his ratings. Even if his ratings were factually accurate (I believe many of them are not), many of his negative ratings are for things that no reasonable person would consider to be a scam. This alone is reason enough to question the integrity of anyone who puts lauda in a position of trust, and/or authority. I can post examples of this however I don't think this fact is really unknown to both of laudas default trust sponsors. If necessary I will post examples of this so neither of them can claim ignorance, however anything I post in this regard should be news to either hc or blazed.

There are other additional reasons why I believe lauda should not be in the default trust network, nor in any position of trust or authority, however this is not what this thread is about.

This might be an oversight or a bad judgment call that is forgivable on hc's part, provided it is quickly addressed. However I don't think anyone who puts someone that fits the above description in a position of trust or power should himself be in a position of trust, power or the authority to exercise his good judgment.

[Lauda]

...

Again, delusional rambling that couldn't be further from the reality. I think that all the escrow scamming and shilling is getting to your head.
Then again, considering the amount of farmed accounts that were abusing campaigns, sold accounts and scammers that I've tagged, my removal would certainly be beneficial for you and your gang.

[Quickseller]

...

Again, delusional rambling that couldn't be further from the reality. I think that all the escrow scamming and shilling is getting to your head.
Then again, considering the amount of farmed accounts that were abusing campaigns, sold accounts and scammers that I've tagged, my removal would certainly be beneficial for you and your gang.

Let me make one thing very clear, you have not left negative trust against any of my unknown alts now or previous as of when I owned them. Furthermore, the amount of money you have cost me in any way is exactly zero. I do not stand to profit in anyway from your removal from the default trust network other than the fact that the trust system and marketplace would have more credibility.

[minifrij]

Let me make one thing very clear, you have not left negative trust against any of my unknown alts now or previous as of when I owned them. Furthermore, the amount of money you have cost me in any way is exactly zero. I do not stand to profit in anyway from your removal from the default trust network other than the fact that the trust system and marketplace would have more credibility.

It is hard to believe anything that you say when you have lied so freely in the past.

[LTU_btc]

Here we go again... I don't know who made this topic, but are you still not tired to fight against respected bitcointalk members? Ok, hilariousandco have Lauda on his trust list, but can you tell, how it can affect moderation of forum? My personal opinion that he is doing his job not bad (can't say perfect, because there is too much spam, but at least he is trying to take actions to reduce it).
I don't see any reasons why h&c shouldn't be mod of bitcointalk.

[audaciousbeing]

Ever since i have been exposed to the issue of quickseller versus others, it has always been one issue after the other and up till now, it does not seems to come to an end. I think there is need to separate issues whether the moderator has default in his responsibility is what should be the deciding factor in determining whether he should continue or not and this is what every who has commented freely have agreed. The moment he start failing in that or the trust issues start affecting the main function, we can then start this discussion.

[shorena]

I assume I will be dragged into this next so here is my answer...no need for a special Blazed thread 

You assume correct:

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list. 

Thanks for posting what I knew you would though. I probably should just accept that you will not see this differently.

[Lauda]

Let me make one thing very clear, you have not left negative trust against any of my unknown alts now or previous as of when I owned them. Furthermore, the amount of money you have cost me in any way is exactly zero. I do not stand to profit in anyway from your removal from the default trust network other than the fact that the trust system and marketplace would have more credibility.

[BitcoinEXpress]

This is Quickseller.

hilariousandco is a trusted member of this forum.  Quickseller is not.

/end

Are you talking about the very same Quickseller that was kicked off DT because he was caught red-handed running an escrow scam?

Not that QS?



~BCX~

[Quickseller]

Ignoring the above, lauda has a history of trolling those who question him and refuses to have a public discussion about any of his ratings. Even if his ratings were factually accurate (I believe many of them are not), many of his negative ratings are for things that no reasonable person would consider to be a scam. This alone is reason enough to question the integrity of anyone who puts lauda in a position of trust, and/or authority. I can post examples of this however I don't think this fact is really unknown to both of laudas default trust sponsors. If necessary I will post examples of this so neither of them can claim ignorance, however anything I post in this regard should be news to either hc or blazed.

