Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 02:58:04 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core:  [Torrent]. (New!)
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
Author Topic: The taxpayers' oligarchy - A way to organize large societies  (Read 1747 times)
Full Member
Offline Offline

Activity: 132

View Profile
April 08, 2013, 05:18:52 AM

How is this different from today? If you take away 'taxpayers' and put in 'donations'. It putting the power of control over the many in the hands of the few (elite) that have the money.

Formalism and informalism as I explained.

If I were very rich and so inclined, I'd pay my high taxes, then use my political power to undermine all my opponents and get policy and law to favour my businesses, forcing out all other competition so I have the monopoly on my particular business, then I would proceed to make sure that government and the society I lived in relied 110% on my particular business and that no other competition could ever gain ground. Then my wealth and power grows, it won't matter on the taxes I paid anymore, as government and society would not be able to run without my business and I could control vast influence by changing my prices up/down to those I favoured, thus controlling other business elements and politicians.

Every favour you seek for your own business is counted as a payment to your business, reducing the net tax paid by that much and reducing your own political power by that much in the next election. This needs a slightly different way of thinking compared to present day institutions. It is possible to imagine an independent body which studies every tax allocation not given out to every person in general (like a negative income tax) and reduces the weight of the taxes paid by the recipient for the next election cycle.

Informal lobbying efforts have a huge return in the present scenario. In the taxpayer's oligarchy, it will be greatly reduced because the payments are out in the open.

My thoughts on this are most definitely not original .. look at big pharma (vs natural medicine) the 'drug war' , the oil and energy industries (vs free energy) .. Competition is made illegal, competitors killed or locked up.

I'd still be paying my high taxes, and as my wealth and power grew I'd continue to pay even higher taxes to assure my dominance. The difference being from this scenario to our world is that in the 'tax scenario' I would be completely legit.

It's a very scary thought..

In a slightly larger context, I am in favour of competing jurisdictions. This is a suggestion for one such jurisdiction. If a community degenerates this way into a banana republic (banana being whatever commodity/industry dominates), then it becomes highly possible that it will face a talent drain.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Offline Offline

Activity: 11

View Profile
April 08, 2013, 09:13:57 AM

I think your wrong... there is no way to make it work, we are all different, have different needs and beliefs!

Society need to organize itself in a peer to peer way:

Get together with like minded people and live for life!
You can't force your opinion on others, or they will resent you!

No Government will ever work in an enlightened society!
Offline Offline

Activity: 910

View Profile
April 08, 2013, 09:46:41 AM

But tell me.. who decides where tax is spent?

What's to prevent someone paying a trillion dollars in tax.. having 99% of the voting power and deciding that the tax will fund his own ventures?
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!