Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 06:16:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Are lightweight bitcoin wallets less secure?  (Read 501 times)
Captimiz (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100


Hoqu.io – Decentralized Affiliate platform


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 11:24:06 AM
 #1

What's the catch, why doesn't everyone use them?

1713852999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713852999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713852999
Reply with quote  #2

1713852999
Report to moderator
1713852999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713852999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713852999
Reply with quote  #2

1713852999
Report to moderator
1713852999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713852999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713852999
Reply with quote  #2

1713852999
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713852999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713852999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713852999
Reply with quote  #2

1713852999
Report to moderator
1713852999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713852999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713852999
Reply with quote  #2

1713852999
Report to moderator
1713852999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713852999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713852999
Reply with quote  #2

1713852999
Report to moderator
talkbitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1032


All I know is that I know nothing.


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 11:35:16 AM
 #2

because an SPV client does not have the whole blockchain. so they can not do the verification on themselves. they need to rely on Full nodes to give them honest answers.

the reason why many use them is because it is easier to use a light wallet which will only take minimum of 30-40 MB of your Hard Disk and nearly no bandwidth compared to running a Full node which will require at least 100 GB (i think 2 GB in prune mode) of your hard disk and requires a lot of your network traffic also.

read more here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Thin_Client_Security

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
jtipt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 529



View Profile
May 07, 2017, 11:41:06 AM
 #3

What's the catch, why doesn't everyone use them?
As explained by talkbitcoin, these light weight wallets can be a little unsecure but it's not much to worry about if you are a casual bitcoin user abd don't deal in 100 s of bitcoin daily. Running a full node is not possible for everyone, for example me, I can't afford to download the while blockchain it would cost a lot of bandwidth as well as storage. So I think most of the users here use these light weight wallets, and as of now there are many secure wallets available.
ranochigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 4163


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 12:26:12 PM
 #4

because an SPV client does not have the whole blockchain. so they can not do the verification on themselves.
They use the merkle root to verify if the transaction does exist in the blockchain provided. They however, do still trust the nodes to provide them with blocks that follows the protocol rules. They simply assume the longest chain with the highest difficulty being valid. In a sense, they are also more susceptible to sybil attack.


The bandwidth and the synchronization time is way too much for most users, including me. Using a SPV client is more or less still secure if you're an average user. If you would like to have lesser trust in the servers, you can run a node and connect your SPV client to it. You are effectively trusting yourself in this situation.

.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
peter0425
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 440



View Profile
May 07, 2017, 12:27:25 PM
 #5

What's the catch, why doesn't everyone use them?
As explained by talkbitcoin, these light weight wallets can be a little unsecure but it's not much to worry about if you are a casual bitcoin user abd don't deal in 100 s of bitcoin daily. Running a full node is not possible for everyone, for example me, I can't afford to download the while blockchain it would cost a lot of bandwidth as well as storage. So I think most of the users here use these light weight wallets, and as of now there are many secure wallets available.

I don't think light wallet is less secure. If you know how to somewhat mitigate the risk then I guess you will be Ok using it. I also can't run a full node as well, its not possible and its going to be too slow on my end. That's why I used light wallet only and learn how to take care of it security wise. And I don't have a lot of bitcoin anyway so again, light wallet is the best option for me.









▄▄████████▄▄
▄▄████████████████▄▄
▄██
████████████████████▄
▄███
██████████████████████▄
▄████
███████████████████████▄
███████████████████████▄
█████████████████▄███████
████████████████▄███████▀
██████████▄▄███▄██████▀
████████▄████▄█████▀▀
██████▄██████████▀
███▄▄█████
███████▄
██▄██████████████
░▄██████████████▀
▄█████████████▀
████████████
███████████▀
███████▀▀
Mars,           
here we come!
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄██████████
███████████
▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█
██████████████████████▀
▀██
███████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀█████████
██████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
ElonCoin.org.
████████▄▄███████▄▄
███████▄████████████▌
██████▐██▀███████▀▀██
███████████████████▐█▌
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄
███▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀
███████████████████
█████████████▄████
█████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄
███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀
███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀
▄██████▄▀███████▀
████████▄▀████▀
█████▄▄
.
"I could either watch it
happen or be a part of it"

▬▬▬▬▬
panju1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 07, 2017, 12:59:51 PM
 #6

What's the catch, why doesn't everyone use them?

The security is sufficient. But you do have some loss of privacy.
If you are running other applications on the Bitcoin network, then you do need a full node.
Juggy777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 686


View Profile
May 07, 2017, 01:06:31 PM
 #7

because an SPV client does not have the whole blockchain. so they can not do the verification on themselves. they need to rely on Full nodes to give them honest answers.

the reason why many use them is because it is easier to use a light wallet which will only take minimum of 30-40 MB of your Hard Disk and nearly no bandwidth compared to running a Full node which will require at least 100 GB (i think 2 GB in prune mode) of your hard disk and requires a lot of your network traffic also.

read more here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Thin_Client_Security

It has been explained really well by talkbitcoin and I don't think using a light weight wallet is really that big a issue. As I have seen people use it and they have user it for quiet a while without any issue been reported or their coins being lost. However all this users would barely have huge transactions, all are had mid range transactions and so they did not face any issue. You need to make a call depending on your transactions, your hard disk capacity and bandwidth speed. Even if you stick to a light weight one, it should just work fine for you.
margana
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 102


View Profile
September 03, 2017, 09:44:54 AM
 #8


It has been explained really well by talkbitcoin and I don't think using a light weight wallet is really that big a issue.

In which thread do you think it is best explained?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!