Trolling with a meme (excluding the Michael Jackson Meme):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2129181.msg21352690#msg21352690
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2101968.msg21012792#msg21012792
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2066778.msg20888931#msg20888931
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2078528.msg20773141#msg20773141
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2066778.msg20641605#msg20641605
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2066778.msg20636133#msg20636133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2066778.msg20634366#msg20634366
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2043715.msg20390616#msg20390616




Using the word “snowflake”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.msg21289657#msg21289657
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.msg21284120#msg21284120
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2087580.msg21217968#msg21217968



Michael Jackson Popcorn meme:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2119760.msg21195900#msg21195900
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1984169.msg20512859#msg20512859


Openly being proud of the fact that people hate him:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.msg20927343#msg20927343

Most importantly, after a review of the last ~45 days of Lauda's post history, I was able to find exactly zero posts in which Lauda attempted to address any concerns about his ratings.

[Quickseller]

There is also the below IRC comment by Lauda


Lauda literally has zero respect for others, and this kind of behavior does nothing good for the community.


As mentioned previously, I cannot trust the integrity of anyone that puts someone who acts this way in a position of power.

[Lauda]

Most importantly, after a review of the last ~45 days of Lauda's post history, I was able to find exactly zero posts in which Lauda attempted to address any concerns about his ratings.

There were no public concerns that need be addressed, there is only concern trolling from known scammers such as yourself.

-snip-
Lauda literally has zero respect for others, and this kind of behavior does nothing good for the community.

And the puppet continues to lie. Maybe selling an account or two to a scammer, again, would make you feel better?
Hmm, what do we have here?

Lol, I find it hilarious how easy it is for some people to troll zepher:D

You continue to bully other projects, but of course, I don't expect mr. shorena to act equally and neg. rate you. I wonder why that is.

[Vod]

As mentioned previously, I cannot trust the integrity of anyone that puts someone who acts this way in a position of power.

Remember your escrow scam?

I cannot trust the integrity of anyone who acts that way in a position of power.

This is why Quickseller is a hypocrite.  Does one thing, says another.

[Lauda]

This is why Quickseller is a hypocrite.  Does one thing, says another.

Take a look at his continued bullying / defamation (of course neither *teams* care about this / are already informed / his post will likely be removed):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1370307.msg21366477#msg21366477
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1715214.msg21366560#msg21366560

Attacking projects, run by others, which have / had nothing to do with any of that is utmost pathetic to say the least.

You continue to bully other projects, but of course, I don't expect mr. shorena to act equally and neg. rate you. I wonder why that is.

PM sent just in case.

[Vod]

Take a look at his continued bullying / defamation (of course neither *teams* care about this / are already informed / his post will likely be removed):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1370307.msg21366477#msg21366477
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1715214.msg21366560#msg21366560

His account is destroyed.  Nothing he can do now can make it any worse, so he'll make up any story he can.

Sorry you have to go through this, but people can see his trust rating and make their own decisions.

[Lauda]

His account is destroyed.  Nothing he can do now can make it any worse, so he'll make up any story he can.

Indeed. I haven't seen someone around here who is this much out of touch with reality; then again, I don't visit really weird threads often.

Sorry you have to go through this, but people can see his trust rating and make their own decisions.

Thanks; I'm ok / used to, let's say, *malicious things* such as this. It is others, who are completely Innocent, that are suffering with statements like those.

[Vod]

Indeed. I haven't seen someone around here who is this much out of touch with reality; then again, I don't visit really weird threads often.

Quickseller is just immoral.   There are weirder people out there:

The little child with bone cancer is imperfect. The bone cancer shows it. Since he is imperfect, he is a sinner, even though it was foisted on him by his parents.

Thank God that He has found a way to allow us imperfect people to continue to live for a while. Thank Him even more that He has given us Jesus, His Son, so that we can even have eternal life when we believe.

lol

[klaaas]

Your personal vendetta again QuickSeller.

QS with trusts issues   

I cannot trust

Name:   Quickseller
Trust:   -241: -8 / +15
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

I dont trust you... your a scammer Scam Accusations (Moderator: Cyrus) > Quickseller escrowing for himself

Most importantly, after a review of the last ~45 days of Lauda's post history, I was able to find exactly zero posts in which Lauda attempted to address any concerns about his ratings.

Your history shows your obsessed by Lauda.